Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 31(1): 144-149, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31778266

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A two-incision technique, in association with inter-muscular positioning of the subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD), is now the most frequently adopted implantation approach in Europe. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) has been proposed to provide anesthesia/analgesia during S-ICD implantation. OBJECTIVE: We performed a case-control analysis in which a standardized SAPB approach was compared with the typical local anesthesia and sedation approach. METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients underwent implantation of an S-ICD with the SAPB approach for anesthesia/analgesia at 10 centers. The control group consisted of 55 consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation with a standard local approach. RESULTS: The mean procedure duration was 59 ± 15 minutes in the SAPB group and 76 ± 23 minutes in the control group (P < .001). No operative complications were reported in either group. During the procedure, 79 (87%) patients in the SAPB group and 25 (46%) patients in the control group (P < .001) remained awake. Lower values of pain intensity at the device pocket (P = .005) and the lateral tunneling site (P = .046) were reported in the SAPB group. The difference in static (P = .002) and dynamic (P = .007) pain intensity between the groups persisted at 1 hour, while no differences were observed 6 hours after the end of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: SAPB is feasible and effective in providing anesthesia/analgesia during S-ICD implantation. The procedures were successfully accomplished and no complications occurred in either group. However, SAPB was associated with lower pain levels, enabling the need for sedation to be reduced and more patients to remain awake. Moreover, it resulted in shorter procedure durations.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Músculo Esquelético/inervação , Bloqueio Nervoso , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cardioversão Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Europace ; 22(12): 1822-1829, 2020 12 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33118017

RESUMO

AIMS: The traditional technique for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation involves three incisions and a subcutaneous pocket. Recently, a two-incision and intermuscular (IM) technique has been adopted. The PRAETORIAN score is a chest radiograph-based tool that predicts S-ICD conversion testing. We assessed whether the S-ICD implantation technique affects optimal position of the defibrillation system according to the PRAETORIAN score. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed consecutive patients undergoing S-ICD implantation. The χ2 test and regression analysis were used to determine the association between the PRAETORIAN score and implantation technique. Two hundred and thirteen patients were enrolled. The S-ICD generator was positioned in an IM pocket in 174 patients (81.7%) and the two-incision approach was adopted in 199 (93.4%). According to the PRAETORIAN score, the risk of conversion failure was classified as low in 198 patients (93.0%), intermediate in 13 (6.1%), and high in 2 (0.9%). Patients undergoing the two-incision and IM technique were more likely to have a low (<90) PRAETORIAN score than those undergoing the three-incision and subcutaneous technique (two-incision: 94.0% vs. three-incision: 78.6%; P = 0.004 and IM: 96.0% vs. subcutaneous: 79.5%; P = 0.001). Intermuscular plus two-incision technique was associated with a low-risk PRAETORIAN score (hazard ratio 3.76; 95% confidence interval 1.01-14.02; P = 0.04). Shock impedance was lower in PRAETORIAN low-risk patients than in intermediate-/high-risk categories (66 vs. 96 Ohm; P = 0.001). The PRAETORIAN score did not predict shock failure at 65 J. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of S-ICD recipients, combining the two-incision technique and IM generator implantation yielded the lowest PRAETORIAN score values, indicating optimal defibrillation system position. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT02275637.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Estudos de Coortes , Impedância Elétrica , Humanos , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco
3.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 22(12): e41-e42, 2021 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570035

RESUMO

A young male with ß-thalassemia major was implanted with a single-chamber Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for a cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. He received multiple inappropriate shocks due to atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation and then to high-rate atrial tachycardia refractory to amiodarone and not inducible during electrophysiological study. He refused empirical pulmonary vein isolation. Upgrading to biventricular ICD and performing atrioventricular node ablation avoided further inappropriate shocks.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda , Sobrecarga de Ferro , Taquicardia Supraventricular , Talassemia beta , Adulto , Nó Atrioventricular/fisiopatologia , Nó Atrioventricular/cirurgia , Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Humanos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/etiologia , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Sobrecarga de Ferro/diagnóstico , Sobrecarga de Ferro/etiologia , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Taquicardia Supraventricular/etiologia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/fisiopatologia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Talassemia beta/complicações , Talassemia beta/terapia
4.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 7(6): 767-776, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33516714

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of conversion test performed at 40 J (defibrillation margin ≥40 J), and factors potentially associated with test failure were identified. BACKGROUND: Current subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) devices deliver a maximum of 80 J. Functional defibrillation testing is recommended at S-ICD implantation, and it is usually conducted by delivering a shock energy of 65 J to ensure a safety defibrillation margin ≥15 J. Although high rates of successful conversion were reported at 65 J, limited data exist on the defibrillation margin extent. METHODS: Ventricular fibrillation was induced and conversion test was performed by delivering a 40-J shock in 308 patients. Success was defined as termination of ventricular fibrillation by the first shock delivered in standard polarity. The S-ICD system positioning was evaluated with the PRAETORIAN score using bidirectional chest X-rays. RESULTS: The generator was positioned in an intermuscular pocket in 301 patients (98%) and the lead was implanted by means of a 2-incision technique. The PRAETORIAN score was <90 (low risk of conversion failure) in 293 (95%) patients. Overall, ventricular fibrillation termination occurred in 259 (84%) patients with 40 J. Male gender (odds ratio [OR]: 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 13.14; p = 0.036), body mass index (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19; p = 0.036), dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced ejection fraction (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.87; p = 0.019), and PRAETORIAN score >50 (OR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.26 to 6.83; p = 0.013) were independently associated with conversion failure. CONCLUSIONS: The authors showed a high rate of defibrillation success with 40-J shocks in S-ICD systems implanted by means of modern surgical techniques. The variables associated with shock failure were male gender, higher body mass index, and suboptimal device position according to the PRAETORIAN score.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Arritmias Cardíacas , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Fibrilação Ventricular/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA