Case report and systematic review of iatrogenic left atrial dissection in different cardiovascular specialties: A common treatment for an uncommon complication?

OBJECTIVES: Left atrial dissection (LatD) is a rare and heterogeneous condition affecting many cardiovascular areas. The present article, by the means of personal case report illustration and systemic review of different clinical management, is aimed to give to clinicians further knowledge on this controversial topic. BACKGROUND: LatD is an exceedingly rare but potentially fatal complication of cardiac surgery or catheter-based interventional procedures. Most of the cases are iatrogenic and its incidence is expected to grow due to an increase in the number of percutaneous coronary intervention and structural heart disease procedures. The management of this complication is controversial, and it may depend on related etiologies. METHODS: We have reported our single-case experience and review of the scientific literature, focusing on the decision-making process and the strategical approach by multimodality imaging techniques. RESULTS: Our case of LatD with initial hemodynamic instability was surgically treated. Conservative approach is often employed in literature despite the fact that conservative versus surgical approach is debatable, depending on clinical presentation, hemodynamic stability, multimodal imaging findings, and personal experience of the center. CONCLUSIONS: According to systematic literature review, a watchful-waiting strategy supported by multimodality imaging could be a safe and effective management in stable LatD.

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of right-to-left shunt is crucial in the work-up of patients with suspected patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD). While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) remains the gold standard diagnostic tool for the anatomic assessment of PFO/ASD, transcranial Doppler (TCD) and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiogram (CE-TTE) hold the promise of providing minimally invasive yet accurate clinical details. Their comparative accuracy remains however debated. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study leveraging our extensive institutional experience with systematic TCD and CE-TTE in patients with suspected PFO/ASD. Several measures of diagnostic test accuracy were computed, with point estimates and 95% confidence intervals, when applicable. RESULTS: A total of 1358 patients were included, with age 48±14 years and 772 (58%) women. Tests were performed for diagnostic purposes in 797 (58.6%) and during follow-up in 740 (54.5%). A PFO was eventually diagnosed in 1038 (77.9%) patients, and an ASD in 60 (4.5%). Agreement between TCD and CE-TTE occurred in 1309 (85.2%) cases, with TCD yielding worse findings than CE-TTE in 91 (5.9%) patients, and vice versa in 137 (8.9%), yielding a Cohen kappa of 78.6% (95% CI: 76.3-81.1%) and a highly significant P value at McNemar test (P<0.001). After dichotomization, and using TCD as benchmark, CE-TTE yielded sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 95.1%, area under the curve 92.1%, and P=0.249. Similar findings were obtained when focusing only on diagnostic tests or follow-up ones (Cohen kappa respectively 74.0% [70.2-77.1%], P<0.001 and 80.3% [76.4-84.3%], P<0.001). Notably, Valsalva was necessary to disclose the presence of shunt during TCD in 487 (31.7%) patients and during CE-TTE in 482 (31.4%) cases. Finally, performance of TCD and CE-TTE in a subset of patients eventually undergoing TTE was quite similar. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of CE-TTE appears favorable, and this imaging test may identify patients who may be missed if only TCD is used to screen patients with suspected PFO/ASD. Accordingly, CE-TTE is recommended as an adjunct diagnostic modality for all patients with a high pre-test probability of PFO/ASD and right-to-left shunt.

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has a high estimated prevalence (25% of the general population) and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cryptogenic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), as well as in the pathogenesis of migraine headache. This study evaluated the effectiveness of percutaneous transcatheter PFO closure with Amplatzer™ (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) devices, from a large single-center experience. METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2014, 577 patients (243 males and 334 females, mean age 50 years, range 11-82 years) with documented PFO and history of at least one episode of cryptogenic stroke/TIA (N.=356) or occasional finding of previous ischemic lesions on MRI (N.=221) underwent percutaneous transcatheter closure of PFO using an Amplatzer™ Occluder (Abbott Laboratories). All the procedures were performed under general anesthesia or mild sedation and were assisted by transesophageal or intracardiac echocardiography. RESULTS: Procedural success was 100%. After a median follow-up period of 2.7 years with echocardiographic evaluations, the rate of recurrent adverse cerebral events was 0.4%. Two patients (0.4%) required a secondary procedure for significant residual shunt. Of 36 patients with minor residual shunt, 30 (83%) showed spontaneous shunt regression at follow-up. There was a consistent decrease after procedure in headache migraine, platypnea-orthodeoxia, fainting episodes, syncope, and coenesthesia phenomena. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter PFO closure is an effective and safe therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic events in the patients with cryptogenic stroke/TIA or an occasional finding of a positive cerebral MRI. Late follow-up shows device stability and clinical improvement in the majority of patients.

Closure of patent foramen ovale: when and how?

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) was performed in 98 consecutive patients (mean age 52.5 +/- 13 years, 61 women). Indications included recurrent transient ischaemic attack (47%), cryptogenic stroke (34%), peripheral embolism (11%), disabling migraine with aura (4%), professional scuba diving (1 pt) and severe platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (1 pt). Each PFO was characterized by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) according to anatomy, degree of shunt (1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe), right atrial anatomical features relevant for PFO closure (such as presence of an Eustachian valve, Chiari network, lipomatosis or absence of septum secundum) with a new classification scheme. According to this classification successful device delivery was obtained in 100% of pts. Major complications included heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in 1 pt and device dislodgment in 1 pt; minor complications were mostly related to the catheter introduction site (2 pts) and mild immediate shunt (2 pts). In conclusion, percutaneous PFO closure based on strict anatomic criteria is a safe procedure with minimal periprocedural complications.