Detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Targeting Nucleocapsid or Spike Protein by Four High-Throughput Immunoassays Authorized for Emergency Use.

A total of 1,200 serum samples that were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody using the Abbott Architect immunoassay targeting the nucleocapsid protein were run in 3 SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays targeting spike proteins (DiaSorin Liaison, Ortho Vitros, and Euroimmun). Consensus-positive and consensus-negative interpretations were defined as qualitative agreement in at least 3 of the 4 assays. Agreement of the 4 individual assays with a consensus-negative interpretation (n = 610) ranged from 96.7% to 100%, and agreement with a consensus-positive interpretation (n = 584) ranged from 94.3% to 100%. Laboratory-developed inhibition assays were utilized to evaluate 49 consensus-negative samples that were positive in only one assay; true-positive reactivity was confirmed in only 2 of these 49 (4%) samples. These findings demonstrate very high levels of agreement among 4 SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays authorized for emergency use, regardless of antigen target or assay format. Although false-positive reactivity was identified, its occurrence was rare (no more than 1.7% of samples for a given assay).

Multilaboratory Comparison of Pneumococcal Multiplex Immunoassays Used in Immunosurveillance of Streptococcus pneumoniae across Europe.

Surveillance studies are required to estimate the impact of pneumococcal vaccination in both children and the elderly across Europe. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) as standard methods for immune surveillance of pneumococcal antibodies. However, as levels of antibodies to multiple serotypes are monitored in thousands of samples, a need for a less laborious and more flexible method has evolved. Fluorescent-bead-based multiplex immunoassays (MIAs) are suitable for this purpose. An increasing number of public health and diagnostic laboratories use MIAs, although the method is not standardized and no international quality assessment scheme exists. The EU Pneumo Multiplex Assay Consortium was initiated in 2013 to advance harmonization of MIAs and to create an international quality assessment scheme. In a multilaboratory comparison organized by the consortium, agreement among nine laboratories that used their own optimized MIA was assessed on a panel of 15 reference sera for 13 pneumococcal serotypes with the new WHO standard 007sp. Agreement was assessed in terms of assay accuracy, reproducibility, repeatability, precision, and bias. The results indicate that the evaluated MIAs are robust and reproducible for measurement of vaccine-induced antibody responses. However, some serotype-specific variability in the results was observed in comparisons of polysaccharides from different sources and of different conjugation methods, especially for serotype 4. On the basis of the results, the consortium has contributed to the harmonization of MIA protocols to improve reliability of immune surveillance of Streptococcus pneumoniaeIMPORTANCE Serology of Streptococcus pneumoniae is challenging due to existence of multiple clinically relevant serotypes and the introduction of multivalent vaccines in national immunization programs. Multiplex immunoassays (MIAs) are applied as high-throughput cost-effective methods for serosurveillance, and yet laboratories use their own protocols. The aims of this study were to assess the agreement of results generated by MIAs in different laboratories within the EU Pneumo Multiplex Assay Consortium, to analyze factors contributing to differences in outcome, and to create a harmonized protocol. The study demonstrated good agreement of results of MIAs performed by laboratories using controlled assays for determination of levels of vaccine-induced pneumococcal antibodies. The EU Pneumo Multiplex Assay Consortium is open to everyone working in public health services, and it aims to facilitate efforts by participants to run and maintain a cost-effective, reproducible, high-quality MIA platform.

Persistence of antibodies to West Nile virus nonstructural protein 5.

BACKGROUND: Because IgM antibody against West Nile virus (WNV) pre-membrane/envelope (preM/E) recombinant protein may persist for more than 1 year, an assay distinguishing recent from past WNV infection would be useful. Published findings for a single patient suggest that the presence of antibody against WNV nonstructural protein 5 (NS5) indicates recent infection. OBJECTIVES: To compare the persistence of WNV NS5 antibodies and preM/E IgM using plasma samples from blood donors who were viremic at the time of donation. STUDY DESIGN: Follow-up plasma samples from 35 viremic donors were tested for WNV NS5 antibodies using a microsphere immunoassay, and compared to WNV preM/E IgM antibodies determined on the same samples using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: At 90+/-14 days of follow-up, 20/26 donors (77%) were positive for NS5 antibodies; 6/25 (24%) were positive at 180+/-27 days, and 3/23 (13%) were positive at 365+/-55 days. The comparable values for preM/E IgM antibodies were 77%, 32% and 17%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Persistence of WNV NS5 antibody in plasma is similar to that of preM/E IgM antibody. WNV NS5 antibody cannot be used to distinguish recent from past WNV infection.

Identification of interferon-beta antibodies in a reference laboratory setting: findings for 1144 consecutive sera.

Clinical studies demonstrate differences in interferon-beta (IFNbeta) antibody detection frequencies among multiple sclerosis patients receiving different IFNbeta products. We sought to determine if these differences are also found when IFNbeta antibodies are measured in a reference laboratory, where factors normally controlled in clinical studies are unknown. Serum IFNbeta binding antibodies (BAbs) were quantitated by ELISA; BAbs-positive samples were then tested in a bioassay for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Consistent with clinical studies, frequencies of BAbs-positive sera and NAbs-positive sera were lower in the Avonex (IFNbeta-1a) treatment group than Rebif (IFNbeta-1a) and Betaseron (IFNbeta-1b) groups. We further identified a predictive relationship between positive BAbs levels and NAbs activity in patients treated with IFNbeta-1a products, but not those treated with IFNbeta-1b.

Elimination of falsely reactive results in a commercially-available West Nile virus IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by heterophilic antibody blocking reagents.

All sera initially reactive in the Focus Diagnostics West Nile virus IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (WNV IgM ELISA) must be retested with background subtraction to identify falsely-reactive (FR) samples due to antibodies that bind to immunoglobulins of other animal species (heterophilic antibodies). In some settings, such as pre-transplant testing of organ donors, the reporting delay associated with retesting can have an adverse impact on donor procurement and organ placement. We sought to determine if inclusion of heterophilic antibody blockers in assay conjugate could eliminate the nonspecific reactivity of FR samples. Of 6 blocking reagents evaluated using a well-characterized FR sample, immunoglobulin inhibiting reagent from Bioreclamation (IIR) and blocker from Fitzgerald Industries (BFI) were superior in their ability to inhibit false reactivity; these 2 blockers were then used to evaluate 20 additional FR and 21 truly-reactive (TR) samples. Both blockers eliminated the reactivity of 20/21 FR samples, whereas all 21 TR samples remained reactive; further, all 13 truly non-reactive (NR) samples evaluated remained non-reactive when using blocker-containing conjugate. A subset of 22 samples were tested in parallel using the initial lot and a second lot of IIR and BFI; with one exception, all samples showed the same qualitative result using both lots of a given blocker. These findings demonstrate that modification of the Focus WNV IgM screening ELISA to include heterophilic antibody blocker IIR or BFI in assay conjugate eliminates the reactivity of most FR samples, markedly reducing the number of samples requiring further testing by background subtraction.

Evaluation of Commercial Assays for Single-Point Diagnosis of Pertussis in the US.

BACKGROUND: Pertussis serodiagnosis is increasingly being used in the United States despite the lack of a US Food and Drug Administration-approved, commercially available assay. To better understand the utility of these assays in diagnosing pertussis, serology assays were evaluated for analytical parameters and clinical accuracy. METHODS: Forty-three antigen-antibody combinations were evaluated for single-point diagnosis of pertussis. Serum panels included sera from laboratory-confirmed cases, an international reference standard, and healthy donors. Phase I panel (n = 20) of sera was used to assess precision, linearity, and accuracy; Phase II panel (n = 226) followed with positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) estimates. Analytical analyses included coefficients of variation (CV) and concordance correlation coefficients (rc). RESULTS: Intra-analyst variability was found to be relatively low among samples per assay, with only 6% (78 of 1240) having CV >20%, primarily with the highly concentrated immunoglobulin (Ig)G anti-pertussis toxin (PT) specimens and IgM assays. The rc measurements to assess linearity ranged between 0.282 and 0.994, 0.332 and 0.999, and -0.056 and 0.482 for IgA, IgG, and IgM, respectively. Analytical accuracy for calibrated IgG anti-PT assays was 86%-115%. The PPA and NPA varied greatly for all assays; PPA/NPA ranges for IgA, IgG, and IgM assays, with culture and/or polymerase chain reaction positivity as control, were 29-90/13-100, 26-96/27-100, and 0-73/42-100, respectively. In IgG assays, mixing filamentous hemagglutinin antigen with PT increased PPA but decreased NPA. CONCLUSIONS: Seroassays varied substantially under both analytical and clinical parameters; however, those that were calibrated to a reference standard were highly accurate. Our findings support incorporation of calibrated pertussis seroassays to the pertussis case definition for improved diagnosis and surveillance.

Comparison of Enzyme Immunoassays for Detection of Antibodies to Hepatitis D Virus in Serum.

Serology remains critical for diagnosing hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection, which affects 15 to 20 million people worldwide, but the literature on characterizing commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) dates back to 15 years ago. We evaluated 2 commercial EIAs currently available for detecting anti-HDV antibodies. The DiaSorin assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity. Using a modified cutoff value, the Cusabio assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.3% and specificity of 90.9%. Our data show that recently developed EIAs are reliable for anti-HDV antibody detection.

Role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity testing in diagnosing primary CMV infection during pregnancy.

The risk of intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus (CMV) during pregnancy is much greater for women who contract primary CMV infection after conception than for women with evidence of infection (circulating CMV antibodies) before conception. Thus, laboratory tests that aid in the identification of recent primary CMV infection are important tools for managing the care of pregnant women suspected of having been exposed to CMV. CMV IgM detection is a sensitive marker of primary CMV infection, but its specificity is poor because CMV IgM is also produced during viral reactivation and persists following primary infection in some individuals. Studies conducted over the last 20 years convincingly demonstrate that measurement of CMV IgG avidity is both a sensitive and a specific method for identifying pregnant women with recent primary CMV infection and thus at increased risk for vertical CMV transmission. IgG avidity is defined as the strength with which IgG binds to antigenic epitopes expressed by a given protein; it matures gradually during the 6 months following primary infection. Low CMV IgG avidity is an accurate indicator of primary infection within the preceding 3 to 4 months, whereas high avidity excludes primary infection within the preceding 3 months. In this minireview, we summarize published data demonstrating the clinical utility of CMV IgG avidity results for estimating time since primary infection in pregnant women, describe commercially available CMV IgG avidity assays, and discuss some of the issues and controversies surrounding CMV IgG avidity testing during pregnancy.

Performance of a cytomegalovirus IgG enzyme immunoassay kit modified to measure avidity.

The measurement of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity accurately discriminates recent and past CMV infections. We sought to determine if the Wampole Laboratories CMV IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) could be modified to measure avidity. The evaluation panel consisted of 156 serum samples we used in 2002 to validate a laboratory-developed EIA, in which 78 serum samples exhibited low avidity, 7 exhibited intermediate avidity, and 71 exhibited high avidity. The qualitative agreement between the two avidity assays was 94% (147/156); all 9 sera with discordant results exhibited intermediate avidity in one of the assays. The avidity index (AI) values in the two assays showed excellent correlation (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001). The definition of high avidity was verified for the Wampole assay by demonstrating high avidity in 91/93 (98%) recently collected CMV IgG-positive/IgM-negative serum samples. The performance of the Wampole avidity assay in a reference laboratory setting was assessed using 470 consecutive serum samples submitted for CMV IgG avidity testing. Surprisingly, 101 serum samples were negative when screened for CMV IgG using the Wampole kit per the package insert; 98 of these 101 serum samples were tested using a CMV IgG chemiluminescent immunoassay, and only 5 were positive. Of the 369 CMV IgG-positive samples, 6% exhibited low IgG avidity, 6% exhibited intermediate avidity, and 88% exhibited high avidity; CMV IgM detection rates were inversely related to AI levels. These findings show that (i) the Wampole CMV IgG EIA can be modified to measure CMV IgG avidity, (ii) many samples are apparently submitted for avidity testing without knowledge of their CMV IgG status, and (iii) most CMV IgG-positive sera submitted for avidity testing exhibit high avidity.

Potential impact of different cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgM assays on an algorithm requiring IgM reactivity as a criterion for measuring CMV IgG avidity.

The measurement of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity is a powerful tool for identifying individuals with recent CMV infection. Because such patients are expected to be positive for CMV IgM, several investigators have suggested that CMV IgG-positive sera first be screened for CMV IgM and then only the IgM-reactive sera be tested for avidity. We investigated the impact of different CMV IgM assays on such a reflexing algorithm using a panel of 369 consecutive IgG-positive serum samples submitted for avidity testing. A bead-based immunofluorescent assay (BIFA) identified 105 IgM-positive serum samples, whereas an IgM-capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA) identified 48 IgM-positive serum samples; this marked difference led us to evaluate additional CMV IgM assays. An enzyme-linked immunofluorescent assay (ELFA) and a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) were used to test all sera with discordant BIFA/EIA results, all sera with concordant positive results, and selected sera with concordant negative results. The findings indicated that the ELFA would identify 74 CMV IgM-positive samples and the CIA would identify 64. Of the 23 low-avidity serum samples, 2 were IgM negative by BIFA, 3 by ELFA and CIA, and 4 by EIA; of the 23 intermediate-avidity serum samples, 6 were IgM negative by BIFA, 10 by ELFA, and 15 by EIA and CIA. In both these avidity groups, BIFA IgM-negative sera were also negative by the other 3 assays. These findings demonstrate that an algorithm requiring CMV IgM reactivity as a criterion for CMV IgG avidity testing does not identify all low-avidity sera and thus misses some cases of acute CMV infection.

Primary and probable secondary dengue virus (DV) infection rates in relation to age among DV IgM-positive patients residing in the United States mainland versus the Caribbean islands.

Dengue virus (DV) primary infection and probable secondary infection rates in relation to patient age (years) were determined for DV IgM-positive U.S. mainland residents (presumed travelers to areas of DV endemicity) and Caribbean island (area of DV endemicity) residents by evaluating IgG status and IgG avidity. Regardless of place of residence, most patients ≤20 years old exhibited primary infection and most patients >60 years old exhibited probable secondary infection. Among patients 21 to 60 years old, the primary infection rate was markedly higher in U.S. residents.

Utility of IgM/IgG ratio and IgG avidity for distinguishing primary and secondary dengue virus infections using sera collected more than 30 days after disease onset.

Dengue virus (DV) IgM/IgG ratio and IgG avidity value (AV) can reliably distinguish between primary and secondary DV infections using sera collected within 30 days of disease onset, but little is known about their efficacies using sera collected >30 days after onset. To investigate this issue, we analyzed specimens submitted to our reference laboratory for DV antibody testing. We first classified patients as having primary (n = 55) or secondary (n = 58) infections based on seroconversion patterns in a comparison of two sera collected <30 days apart. We then evaluated IgM/IgG ratios and IgG AVs of the second specimens by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The IgM/IgG ratio that best discriminated primary from secondary infection was 1.32; 95% of 55 primary infections exhibited ratios of >1.32, whereas 93% of 58 secondary infections exhibited ratios of ≤1.32. The discriminatory AV was 0.39; 95% of 41 primary infections exhibited AVs of ≤0.39, whereas 95% of 38 secondary infections exhibited AVs of >0.39. We then evaluated the IgM/IgG ratios and AV for primary-infection patients whose second serum samples were collected ≥30 days after the first serum samples; only 56% of 27 sera exhibited ratios of >1.32, whereas 81% of 21 sera exhibited AVs of ≤0.39. Assuming that the first specimens were collected within a week after symptoms appeared, these findings indicate that IgG AV is superior to the IgM/IgG ratio for distinguishing primary from secondary DV infections when using samples collected more than 5 weeks after disease onset.

Comparison of the Babesia duncani (WA1) IgG detection rates among clinical sera submitted to a reference laboratory for WA1 IgG testing and blood donor specimens from diverse geographic areas of the United States.

All reported cases of WA1 babesiosis have occurred in the Pacific coast region of the United States, suggesting that WA1 is limited to this geographic area. However, we detected WA1 IgG in 27% of clinical sera sent to our laboratory for WA1 IgG testing from across the United States over a 2-year period, suggesting that exposure to WA1 or a closely related organism occurs outside Pacific coast states. We sought to determine if this high WA1 IgG detection rate among clinical specimens merely reflects WA1 seroprevalence outside the Pacific region. WA1 IgG, as well as Babesia microti IgG, was measured in 900 blood donor specimens from 9 states. Overall seroprevalence was 2.0% for WA1 and 0.4% for B. microti; regional seroprevalences ranged from 0 to 4% and 0 to 2%, respectively. Additional studies were performed to determine if WA1 IgG reactivity was attributable to polyclonal B-cell activation associated with acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection; 40 WA1 IgG-positive clinical sera and the 18 WA1 IgG-positive blood donor specimens were all negative for EBV capsid antigen (EBVCA) IgM (a marker of acute EBV infection), and 40 EBVCA IgM-positive sera were all negative for WA1 IgG. These findings indicate that the high WA1 IgG detection rate among clinical specimens does not simply reflect the national WA1 seroprevalence among blood donors or nonspecific reactivity due to acute EBV infection. Rather, the findings suggest that infection with WA1 or a related organism is more common than indicated by the literature and is not limited to Pacific coast states.

Evaluation of a multiplex bead-based screening assay for detection of binding antibodies to interferon-beta.

Multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon-beta (IFNbeta) can develop neutralizing binding antibodies (BAbs) that reduce the agent's effectiveness. Screening for these antibodies can be performed by ELISA. We investigated a multianalyte immune detection (MAID) assay as an alternative to ELISA to detect anti-IFNbeta-1a and -1b. For 146 sera representing both 1a and 1b treated groups, MAID concordance with ELISA was 94% and 92%, respectively. For all discordant results, the corresponding ELISA and MAID values were within 4 units of each other, and all discordant values but one fell within 2 units of the BAbs cutoff value for reflexing to neutralization testing (4 units). Our data indicate that the MAID assay is an accurate and cost-effective alternative to ELISA for detecting BAbs to IFNbeta.

Development of a more efficient algorithm for identifying false-positive reactivity results in a dengue virus immunoglobulin M screening assay.

Of 2,692 sera screened for dengue virus immunoglobulin M by using a mu-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 954 had equivocal (index from 0.90 to 1.10) or positive (index of >1.10) results and were retested using a background subtraction (BS) ELISA that identifies screen false positives. No false positives were found among 427 sera with screen ELISA indices of >6.00; thus, retesting this specimen subset by BS ELISA is unnecessary.

Evaluation of a tetraplex microsphere assay for Bordetella pertussis antibodies.

To increase testing efficiency, a microsphere-based multianalyte immune detection (MAID) system was developed to measure serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA recognizing two Bordetella pertussis antigens, pertussis toxin (PT) and filamentous hemagglutinin antigen (FHA). The assay was performed as two separate duplexes. One duplex measured IgG to PT and FHA, and the other measured IgA to PT and FHA. The two duplexes were then combined and analyzed as a tetraplex. The MAID system and an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system were used to evaluate 100 sera from blood donors and 220 consecutive sera submitted for B. pertussis antibody testing. For both the MAID and ELISA systems, antibody levels were defined as increased if greater than the blood donor group 95th percentile value. The qualitative concordance rates between MAID and ELISA results for the 220 consecutively submitted sera were as follows: PT IgG, 99%; PT IgA, 94%; FHA IgG, 93%; FHA IgA, 94%. The overall concordance rate was 95% (836 of 880 result sets). For 29 of 44 (66%) discordant result sets, the discordant MAID result was supported by the MAID and ELISA results for other B. pertussis antibodies. The MAID and in-house ELISA systems were also used to evaluate 20 sera previously tested for pertussis antibodies at a pertussis vaccine research laboratory; MAID results for all four analytes did not significantly differ from results obtained by the research laboratory. These findings show that antibodies to B. pertussis antigens can be measured easily and accurately using a tetraplex microsphere system.

Evaluation of a West Nile virus immunoglobulin A capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

An in-house-developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detected West Nile virus (WNV) immunoglobulin A (IgA) in 65 of 68 sera from WNV-infected patients; 40 of 63 WNV IgM-positive, IgG-negative serum or plasma specimens; 65 of 67 WNV IgM-positive, IgG-positive specimens; 0 of 70 WNV IgM-negative, IgG-negative specimens; and 0 of 64 archived blood donation sera. WNV IgA is thus highly prevalent among WNV-infected patients and typically appears after WNV IgM but before WNV IgG.

Utilization of follow-up specimens from viremic blood donors to assess the value of west nile virus immunoglobulin G avidity as an indicator of recent infection.

The value of West Nile virus immunoglobulin G avidity for distinguishing recent from past infection was investigated using 348 follow-up specimens from 170 viremic blood donors. Low avidity accurately indicated infection within the previous 4 months. However, due to rapid avidity maturation in some individuals, high avidity did not accurately indicate past infection.

Development and persistence of West Nile virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgA, and IgG in viremic blood donors.

West Nile Virus (WNV) antibody development and persistence were investigated in blood donors who made WNV RNA-positive (viremic) donations in 2003. Plasma samples from the index donations and follow-up serum or plasma samples were tested for WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgA, and IgG by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Antibody development was investigated with 154 samples collected from 84 donors 1 to 21 days after their RNA-positive, antibody-negative, index donation. WNV IgM and IgA were first detected on day 3, and all samples collected after day 9 were WNV IgM and IgA positive; WNV IgG was first detected on day 4, and all samples collected after day 16 were positive. Antibody persistence in this donor group (index donations antibody negative) was evaluated by using 128 samples collected from 89 donors on days 22 to 440 of follow-up; 88% of samples were WNV IgM positive, 86% were WNV IgA positive, and 100% were WNV IgG positive. In linear regression analysis, trendlines for WNV IgM and IgA reached the value discriminating positive from negative results at 218 days and 232 days of follow-up, respectively. Similar WNV IgM and IgA persistence trends characterized 27 donors whose index samples were positive for WNV IgM and IgA, as well as 14 donors whose index samples were positive for WNV IgG but negative for WNV IgM. These findings show that WNV IgG emerges after WNV IgM and IgA and that both WNV IgM and IgA typically persist for at least 6 months after infection. Thus, unlike some other flavivirus infections, WNV infection is not characterized by a relatively rapid disappearance of virus-specific IgA.

Performance of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using a West Nile virus recombinant antigen (preM/E) for detection of West Nile virus- and other flavivirus-specific antibodies.

Focus Technologies developed an indirect immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a mu-capture IgM ELISA for the detection of West Nile virus (WNV)-specific antibodies based on a WNV preM/E protein recombinant antigen. Normal and disease state serum panels were used to assess the performance characteristics of the two WNV ELISA kits. Totals of 807 and 1,423 sera were used to assess the IgG ELISA and IgM ELISA kits, respectively. The Focus Technologies IgG ELISA had a sensitivity of 97.6% and a specificity of 92.1% (excluding non-WNV flavivirus sera). The comparative method for WNV IgG may lack sensitivity in detecting IgG in early WNV infection, so the specificity of the Focus IgG ELISA may be higher than 92.1%. When sera from patients either infected with or vaccinated against other flaviviruses were tested on the WNV IgG assay, 35% of the sera reacted as positive for WNV IgG. Yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis vaccinees were less reactive in the IgG ELISA than St. Louis and dengue fever patients. The Focus Technologies IgM ELISA had a sensitivity and a specificity of 99.3% (excluding the non-WNV flavivirus sera). The overall cross-reactivity for the IgM ELISA to flavivirus sera was 12%, with 31% of St. Louis encephalitis patients found to be WNV IgM positive and no yellow fever vaccinees found to be WNV IgM positive. In a selected population of 706 sera, 15 false-positive WNV IgM sera were identified. The use of a background subtraction method for the IgM ELISA eliminated all 15 false-positive results, giving a specificity of 100% for the Focus IgM ELISA.