Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Position Statement: Access to abortion care.

POSITION: The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine supports the right of all individuals to access the full spectrum of reproductive health services, including abortion care. Reproductive health decisions are best made by each individual with guidance and support from their healthcare providers. The Society opposes legislation and policies that limit access to abortion care or criminalize abortion care and self-managed abortion. In addition, the Society opposes policies that compromise the patient-healthcare provider relationship by limiting a healthcare provider's ability to counsel patients and provide evidence-based, medically appropriate treatment.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #66: Prepregnancy evaluation and pregnancy management of patients with solid organ transplants.

The rate of solid organ transplant in reproductive-aged patients has increased in the past 3 decades. Concurrently, the range of medical immunosuppressive agents has increased, making it safer for reproductive-aged individuals who have received transplants to attempt and continue a pregnancy. In this Consult, we review the general considerations and contemporary approach to medical and obstetrical management of pregnant solid organ transplant recipients, discuss the perinatal outcomes and incidence of graft rejection specific to the most common types of organ transplants, and provide management recommendations based on the available evidence. The following are Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations: (1) we recommend that all solid organ transplant recipients capable of pregnancy be offered prepregnancy counseling as part of the pretransplant evaluation and before any posttransplant pregnancy (Best Practice); (2) we recommend deferring pregnancy for at least 1 year (except for lung transplant recipients in which case a 2-year deferral is recommended) following solid organ transplant or any episode of acute cellular rejection (GRADE 1B); (3) we recommend that solid organ transplant recipients have stable allograft function and optimal control of chronic medical comorbidities before attempting pregnancy (GRADE 1B); (4) we recommend that solid organ transplant recipients of reproductive age use highly effective contraception when on mycophenolate or other immunosuppressive agents with known teratogenic risk (GRADE 1A); (5) we recommend that solid organ transplant recipients contemplating pregnancy transition to an appropriate immunosuppressive regimen before attempting pregnancy to establish stable medication dosing and allograft function (GRADE 1C); (6) we recommend close monitoring of serum drug levels during pregnancy and the postpartum period to guide immunosuppressive therapy dosing (GRADE 1C); (7) we recommend that solid organ transplant recipients who are pregnant or contemplating pregnancy receive all indicated vaccinations before and during pregnancy (GRADE 1C); (8) given the risk of fetal and neonatal sequelae secondary to cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy, we suggest that solid organ transplant recipients ideally complete any indicated antiviral prophylaxis or treatment before pursuing pregnancy (GRADE 2B); (9) we recommend daily low-dose aspirin prophylaxis to reduce the risk for preeclampsia in pregnant solid organ transplant recipients and to reduce the risk for renal allograft failure in renal transplant recipients (GRADE 1C); (10) as for all pregnant people, we recommend that pregnant solid organ transplant recipients have access to mental health specialists and receive screening for depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period (Best Practice); (11) because of the increased incidence of fetal growth restriction and common coexisting medical morbidities, we recommend serial assessment of fetal growth every 4 to 6 weeks throughout gestation after the anatomic survey (GRADE 1C); (12) we suggest antenatal surveillance from 32 weeks of gestation unless other fetal or maternal factors are identified in which case initiation of surveillance at an earlier gestational age is indicated (GRADE 2C); (13) we recommend that renal function be assessed before pregnancy or in early pregnancy in all solid organ transplant recipients (kidney and non-kidney) (GRADE 1C); (14) we suggest individualized delivery timing for pregnant solid organ transplant recipients and to consider delivery at between 37+0/7 and 39+6/7 weeks of gestation; in the absence of other indications, we suggest delivery by 39+6/7 weeks gestation for pregnant solid organ transplant recipients (GRADE 2B); (15) given that a trial of labor is associated with a high success rate and lower neonatal morbidity without increasing maternal morbidity or compromising graft survival, we recommend that cesarean delivery be reserved for medical obstetrical indications in solid organ transplant recipients (GRADE 1C); (16) we recommend that blood pressure targets in pregnant renal transplant recipients with chronic hypertension follow guidelines for nonpregnant recipients with a target blood pressure of ≤130/80 mm Hg (GRADE 1C); (17) we recommend monthly urine cultures to screen for asymptomatic bacteriuria with treatment if positive to protect the graft in pregnant renal transplant recipients (GRADE 1C); (18) we recommend that pregnancies in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients be managed in a similar way as those of renal transplant recipients alone (GRADE 1C); (19) we recommend characterizing the underlying condition that led to liver transplantation and assessing baseline renal function in pregnant liver transplant recipients. (GRADE 1C); (20) because of the cardiovascular demand of pregnancy and the unique physiological implications of cardiac transplantation, we recommend that pregnant heart transplant recipients receive multidisciplinary care with cardiology, cardiac and/or obstetrical anesthesiology, and maternal-fetal medicine specialists (Best Practice); and (21) we recommend careful delivery planning to minimize hemodynamic stress (including considering operative vaginal delivery to minimize Valsalva) and suggest continuous intrapartum or intraoperative electrocardiographic monitoring for heart transplant recipients (GRADE 1C).

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: A critical examination of abortion terminology as it relates to access and quality of care.

Legal, institutional, and payer policies regulating reproductive health care lack a shared language with medicine, resulting in great confusion and consternation. This paper critically examines the implications and ramifications of unclear language related to abortion care. Using a case-based approach, we highlight the ways in which language and terminology may affect the quality and accessibility of care. We also address repercussions for providers and patients within their team, institutional, state, and payer landscapes. In particular, we explore the stigmatization of abortion as both a word and a process, the role of caregivers as gatekeepers, the implications of viability as a limit for access, and the hierarchy of deservedness and value. Recognizing the role of language in these discussions is critical to building systems that honor the complexities of patient-centered reproductive decision-making, ensure access to comprehensive reproductive health care including abortion, and center patient autonomy. Healthcare providers are uniquely positioned to facilitate institutional, state, and national landscapes in which pregnant patients are supported in their autonomy and provided with just and equitable reproductive health care.

Body composition in term neonates of mothers with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Neonates of gravidas with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are at increased lifelong risk of cardiometabolic complications. Neonatal adiposity measured by body composition (BC) is a better surrogate of nutritional status than birth weight. Data comparing BC in term neonates of hypertensive and normotensive pregnant patients is lacking. Our objective was to compare body composition in both groups of neonates. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from March 2018 to June 2019 at our tertiary institution where term neonatal BC are routinely measured. Neonates of patients with HDP and matched controls were included. Skin fold thickness (SFT) and percent body fat (PBF) were calculated using a validated anthropometric formula and compared using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two neonates of patients with HDP were compared to 150 controls. Demographic characteristics were similar except for higher pre-pregnancy BMI (29.7 ± 8.4 vs 26.75 ± 7.1, p = <0.01) in the HDP group. SFT was not significantly different (4.6 vs 4.4 mm, p = 0.09) but PBF was higher in the hypertensive group (13.15 vs 11.72, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PBF is higher in neonates of mothers with HDP, which may contribute to an increased risk of cardiometabolic complications later in life. IMPACT: Birth weight percentiles do not explain the predisposition to cardiovascular complications in offspring of hypertensive mothers. Body composition estimation may provide an explanation for this increased risk. Percent body fat is higher in term neonates of mothers with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy than neonates of normotensive mothers. Body composition is different in term neonates of mothers with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Comparing Two Testing Strategies: Universal versus Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Obstetric Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare universal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronvirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing to symptomatic testing at two large academic centers. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the approach to testing at two academic centers in Northeast Ohio. The study period started with the inception of symptomatic testing for SARS-CoV-2 at both institutions in March 2020. Women younger than 18 years were excluded. The primary outcome was the SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate in symptomatic pregnant patients at both institutions. Our coprimary outcome was the additional positivity rate obtained from universal testing at the University Hospitals. The secondary outcome of interest was the percentage of SARS-CoV-2 screen positive mothers with screen positive neonates. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables with chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for proportions. RESULTS: During the study period, 144 pregnant women with symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were tested at MetroHealth of which 27 resulted as positive for SARS-CoV-2 (18.7% positivity rate). University Hospitals tested 392 pregnant women with symptoms of COVID-19 of which 67 resulted as positive for SARS-CoV-2 (positivity rate 17.0%). In the universal testing program at University Hospitals, an additional 2,870 tests were performed on asymptomatic pregnant women of which 30 were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (1.0% positivity rate).There were no SARS-CoV-2 positive infants in our cohort, and all cases of maternal critical illness occurred in symptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Universal and symptomatic testing approaches demonstrated similar clinical performance within a single geographic region in obstetric patients. KEY POINTS: · There is a lack of data to recommend an optimal approach to SARS-CoV-2 testing in obstetric patients.. · Universal testing detected few additional cases of SARS-CoV-2.. · Maternal and neonatal outcomes were unaffected by testing strategy..

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #54: Assessing the risk of maternal morbidity and mortality.

The rates of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States demand a comprehensive approach to assessing pregnancy-related risks. Numerous medical and nonmedical factors contribute to maternal morbidity and mortality. Reducing the number of women who experience pregnancy morbidity requires identifying which women are at greatest risk and initiating appropriate interventions early in the reproductive life course. The purpose of this Consult is to educate all healthcare practitioners about factors contributing to a high-risk pregnancy, strategies to assess maternal health risks due to pregnancy, and the importance of risk assessment across the reproductive spectrum in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist survey on abortion training and service provision.

Following a collaborative workshop at the 39th Annual Pregnancy Meeting, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Reproductive Health Advisory Group identified a need to assess the attitudes of maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists about abortion services and the available resources at the local and regional levels. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of practicing maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists in the United States regarding abortion. An online survey was distributed to associate and regular members of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine to assess their personal training experience, abortion practice patterns, factors that influence their decision to provide abortion care, and their responses to a series of scenarios about high-risk maternal or fetal medical conditions. Frequencies were analyzed and univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted on the survey responses. Of the 2751 members contacted, 546 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine members completed all (448 of 546, 82.1%) or some (98 of 546, 17.9%) of the survey. More than 80% of the respondents reported availability of abortion services in their state, 70% reported availability at their primary institution, and 44% reported provision as part of their personal medical practice. Ease of referral to family planning subspecialists or other abortion providers, institutional restrictions, and the lack of training or continuing education were identified as the most significant factors contributing to the respondents' limited scope of abortion services or lack of any abortion services offered. In the univariable analysis, exposure to formal family planning training programs, fewer years since the completion of residency, current practice setting not being religiously affiliated, and current state categorized as supportive by the Guttmacher Institute's abortion policy landscape were factors associated with abortion provision (all P values <.01). After controlling for these factors in a multivariable regression, exposure to formal family planning training programs was no longer associated with current abortion provision (P=.20; adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-2.10), whereas a favorable state policy environment and fewer years since the completion of residency remained associated with abortion provision. The results of this survey suggest that factors at the individual, institutional, and state levels affect the provision of abortion care by maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists. The subspecialty of maternal-fetal medicine should be active in ensuring adequate training and education to create a community of maternal-fetal medicine physicians able to provide comprehensive reproductive healthcare services.

Term Labor Outcomes after Cerclage Placement in a Multi-institutional Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The placement of a cervical cerclage in early pregnancy could influence subsequent labor outcomes at term. Prior studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the potential association with adverse labor outcomes such as cesarean delivery (CD), cervical laceration, and prolonged labor. Our objective was to evaluate rate of CD and adverse maternal outcomes in women who labored at term with and without a cerclage within the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL) cohort. We hypothesize that women with a cerclage in the incident pregnancy will have an increased frequency of CD and other adverse term labor outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from the CSL. Women with live nonanomalous singleton gestations≥ 37 weeks with induced or spontaneous labor were identified. The risk of CD and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women with and without cerclage placement during pregnancy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed with adjustment for confounding factors. Planned subgroup analysis by history of CD was performed. RESULTS: A total of 374 of the 147,463 patients who met study inclusion criteria in the CSL (0.25%) had a cerclage. In univariable analysis, cerclage placement was associated with a significant increase in the frequency of CD (17.1 vs. 12.8%, p = 0.016, odds ratio: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.07-1.84), cervical lacerations, infectious morbidity, and blood loss. The association with CD persisted in multivariable regression. Cerclage placement was not associated with an increased risk of neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: Cerclage placement in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of CD, cervical laceration, and infectious morbidity among women delivering at term. These findings suggest that cerclage placement may impact labor progression and outcomes. However, the magnitude of the association may not alter clinical decisions regarding cerclage placement in appropriate candidates.

Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal method for induction of labor for multiparous women with an unfavorable cervix is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if induction of labor with simultaneous use of oxytocin and a cervical ripening balloon, compared with sequential use, increases the likelihood of delivery within 24 hours in multiparous women. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized controlled trial from November 2014 through June 2017. Eligible participants were multiparous women with a vertex presenting, nonanomalous singleton gestation ≥34 weeks undergoing induction of labor. Women were excluded for admission cervical examination >2 cm, ruptured membranes, chorioamnionitis or evidence of systemic infection, placental abruption, low-lying placenta, >1 prior cesarean delivery, or contraindication to vaginal delivery. Patients were randomly allocated to the following cervical ripening groups: simultaneous (oxytocin with cervical ripening balloon) or sequential (oxytocin following cervical ripening balloon expulsion). The primary outcome was delivery within 24 hours of cervical ripening balloon placement. Secondary outcomes included induction-to-delivery interval, time to cervical ripening balloon expulsion, mode of delivery, and adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: In all, 180 patients were randomized (90 simultaneous, 90 sequential). Baseline demographic and obstetric characteristics were similar between study groups. Women in the simultaneous group were significantly more likely to deliver within 24 hours of cervical ripening balloon placement compared to the sequential group (87.8% vs 73.3%, P = .02). The simultaneous group also had a significantly shorter induction-to-delivery interval and greater cervical dilation at cervical ripening balloon expulsion. There were no differences in mode of delivery, chorioamnionitis, or adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: In multiparous women with an unfavorable cervix, the simultaneous use of cervical ripening balloon and oxytocin results in an increased frequency of delivery within 24 hours and a shorter induction-to-delivery interval.

Pulse Pressure and Carotid Artery Doppler Velocimetry as Indicators of Maternal Volume Status: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Narrow pulse pressure has been demonstrated to indicate low central volume status. In critically ill patients, volume status can be qualitatively evaluated using Doppler velocimetry to assess hemodynamic changes in the carotid artery in response to autotransfusion with passive leg raise (PLR). Neither parameter has been prospectively evaluated in an obstetric population. The objective of this study was to determine if pulse pressure could predict the response to autotransfusion using carotid artery Doppler in healthy intrapartum women. We hypothesized that the carotid artery Doppler response to PLR would be greater in women with a narrow pulse pressure, indicating relative hypovolemia. METHODS: Intrapartum women with singleton gestations ≥35 weeks without acute or chronic medical conditions were recruited to this prospective cohort study. Participants were grouped by admission pulse pressure as <45 mm Hg (narrow) or ≥50 mm Hg (normal). Maternal carotid artery Doppler assessment was then performed in all patients before and after PLR using a standard technique where carotid blood flow (mL/min) = π × (carotid artery diameter/2) × (velocity time integral) × (60 seconds). The velocity time integral was calculated from the Doppler waveform. The primary outcome was the change in the carotid Doppler parameters (carotid artery diameter, velocity time integral, and carotid blood flow) after PLR. Outcomes were compared between study groups with univariable and multivariable analyses with adjustment for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Thirty-three women consented to participation, including 18 in the narrow and 15 in the normal pulse pressure groups (mean and standard deviation initial pulse pressure, 38.3 ± 4.4 vs 57.3 ± 4.1 mm Hg). The 2 groups demonstrated similar characteristics except for initial pulse pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and race. In response to PLR, the narrow pulse pressure group had a significantly greater increase in carotid artery diameter (0.08 vs 0.02 cm; standardized difference, 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.84), carotid blood flow (79.4 vs 16.0 mL/min; standardized difference, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.36-3.10), and percent change in carotid blood flow (47.5% vs 8.7%; standardized difference, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.60-3.43) compared with the normal pulse pressure group. In multivariable analysis with adjustment for potential confounding factors, women with narrow admission pulse pressure had a significantly larger carotid diameter (0.66 vs 0.62 cm; P < .0001) and greater carotid flow (246.7 vs 219.3 cm/s; P = .001) after PLR compared to women with a normal pulse pressure. Initial pulse pressure was strongly correlated with the change in carotid flow after PLR (r = 0.60; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic response of the carotid artery to autotransfusion after PLR is significantly greater in women with narrow pulse pressure. Pulse pressure correlates with the physiological response to autotransfusion and provides a qualitative indication of intravascular volume in term and near-term pregnant women.

The systematic error in the estimation of fetal weight and the underestimation of fetal growth restriction.

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with an increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality and has lifetime implications for the risk of chronic medical conditions. Antenatal diagnosis of FGR remains poor, with the majority of cases remaining undiagnosed. Although several factors contribute to the underdiagnosis of FGR, the error in ultrasound estimation of fetal weight (EFW) generally is not considered in clinical practice. In this commentary, we suggest that the intrinsic, or systematic, error in ultrasound EFW is a significant factor contributing to the underestimation of fetuses predicted to have FGR and should be incorporated into screening and surveillance recommendations. To illustrate this point, we present an analytic model of published data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies characterizing and quantifying the impact of the systematic error in ultrasound EFW on the underdiagnosis of FGR. Independent of the centile at which the risk of adverse outcome related to FGR begins, whether the 10th, 5th or 3rd percentile, our analysis suggests the need to modify to the current paradigm for identifying and responding to fetuses estimated to be at risk.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.

BACKGROUND: The prevailing obstetric practice of planned cesarean delivery for triplet gestations is largely empiric and data on the optimal route of delivery are limited. OBJECTIVE: The primary objectives of this study are to determine the likelihood of success in an attempted vaginal delivery and assess maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal vs planned cesarean delivery of triplets using a multiinstitution obstetric cohort. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Consortium on Safe Labor, identifying triplet pregnancies with delivery at a gestational age ≥28 weeks. Women with a history of cesarean delivery and pregnancies complicated by chromosomal or congenital anomalies, twin-twin transfusion syndrome, or a fetal demise were excluded. The attempted vaginal group included all women with spontaneous or induced labor and excluded all women delivering by prelabor cesarean delivery, including those coded as elective or for fetal malpresentation. Primary maternal outcomes included infection (composite of chorioamnionitis, endometritis, wound separation, and wound infection), blood transfusion, or transfer to the intensive care unit. Primary neonatal outcomes included neonatal asphyxia, mechanical ventilation, and composite neonatal morbidity, consisting of ≥1 of the following: birth injury, 5-minute Apgar <4, arterial pH <7.0 or base excess <-12.0, neonatal asphyxia, or neonatal death. For neonatal outcomes, Poisson regression was performed with clustering to account for correlation between neonates within a triplet pregnancy, controlling for confounders as outcome rates allowed. A sensitivity analysis was performed in the subcohort delivering at gestational age ≥34 weeks in which the attempted vaginal delivery group was restricted to include only women with evidence of induction or augmentation or labor. RESULTS: 188 triplet sets were identified of which 80 sets (240 neonates) met inclusion criteria and 24 sets (30%) had an attempted vaginal delivery. The rate of successful attempted vaginal delivery was 16.7% (4 triplet sets; 12 neonates). No women had a combined mode of delivery. Women attempting vaginal delivery were more likely to have preterm labor (45.8 vs 12.5%, P < .001) and receive antenatal corticosteroids (45.8 vs 21.4%, P = .03), however gestational age at delivery did not differ by mode of delivery. Attempted vaginal delivery was associated with a higher risk of maternal transfusion (20.8% vs 3.6%, P = .01) and neonatal mechanical ventilation (26.4% vs 7.7%; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.24). There was no significant difference in the risk of asphyxia or composite neonatal morbidity by mode of delivery. In the subcohort sensitivity analysis, attempted vaginal delivery was associated with an increased risk of composite neonatal morbidity (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 12.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-127.20) but not maternal transfusion (22.2% vs 3.5%, P = .06) or neonatal mechanical ventilation (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.17). CONCLUSION: In a multicenter US cohort, attempted vaginal delivery of triplets is associated with higher risks of maternal transfusion and neonatal mechanical ventilation. Composite severe neonatal morbidity may be higher with attempted vaginal delivery although studies with greater power are required. The low probability of successful vaginal delivery raises questions regarding the utility of attempted vaginal delivery in triplet gestations. Our data support planned prelabor cesarean delivery as the preferred mode of delivery for triplet gestations.

Does pregnancy increase the risk of abdominal hernia recurrence after prepregnancy surgical repair?

BACKGROUND: By increasing intraabdominal pressure, pregnancy may increase the risk of abdominal hernia recurrence. Current data are limited to studies with small sample size and thus the impact of pregnancy on recurrence is unclear. OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the impact of pregnancy on clinically significant abdominal hernia recurrence in a large multicenter cohort. STUDY DESIGN: A multiinstitution deidentified electronic health record database, EPM: Explore (Explorys Inc, Cleveland, OH) was utilized to perform a retrospective cohort study of women aged 18-45 years with a history of an abdominal hernia repair from 1999 through 2013. Abdominal hernia was defined to include ventral and incisional hernias, and other types were excluded. The presence or absence of a pregnancy following primary hernia repair was elucidated from the database. Subjects were excluded if a hernia repair occurred during pregnancy. The rate of hernia recurrence, defined as reoperation, was calculated. The association between pregnancy and hernia recurrence was evaluated with logistic regression, both unadjusted and adjusted for diabetes, obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m(2)), tobacco abuse, and wound complication at the time of initial hernia repair. RESULTS: A total of 11,020 women with a history of hernia repair were identified, of whom 840 had a subsequent pregnancy. Overall, 915 women in the cohort had a hernia recurrence (8.3%). Women with a history of pregnancy following primary hernia repair were more likely to have a body mass index >30 kg/m(2), a history of tobacco abuse, and a wound complication at the time of primary repair. In an unadjusted analysis, pregnancy was associated with an increase in the risk of hernia recurrence (13.1% vs 7.1%, odds ratio, 1.96, 95% confidence interval, 1.60-2.42). The association between pregnancy and hernia recurrence was attenuated but persisted after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73, 95% confidence interval, 1.40-2.14). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of abdominal hernia recurrence after adjusting for confounding factors. The magnitude of this association is likely underestimated, given that the risk of recurrence was defined as reoperation, which captures only the most clinically significant group of recurrences. This information will facilitate counseling for reproductive-aged women planning elective ventral or incisional hernia repair. The risk of recurrence and subsequent reoperation should be balanced against the risk of incarceration and emergent surgery during pregnancy. As such, the desire for future pregnancy and/or contraception should be considered when planning asymptomatic hernia repair for women of reproductive age.

Intravenous drug use is associated with alloimmunization in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal evidence has suggested an association of intravenous drug abuse with alloimmunization; however, published data are limited to case reports. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether women with a history of intravenous drug abuse have an increased risk of alloimmunization. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed with the use of data from a single-center blood bank and perinatal database from 2008-2014. Blood bank data were used to identify women with alloimmunization, which was defined as a positive antibody screen in pregnancy not due to naturally occurring antibodies, agglutinins, autoantibodies, or Rh immunoglobulin administration. Intravenous drug abuse was ascertained from a comprehensive database that has captured all drug abuse in pregnancy since 2008. For women who contributed >1 pregnancy to the database, only the most recent pregnancy was included. The rates of alloimmunization among women with a history of intravenous drug abuse and general obstetric populations were calculated and compared. The distribution of alloantibody types, proportion of Rh-group alloantibodies, and patient Rh status were assessed for intravenous and non-intravenous drug abuse-associated alloimmunization. Characteristics and outcomes between intravenous and non-intravenous drug abuse-associated alloimmunization were assessed for women with clinically significant alloantibodies. RESULTS: Alloimmunization was more common in women with a history of intravenous drug abuse (11/305 women; 3.6%) compared to women without a history of intravenous drug abuse (288/16,022 women; 1.8%; relative risk, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.62). Needle-sharing was present in 7 and suspected in 4 women with an intravenous drug abuse history. Among women with a history of intravenous drug abuse, none had a history of transfusion or traditional risk factor for alloimmunization. The distribution of alloantibodies was different between intravenous drug abuse- and non-intravenous drug abuse-associated alloimmunization. Rh group alloantibodies and Rh-negative status were more common in women with a history of intravenous drug abuse. Among Rh-negative women with a history of intravenous drug abuse, 50% of RhD alloimmunization cases occurred in nulliparous women. The rate of multiple alloantibodies was not different between intravenous drug abuse- and non-intravenous drug abuse-associated alloimmunization. CONCLUSION: Maternal history of intravenous drug abuse is associated with an increased risk of alloimmunization. Approximately 1 in 30 intravenous drug abuse women may be diagnosed with an alloantibody in pregnancy. Given the current US opioid epidemic, increased vigilance in screening is required. Needle-sharing represents a possible mechanism for intravenous drug abuse-associated alloimmunization; however, limited obstetric care, failure to obtain Rh immunoglobulin, or failure to identify early pregnancy loss cannot be excluded.

Triggers, bundles, protocols, and checklists--what every maternal care provider needs to know.

The rise in maternal morbidity and mortality has resulted in national and international attention at optimally organizing systems and teams for pregnancy care. Given that maternal morbidity and mortality can occur unpredictably in any obstetric setting, specialists in general obstetrics and gynecology along with other primary maternal care providers should be integrally involved in efforts to improve the safety of obstetric care delivery. Quality improvement initiatives remain vital to meeting this goal. The evidence-based utilization of triggers, bundles, protocols, and checklists can aid in timely diagnosis and treatment to prevent or limit the severity of morbidity as well as facilitate interdisciplinary, patient-centered care. The purpose of this document is to summarize the pertinent elements from this forum to assist primary maternal care providers in their utilization and implementation of these safety tools.

Intravenous Sedation Without Intubation and the Risk of Anesthesia Complications for Obese and Non-Obese Women Undergoing Surgical Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to assess the risk of perioperative anesthesia-related complications in a cohort of obese and non-obese women undergoing outpatient surgical abortion under IV sedation without tracheal intubation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all surgical abortions through 22 6/7 weeks' gestation at an outpatient clinic from 2012 to 2013. Women receiving IV sedation were included. Obesity status was defined by the World Health Organization criteria. The primary outcome was the rate of perioperative anesthesia complications defined as tracheal intubation, pulmonary aspiration, hospital transfer for an anesthesia indication, or anesthesia-related adverse events (persistent hypoxemia and allergic reaction). The use of opioid reversal (naloxone) was assessed as a secondary outcome measure. Multivariate analysis for the secondary outcome measure was performed with adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: During the study period, 9348 abortions were performed. Of the 5579 patients who received IV sedation, 1438 (25.8%) were obese, 1707 (30.6%) were in the second trimester, and 851 (15.3%) were ≥17 weeks' gestation. No patients experienced a primary outcome measure. Based on the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the sample size, the maximal risk of an anesthesia-related complication is 1 in 1860 procedures. Naloxone use occurred in 13 (0.2%) patients and was not more frequent among obese patients (0.14% vs 0.27%; 95% CI of odds ratio [OR], 0.12-2.36; P = 0.54) or procedures at ≥17 weeks' gestation (0.47% vs 0.19%; 95% CI of OR, 0.76-8.06; P = 0.12). These negative findings should be interpreted with caution, given the limitations of the sample size to assess these secondary outcome measures. Naloxone use was associated with fentanyl doses >200 µg (0.82% vs 0.13%; P = 0.002), an association that remained significant when we controlled for confounding factors (adjusted OR, 5.51; 95% CI, 1.61-18.91). Further analysis revealed that fentanyl dose >200 µg was associated with naloxone use for procedures in the first trimester (incident rate ratio, 9.02; 95% CI, 3.73-21.80) but not in the second trimester (incident rate ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.23-3.70). CONCLUSIONS: Among women receiving IV sedation without tracheal intubation for surgical abortion, anesthesia complications are rare and may not be greater for obese women or procedures at gestational age ≥17 weeks. IV sedation without tracheal intubation may be considered for women undergoing first- and second-trimester surgical abortion; however, the rarity of anesthesia-related complications in our cohort precludes a definitive conclusion regarding the overall safety of IV sedation without tracheal intubation.

Modified obstetric early warning scoring systems (MOEWS): validating the diagnostic performance for severe sepsis in women with chorioamnionitis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the predictive power of published modified obstetric early warning scoring systems (MOEWS) for the development of severe sepsis in women with chorioamnionitis. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected clinical observations at a single tertiary unit (Chicago, IL). Hospital databases and patient records were searched to identify and verify cases with clinically diagnosed chorioamnionitis during the study period (June 2006 through November 2007). Vital sign data (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, temperature, mental state) for these cases were extracted from an electronic database and the single worst composite recording was identified for analysis. Global literature databases were searched (2014) to identify examples of MOEWS. Scores for each identified MOEWS were derived from each set of vital sign recordings during the presentation with chorioamnionitis. The performance of these MOEWS (the primary outcome) was then analyzed and compared using their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver-operating characteristic curve for severe sepsis. RESULTS: Six MOEWS were identified. There was wide variation in design and pathophysiological thresholds used for clinical alerts. In all, 913 women with chorioamnionitis were identified from the clinical database. In all, 364 cases with complete data for all physiological indicators were included in analysis. Five women developed severe sepsis, including 1 woman who died. The sensitivities of the MOEWS in predicting the severe deterioration ranged from 40-100% and the specificities varied even more ranging from 4-97%. The positive predictive values were low for all MOEWS ranging from <2-15%. The MOEWS with simpler designs tended to be more sensitive, whereas the more complex MOEWS were more specific, but failed to identify some of the women who developed severe sepsis. CONCLUSION: Currently used MOEWS vary widely in terms of alert thresholds, format, and accuracy. Most MOEWS have not been validated. The MOEWS generally performed poorly in predicting severe sepsis in obstetric patients; in general severe sepsis was overdetected. Simple MOEWS with high sensitivity followed with more specific secondary testing is likely to be the best way forward. Further research is required to develop early warning systems for use in this setting.

Permanent and long-acting reversible contraception volumes at a multihospital system in Ohio before and after Dobbs.

OBJECTIVES: Immediately following the Dobbs decision, Ohio prohibited abortion after the detection of fetal cardiac activity. We aimed to characterize changes in the uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and permanent contraception following the abrupt enactment of restrictive abortion legislation. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record data of patients aged 15 to 55 who underwent permanent contraception (tubal ligation, vasectomy) or LARC placement (intrauterine device, contraceptive implant) at a multihospital system in northeast Ohio from January 1, 2022 to Decemeber 31, 2022, 6 months before and after Dobbs. We compared procedure volumes and patient characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 4247 tubal ligation and LARC procedures pre-Dobbs, including 725 (17.1%) permanent contraception and 3522 (82.9%) LARC. Post-Dobbs, the total number of tubal ligation and LARC procedures increased by 15.8% (4916), and there was a significant increase in the proportion of permanent contraception, (p < 0.001). Vasectomy volume increased by 33.3% post-Dobbs, from 1193 to 1590 procedures. Compared to pre-Dobbs, patients undergoing contraceptive procedures post-Dobbs were younger (tubal ligation and LARC, 30.9 median years [24.5, 36.8] vs 31.5 [25.2, 36.9], p = 0.011; vasectomy, median 36.6 years [32.9, 39.6] vs 37.2 [34.2, 40.4], p < 0.001) and more likely to report single relationship status (57.4% vs 55.9% for tubal ligation and LARC, p = 0.028% and 23.0% vs 18.1% for vasectomy, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates increased uptake of contraceptive procedures following the Dobbs decision. This rise in permanent contraception suggests a relationship between abortion policy and contraceptive decision-making, especially among younger patients. IMPLICATIONS: Increased permanent and long-acting reversible contraception procedures following Dobbs reveal shifting contraceptive choices, particularly among younger individuals, indicating a connection between abortion policy and reproductive decisions.