Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 37(6): 1189-1190, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32897600

RESUMO

Over the years, the application and complications of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in selective fetal reduction for complex pregnancies have been increasingly documented. Despite its rising use in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, the cutaneous complications of RFA have not been commonly reported. Here, we present a case of cutaneous thermal injury to the fetus likely secondary to intrauterine RFA for fetal reduction.


Assuntos
Redução de Gravidez Multifetal , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Administração Cutânea , Feminino , Feto , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Ablação por Radiofrequência/efeitos adversos , Pele
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e060867, 2022 03 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35296492

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the phenomenon of topical corticosteroid (TCS) phobia and comprehensively understand the factors driving TCS concerns, in particular pertaining to steroid addiction and withdrawal. DESIGN: Prospective qualitative study using 1:1 in-depth semistructured interviews and analysed using grounded theory. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a prior experience of TCS use for a dermatological condition recruited from a tertiary academic dermatology clinic, or through word of mouth and online social media platforms. RESULTS: 26 participants encompassing those with positive, neutral and negative opinions towards TCS were interviewed. 13 reported having topical steroid addiction or withdrawal. The drivers of TCS concerns could be categorised into seven themes: attitudes towards TCS (comprising beliefs and knowledge about TCS), availability of alternatives, treatment inconvenience, personality, patient's ongoing evaluation of clinical response to TCS, doctor-patient relationship and healthcare-seeking behaviour. Of mention, patients placed high value and trust on their own experiences with TCS, such as their perceived experienced side effects. The doctor who failed to acknowledge the patient's opinions and instead emphasised the safety of TCS was often viewed as dismissive, resulting in a deteriorating patient-doctor relationship. CONCLUSION: Provision of knowledge and education is important but may be ineffective if the basis for TCS concern regarding safety is reasonable, or when the patient has a firmly established belief supporting his/her concern. In such instances, failure to acknowledge and respect the patient's decision to avoid TCS could worsen the doctor-patient relationship.


Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Esteroides
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA