Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 78
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 64(1): 260-267.e2, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37981070

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The United States (US) experiences the highest rate of maternal mortality of similar countries. Postpartum care (PPC) focused on chronic disease management is potentially lifesaving, especially among pregnancies complicated by risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and mental health conditions (MHCs), which are conditions in which pharmacists can have an impact. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of maternal mortality risk factors and their relationships with receipt of PPC among Texas Medicaid enrollees. METHODS: A retrospective study included women with a delivery between 3/25/2014-11/1/2019 who were continuously enrolled in Texas Medicaid during the study period from 84 days pre-delivery to 60 days post-delivery. PPC was defined as ≥1 visit associated with postpartum follow-up services. Maternal mortality risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, and MHCs) during and after pregnancy were identified using diagnoses and medication utilization. Age, race/ethnicity, cesarean delivery, and preterm birth served as covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to address the study objective. RESULTS: The sample (N = 617,010) was 26.5±5.7 years, primarily (52.8%) Hispanic, and 33.0% had cesarean deliveries and 9.3% had preterm births. Risk factor prevalence included: diabetes (14.0%), hypertension (14.3%), and MHCs during (6.3%) and after (9.1%) pregnancy. A majority (77.9%) had a PPC visit within 60 days of delivery. The odds of receiving PPC were 1.2 times higher for patients with diabetes (OR = 1.183; 95% CI = 1.161-1.206; P < 0.0001), 1.1 times higher for patients with hypertension (OR = 1.109; 95% CI= 1.089-1.130; P < 0.0001), and 1.1 times higher for patients with MHCs (OR=1.138; 95% CI = 1.108-1.170; P < 0.0001) than patients without, respectively. CONCLUSION: Over three-quarters of Texas Medicaid pregnant enrollees received PPC within 60 days of delivery and risk factors were prevalent and predictive of receipt of PPC. Pharmacists can have a positive impact on maternal health by addressing hypertension, diabetes, and MHC risk factors.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Hipertensão , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Texas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Medicaid , Cuidado Pós-Natal , Farmacêuticos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Am J Hematol ; 98(1): 90-101, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251408

RESUMO

Although new pharmaceutical therapy options have recently become available, hydroxyurea is still the most commonly used and affordable treatment option for sickle cell disease (SCD). This study aimed to update the evidence on hydroxyurea adherence and its association with clinical and economic outcomes among individuals with SCD. This retrospective study used Texas Medicaid claims data from 09/2011-08/2016. Individuals were included if they had ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient SCD diagnoses, had ≥1 hydroxyurea prescription, were 2-63 years of age, and were continuously enrolled in Texas Medicaid between 6 months before and 1 year after the first hydroxyurea prescription fill date (index date). Hydroxyurea adherence (Medication Possession Ratio; MPR), vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC)-related outcomes, healthcare utilization and expenditures (SCD-related and all-cause) during the 1 year following the index date were measured. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to address the study objectives. Among 1035 included individuals (age: 18.8 ± 12.5 years, female: 52.1%), 20.9% were adherent to hydroxyurea (defined as MPR≥0.8). After adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, compared to being non-adherent, adhering to hydroxyurea was significantly associated with: a lower risk (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.480, p = .0007) and hazard rate (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.748, p = .0005) of a VOC event, fewer VOC events (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] = 0.767, p = .0009), fewer VOC-related hospital days (IRR = 0.593, p = .0003), fewer all-cause and SCD-related hospitalizations (IRR = 0.712, p = .0008; IRR = 0.707, p = .0008, respectively) and emergency department visits (IRR = 0.768, p = .0037; IRR = 0.746, p = .0041, respectively), and lower SCD-related total healthcare expenditures (IRR = 0.796, p = .0266). Efforts to increase adherence to hydroxyurea could improve clinical and economic outcomes among individuals with SCD.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Lactente , Hidroxiureia/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/uso terapêutico , Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Adesão à Medicação
3.
Headache ; 62(2): 141-158, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35156215

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare healthcare utilization and costs for patients with chronic migraine (CM), episodic migraine (EM), and tension-type headache (TTH) enrolled in US commercial health plans. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart database from January 2015 to December 2018. Adult patients with a diagnosis of EM, CM or TTH and at least 12 months of continuous enrollment before and after diagnosis were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences among the three groups. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline, and healthcare utilization and costs during follow-up, were described and compared between the three groups. RESULTS: A total of 45,849 patients were included: 8955 with CM, 31,961 with EM, and 4933 with TTH. The total all-cause annual direct medical costs of patients with CM ($17,878) were 1.38 times higher (95% CI: 1.31-1.44) than those with EM ($12,986), and 2.26 times higher (95% CI: 2.08-2.47) than those with TTH ($7902). The annual migraine/TTH-related costs of patients with CM ($1869) were 4.19 times higher (95% CI: 3.92-4.48) than those with EM ($446), and 11.90 times (95% CI: 10.59-13.52) higher than those with TTH ($157). In the adjusted analyses, for all service categories (emergency department, inpatient, outpatient, and prescriptions), the expected costs in the migraine groups were higher than in the TTH group (all p < 0.001), while controlling for covariates. Main findings were consistent in both weighted and unweighted samples, and with both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION: This study provides an updated assessment of healthcare utilization and expenditures for adult patients with primary headache disorders. Compared to TTH, migraine is associated with higher resource use and direct medical costs, especially for those with a chronic condition. Future studies are needed to understand the indirect medical costs (productivity loss) and humanistic burden (quality of life) between migraine and TTH.


Assuntos
Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/terapia , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
AIDS Care ; 33(3): 285-289, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31838894

RESUMO

In this work, we use 2011-2013 Texas HIV surveillance data (N=2,175) and apply hierarchical linear and Cox regression modeling to characterize the association of gender and race/ethnicity with rate of immune recovery and determine whether immune recovery contributes to gender and racial/ethnic disparities in AIDS diagnosis and survival. The associations between gender and rate of immune recovery and between race/ethnicity and rate of immune recovery were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In the multivariate survival analyses, there was no statistically significant association between gender and AIDS diagnosis (Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) = 1.06, p = 0.61, 95%=0.85-1.32) and between race/ethnicity and AIDS diagnosis (Blacks vs Whites: AHR = 1.10, p = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.94-1.30; Hispanics vs Whites: AHR = 1.06, p = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.91-1.24). Similarly, there were no statistically significant associations with death (males vs females: AHR = 0.88, p = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.43-1.81; Blacks vs Whites: AHR = 0.68 p = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.36-1.30; Hispanics vs Whites: AHR = 0.96, p = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.55-1.67). However, the direction of the point estimates were in the reverse direction when compared to the rate of immune recovery or the AIDS diagnosis models. Our findings suggest that differences in rate of immune recovery may better explain disparities in AIDS diagnosis than disparities in survival. Future studies with longer follow-up may potentially generate statistically significant results.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/etnologia , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/mortalidade , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/etnologia , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Reconstituição Imune , Mortalidade/etnologia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública/métodos , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Análise de Sobrevida , Texas/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
5.
Headache ; 61(2): 287-299, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33599982

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the subsequent health resource utilization (HRU) between patients with migraine who received opioid medications at their emergency department (ED) visits ("opioid recipients") versus patients with migraine who did not receive opioid medications at their ED visits ("non-recipients"). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that opioid use is common among patients with migraine at emergency settings. Medication overuse, especially the use of opioids, is associated with migraine progression, which can ultimately lead to substantial health resource use and costs. There is limited evidence on opioid use specifically in emergency settings and its impact on future HRU among people with migraine. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from the Baylor Scott & White Health between December 2013 and April 2017. Adult patients who had at least 6 months of continuous enrollment before (baseline or pre-index) and after (follow-up) the first date they had an ED visit with a diagnosis of migraine (defined as index date) were enrolled in the study. Opioid use and HRU during follow-up period between opioid recipients and non-recipients were summarized and compared. RESULTS: A total of 788 patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study. During the 6-month follow-up period, compared to patients with migraine who were non-recipients at their index ED visits, opioid recipients had significantly more all-cause (3.6 [SD = 6.3] vs. 1.9 [SD = 4.8], p < 0.0001) and migraine-related (1.6 [SD = 4.2] vs. 0.6 [SD = 2.1], p < 0.0001) opioid prescriptions (RXs), and more all-cause (2.6 [SD = 4.3] vs. 1.6 [SD = 2.6], p = 0.002) and migraine-related (0.6 [SD = 1.4] vs. 0.3 [SD = 0.8], p = 0.001) ED visits. In addition, opioid recipients had higher risk of future migraine-related ED visits controlling for covariates (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.09-2.03, p = 0.013). Factors that were significantly (p < 0.05) related to future migraine-related ED visits include previous opioid use (HR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.24-3.65, p = 0.007), previous ED visits (HR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.23-4.58, p = 0.010), hypertension (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.07-2.00, p = 0.017), age between 45 and 64 years (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48-0.97, p = 0.033), female sex (HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.12-2.86, p = 0.015), and tobacco use disorder (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.07-1.97, p = 0.017). Sub-analyses were restricted to the group of patients who were opioid naïve at baseline (n = 274, defined as having ≤1 opioid RXs during the 6-month pre-index period). Patients who were baseline opioid naïve but received opioids during their index ED visits were more likely to have future migraine-related ED visits compared to patients who were baseline opioid naïve and did not receive any opioids during their index ED visits, controlling for covariates (HR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.54-5.46, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Opioid use among patients with migraine presenting to the ED is associated with increased future HRU, which highlights the need for optimizing migraine management in emergency settings.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Texas
6.
Cephalalgia ; 40(13): 1489-1501, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32781832

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare medication use and health resource utilization between migraineurs with evidence of opioid use at emergency department visit versus no opioid use at emergency department visit, and to examine predictors of opioid use among migraineurs at emergency department visits. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using REACHnet electronic health records (December 2013 to April 2017) from Baylor Scott & White Health Plan. The index date was defined as the first migraine-related emergency department visit after ≥6 months of enrollment. Adult patients with a migraine diagnosis and ≥6 months of continuous enrollment before and after their index dates were included. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were used to compare medication use and health resource utilization between opioid users and non-opioid users. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine predictors of opioid use at emergency department visits. RESULTS: A total of 788 migraineurs met eligibility criteria. Over one-third (n = 283, 35.9%) received ≥1 opioid medication during their index date emergency department visit. Morphine (n = 103, 13.1%) and hydromorphone (n = 85, 10.8%) were the most frequently used opioids. Opioid users had more hospitalizations and emergency department visits during their pre-index period (both p < 0.05). Significant (p < 0.05) predictors of opioid use at emergency department visits included past migraine-related opioid use (2-4 prescriptions, Odds Ratio = 1.66; 5-9 prescriptions, Odds Ratio = 2.12; ≥10 prescriptions, Odds Ratio = 4.43), past non-migraine-related opioid use (≥10 prescriptions, Odds Ratio = 1.93), past emergency department visits (1-3 visits, Odds Ratio = 1.84), age (45-64 years, Odds Ratio = 1.45), and sleep disorder (Odds Ratio = 1.43), controlling for covariates. CONCLUSION: Opioids were commonly given to migraineurs at emergency departments. Previous opioid use, health resource utilization, age, and specific comorbidities might be used to identify migraineurs with a high risk of opioid use.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 72(9): 2461-2468, 2017 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28859442

RESUMO

Background: Staphylococcus aureus is a major pathogen causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The emergence of MDR S. aureus strains in the community setting has major implications in disease management. However, data regarding the occurrence and patterns of MDR community-associated S. aureus sub-clones is limited. Objectives: To use whole-genome sequences to describe the diversity and distribution of resistance mechanisms among community-associated S. aureus isolates. Methods: S. aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and nasal colonization were collected from patients within 10 primary care clinics from 2007 to 2015. The Illumina Miseq platform was used to determine the genome sequences for 144 S. aureus isolates. Phylogenetic and bioinformatics analyses were performed using in silico tools. The resistome was assembled and compared with the phenotypically derived antibiogram. Results: Approximately one-third of S. aureus isolates in the South Texas primary care setting were MDR. A higher proportion of SSTI isolates were MDR in comparison with nasal colonization isolates. Individuals with MDR S. aureus SSTIs were more likely to be African American and obese. Furthermore, S. aureus populations are able to acquire and lose antimicrobial resistance genes. USA300 strains were differentiated by a stable chromosomal mutation in gyrA conferring quinolone resistance. The resistomes were highly predictive of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes. Conclusions: These findings highlight the high prevalence and epidemiological factors associated with MDR S. aureus strains in the community setting and demonstrate the utility of next-generation sequencing to potentially quicken antimicrobial resistance detection and surveillance for targeted interventions.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Nariz/microbiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Genoma Bacteriano , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Masculino , Resistência a Meticilina/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Filogenia , Prevalência , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Value Health ; 20(4): 602-609, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28408002

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the adjusted incremental total costs (direct and indirect) for patients (aged 3-17 years) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the differences in the adjusted incremental direct expenditures with respect to age groups (preschoolers, 0-5 years; children, 6-11 years; and adolescents, 12-17 years). METHODS: The 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was used as the data source. The ADHD cohort consisted of patients aged 0 to 17 years with a diagnosis of ADHD, whereas the non-ADHD cohort consisted of subjects in the same age range without a diagnosis of ADHD. The annual incremental total cost of ADHD is composed of the incremental direct expenditures and indirect costs. A two-part model with a logistic regression (first part) and a generalized linear model (second part) was used to estimate the incremental costs of ADHD while controlling for patient characteristics and access-to-care variables. RESULTS: The 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey database included 9108 individuals aged 0 to 17 years, with 458 (5.0%) having an ADHD diagnosis. The ADHD cohort was 4.90 times more likely (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.97-8.08; P < 0.001) than the non-ADHD cohort to have an expenditure of at least $1, and among those with positive expenditures, the ADHD cohort had 58.4% higher expenditures than the non-ADHD cohort (P < 0.001). The estimated adjusted annual total incremental cost of ADHD was $949.24 (95% CI $593.30-$1305.18; P < 0.001). The adjusted annual incremental total direct expenditure for ADHD was higher among preschoolers ($989.34; 95% CI $402.70-$1575.98; P = 0.001) than among adolescents ($894.94; 95% CI $428.16-$1361.71; P < 0.001) or children ($682.71; 95% CI $347.94-$1017.48; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and use of evidence-based treatments may address the substantial burden of ADHD.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/economia , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Pediatria/economia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/diagnóstico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 15(1): 58, 2016 Nov 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27876059

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of outpatient visits for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) has substantially increased over the last decade. The emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has made the management of S. aureus SSTIs complex and challenging. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors contributing to treatment failures associated with community-associated S. aureus skin and soft tissue infections SSTIs. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study among 14 primary care clinics within the South Texas Ambulatory Research Network. The primary outcome was treatment failure within 90 days of the initial visit. Univariate associations between the explanatory variables and treatment failure were examined. A generalized linear mixed-effect model was developed to identify independent risk factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Overall, 21% (22/106) patients with S. aureus SSTIs experienced treatment failure. The occurrence of treatment failure was similar among patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus and those with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus SSTIs (19 vs. 24%; p = 0.70). Independent predictors of treatment failure among cases with S. aureus SSTIs was a duration of infection of ≥7 days prior to initial visit [aOR, 6.02 (95% CI 1.74-19.61)] and a lesion diameter size ≥5 cm [5.25 (1.58-17.20)]. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors for treatment failure included a duration of infection for ≥7 days prior to the initial visit and a wound diameter of ≥5 cm. A heightened awareness of these risk factors could help direct targeted interventions in high-risk populations.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/fisiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
10.
BMC Med ; 12: 96, 2014 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24916809

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of antibiotics is the single most important driver in antibiotic resistance. Nevertheless, antibiotic overuse remains common. Decline in antibiotic prescribing in the United States coincided with the launch of national educational campaigns in the 1990s and other interventions, including the introduction of routine infant immunizations with the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-7); however, it is unknown if these trends have been sustained through recent measurements. METHODS: We performed an analysis of nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys from 2000 to 2010. Trends in population-based prescribing were examined for overall antibiotics, broad-spectrum antibiotics, antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) and antibiotics prescribed during ARTI visits. Rates were reported for three age groups: children and adolescents (<18 years), adults (18 to 64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). RESULTS: An estimated 1.4 billion antibiotics were dispensed over the study period. Overall antibiotic prescribing decreased 18% (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.72 to 0.94) among children and adolescents, remained unchanged for adults, and increased 30% (1.30, 1.14 to 1.49) among older adults. Rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescriptions doubled from 2000 to 2010 (2.11, 1.81 to 2.47). Proportions of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing increased across all age groups: 79% (1.79, 1.52 to 2.11) for children and adolescents, 143% (2.43, 2.07 to 2.86) for adults and 68% (1.68, 1.45 to 1.94) for older adults. ARTI antibiotic prescribing decreased 57% (0.43, 0.35 to 0.52) among children and adolescents and 38% (0.62, 0.48 to 0.80) among adults; however, it remained unchanged among older adults. While the number of ARTI visits declined by 19%, patients with ARTI visits were more likely to receive an antibiotic (73% versus 64%; P <0.001) in 2010 than in 2000. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic use has decreased among children and adolescents, but has increased for older adults. Broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing continues to be on the rise. Public policy initiatives to promote the judicious use of antibiotics should continue and programs targeting older adults should be developed.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos , Vacinação , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
11.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 40(5): 781-788, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465414

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among individuals with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) receiving second-line therapies (rituximab, romiplostim, or eltrombopag). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative claims database (January 2013-May 2020) among continuously enrolled patients ≥18 years prescribed second-line ITP therapies. The index date was the date of the first claim of the study medications. Treatment patterns and outcomes were measured during the 12-month follow-up period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare treatment patterns and bleeding risk outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients were included (rituximab, N = 285; romiplostim, N = 212; eltrombopag, N = 198). After IPTW, all baseline covariates were balanced. Compared to eltrombopag, patients in the rituximab cohort were 57% more likely to receive other ITP therapies (systematic corticosteroids or third-line therapies) during the follow-up period (odds ratio [OR] = 1.571, p = .030). There was no significant difference in the odds of receiving a different second-line therapy or experiencing a bleeding-related episode among three groups (p > .050). Patients in the romiplostim cohort were 69% more likely to receive rescue therapy compared to those in the rituximab cohort (OR = 1.688, p = .025). CONCLUSION: Patients with ITP receiving rituximab were more likely to need other ITP therapies but did not experience higher risk of bleeding compared to those receiving eltrombopag or romiplostim. Benefits, risks, cost-effectiveness, and patient preference should all be considered in optimizing second-line therapy for ITP.


Assuntos
Benzoatos , Hidrazinas , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática , Pirazóis , Receptores Fc , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Rituximab , Trombopoetina , Humanos , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/efeitos adversos , Hidrazinas/uso terapêutico , Hidrazinas/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Trombopoetina/uso terapêutico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Receptores Fc/uso terapêutico , Benzoatos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais
12.
Ann Pharmacother ; 47(9): 1115-21, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24259725

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has been increasing at an alarming rate worldwide. Despite that increase, there are limited data identifying risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors associated with the acquisition of CRE among hospitalized patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-case-control study in 4 community hospitals from June 2007 through June 2012. Case group 1 (CG1) consisted of patients with CRE. Case group 2 (CG2) consisted of patients with carbapenem susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (CSE). CG2 patients were matched to CG1 patients by site of infection and species of Enterobacteriaceae. Hospitalized controls were matched 2:1 by date of admission and hospital location to patients in CG1. Two sets of analyses were conducted comparing demographics, comorbidities, and antibiotic exposures of CG1 and CG2 to controls and then contrasted to identify unique risk factors associated with CRE. RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients (CG1, 25 patients; CG2, 29 patients, control, 50 patients) were evaluated. CRE and CSE consisted mostly of Klebsiella spp. (63%) from a urinary source (28%). In multivariable analyses, intensive care unit (ICU) stay (OR 12.48; 95% CI 1.14-136.62; p = 0.04) and cumulative number of antibiotic days (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.02-2.16; p = 0.04) were distinct independent predictors of CRE isolation; whereas, cumulative health care exposures (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.20-3.41; p < 0.01) and vancomycin exposure (OR 6.70; 95% CI 1.15- 38.91; p = 0.03) were predictors for CSE. CONCLUSIONS: CRE should be considered in patients requiring ICU admission, particularly those who have received multiple antibiotics. Antibiotic stewardship efforts should be directed at reducing all antibiotic exposures as opposed to any specific antibiotic class to reduce the risk of CRE.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Texas/epidemiologia
13.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 15(1): 26-33, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36898892

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy transitioned from onsite interviews to virtual interviews in fall 2020. There is limited literature on whether the virtual format impacts an interviewer's assessment of a candidate. This study examined interviewer ability to assess candidates and barriers to participation. METHODS: During the virtual interview process, interviewers utilized a modified multiple mini interview (mMMI) format to evaluate prospective college of pharmacy students. An 18-item survey was emailed to 62 interviewers from the 2020-2021 cycle. Virtual mMMI scores were compared to the previous year's onsite MMI scores. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to assess the data. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 53% (33/62), and 59% of interviewers preferred virtual interviews to in-person. Interviewers stated that there were fewer barriers to participation, increased comfort, and more time with applicants during virtual interviews. For six of the nine attributes evaluated, ≥ 90% of interviewers reported that they were able to assess applicants as well as they did in person. When comparing virtual and onsite MMI scores, seven of nine attributes were statistically significantly higher in the virtual cohort than onsite. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of interviewers, the virtual interview decreased barriers to participation and still allowed the ability to assess the candidates. While offering a choice of interview setting to interviewers could increase accessibility, the statistically significant difference in MMI scores between virtual and onsite formats suggests that additional standardization is required to offer both formats simultaneously.


Assuntos
Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Estudantes de Farmácia , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários
14.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 15(1): 19-25, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36925363

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy transitioned the prospective student interview process for the incoming Class of 2025 from an onsite to a virtual Zoom interview. Differences between the two processes were assessed to determine utility of virtual interviews in the future. The objective was to compare preference, impact, and barriers to onsite and virtual interview experiences for prospective students. METHODS: A survey to assess interviewees' opinions regarding the interview process, preference, and barriers to participation was emailed to candidates following the 2020-2021 interviews. Responses were evaluated using descriptive statistics, chi-square, Mann-Whitney U tests, and constant comparison thematic analysis. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 40%. Of these, 54% preferred virtual interviews. Travel, lodging, and time were identified as barriers, with 80.5% of interviewees reporting at least one of these barriers. Respondents who chose time or had more barriers were more likely to prefer virtual interviews. Hosting a pre-interview day helped candidates prepare. Having a pharmacy student in the breakout room helped reduce stress. Interviewees were able to engage, showcase their personality, and learn the culture of the college despite the virtual nature. CONCLUSIONS: From an interviewee perspective, the virtual interview process is a viable method to continue. Virtual interviews decrease barriers to access for candidates unable to attend onsite interviews while still allowing candidates to feel engaged, learn about the program, and have a positive experience. Pharmacy institutions may consider virtual interviews as an alternative or supplement to onsite interviews.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Estudantes de Farmácia , Humanos , Emoções , Aprendizagem , Personalidade
15.
Med Care ; 50(11): 920-7, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23047780

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review is to identify and analyze published studies that have evaluated disparities for opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis between blacks and whites with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the United States. METHODS: The authors conducted a web-based search of MEDLINE (1950-2009) to identify original research articles evaluating the use of OI prophylaxis between blacks and whites with HIV/AIDS. The search was conducted utilizing the following MeSH headings and search terms alone and in combination: HIV, AIDS, Black, race, ethnicity, disparities, differences, access, opportunistic infection, and prophylaxis. The search was then expanded to include any relevant articles from the referenced citations of the articles that were retrieved from the initial search strategy. Of the 29 articles retrieved from the literature search, 19 articles were excluded. RESULTS: Ten publications met inclusion criteria, collectively published between 1991 and 2005. The collective time periods of these studies spanned from 1987 to 2001. Four studies identified a race-based disparity in that blacks were less likely than whites to use OI prophylaxis, whereas 5 studies failed to identify such a relationship between race and OI prophylaxis. One study identified disparities for Mycobacterium avium complex prophylaxis, but not for Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence regarding race-based disparities in OI prophylaxis is inconclusive. Additional research is warranted to explore potential race-based disparities in OI prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/etnologia , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/prevenção & controle , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/etnologia , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 52(5): 622-9, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23023842

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify the groups or individuals that influence pharmacists' decision making to report adverse drug events (ADEs), determine the differences in social influence or subjective norm between intenders and nonintenders, and determine the relationship between subjective norm toward reporting serious ADEs and practice and demographic characteristics. DESIGN: Nonexperimental cross-sectional study. SETTING: Texas during June and July 2009. PARTICIPANTS: 1,500 Texas pharmacists. INTERVENTION: As part of a larger survey, 3 and 18 items were used to assess pharmacists' intentions and subjective norm, respectively, to report serious ADEs to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pharmacists' subjective norm toward reporting serious ADEs. RESULTS: The survey had a response rate of 26.4% (n = 377). Most pharmacists intended to report serious ADEs that they would encounter (15.87 ± 4.22 [mean ± SD], possible range 3-21, neutral = 12). The mean subjective norm scores were moderately high and positive (28.75 ± 9.38, 1-49, 16), indicating that the referents had a moderate influence on pharmacists regarding reporting serious ADEs to FDA. FDA had the greatest (34.82 ± 12.16) and drug manufacturers the lowest (21.55 ± 13.83) social influence. The most important salient referents (important others) in pharmacists' decisions to report serious ADEs were FDA, patients, pharmacy associations, pharmacy managers/bosses, and hospitals and hospital groups. Gender (female equals higher), pharmacists' years of experience (negative correlation), and knowledge of ADE reporting (positive correlation) were associated with subjective norm. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists had a moderately high subjective norm, suggesting that ADE reporting intentions is influenced by others and that the opinions of others are of great importance in pharmacists' intentions regarding ADE reporting. The main drivers of subjective norm were FDA, patients, pharmacy associations, and managers/bosses.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Tomada de Decisões , Intenção , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Indústria Farmacêutica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Texas , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
17.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 52(5): e109-12, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23023857

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers to and facilitators of pharmacist reporting of serious adverse drug events (ADEs) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). METHOD: Two focus groups consisting of practicing pharmacists were held in Austin, TX, in 2009. The following open-ended questions were used in the focus groups: (1) What do you think would make it easier to report serious ADEs to the FDA? (2) What do you think would make it more difficult to report serious ADEs to the FDA? A content analysis was performed on the generated transcripts. RESULTS: 13 pharmacists practicing in hospital and community settings in Texas participated. Pharmacists identified 27 barriers to and facilitators of reporting serious ADEs to FDA. Lack of patients' complete medical histories and lack of time were the barriers most frequently cited. Knowledge and awareness of ADEs and ADE reporting emerged as important factors that would facilitate reporting serious ADEs to FDA. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the factors that facilitate and/or inhibit pharmacist reporting of serious ADEs to FDA. Improved knowledge of ADEs and ADE reporting would facilitate reporting behaviors, while lack of time, lack of complete patient medical histories, and lack of compensation issues serve as important barriers to reporting. Interventions are needed to address these factors.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , United States Food and Drug Administration , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Intenção , Masculino , Estados Unidos
18.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 28(11): 1272-1281, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36282930

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Migraineurs may be categorized as having episodic migraine (EM: < 15 headache days/month) or chronic migraine (CM: ≥ 15 days/month for > 3 months with ≥ 8 days/month having features of migraine). Opioid use has been linked to progression from EM to CM. OBJECTIVE: To describe the utilization of opioid prescriptions among patients with migraine, to determine the association between opioid use and migraine progression, and to explore demographic and clinical risk factors for migraine progression. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database from January 2015 to December 2018. Adult patients with a migraine diagnosis and continuous health plan enrollment were included. Opioid use was measured by average daily morphine equivalent dose, also known as morphine milligram equivalent (MME). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the opioid use by patient demographic and clinical characteristics. A Cox proportional hazards model with stepwise selection was used to determine the risk factors of new-onset CM. RESULTS: Overall, 35% of patients with migraine (27,331 of 78,134) received prescription opioids (> 0 MME/day) during the 12-month follow-up period. Higher opioid dosage was found in patients who had CM and comorbidities of interest. Compared with patients with EM, patients with CM were twice as likely to receive at least 20 MME/day (CM 3.8% vs EM 1.9%) and had a higher median opioid day supply (CM 20 vs EM 10) during follow-up. About 7% of patients with CM with at least 1 opioid prescription had at least 50 MME/day in any 90-day period during follow-up. A significant association was found between MME level and the likelihood of new-onset CM. Additional significant risk factors of migraine progression included younger age, female sex, South and West regions, and having a diagnosis of medication overuse headache, depression, back pain, or fibromyalgia (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite guidelines and the availability of more migraine-specific treatments, opioids are still commonly prescribed to patients with migraines in real-world practice, especially for those with CM. In this study population, a higher risk of new-onset CM was associated with receiving higher opioid doses.


Assuntos
Seguro , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Derivados da Morfina/uso terapêutico
19.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 72(1): 143-52, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21332572

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate the influence of pharmacists' attitudes on intention to report serious adverse drug events (ADEs) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a mail survey to collect data from hospital and community pharmacists practicing in Texas, United States. Three and 16 items were used to measure intention and attitudes, respectively, using a seven-point bipolar scale. Pharmacists' demographic and practice characteristics, and past reporting were also measured. RESULTS: The response rate was 26.4% (n= 377/1500 pharmacists). Most pharmacists intended (n= 297, 78.8%) to report serious ADEs that they will encounter to the FDA through MedWatch. Overall, pharmacists held favourable attitudes towards reporting serious ADEs (mean = 24.5, SD = 6.7, possible range 1-49, neutral = 16). Pharmacists intending to report serious ADEs had more favourable attitudes than those who did not (P < 0.001). About 90% of the pharmacists believed that reporting serious ADEs would improve patient safety. However, 72.6% indicated that reporting serious ADEs was time consuming and over half (55.5%) of the respondents believed that reporting serious ADEs disrupted the normal workflow. Non-intenders held stronger beliefs that ADE reporting would disrupt the normal workflow and was time consuming compared with intenders. Years of experience, number of hours worked and practice setting were associated with pharmacists' attitudes towards reporting (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most pharmacists held moderately favourable attitudes and high intentions toward reporting serious ADEs to the FDA. This study's findings contribute to an increased understanding of individual factors that influence pharmacists' attitude and intention towards reporting serious ADEs to the FDA.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/normas , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Educação Continuada em Farmácia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmacovigilância , Inquéritos e Questionários , Texas , Estados Unidos
20.
South Med J ; 104(12): 794-800, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22089356

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The benefit of improved health outcomes for blacks receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) lags behind that of whites. This project therefore sought to determine whether the reason for this discrepancy in health outcomes could be attributed to disparities in use of antiretroviral therapy between black and white patients with HIV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 1996-2006 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys were used to identify hospital outpatient visits that documented antiretrovirals. Patients younger than 18 years, of nonblack or nonwhite race, and lacking documentation of antiretrovirals were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed with race as the independent variable and use of HAART as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Approximately 3 million HIV/AIDS patient visits were evaluated. Blacks were less likely than whites to use HAART and protease inhibitors (odds ratio, 95% CI 0.81 [0.81-0.82] and 0.67 [0.67-0.68], respectively). More blacks than whites used non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (odds ratio, 95% CI 1.18 [1.17-1.18]). In 1996, the crude rates of HAART were relatively low for both black and white cohorts (5% vs 6%). The rise in HAART for blacks appeared to lag behind that of whites for several years, until 2002, when the proportion of blacks receiving HAART slightly exceeded the proportion of whites receiving HAART. In later years, the rates of HAART were similar for blacks and whites (81% vs 82% in 2006). Blacks appeared less likely than whites to use protease inhibitors and more likely than whites to use non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors from 2000 to 2004. CONCLUSIONS: Blacks experienced a lag in the use of antiretrovirals at the beginning of the study; this discrepancy dissipated in more recent years.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA