What rheumatologists need to know about mRNA vaccines: current status and future of mRNA vaccines in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines as a novel vaccine platform offer new tools to effectively combat both emerging and existing pathogens which were previously not possible. The 'plug and play' feature of mRNA vaccines enables swift design and production of vaccines targeting complex antigens and rapid incorporation of new vaccine constituents as needed. This feature makes them likely to be adopted for widespread clinical use in the future.Currently approved mRNA vaccines include only those against SARS-CoV-2 virus. These vaccines demonstrate robust immunogenicity and offer substantial protection against severe disease. Numerous mRNA vaccines against viral pathogens are in the early to late phase of development. Several mRNA vaccines for influenza are tested in clinical trials, with some already in phase 3 studies. Other vaccines in the early and late phases of development include those targeting Cytomegalovirus, varicella zoster virus, respiratory syncytial virus and Epstein-Barr virus. Many of these vaccines will likely be indicated for immunosuppressed populations including those with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD). This review focuses on the mechanism, safety and efficacy of mRNA in general and summarises the status of mRNA vaccines in development for common infectious diseases of particular interest for patients with AIIRD.

Risk of urolithiasis associated with allopurinol versus benzbromarone among patients with gout: a population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of urolithiasis in gout patients initiating allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, vs benzbromarone, a uricosuric. METHODS: Using the 2011-2020 Korea National Health Insurance Service database, we conducted a cohort study on gout patients initiating allopurinol vs benzbromarone as the 1st-line urate-lowering treatment (ULT). The primary outcome was a new onset urinary stone. The secondary outcome was a stone requiring intervention. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Cox proportional hazard models with a 5:1 ratio propensity-score matching on > 80 variables. Subgroup analyses were done by age, sex, thiazide use, and cardiovascular (CV) risk. RESULTS: 61 300 allopurinol initiators PS-matched on 12 260 benzbromarone initiators were included (mean age 59 years, 79% male). During a mean follow-up of 322 days, 619 urolithiasis cases occurred with an incidence rate of 0.87 per 100 person-years in allopurinol and 1.39 in benzbromarone initiators, showing a HR of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51-0.80). ∼44% of urinary stones required intervention with a HR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.43-0.88). The lower risk associated with allopurinol compared with benzbromarone persisted across subgroups but was greater in the high than non-high CV risk subgroup (p for interaction = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This population-based cohort study found that allopurinol compared with benzbromarone was associated with a substantially lower risk of urolithiasis particularly in the presence of the high CV risk. This finding provides important safety information for clinicians' decision-making on ULTs of different mechanisms of action.

All-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with Behçet disease versus the general population.

BACKGROUND: The comparative risk of cause-specific mortality in patients with Behçet disease (BD) vs. the general population is not known. OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with BD vs. the general population. METHODS: Using data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service database for the period 2002-20, we conducted a cohort study comparing patients with BD with the general population, matched according to age and sex (1 : 4 ratio). We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Subgroup analyses by age and sex were done. RESULTS: We included 24 669 patients with BD and 98 676 age- and sex-matched controls [mean (SD) age 40.5 (12.9) years; 34% male]. During a mean follow-up of 11.9 years, the incidence rate (IR) of death per 100 person-years was 0.36 in patients with BD and 0.29 in controls [hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-1.38]. The risk of mortality was highest in the first year after BD diagnosis (HR 2.66, 95% CI 2.09-3.40). Patients with BD died more often in this period as a result of malignancy (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.30-2.98); cardiovascular (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.45-4.97), gastrointestinal (HR 3.50, 95% CI 1.35-9.07) and respiratory disease (HR 5.00, 95% CI 1.34-18.62); and infection (HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.02-10.92). Mortality as a result of neurological (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.06-2.35) or genitourinary disease (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.43-3.37) was also more common in patients with BD during the overall follow-up. Subgroup analyses showed consistent results. The risk of cardiovascular mortality vs. the general population was higher in younger patients (P = 0.006) and the risk of gastrointestinal mortality was increased in women vs. men (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based cohort study revealed that the first year after diagnosis is the highest risk period for excess mortality in people with BD. The mortality burden in BD derives from a wide spectrum of organ involvement and should serve as a warning to clinicians about the systemic nature of the disease.

Behçet disease (BD) is a multisystem vasculitis (inflammation of the blood vessels) of unknown origin that commonly results in oral and genital ulcers, uveitis (eye inflammation) and skin lesions. BD is most prevalent in people from the Mediterranean to East Asia, affecting 0.4% of people in this area. Most lesions go away with time, but more severe forms that involve the cardiovascular and neurological systems can lead to death. It is estimated that people with BD have 1.4 times the risk of dying than the general population. Using large insurance databases in Korea, we investigated the risk of death in people with BD versus age- and sex-matched controls (i.e. people without the disease) from the general population. We found that patients with BD had a 28% greater risk of death than controls over 11.9 years of follow-up, with the highest risk being in first year after diagnosis. Top causes of death in people with BD included cancer, and cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, neurological, genitourinary, respiratory and infectious disease. Further analyses of the data showed that the risk of death in BD is affected by age and sex. In particular, younger patients were more susceptible to death as a result of cardiovascular disease and women were more susceptible to dying of gastrointestinal disease. Our study suggests that there could be an increased risk of death within the first year of being diagnosed with BD and highlights how BD is a systemic disease (i.e. the involvement of any internal organ system could lead to an increase in mortality). Finally, there were unique patterns of cause-specific deaths across subgroups of people with BD.

Comparative risk of blindness and vision-threatening ocular comorbidities in patients with Behçet's disease versus the general population.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of blindness and vision-threatening ocular comorbidities in patients with Behçet's disease (BD) vs the general population. METHODS: Using 2002-2017 Korea National Health Insurance Service database, we did a population-based cohort study comparing newly diagnosed BD patients and age- and sex-matched non-BD controls at a 1:5 ratio. The primary outcome was blindness, defined as a best-corrected visual acuity of ≤20/500 in the better-seeing eye. Secondary outcomes were vision-threatening ocular comorbidities (cataract, glaucoma and retinal disorders) that require surgical interventions and incident uveitis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. We performed subgroup analyses by sex and BD diagnosis age. RESULTS: We included 31 228 BD patients and 156 140 controls. During a follow-up of 9.39 years, the incidence rate of blindness per 1000 person-years was 0.24 in BD and 0.02 in controls with an HR of 10.73 (95% CI 7.10, 16.22). The HR for secondary outcomes was 2.06 (95% CI 1.98, 2.15) for cataract surgery, 5.43 (4.57, 6.45) for glaucoma surgery and 2.71 (2.39, 3.07) for retinal surgery. The HR of incident uveitis was 6.19 (95% CI 5.83, 6.58). Males suffered a disproportionately higher risk of blindness than females due to greater severity rather than a lower incidence of uveitis. The risk of uveitis and blindness decreased as BD diagnosis age increased. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population-based cohort study, BD patients compared with the general population have a 10.73-fold risk of blindness in 10 years and also a substantially higher risk of diverse ocular comorbidities that pose potential threats to vision.

Risk of Bloodstream Infection in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Exposed to Prolonged Medium-to-High-Dose Glucocorticoids.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors of bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exposed to medium to high doses of glucocorticoids. METHODS: This study included 1109 treatment episodes with prolonged (≥4 weeks) medium-to-high-dose glucocorticoids (≥15 mg/day prednisolone) in 612 patients with SLE for over 14 years. Clinical features regarding systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), immunosuppressant use, and laboratory results were obtained from the electronic medical database. The primary outcome of this study was the 1-year incidence of BSI. The effect of clinical factors on the outcome was investigated using a generalized estimating equation. RESULTS: During a total of 1078.64 person-years, 30 cases of BSI occurred, with an incidence rate of 2.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.88-3.97) per 100 person-years. Mortality rate of the treatment episodes with BSI was 16.7%, which was significantly higher than that in the other episodes (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 19.59, 95% CI 7.33-52.44). When the incidence rate of BSI was stratified by baseline glucocorticoid dose and SLEDAI-2K score, a higher incidence rate of BSI occurred as disease activity or baseline glucocorticoid dose increased. In the multivariable analysis, SLEDAI-2K ≥20 (adjusted IRR (aIRR) 4.66, 95% CI 2.17-10.00), initial baseline prednisolone ≥ 60 mg/day (aIRR 2.42, 95% CI 1.11-5.32), and cumulative prednisolone dose ≥15 mg/day during the previous 6 months (aIRR 2.13, 95% CI 1.03-4.40) significantly increased the risk of BSI. CONCLUSION: In patients with SLE exposed to prolonged medium-to-high-dose glucocorticoids, the 1-year incidence rate of BSI was significantly higher than previously reported in the general patients with SLE. Severe disease activity, and high-dose glucocorticoid treatment previously or at baseline increased the risk of BSI.

Proinflammatory Features of Stem Cell-like Memory T Cells from Human Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Stem cell-like memory T (Tscm) cells are a subset of memory T cells that have characteristics of stem cells. The characteristics of Tscm cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are not well known. The percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ Tscm cells in PBMCs and synovial fluid mononuclear cells was measured. After confirming the stem cell nature of Tscm cells, we examined their pathogenicity in RA patients and healthy controls (HCs) by assessing T cell activation markers and cytokine secretion after stimulation with anti-CD3/CD28 beads and/or IL-6. Finally, RNA transcriptome patterns in Tscm cells from RA patients were compared with those in HCs. In this study, the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ Tscm cells in total T cells was significantly higher in RA patients than in HCs. Tscm cells self-proliferated and differentiated into memory and effector T cell subsets when stimulated. Compared with Tscm cells from HCs, Tscm cells from RA patients were more easily activated by anti-CD3/CD28 beads augmented by IL-6. Transcriptome analyses revealed that Tscm cells from RA patients showed a pattern distinct from those in HCs; RA-specific transcriptome patterns were not completely resolved in RA patients in complete clinical remission. In conclusion, Tscm cells from RA patients show a transcriptionally distinct pattern and are easily activated to produce inflammatory cytokines when stimulated by TCRs in the presence of IL-6. Tscm cells can be a continuous source of pathogenicity in RA.

Performance of cut-offs adjusted with positive control band intensity in line-blot assays for myositis-specific antibodies.

The diagnostic performance of band intensity (BI) cut-offs, adjusted by a positive control band (PCB) in a line-blot assay (LBA) for myositis-related autoantibodies (MRAs) is investigated. Sera from 153 idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) patients with available immunoprecipitation assay (IPA) data and 79 healthy controls were tested using the EUROLINE panel. Strips were evaluated for BI using the EUROLineScan software, and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and the Youden's index (YI) were estimated at non-adjusted or PCB-adjusted cut-off values. Kappa statistics were calculated for IPA and LBA. Although inter-assay CV for PCB BI was 3.9%, CV was 12.9% in all samples, and a significant correlation was found between BIs of PCB and seven MRAs (all P < 0.05). At adjusted BI (aBI) > 10, the negative conversion rate of myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positivity at BI > 10 was 11.5% in controls and 1.3% in patients. The specificity, AUC, and YI for MSAs at aBI > 10 or > 20 were higher than those at non-adjusted cut-off values. Additionally, AUC (0.720), YI (0.440), and the prevalence of MRAs with kappa > 0.60 (58.3%) were the highest at aBI > 20. The overall sensitivity and specificity for MSAs were 50.3% and 93.7% at aBI > 20, respectively, and 59.5% and 65.8% with BI > 10, respectively. The diagnostic performance of LBA can be improved using PCB-adjusted BIs. aBI > 20 is the optimal cut-off for IIM diagnosis using the EUROLINE LBA panel.

Safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to assess the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical settings in Korea. METHODS: This is a prospective, multi-centre post-marketing surveillance study. Data were prospectively collected within 6 months after the start of tofacitinib therapy. Safety was evaluated based on the presence of adverse events (AEs) observed in patients who received at least one dose of tofacitinib. Effectiveness was assessed according to the proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity and remission, American College of Rheumatology 20 criteria (ACR20), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, and change of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28). RESULTS: The incidence rates [patients with events per 100 patient-years (PY)] of AEs and serious AEs were 56.92 and 10.69, respectively. Regarding AEs of special interest, the incidence rates were 4.33 per 100 PY for serious infections and infestations, 5.78 per 100 PY for herpes zoster, no event of tuberculosis, 0.29 per 100 PY for malignancy, 0.29 per 100 PY for venous thromboembolism (one event of deep vein thrombosis and no event of pulmonary embolism), 0.87 per 100 PY for major adverse cardiovascular event, and 0.58 per 100 PY for mortality. Moreover, ∼40.48% and 21.60% of patients achieved low disease activity and remission of DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The EULAR response was classified as good responders with 39.12% in the DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit/risk profile of tofacitinib in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical settings in Korea was similar to long-term clinical trial data.

Utility of the breath-holding test in patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiopulmonary involvement is a major cause of death in patients with SSc. This study evaluated the clinical utility and reliability of breath-holding test (BHT) in evaluating cardiopulmonary function in patients with SSc. METHODS: Seventy-two prospectively enrolled patients with SSc underwent BHT and the 6 min walk test (6MWT), along with measurements of the Borg dyspnoea scale and Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ). Data on pulmonary function test and echocardiography were also collected. Validity was assessed based on the correlations between the best BHT and relevant clinical parameters. To assess the reliability of BHT, an additional 31 patients with SSc underwent BHTs twice within 2 week intervals. RESULTS: Mean (s.d.) best BHT time was 38.4 (15.7) s, and 6MWT distance was 473.5 (95.5) m. BHT showed significant correlations with the Borg dyspnoea scale before (r = -0.367, P < 0.001) and after (r = -0.285, P = 0.016) testing, whereas 6MWT were correlated with the Borg dyspnoea scale after (r = -0.351, P = 0.002) but not before (r = -0.113, P = 0.343) testing. BHT time was correlated with diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (%, r = 0.426, P < 0.001), forced vital capacity (litres, r = 0.373, P = 0.001), pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (mmHg, r = -0.272, P = 0.031) and SHAQ score (r = -0.470, P < 0.001), but not with left ventricular ejection fraction (%, r = -0.135, P = 0.263). BHT showed excellent reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (2, 1) of 0.943 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.97). CONCLUSION: BHT, a simple and less time-consuming test, shows excellent reliability and significant correlation with the Borg scale, SHAQ and pulmonary parameters. These results suggest that BHT might be a useful surrogate marker of pulmonary capacity in SSc patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04484948.

Prevention and management of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: a clinical review.

The risk of herpes zoster (HZ) and HZ-related complications is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) relative to the general population; therefore, HZ vaccination is recommended in these patient groups. In this literature-based review, we summarise the available evidence on the use of HZ vaccines in patients with RA and PsA, and discuss strategies for managing breakthrough infection. Currently available data show suboptimal rates of HZ vaccination among these patients and highlight a need for strategies to improve HZ vaccination programmes in clinical practice. Further clinical studies are also required to optimise the use of HZ vaccines in patients with RA and PsA, particularly with regard to determining the impact of different immunosuppressive therapy regimens on vaccine immunogenicity and, ultimately, efficacy, as well as the impact of vaccination on disease activity and safety.

Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement.

OBJECTIVES: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for use in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. With five agents licensed, it was timely to summarise the current understanding of JAKi use based on a systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy and safety. METHODS: Existing data were evaluated by a steering committee and subsequently reviewed by a 29 person expert committee leading to the formulation of a consensus statement that may assist the clinicians, patients and other stakeholders once the decision is made to commence a JAKi. The committee included patients, rheumatologists, a gastroenterologist, a haematologist, a dermatologist, an infectious disease specialist and a health professional. The SLR informed the Task Force on controlled and open clinical trials, registry data, phase 4 trials and meta-analyses. In addition, approval of new compounds by, and warnings from regulators that were issued after the end of the SLR search date were taken into consideration. RESULTS: The Task Force agreed on and developed four general principles and a total of 26 points for consideration which were grouped into six areas addressing indications, treatment dose and comedication, contraindications, pretreatment screening and risks, laboratory and clinical follow-up examinations, and adverse events. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined based on the SLR and levels of agreement were voted on for every point, reaching a range between 8.8 and 9.9 on a 10-point scale. CONCLUSION: The consensus provides an assessment of evidence for efficacy and safety of an important therapeutic class with guidance on issues of practical management.

Tuberculosis risk with biologics by screening-guided preventive strategy in rheumatoid arthritis under intermediate tuberculosis burden.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare tuberculosis (TB) risk during biologics treatment between patients with RA who did (prophylaxis) and did not (non-prophylaxis) undergo chemoprophylaxis following pre-biologic latent TB screening in Korea of an intermediate TB burden. METHODS: Using the 2002-16 Korea National Health Insurance database, we conducted a cohort study examining TB risk, defined by International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision codes plus anti-TB drugs, among RA patients initiating a biologic drug with and without chemoprophylaxis after screening triage for latent TB. To control baseline confounding, we used propensity score-based fine stratification (PSS) and weighting. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios and 95% CIs comparing TB risk between the prophylaxis vs non-prophylaxis groups. RESULTS: The PSS-weighted study cohort (mean age 57.0 years; 81.3% female) included 2249 and 7225 RA patients in the prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups, respectively. During 2.42 years of biologics treatment, 118 patients developed TB with the incidence rate per 100 person-years of 0.33 in the prophylaxis and 0.63 in the non-prophylaxis groups. The PSS-weighted hazard ratio (95% CI) for TB associated with the prophylaxis was 0.52 (0.32, 0.86). During the follow-up time, the incidence rate of TB remained consistently low in the prophylaxis group but it was highest in the first year, then time-dependently declined in the non-prophylaxis group. CONCLUSION: This population-based cohort study warns that the current screening-based preventive strategy generates a substantially higher TB risk after biologics initiation among screening-negative patients compared with screening-positive patients receiving chemoprophylaxis, when the background TB burden is not low.

A clinical comparison of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for treating digital ulcers of systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase type5 inhibitors (PDE5is) for treating SSc-related digital ulcers (DUs). METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study recruited patients with active SSc-related DUs from 13 medical centres in South Korea. The primary outcome was time to cardinal ulcer (CU) healing. A secondary outcome was time to new DU occurrence. Patients were followed up 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were analysed. Their mean age was 49.9 years (s.d. 11.4) and 49 were female. Twenty-eight had limited SSc. Forty-nine patients received ERA, 11 received a PDE5i (9 sildenafil, 1 udenafil and 1 tadalafil) and 3 received other medication. The hazard ratio (HR) for time to CU healing in the ERA group vs the PDE5i group was 0.75 (95% CI 0.35, 1.64; P = 0.47) in an unadjusted model and 0.80 (95% CI 0.36, 1.78; P = 0.59) in a model adjusted for age, sex, use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs), total DU number and initial CU area. The HR for new DU development in the ERA group vs the PDE5i group was 0.39 (95% CI 0.16, 0.93; P = 0.03) in an unadjusted model and 0.32 (95% CI 0.13, 0.81; P = 0.02) in an adjusted model. No patients receiving CCBs developed new DUs at 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Time to CU healing is comparable for ERA and PDE5i. ERAs are more effective in reducing new DU occurrence than PDE5is. CCBs may be effective as a background medication.

Efficacy of Health Coaching and an Electronic Health Management Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: For chronic disease management, self-management strategies are essential to achieve sustained improvement. OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluated the efficacy of health coaching and a self-management strategy-based electronic program on self-management strategies for patients with osteoporosis, chronic respiratory disease, or arthritis. DESIGN: Three-arm randomized controlled trial, pilot study PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four participants INTERVENTIONS: The first intervention group (n = 53) received a self-management strategy-based electronic program and 12 weeks of health coaching (20 sessions). The second intervention group received the information and communications technology (ICT) program; the control group received usual care and an educational booklet about self-management of chronic diseases. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference in the change of the mean of self-management strategy scores. Secondary outcomes included depression (PHQ-9), physical activity (Godin Leisure Exercise Questionnaire), and health habit maintenance (transtheoretical model) after 12 weeks in the program. KEY RESULTS: The combination of health coaching and ICT was superior to control group (change 18.5 vs. - 2.6, adjusted difference = 24.5, p < 0.001); however, the ICT alone group was not superior to the control group (change 8.0 vs. - 2.6, adjusted difference = 8.0, p = 0.156). As a result of evaluating the change in the percentage of people with positive stage changes in the transtheoretical model of health habits, regular exercise (p = 0.008), a balanced diet (p = 0.005), helping others (p = 0.001), and living with loved ones (p = 0.038) showed significant differences. There was no significant difference in the changes in percentage of patients with depressive symptoms in comparison with control group; however, there was in comparison with control group among groups (p = 0.033). Compared to the control group, the proportion of patients who achieved an exercise amount of 12.5 MET or higher was significantly higher (p = 0.028) in the health coaching and ICT group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ICT + health coaching led to improvement in self-management as well as in increasing exercise, and several healthy behaviors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03294057.

Predictors of a placebo response in patients with hand osteoarthritis: post-hoc analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Placebo can have a significant therapeutic effect in patients with hand osteoarthritis (OA). This aim of the study is to identify factors associated with a clinically meaningful placebo response in patients with hand OA. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of GCSB-5 or diacerein as treatments for hand OA analyzed the efficacy of a placebo. Clinical and laboratory factors associated with a clinically meaningful response, defined as an improvement in the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) pain score > 10 at 4 weeks relative to baseline, were identified. RESULTS: The mean improvement in the AUSCAN pain score was - 6.0 ± 20.3, with marked variation between 143 hand OA patients (range: - 76.4 to 33.2). A clinically meaningful improvement was observed in 54 (37.8%) patients. Placebo responders had worse AUSCAN pain scores (55.7 ± 19.7 vs. 43.6 ± 21.6, p = 0.001) and a worse AUSCAN stiffness (68.2 ± 20.5 vs. 57.5 ± 24.5, p = 0.008) at baseline than non-responders. Improvements in pain correlated with the baseline pain level (Pearson r = - 427, p < 0.001). Structural joint changes such as tender, swollen, enlarged, or deformed joint counts did not differ between placebo responders and non-responders. In a multivariable analysis, only baseline AUSCAN pain was associated with a clinically meaningful placebo response (OR: 1.054, 95% CI [1.019-1.089], p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of pain at baseline are predictive of a clinically meaningful placebo response in patients with hand OA. Further studies are needed to optimize and utilize the benefit of placebo responses in patients with hand OA.

Management of Women with Antiphospholipid Antibodies or Antiphospholipid Syndrome during Pregnancy.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which is characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), is associated with increased risk of thrombosis and obstetric complications, including preterm delivery and recurrent pregnancy losses. APS shows diverse clinical manifestations and the risk of complications varies among clinical subtypes. Although these patients are usually treated with aspirin and anticoagulants, the optimal treatment in various clinical settings is unclear, as the risk of complications vary among clinical subtypes and the management strategy depends on whether the patient is pregnant or not. Also, there are unmet needs for the evidence-based, pregnancy-related treatment of asymptomatic women positive for aPL. This review focuses on the management of positive aPL or APS in pregnant and postpartum women, and in women attempting to become pregnant. For asymptomatic aPL positive women, no treatment, low dose aspirin (LDA) or LDA plus anticoagulants can be considered during antepartum and postpartum. In obstetric APS patients, preconceptional LDA is recommended. LDA plus low molecular weight heparin is administered after confirmation of pregnancy. Vascular APS patients should take frequent pregnancy test and receive heparin instead of warfarin after confirmation of pregnancy. During pregnancy, heparin plus LDA is recommended. Warfarin can be restarted 4 to 6 hours after vaginal delivery and 6 to 12 hours after cesarean delivery. Most importantly, a tailored approach and patient-oriented treatment are mandatory.

Erratum: Correction of Authors' Name Spelling in the Article "COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Clinical Guidance of the Korean College of Rheumatology".

This corrects the article on p. e95 in vol. 36, PMID: 33783147.

COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Clinical Guidance of the Korean College of Rheumatology.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused more than 100 million infections and 2 million deaths worldwide. In up to 20% of cases, COVID-19 infection can take a severe, life-threatening course. Therefore, preventive measures such as mask-wearing, hand hygiene, and social distancing are important. COVID-19 vaccines that use novel vaccine technology can prevent up to 95% of infections. However, the uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (AIIRD), who are immunocompromised due to underlying immune dysfunction and concomitant immunosuppressive treatment, warrants clear guidance. A task force of the Korean College of Rheumatology formulated a set of vaccination guidance based on the currently available data and expert consensus. The currently available COVID-19 vaccines are considered to be safe and effective. Every patient with AIIRD should receive one of the available COVID-19 vaccines unless contraindicated for medical reasons such as prior allergy/anaphylaxis to the COVID-19 vaccine or its components. Patients should continue immunosuppressive treatment for their underlying AIIRD, including biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). Corticosteroids should be reduced to the lowest dose possible without aggravating the AIIRD. To improve the vaccine response, methotrexate can be withheld for 1-2 weeks after each vaccination, and the timing of rituximab and abatacept infusion should be adjusted if clinically acceptable. Rheumatologists should play a leading role in educating and vaccinating patients with AIIRD.

Quality Indicators for Evaluating the Health Care of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Korean Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the quality of health care and considerable efforts are being made to improve it. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease that can result in favorable outcomes when appropriate diagnosis and treatment are provided. However, several studies have shown that RA is often managed inappropriately. Therefore, the Korean College of Rheumatology aimed to develop quality indicators (QIs) to evaluate and improve the health care of patients with RA. METHODS: Preliminary QIs were derived based on the existing guidelines and QIs for RA. The final QIs were determined through two separate consensus meetings of experts. The consensus was achieved through a panel of experts who voted using the modified Delphi method. RESULTS: Fourteen final QIs were selected among 70 preliminary QIs. These included early referral to and regular follow-up with a rheumatologist, radiographs of the hands and feet, early initiation and maintenance of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy, periodic assessment of disease activity, screening for drug safety and comorbidities, including viral hepatitis and tuberculosis before biologic DMARD therapy, periodic laboratory testing, supplementation with folic acid, assessment of the risk for cervical spine instability before general anesthesia, patient education, and specialized nurse. CONCLUSION: These QIs can be used to assess and improve the quality of health care for patients with RA.

Systemic sclerosis and the COVID-19 pandemic: World Scleroderma Foundation preliminary advice for patient management.

Due to the frequent presence of interstitial lung disease and widespread use of immunosuppressive treatment, systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients may be considered at risk for a more severe disease course and higher mortality when they develop Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - Coronavirus - 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus infection. Therefore, with World Scleroderma Foundation endorsement, experts from different specialties including rheumatology, virology and clinical immunology gathered virtually to answer to the main practical clinical questions regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection coming from both patients and physicians. This preliminary advice is aligned with other national and international recommendations, adapted for SSc patients.