The incidence and interpretation of large differences in EIT-based measures for PEEP titration in ARDS patients.

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can be titrated by electrical impedance tomography (EIT). The aim of the present study was to examine the performance of different EIT measures during PEEP trials with the aim of identifying "optimum" PEEP and to provide possible interpretations of largely diverging results. After recruitment (maximum plateau pressure 35 cmH2O), decremental PEEP trial with steps of 2 cmH2O and duration of 2 min per step was performed. Ventilation gain and loss, the global inhomogeneity (GI) index, trend of end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) and regional compliance (Creg) for estimation of overdistension and collapse were calculated. Largely diverging results of PEEP selection among the measures were defined as differences ≥ 4 PEEP steps (i.e. ≥ 8 cmH2O). In 30 ARDS patients we examined so far, 3 patients showed significant differences in PEEP selections. Overdistension and collapse estimation based on Creg tended to select lower PEEP while the GI index and EELI trend suggested higher PEEP settings. Regional inspiration times were heterogeneous indicating that the assumption of a uniform driving pressure in the calculation of Creg may not be valid. Judging by the predominant ventilation distribution in the most dependent regions, these patients were non-recruitable with the applied recruitment method or pressure levels. The existence of differences in the recommended PEEP among the analyzed EIT measures might be an indicator of non-recruitable lungs and heterogeneous airway resistances. In these extreme cases, the largely diverging results may prompt the attending clinician to develop individual ventilation strategies.Clinical Trial Registration Registration number NCT03112512, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ Registered 13 April 2017.

Effect of the Timing of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on the Prognosis of Patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on the hearing recovery of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). The clinical data of 79 patients diagnosed with ISSNHL and treated with HBOT between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The pure tone audiometry (PTA) scores before and after HBOT were recorded. The associations of HBOT efficacy with demographic and clinical characteristics and the duration from disease onset to HBOT administration were determined. The average PTA score was 80.06 ± 25.94 dB before and 60.75 ± 21.26 dB after HBOT; the difference was significant. HBOT improved the hearing of 55.7% of the patients with ISSNHL (defined as an average PTA ≥ 11dB or a final average PTA score below 29 dB). There was a significant inverse relationship between the duration from symptom onset to HBOT administration and PTA score reduction after HBOT, which was adjusted for factors including age, sex, laterality of hearing loss, initial PTA score, reception of intratympanic steroid injections, tinnitus, dizziness, vertigo, diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. Commencing HBOT at an earlier stage is closely linked to greater improvements in hearing for patients with ISSNHL.