Chronic graft-versus-host disease in pediatric patients: Differences and challenges.

Despite the use of high-resolution molecular techniques for tissue typing, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a major complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. cGVHD adversely affects the life-expectancy and quality of life. The latter is particularly important and functionally relevant in pediatric patients who have a longer life-expectancy than adults. Current laboratory evidence suggests that there is not any difference in the pathophysiology of cGVHD between adults and pediatric patients. However, there are some clinical features and complications of the disease that are different in pediatric patients. There are also challenges in the development of new therapeutics for this group of patients. In this review, we will discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and consequences of the disease, and highlight the differences between pediatric and adult patients. We will examine the current treatment options for pediatric patients with moderate to severe cGVHD and discuss the challenges facing therapeutic development for cGVHD in the pediatric population.

Metabolic syndrome is independently associated with improved overall survival to first-line therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Many co-existing medical conditions may affect the outcome in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced cancer. There is currently not any information on whether metabolic syndrome (MetS) impacts the clinical outcome in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced non-small cell line cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We carried out a single-center retrospective cohort study to determine the effects of MetS on first-line ICI therapy in patients with NSCLC. Results: One hundred and eighteen consecutive adult patients who received first-line therapy with ICIs and had adequate medical record information for the determination of MetS status and clinical outcomes were included in the study. Twenty-one patients had MetS and 97 did not. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, smoking history, ECOG performance status, tumor histologic types, pre-therapy use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, PD-L1 expression, pre-treatment neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, or proportions of patients who received ICI monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. With a median follow-up of 9 months (range 0.5-67), MetS patients enjoyed significantly longer overall survival (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92) (p = 0.02) but not progression-free survival. The improved outcome was only observed in patients who received ICI monotherapy and not chemoimmunotherapy. MetS predicted for higher probability of survival at 6 months (p = 0.043) and 12 months (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis indicated that, in addition to the known adverse effects of use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and the beneficial effects of PD-L1 (Programmed cell death-ligand 1) expression, MetS was independently associated with improved overall survival but not progression-free survival. Conclusions: Our results suggest that MetS is an independent predictor of treatment outcome in patients who received first-line ICI monotherapy for NSCLC.

l-glutamine, crizanlizumab, voxelotor, and cell-based therapy for adult sickle cell disease: Hype or hope?

For more than two decades, hydroxyurea was the only therapeutic agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for sickle cell disease (SCD). Although curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCT) were also available, only very few patients underwent the procedure due to lack of matched-related donors. However, therapeutic options for SCD patients increased dramatically in the last few years. Three new agents, l-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor, were approved by the FDA for use in SCD patients. The number of SCD patients who underwent allo-HSCT also increased as a result of advances in the prevention of graft failure and graft-versus-host disease from using mismatched donor HSC. More recently gene therapy was made available on clinical trials. The increased treatment options for SCD have led to a sense of optimism and excitement among many physicians that these new approaches would alter the clinical course and disease burden. Although these newer agents do provide hope to SCD patients, the hyped-up responses need to be evaluated in the context of reality. In this review, we will discuss and compare these new agents and cell-based therapy, evaluate their clinical and economic impacts, and examine their roles in reducing the disease burden.

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab-induced Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: A Case Report.

Immunotherapies such as the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitor ipilimumab and the programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor nivolumab have become ubiquitous in cancer treatment. Recently, the FDA approved nivolumab with or without ipilimumab for the treatment of refractory small cell lung cancer. Immunotherapies increase the immune response to cancer cells by interfering with inhibitory molecular pathways that prevent tumor cell killing, thus augmenting tumor cell death without many of the cytotoxic side effects associated with chemotherapy. However, this augmented immune response may result in unwanted immune-mediated inflammation of different organs and are therefore associated with immune-related adverse events, unlike traditional chemotherapies or targeted therapies. Here, we describe 1 patient with advanced small cell lung cancer who developed grade III-IV acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy after treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab. The patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin alone and showed symptomatic improvement.