A pan-cancer compendium of chromosomal instability.

Chromosomal instability (CIN) results in the accumulation of large-scale losses, gains and rearrangements of DNA1. The broad genomic complexity caused by CIN is a hallmark of cancer2; however, there is no systematic framework to measure different types of CIN and their effect on clinical phenotypes pan-cancer. Here we evaluate the extent, diversity and origin of CIN across 7,880 tumours representing 33 cancer types. We present a compendium of 17 copy number signatures that characterize specific types of CIN, with putative aetiologies supported by multiple independent data sources. The signatures predict drug response and identify new drug targets. Our framework refines the understanding of impaired homologous recombination, which is one of the most therapeutically targetable types of CIN. Our results illuminate a fundamental structure underlying genomic complexity in human cancers and provide a resource to guide future CIN research.

Signatures of copy number alterations in human cancer.

Gains and losses of DNA are prevalent in cancer and emerge as a consequence of inter-related processes of replication stress, mitotic errors, spindle multipolarity and breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, among others, which may lead to chromosomal instability and aneuploidy1,2. These copy number alterations contribute to cancer initiation, progression and therapeutic resistance3-5. Here we present a conceptual framework to examine the patterns of copy number alterations in human cancer that is widely applicable to diverse data types, including whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, single-cell DNA sequencing and SNP6 microarray data. Deploying this framework to 9,873 cancers representing 33 human cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas6 revealed a set of 21 copy number signatures that explain the copy number patterns of 97% of samples. Seventeen copy number signatures were attributed to biological phenomena of whole-genome doubling, aneuploidy, loss of heterozygosity, homologous recombination deficiency, chromothripsis and haploidization. The aetiologies of four copy number signatures remain unexplained. Some cancer types harbour amplicon signatures associated with extrachromosomal DNA, disease-specific survival and proto-oncogene gains such as MDM2. In contrast to base-scale mutational signatures, no copy number signature was associated with many known exogenous cancer risk factors. Our results synthesize the global landscape of copy number alterations in human cancer by revealing a diversity of mutational processes that give rise to these alterations.

Genomic profile analysis of leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei and fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas: Strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of array-CGH interpretation.

A close relationship has been demonstrated between genomic complexity and clinical outcome in uterine smooth muscle tumors. We studied the genomic profiles by array-CGH of 28 fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas and 37 leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (LMBN) from 64 patients. Follow-up was available for 46 patients (from three to 249 months, mean 87.3 months). All patients were alive without evidence of disease. For 51 array-CGH interpretable tumors the mean Genomic Index (GI) was 16.4 (median: 9.8; from 1 to 57.8), significantly lower than the mean GI in LMS (mean GI 51.8, p < 0.001). We described three groups: (1) a group with FH deletion (24/58) with low GI (mean GI: 11 vs. 22,4, p = 0.02), (2) a group with TP53 deletion (17/58) with higher GI (22.4 vs. 11 p = 0.02), and (3) a group without genomic events on FH or TP53 genes (17/58) (mean GI:18.3; from 1 to 57.8). Because none of these tumors recurred and none showed morphological features of LMS we concluded that GI at the cut-off of 10 was not applicable in these subtypes of LM. By integration of all those findings, a GI <10 in LMBN remains a valuable argument for benignity. Conversely, in LMBN a GI >10 or alteration in tumor suppressor genes, should not alone warrant a diagnosis of malignancy. Nine tumors were tested with Nanocind CINSARC® signature and all were classified in low risk of recurrence. We propose, based on our observations, a diagnostic approach of these challenging lesions.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor enhancers support a transcription factor network predictive of clinical outcome.

Activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases are hallmarks of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The biological underpinnings of recurrence following resection or disease progression beyond kinase mutation are poorly understood. Utilizing chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing of tumor samples and cell lines, we describe the enhancer landscape of GIST, highlighting genes that reinforce and extend our understanding of these neoplasms. A group of core transcription factors can be distinguished from others unique to localized and metastatic disease. The transcription factor HAND1 emerges in metastatic disease, binds to established GIST-associated enhancers, and facilitates GIST cell proliferation and KIT gene expression. The pattern of transcription factor expression in primary tumors is predictive of metastasis-free survival in GIST patients. These results provide insight into the enhancer landscape and transcription factor network underlying GIST, and define a unique strategy for predicting clinical behavior of this disease.

LIX1 regulates YAP activity and controls gastrointestinal cancer cell plasticity.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, result from deregulated proliferation of transformed KIT-positive interstitial cells of Cajal that share mesenchymal progenitors with smooth muscle cells. Despite the identification of selective KIT inhibitors, primary resistance and relapse remain a major concern. Moreover, most patients develop resistance partly through reactivation of KIT and its downstream signalling pathways. We previously identified the Limb Expression 1 (LIX1) gene as a unique marker of digestive mesenchyme immaturity. We also demonstrated that LIX1 regulates mesenchymal progenitor proliferation and differentiation by controlling the Hippo effector YAP1, which is constitutively activated in many sarcomas. Therefore, we wanted to determine LIX1 role in GIST development. We found that LIX1 is strongly up-regulated in GIST samples and this is associated with unfavourable prognosis. Moreover, LIX1 controls GIST cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Upon LIX1 inactivation in GIST cells, YAP1/TAZ activity is reduced, KIT (the GIST signature) is down-regulated, and cells acquire smooth muscle lineage features. Our data highlight LIX1 role in digestive mesenchyme-derived cell-fate decisions and identify this novel regulator as a target for drug design for GIST treatment by influencing its differentiation status.

Impact of preoperative treatment on the CINSARC prognostic signature: translational research results from a phase 1 trial of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG 03).

PURPOSE: CINSARC (Complexity INdex in SARComas) is a prognostic signature for soft tissue sarcoma that determines the risk for recurrence and may serve to guide the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the CINSARC signature of pre- and posttreatment biopsies of sarcoma patients treated within a phase I trial evaluating preoperative sunitinib and irradiation. METHODS: We retrieved 14 pairs of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks from pretreatment biopsies and posttreatment resection specimens and performed expression profiling of the 67 CINSARC signature genes. RESULTS: In 5/14 patients, both probes were unsuitable for expression analysis because there was no (vital) tissue left in biopsies or resection specimens. Comparing the CINSARC risk classification before and after treatment in the remaining patients, 2/9 shifted from a high- to a low-risk classification for metastatic disease after preoperative treatment with radiation therapy plus sunitinib and 7/9 pairs of pre- and posttreatment biopsies revealed identical results. CONCLUSION: Concurrent radiation therapy and sunitinib leads to diverging results of prognostic gene array testing in a relevant proportion of sarcoma patients. These changes may reflect tumor heterogeneity, local treatment effects, or prognostic changes of the disease. Caution is advised in the selection of samples and interpretation of test results.

Value of peri-operative chemotherapy in patients with CINSARC high-risk localized grade 1 or 2 soft tissue sarcoma: study protocol of the target selection phase III CHIC-STS trial.

BACKGROUND: The value of chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains controversial. Several expert teams consider that chemotherapy provides a survival advantage and should be proposed in high-risk (HR) patients. However, the lack of accuracy in identifying HR patients with conventional risk factors (large, deep, FNCLCC grade 3, extremity STS) is an issue that cannot be neglected. For example, while the FNCLCC grading system is a powerful tool, it has several limitations. CINSARC, a 67-gene signature, has proved to be an additional independent factor for predicting metastatic spread and outperforms histological grade. Regardless of FNCLCC grade, CINSARC stratifies patients into two separate prognostic groups: one with an excellent prognosis (low-risk (LR) CINSARC) and the other with a worse outcome (HR-CINSARC) in terms of metastatic relapse. Here we evaluate the role of chemotherapy in grade 1-2 STS patients with HR-CINSARC and assess the prognostic value of CINSARC in patients treated with standard of care. METHODS: CHIC is a parallel, randomized, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the effect on metastasis-free survival of adding perioperative chemotherapy to standard of care in patients with grade ½ STS sarcoma defined as HR by CINSARC. In this target selection design, 600 patients will be screened with CINSARC to randomize 250 HR-CINSARC patients between standard of care and standard of care plus chemotherapy (4 cycles of 3 weeks of intravenous chemotherapy with doxorubicin in combination with dacarbazine or ifosfamide according to histologic subtype). LR-CINSARC patients will be treated by standard of care according to the investigator. The primary endpoint is metastasis-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-free survival and safety. Furthermore, the prognostic value of CINSARC will be evaluated by comparing LR-CINSARC patients to HR-CINSARC patients randomized in standard of care. DISCUSSION: CHIC is a prospective randomized phase III trial designed to comprehensively evaluate the benefit of chemotherapy in HR-CINSARC patients and to prospectively validate the prognostic value of CINSARC in grade ½ STS sarcoma patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04307277 Date of registration: 13 March 2020.

CINSARC signature as a prognostic marker for clinical outcome in sarcomas and beyond.

Prognostication is a key issue for sarcoma patients' care as it triggers the therapeutic approach including chemotherapy, which is still not standard for localized patients. Current prognostic evaluation, based on the FNCLCC grading system, has recently been improved by the CINSARC signature outperforming histology-based grading system by identifying high-risk patients in every grade, even in those considered as low. CINSARC is an expression-based signature related to mitosis and chromosome integrity with prognostic value in a wide range of cancers additional to sarcoma. First developed with frozen material, CINSARC is now coupled with NanoString technology allowing evaluation from FFPE blocks used in clinical practice. Consequently, CINSARC is currently evaluated in clinical trials with a dual objective of demonstrating the benefit of chemotherapy in sarcoma patients and testing its response prediction. Considering its overarching value in oncology, its development is welcome in any cancers where the prognostication needs to be improved.

GREB1-CTNNB1 fusion transcript detected by RNA-sequencing in a uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor (UTROSCT): A novel CTNNB1 rearrangement.

Mutations of CTNNB1 have been implicated in tumorigenesis in many organs. However, tumors harboring a CTNNB1 translocation are extremely rare and this translocation has never been reported in a uterine mesenchymal neoplasm. We report a novel translocation t(2;3)(p25;p22) involving the GREB1 (intron 8) and CTNNB1 (exon 3) in a uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor (UTROSCT), which exhibited extrauterine metastasis. The translocation detected by RNA-sequencing was validated by RT-PCR, and resulted in nuclear expression of ß-catenin. Juxtapositioning with GREB1, which is overexpressed in response to estrogens, resulted in overexpression of a truncated and hypophosphorylated nuclear ß-catenin in the primary and recurrent tumors. This accumulation of nuclear ß-catenin results in a constitutive activation of the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway with a major oncogenic effect. The CTNNB1 gene fusion, promoted by an estrogen-responsive gene (GREB1), could be a potential driver of tumorigenesis in this case and a therapeutic target with adapted inhibitors. RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry performed on 11 additional UTROSCTs showed no CTNNB1 fusion transcript or nuclear ß-catenin immunoreactivity.

Genomic and transcriptomic comparison of post-radiation versus sporadic sarcomas.

Post-radiation sarcomas are rare secondary cancers arising from radiation therapies. To date, few genetic specificities have been described for such malignancies and the oncogenesis of sarcomas with complex genetics (both sporadic and post-radiation) remains largely misunderstood. We performed genomic and transcriptomic analyses on 77 post-radiation sarcomas using DNA-array and RNA sequencing. Consequently, we were able to investigate changes in copy number variations, transcriptome profiling, fusion gene expression, and mutational landscapes. We compare these data to a reference cohort of 93 sporadic sarcomas. At genomic level, similar chromosomal complexity was observed both in post-radiation and sporadic sarcomas with complex genetics. We found more frequent CDKN2A and CDKN2B (coding for p14/p16 and p15 proteins, respectively; at 9p21.3) losses in post-radiation (71%) than in sporadic tumors (39%; P = 6.92e-3). Among all detected fusion genes and punctual variations, few specificities were observed between these groups and such alterations are not able to drive a strong and specific oncogenesis. Recurrent MYC amplifications (96%) and KDR variants (8%) were detected in post-radiation angiosarcomas, in agreement with the literature. Transcriptomic analysis of such angiosarcomas revealed two distinct groups harboring different genomic imbalances (in particular gains of 17q24.2-17qter) with different clinical courses according to patient's vital status. Differential gene expression analysis permitted to focus on the immune response as a potential actor to tumor aggressiveness. Histochemistry validated a lower inflammation and lower immune infiltrate at tumor periphery for highly aggressive angiosarcomas. Our results provide new genomic and transcriptomic information about post-radiation sarcomas. The techniques we used (RNA-seq and DNA-arrays) did not highlight major differences in sarcomas with complex genetics depending on the radiation context, revealing similar patterns of transcriptomic profiles and chromosomal copy number variations. Additional characterizations, particularly whole genome sequencing, could measure changes in DNA following radiation therapy in such malignancies and may precise their oncogenesis.