A machine learning-based risk score for prediction of infective endocarditis among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia - The SABIER score.

BACKGROUND: Early risk assessment is needed to stratify Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis (SA-IE) risk among Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) patients to guide clinical management. The objective of this study is to develop a novel risk score independent of subjective clinical judgment and can be used early at the time of blood culture positivity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective big data analysis from territory-wide electronic data and included hospitalized patients with SAB between 2009 and 2019. We applied a random forest risk scoring model to select variables from an array of parameters, according to the statistical importance of each feature in predicting SA-IE outcome. The data was divided into derivation and validation cohorts. The areas under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUCROC) were determined. RESULTS: We identified 15,741 SAB patients, among them 4.18% had SA-IE. The AUCROC was 0.74 (95%CI 0.70-0.76), with a negative predictive value of 0.980 (95%CI 0.977-0.983). The four most discriminatory features were age, history of infective endocarditis, valvular heart disease, and being community-onset. CONCLUSION: We developed a novel risk score with good performance as compared to existing scores and can be used at the time of SAB and prior to subjective clinical judgment.

Reducing thrombotic risks in video gamers: investigating the benefits of walking and compression sleeves on blood hemodynamics.

With the growing popularity of video gaming, deep vein thromboses are increasingly being reported in gamers. This study aimed to compare the effects of lower leg graduated compression sleeves and a 6-min walking break during prolonged gaming on blood flow and hemodynamics in competitive sport players to help mitigate this risk. Ten healthy gamers (19.6 ± 1.2 yr old; 9 men) consented to participate in this mixed-model crossover design study that consisted of three visits. In visit 1, participants engaged in continuous 2-h video game play wearing no compression (continuous). Visits 2 and 3 involved 2-h play wearing compression sleeves (compression) and 2-h game play interrupted at 1 h by a 6-min walk (walk). Doppler ultrasound measurements of the left popliteal artery were taken at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min, to record vessel diameter, blood flow velocity, and blood flow volume. Participants completed a survey to assess their perception of each approach. There was a significant interaction between conditions for blood flow and blood velocity (P = 0.01, P < 0.001). Post hoc analysis demonstrated a greater decrease in blood flow and blood velocity in the continuous group compared with the walk group at the 90-min mark (P = 0.04, P = 0.01). No differences were found between the compression and walk groups or between the continuous and compression groups (P = 0.42, P = 0.69). No interactions were observed in diameter, mean arterial pressure, or heart rate. This study suggests that incorporating a 6-min walk every 60 min during prolonged gaming is advisable to counteract the negative effects on blood flow hemodynamics.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A 6-min light-intensity walking break during gaming can effectively combat the adverse effects of prolonged sitting, surpassing compression garments. Prolonged sitting reduces blood flow velocity, potentially leading to deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Compression sleeves help, with superior results after a 6-min walk at 60 min. Although compression stockings offer moderate improvements, a 6-min active break proves more effective. These findings offer promising interventions for gamers' health, initiating guidelines to mitigate DVT risk during gaming.

Bacterial infections in patients with COVID-19: the impact of procalcitonin testing on antibiotics prescription in the real world.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections are not prevalent among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, while unnecessary prescription of antibiotics was commonly observed. This study aimed to determine the impact of procalcitonin testing on antibiotics prescription in the real-world setting. METHODS: We performed a territory-wide retrospective cohort study involving all laboratory-confirmed patients hospitalized in public hospitals in Hong Kong in 2020 with COVID-19. We determined the prevalence of bacterial co-infections (documented infections within 72 h of admission) and secondary bacterial infections (infections after 72 h of admission) and antibiotics consumption, and the correlation between procalcitonin testing and antibiotics prescription. RESULTS: The cohort included 8666 patients, with mean age 45.3 ± 19.9 years, 48.5% male, and comorbidities in 26.9%. Among 2688 patients with bacterial cultures performed, 147 (5.5%) had bacterial co-infections, and 222 (8.3%) had secondary bacterial infections. Antibiotics were prescribed for 2773 (32.0%) patients during the hospital admission. Procalcitonin tests were performed for 2543 (29.3%) patients. More patients with procalcitonin testing received antibiotics (65.9% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001). Procalcitonin testing was associated with 5-fold increased risk of antibiotics prescription after adjusting for confounding variables. At hospital level, procalcitonin testing correlated with antibiotics prescription. Patients with procalcitonin level < 0.5 ng/mL had a lower probability of antibiotics initiation and shorter duration of antibiotics therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin testing was not associated with lower prescription of antibiotics. Patients with low procalcitonin level had lower antibiotics exposure, supporting the use of procalcitonin to exclude bacterial infections aiding early stopping of antibiotics among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Prospective, Multicenter, Head-to-Head Comparison Between Allergists Versus Nonallergists in Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: Effectiveness, Safety, and Quality of Life (HK-DADI2).

BACKGROUND: Penicillin "allergy" labels are prevalent but frequently misdiagnosed. Mislabelled allergies are associated with adverse outcomes and increased antimicrobial resistance. With an urgent need to delabel the overwhelming number of mislabeled allergies, nonallergist evaluations have been advocated for low-risk individuals. Despite growing interest in non-allergist-led initiatives, evidence on their effectiveness, safety, and impact by direct comparisons is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative outcomes of penicillin allergy evaluations conducted by allergists versus nonallergists. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, pragmatic study was conducted at 4 tertiary hospitals (1 allergist- vs 3 non-allergist-led) for low-risk penicillin allergy patients in Hong Kong-the Hong Kong Drug Allergy Delabelling Initiative 2 (HK-DADI2). RESULTS: Among 228 low-risk patients who underwent testing (32.9% by allergists, 67.1% by nonallergists), only 14 (6.1%) had positive penicillin allergy testing results. Delabeling rates (94.1% vs 93.3%; P = .777), positive skin test results (2.6% vs 2.7%; P > .99), and drug provocation test results (3.3% vs 2.7%; P = 1.000) were similar between allergists and nonallergists. There were no systemic reactions in either cohort. All patients had significant improvements in health-related quality of life (Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire scores -5.00 vs -8.33; P = .072). Nonallergist evaluations had shorter waiting times (0.57 vs 15.7 months; P < .001), whereas allergists required fewer consultations with higher rate of completing evaluations within a single visit (odds ratio, 0.04; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: With training and support, nonallergists can independently evaluate low-risk penicillin allergies. Compared with allergists, evaluation of low-risk penicillin allergy by nonallergists can be comparably effective, safe, and impactful on quality of life. More multidisciplinary partnerships to empower nonallergists to conduct allergy evaluations should be encouraged.

Using a behavioural framework to optimize antibiotic prescribing by family medicine residents.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background and objectives:Overprescribing of antibiotics in primary care is a prominent concern in the context of increasing antimicrobial resistance worldwide. Medical trainees are a key group to deliver thoughtful antimicrobial stewardship training. This study examined the factors influencing antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) by family medicine residents in order to identify educational interventions. Methods: Using purposive sampling of family medicine residents, semi-structured interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were coded into the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Belief statements were created to characterize each domain and categorized as enablers or barriers to appropriate prescribing. Domains were plotted on the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and intervention functions identified. Results:Twelve participants were interviewed. Nine domains of the TDF were relevant to antibiotic prescribing. Social influence was a prominent theme with the preceptor and patient being key influences on resident prescribing. Learning goals were also a key theme including the desire to strengthen independent clinical decision-making skills and improve antibiotic knowledge. Residents' beliefs about capabilities were challenged when faced with diagnostic uncertainty. Additional domains included: professional role; environmental context and resources; intentions; beliefs about consequences and capabilities, and knowledge. Using the BCW, nine intervention functions were identified to change antibiotic prescribing behaviour. Conclusion: This study found nine domains of the TDF were relevant to family medicine resident antibiotic prescribing for URTI. Nine intervention functions could be used to guide intervention design.