Increased Incidence and Mortality of Civilian Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury in Sweden: A Single-Center Registry-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating trauma to the head and neck has increased during the past decade in Sweden. The aim of this study was to characterize these injuries and evaluate the outcomes for patients treated at a tertiary trauma center. METHODS: Swedish trauma registry data were extracted on patients with head and neck injuries admitted to Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) between 2011 and 2019. Outcome information was extracted from hospital records, with the primary endpoints focusing on the physiological outcome measures and the secondary endpoints on the surgical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1436 patients with penetrating trauma, 329 with penetrating head and neck injuries were identified. Of the 329 patients, 66 (20%) had suffered a gunshot wound (GSW), 240 (73%) a stab wound (SW), and 23 (7%) an injury from other trauma mechanisms (OTMs). The median age for the corresponding 3 groups of patients was 25, 33, and 21 years, respectively. Assault was the primary intent, with 54 patients experiencing GSWs (81.8%) and 158 SWs (65.8%). Patients with GSWs had more severe injuries, worse admission Glasgow coma scale, motor, scores, and a higher intubation rate at the injury site. Most GSW patients underwent major surgery (59.1%) as the initial procedure and were more likely to have intracranial hemorrhage (21.2%). The 30-day mortality was 45.5% (n = 30) for GSWs, 5.4% (n = 13) for SWs, and 0% (n = 0) for OTMs. There was an annual increase in the incidence and mortality for GSWs and SWs. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2011 and 2019, an increasing annual trend was found in the incidence and mortality from penetrating head and neck trauma in Stockholm, Sweden. GSW patients experienced more severe injuries and intracranial hemorrhage and underwent more surgical interventions compared with patients with SWs and OTMs.

Bleeding in minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have shown reduced perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing minimally invasive, compared with full sternotomy, aortic valve replacement. Data from randomized trials are conflicting. METHODS: This was a Swedish single center study where adult patients with aortic stenosis, 100 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either minimally invasive (ministernotomy) or full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. The primary outcome was severe or massive bleeding defined by the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding in adult cardiac surgery (UDPB). Secondary outcomes included blood product transfusions, chest tube output, re-exploration for bleeding, and several other clinically relevant events. RESULTS: Out of 100 patients, three patients randomized to ministernotomy were intraoperatively converted to full sternotomy (none was bleeding-related). Three patients (6%) in the full sternotomy group and 3 patients (6%) in the ministernotomy group suffered severe or massive postoperative bleeding according to the UDPB definition (p = 1.00). Mean chest tube output during the first 12 postoperative hours was 350 (standard deviation (SD) 220) ml in the full sternotomy group and 270 (SD 190) ml in the ministernotomy group (p = 0.08). 28% of patients in the full sternotomy group and 36% of patients in the ministernotomy group received at least one packed red blood cells transfusion (p = 0.39). Two patients in each group (4%) underwent re-exploration for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement did not result in less bleeding-related outcomes compared to full sternotomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . Unique identifier: NCT02272621.