Indirect functional connectivity does not predict overall survival in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Lesion network mapping (LNM) is a popular framework to assess clinical syndromes following brain injury. The classical approach involves embedding lesions from patients into a normative functional connectome and using the corresponding functional maps as proxies for disconnections. However, previous studies indicated limited predictive power of this approach in behavioral deficits. We hypothesized similarly low predictiveness for overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: A retrospective dataset of patients with GBM was included (n = 99). Lesion masks were registered in the normative space to compute disconnectivity maps. The brain functional normative connectome consisted in data from 173 healthy subjects obtained from the Human Connectome Project. A modified version of the LNM was then applied to core regions of GBM masks. Linear regression, classification, and principal component (PCA) analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between disconnectivity and OS. OS was considered both as continuous and categorical (low, intermediate, and high survival) variable. RESULTS: The results revealed no significant associations between OS and network disconnection strength when analyzed at both voxel-wise and classification levels. Moreover, patients stratified into different OS groups did not exhibit significant differences in network connectivity patterns. The spatial similarity among the first PCA of network maps for each OS group suggested a lack of distinctive network patterns associated with survival duration. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with indirect structural measures, functional indirect mapping does not provide significant predictive power for OS in patients with GBM. These findings are consistent with previous research that demonstrated the limitations of indirect functional measures in predicting clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for more comprehensive methodologies and a deeper understanding of the factors influencing clinical outcomes in this challenging disease.

Present and Future of Immunotherapy in Patients With Glioblastoma: Limitations and Opportunities.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Standard therapies, including surgical resection, chemoradiation, and tumor treating fields, have not resulted in major improvements in the survival outcomes of patients with GBM. The lack of effective strategies has led to an increasing interest in immunotherapic approaches, considering the success in other solid tumors. However, GBM is a highly immunosuppressive tumor, as documented by the presence of several mechanisms of immune escape, which may represent a reason why immunotherapy clinical trials failed in this kind of tumor. In this review, we examine the current landscape of immunotherapy strategies in GBM, focusing on the challenge of immunoresistance and potential mechanisms to overcome it. We discussed completed and ongoing clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, vaccines, and CAR T-cell therapies, to provide insights into the efficacy and outcomes of different immunotherapeutic interventions. We also explore the impact of radiotherapy on the immune system within the GBM microenvironment highlighting the complex interactions between radiation treatment and the immune response.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with H3K27 altered diffuse midline gliomas: a multicentric retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Adult Diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is a very rare disease. DMGs are currently treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy even if only a few retrospective studies assessed the impact on overall survival (OS) of these approaches. METHODS: We carried out an Italian multicentric retrospective study of adult patients with H3K27-altered DMG to assess the effective role of systemic therapy in the treatment landscape of this rare tumor type. RESULTS: We evaluated 49 patients from 6 Institutions. The median age was 37.3 years (range 20.1-68.3). Most patients received biopsy as primary approach (n = 30, 61.2%) and radiation therapy after surgery (n = 39, 79.6%). 25 (51.0%) of patients received concurrent chemotherapy and 26 (53.1%) patients received adjuvant temozolomide. In univariate analysis, concurrent chemotherapy did not result in OS improvement while adjuvant temozolomide was associated with longer OS (21.2 vs. 9.0 months, HR 0.14, 0.05-0.41, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.1, 95%CI: 0.03-0.34, p = 0.003). In patients who progressed after radiation and/or chemotherapy the administration of a second-line systemic treatment had a significantly favorable impact on survival (8.0 vs. 3.2 months, HR 0.2, 95%CI 0.1-0.65, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In our series, adjuvant treatment after radiotherapy can be useful in improving OS of patients with H3K27-altered DMG. When feasible another systemic treatment after treatment progression could be proposed.

New Insights into Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive malignant primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor and, despite decades of research, it remains a lethal disease with a median overall survival of less than two years [...].

Reirradiation with radiosurgery or stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy in association with regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: No standard treatment has yet been established for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). In this context, the aim of the current study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of reirradiation (re-RT) by radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/FSRT) in association with regorafenib. METHODS: Patients with a histological or radiological diagnosis of recurrent GBM who received re-RT by SRS/FSRT and regorafenib as second-line systemic therapy were included in the analysis. RESULTS: From January 2020 to December 2022, 21 patients were evaluated. The median time between primary/adjuvant RT and disease recurrence was 8 months (range 5-20). Median re-RT dose was 24 Gy (range 18-36 Gy) for a median number of 5 fractions (range 1-6). Median regorafenib treatment duration was 12 weeks (range 3-26). Re-RT was administered before starting regorafenib or in the week off regorafenib during the course of chemotherapy. The median and the 6­month overall survival (OS) from recurrence were 8.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-12.7 months) and 75% (95% CI 50.9-89.1%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) from recurrence was 6 months (95% CI 3.7-8.5 months). The most frequent side effects were asthenia that occurred in 10 patients (8 cases of grade 2 and 2 cases of grade 3), and hand-foot skin reaction (2 patients grade 3, 3 patients grade 2). Adverse events led to permanent regorafenib discontinuation in 2 cases, while in 5/21 cases (23.8%), a dose reduction was administered. One patient experienced dehiscence of the surgical wound after reintervention and during regorafenib treatment, while another patient reported intestinal perforation that required hospitalization. CONCLUSION: For recurrent GBM, re-RT with SRT/FSRT plus regorafenib is a safe treatment. Prospective trials are necessary.

Impressive response to dabrafenib and trametinib plus silybin in a heavily pretreated IDH wild-type glioblastoma patient with BRAFV600E -mutant and SOX2 amplification.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma is the most frequent primary brain tumor in adult patients and its prognosis is still dismal with a median survival of about 1 year. BRAF V600E mutation, an important target for personalized therapy, has been identified in about 3% of these patients, but few data are available from prospective studies on the role of anti-BRAF drugs in adult glioblastoma patients. Moreover, SOX2 gene amplification and overexpression can represent an important mechanism of resistance to BRAF inhibitors by STAT3 gene activation. We present the case of a heavily pretreated 42-year-old man with BRAF V600E mutant and SOX2 amplification glioblastoma having a radiologic and metabolic [analyzed by a brain 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine([18F]FET) PET/MRI] complete response to the combination therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib and silybin, a potent STAT3 inhibitor. The patient is currently undergoing treatment after a total of 24 months of continuation therapy with a good safety profile. In conclusion, we showed a promising activity of the personalized treatment of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patient with BRAF V600E mutant glioblastoma; silybin can play an important role in decreasing drug resistance during BRAF inhibitor therapy, especially in patients with SOX2 amplification.

Association between thyroid function and regorafenib efficacy in patients with relapsed wild-type IDH glioblastoma: a large multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Regorafenib demonstrated encouraging results in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Some studies showed that changes in circulating thyroid hormones (fT3, fT4, fT3/fT4 ratio) can be considered as prognostic factors in patients with various types of tumors. We designed this study to investigate the relationship between baseline thyroid variables and outcome in IDH-wild type GBM patients who were treated with regorafenib. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included recurrent IDH-wild-type glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib. Only patients with baseline thyroid function values (TSH, fT3, fT4, fT3/fT4 ratio) available were evaluated. RANO criteria were used to analyze neuroradiological response. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The relationships between baseline thyroid variables (TSH, fT3, fT4, fT3/fT4) and survival (PFS, OS) were investigated with Cox regression models. RESULTS: From November 2015 to April 2022, 134 recurrent IDH-wildtype GBM patients were treated with regorafenib and 128 of these had information on baseline thyroid function value. Median follow-up was 8 months (IQR 4.7-14.0). Objective Response Rate was 9% and Disease Control Rate was 40.9%. Median PFS was 2.7 months (95%CI 2.2-3.6) and median OS was 10.0 months (95%CI 7.0-13.0). Lower baseline TSH value in the blood was correlated with a higher rate of disease progression to regorafenib (p = 0.04). Multivariable analyses suggested a non-linear relationship between PFS (p = 0.01) and OS (p = 0.03) with baseline fT3/fT4 ratio. CONCLUSION: In recurrent wild-type IDH glioblastoma patients, baseline fT3/fT4 ratio showed a non-linear relationship with survival, with different impacts across the spectrum of fT3/fT4 ratio. Moreover, baseline TSH may be a predictor of regorafenib activity.

Impact of Heavy Metals on Glioma Tumorigenesis.

Recently, an increase in the incidence of brain tumors has been observed in the most industrialized countries. This event triggered considerable interest in the study of heavy metals and their presence in the environment (air, water, soil, and food). It is probable that their accumulation in the body could lead to a high risk of the onset of numerous pathologies, including brain tumors, in humans. Heavy metals are capable of generating reactive oxygen, which plays a key role in various pathological mechanisms. Alteration of the homeostasis of heavy metals could cause the overproduction of reactive oxygen species and induce DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and the alteration of proteins. A large number of studies have shown that iron, cadmium, lead, nickel, chromium, and mercury levels were significantly elevated in patients affected by gliomas. In this study, we try to highlight a possible correlation between the most frequently encountered heavy metals, their presence in the environment, their sources, and glioma tumorigenesis. We also report on the review of the relevant literature.

Prolonged benefit to pembrolizumab in anaplastic oligodendroglioma patient with mismatch repair deficiency: a case report.

High-grade gliomas, including anaplastic oligodendroglioma, represent the most common malignant neoplasms of the central nervous system in the adult. The standard treatment of anaplastic oligodendroglioma consists of maximum surgical resection, radiotherapy and subsequent chemotherapy. Despite multimodal treatment, theoretically, all cases can relapse. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as pembrolizumab demonstrated promising results in many types of tumors, particularly in the presence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). However, no ICI benefit was demonstrated in high-grade glioma prospective studies, although no biomarker was analyzed. Here, we describe an interesting case of recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma with MMRd, reporting a prolonged disease stability during pembrolizumab treatment.

Medulloblastoma of the adult: results from a multicenter retrospective study by AINO (Italian Association of Neuro-Oncology) and SIN (Italian Society of Neurology).

INTRODUCTION: Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common primary malignant intracranial tumor in childhood, but it is very rare in adults, and for this reason, the optimal treatment has not yet been defined. We designed a multicentric study in order to define relevant outcome measures for future prospective studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The project involved 10 Italian centers. The database shared among the centers contains epidemiological, diagnostic (radiological and histological/molecular), therapeutic, recurrence information, and survival data. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (102 males and 50 females, median age 32) were included in the study. Twenty-three of 152 patients had a diagnosis of classic medulloblastoma, 52/152 had desmoplastic/extensive nodularity, 2/152 had large-cell anaplastic medulloblastoma, and the remaining had diagnoses not otherwise specified. Almost all patients underwent craniospinal irradiation after surgery; in 85.5% of patients, adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly platinum- and etoposide-based chemotherapy, was performed immediately after RT. Upon recurrence, most patients were retreated with various chemotherapy regimens, including intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal dissemination. The overall survival (OS) rate at 5 years was 73.3% (95% CI, 65.0-80.0%). The median OS for the whole group of patients was 112 months. CONCLUSIONS: The data collected were mainly consistent with the literature. A limitation of this study was the large number of patients lost to follow-up and the lack of molecular data for most patients diagnosed until 2010. An important challenge for the future will be MB biologic characterization in adults, with the identification of specific genetic patterns. It will be important to have more national and international collaborations to provide evidence-based management strategies that attempt to obtain a standard of care.

Prevalence of nocturia after brain injury: a cross-sectional study in a single rehabilitation center.

Aim: to analyze the prevalence of nocturia and its possible neuro-urological correlations in patients with a history of acquired brain injury (ABI).Methods: a single-centre population-based prospective study involving outpatients who were previously admitted to our Rehabilitation Hospital for acute ABI ≥ 18 months and ≤2 years prior. Impact of nocturia on QoL was evaluated by the standardized International Consultation on Incotinence Nocturia Quality of Life (ICIQ N-QoL). All participants were given a three-day frequency chart. Probability value <0.05 was statistically significant.Results: 48/138 subjects (35%) showed nocturia at 2-year follow-up visit. No, significant differences in age, gender, duration of coma, state of consciousness, disability, cognitive impairment and stroke severity were found in patients with or without nocturia. Subarachnoid haemorrhage (ESA) was the main reason for ABI in subjects showing nocturia (p = .037). The overall ICIQ N-QOL score ranged from 12 to 50 (mean 30.12 ± 8.87). Of them, 75% showed a total score >26. Increased diurnal frequency and small bladder capacity was statistically significantly associated with nocturia (p < .05).Conclusions: the rate of nocturia 2 years following ABI was lower compared to other neurological populations, although it was significantly associated with other storage urinary symptoms.

Eslicarbazepine in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is frequent in patients affected with glioma. Most patients have refractory seizures and require polytherapy. Promising treatment options derive from the development of novel anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), like Eslicarbazepine (ESL), whose role in BTRE has not yet been explored. Our aim was to report a retrospective cohort of patients affected by BTRE treated with ESL as an adjunctive therapy and to discuss the potential role of this third-generation AED in this clinical context. METHODS: We analyzed a single-center, retrospectively collected cohort of patients affected by glioma and BTRE, treated with ESL as an adjunctive therapy. RESULTS: Analysis included 5 males and 3 females with age ranging from 37 to 75 years (mean = 55.5). Mean baseline Karnofsky performance status was 87.5 (range 70-100). Patients were affected by diffuse astrocytoma (3), low grade oligodendroglioma (2), anaplastic glioma (2) and glioblastoma (1). Mean follow-up was 19 months (range 6-59). Mean dose at the last follow-up was 950 mg daily. Mean weekly seizures in the month before initiation of ESL numbered 17.6 (range 0.25-50). At the last follow-up, mean weekly seizures were 2.2 (range 0-10), i.e. significantly lower than baseline (p = 0.03). The mean reduction of seizures achieved after introduction of ESL was 65%, with 6/8 patients (75%) showing a reduction of more than 50%. Two patients (25%) were seizure free. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center experience suggests that ESL may be a well-tolerated, efficacious option as an add-on drug in the treatment of BTRE.

Rapid disease progression in patient with mismatch-repair deficiency pituitary ACTH-secreting adenoma treated with checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab.

Secreting pituitary adenomas are tumors for which few treatment options are available, including surgical treatment and management of hormonal imbalance due to altered pituitary secretion. In case of inoperable relapse, radiotherapy or chemotherapeutic treatment can be considered; the effectiveness of these treatments, however, remains limited. In the immunotherapy era, it is necessary to select patients who can benefit from immunotherapeutic treatment. Mismatch repair deficiency is strongly associated with responsiveness to anti-PD-1 in other cancers and can be detected using immunohistochemistry for MLH1, MSH2, MHS6, and PMS2. In this case report, we report a case of rapid disease progression to pembrolizumab in a patient with a MMRd pituitary adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting adenoma. For the best of our knowledge, we described for the first time, a poor efficacy of pembrolizumab in a patient with ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma having mismatch repair deficiency probably caused by high levels of cortisol in this patient. Prospective study should be performed to assess the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitor alone or in association with temozolomide in this subsetting of pituitary adenomas.

Long-course temozolomide in aggressive pituitary adenoma: real-life experience in two tertiary care centers and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Aggressive pituitary adenomas (APAs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are challenging for their invasive nature, resistance to treatment and recurrences. Temozolomide (TMZ) is used with benefit and well-tolerated toxicity profile in APAs and PCs. In most studies patients received ≤ 12 cycles but the best length of treatment is debated since other options after discontinuation are scarce and a second course is mainly unsuccessful. METHODS: We report outcomes of 8 patients with APAs and PCs treated with TMZ for more than 12 continuous cycles with a literature review. Data were retrospectively collected from Padua and Milan University Hospitals. TMZ was used as a single agent (150-200 p.o. mg/m2 daily, 5/28 days) for 14 to 45 cycles. RESULTS: Eight patients (7 M), 7 APAs and 1 PC. Previous treatments included neurosurgery and radiotherapy in all cases except two giant masses (ACTH-silent APA and prolactinoma). No patient had progression disease (PD) during long-term treatment nor toxicities. No one had complete response (CR) but four had partial response (PR). Four ACTH+ tumors maintained stable disease (SD) but the secretion pattern improved in all. After drug withdrawal, three had delayed PD (2 after 18 and one after 29 months, all ACTH+); two are still in SD. CONCLUSIONS: TMZ may be useful and well-tolerated in APAs and PCs as a long-term therapy. PR appears within the first cycles with no escape throughout the treatment; most patients achieve SD. We suggest extended protocols particularly in responsive ACTH+ PAs and PCs, when further therapies may be unsuccessful.

Mismatch-Repair Protein Expression in High-Grade Gliomas: A Large Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a system for repairing errors in DNA replication. Cancer cells with MMR deficiency can have immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression leading to a hypermutable phenotype that may correlate with anti-PD1 efficacy. Scant data exist about immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression in high-grade gliomas (HGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a large multicenter retrospective study to investigate the frequency and the prognostic role of immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression in HGG patients; we nevertheless evaluated the association between this status and clinical or molecular characteristics. Immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression was recorded as partial or complete loss of at least 1 MMR protein. RESULTS: We analyzed the expression of MMR proteins in tumor tissue of 355 consecutive patients. Partial and complete immunohistochemical loss of MMR proteins was found in 43/355 samples (12.1%) and among these, 15 cases (4.2%) showed a complete loss of at the least one MMR protein. Alteration of MSH2 expression was found in 55.8%, MSH6 in 46.5%, PMS2 in 34.9%, and MLH1 in 30.2%. Alteration of MMR protein expression was statistically more frequent in anaplastic gliomas, in recurrent disease, in patients treated with temozolomide, and in IDH-mut gliomas. Immunohistochemical loss of MMR proteins was not associated with survival, adjusting for clinically relevant confounders. CONCLUSIONS: MMR protein expression status did not affect survival in HGG patients. We identified clinical and molecular characteristics correlating with immunohistochemical loss of MMR proteins expression. A large study should be performed to analyze its predictive role of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in these subgroups of patients.

Regorafenib compared with lomustine in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (REGOMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is a highly vascularised tumour and there are few treatment options after disease recurrence. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal, and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: REGOMA is a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial done in ten centres in Italy. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed glioblastoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and documented disease progression after surgery followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based system, stratified by centre and surgery at recurrence (yes vs no), to receive regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle or lomustine 110 mg/m2 once every 6 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02926222, and is currently in follow-up. FINDINGS: Between Nov 27, 2015, and Feb 23, 2017, 124 patients were screened and 119 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive regorafenib (n=59) or lomustine (n=60). Median follow-up was 15·4 months (IQR 13·8-18·1). At the analysis cutoff date, 99 (83%) of 119 patients had died: 42 (71%) of 59 in the regorafenib group and 57 (95%) of 60 in the lomustine group. Overall survival was significantly improved in the regorafenib group compared with the lomustine group, with a median overall survival of 7·4 months (95% CI 5·8-12·0) in the regorafenib group and 5·6 months (4·7-7·3) in the lomustine group (hazard ratio 0·50, 95% CI 0·33-0·75; log-rank p=0·0009). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33 (56%) of 59 patients treated with regorafenib and 24 (40%) of 60 with lomustine. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to regorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction, increased lipase, and blood bilirubin increased (in six [10%] of 59 patients each). In the lomustine group, the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased platelet count (eight [13%] of 60 patients), decreased lymphocyte count (eight [13%]), and neutropenia (seven [12%]). No death was considered by the investigators to be drug related. INTERPRETATION: REGOMA showed an encouraging overall survival benefit of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma. This drug might be a new potential treatment for these patients and should be investigated in an adequately powered phase 3 study. FUNDING: Veneto Institute of Oncology and Bayer Italy.

A Randomized Phase II Trial (TAMIGA) Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Bevacizumab Through Multiple Lines of Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) through multiple lines in patients with recurrent glioblastoma who had progressed after first-line treatment with radiotherapy, temozolomide, and BEV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TAMIGA (NCT01860638) was a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in adult patients with glioblastoma. Following surgery, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received first-line treatment consisting of radiotherapy plus temozolomide and BEV, followed by six cycles of temozolomide and BEV, then BEV monotherapy until disease progression (PD1). Randomization occurred at PD1 (second line), and patients received lomustine (CCNU) plus BEV (CCNU + BEV) or CCNU plus placebo (CCNU + placebo) until further disease progression (PD2). At PD2 (third line), patients continued BEV or placebo with chemotherapy (investigator's choice). The primary endpoint was survival from randomization. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival in the second and third lines (PFS2 and PFS3) and safety. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients enrolled, 123 were randomized at PD1 (CCNU + BEV, n = 61; CCNU + placebo, n = 62). The study was terminated prematurely because of the high drop-out rate during first-line treatment, implying underpowered inferential testing. The proportion of patients receiving corticosteroids at randomization was similar (BEV 33%, placebo 31%). For the CCNU + BEV and CCNU + placebo groups, respectively, median survival from randomization was 6.4 versus 5.5 months (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.59), median PFS2 was 2.3 versus 1.8 months (stratified HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.48-1.00), median PFS3 was 2.0 versus 2.2 months (stratified HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.37-1.33), and median time from randomization to a deterioration in health-related quality of life was 1.4 versus 1.3 months (stratified HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-1.12). The incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 4 adverse events was 19% (CCNU + BEV) versus 15% (CCNU + placebo). CONCLUSION: There was no survival benefit and no detriment observed with continuing BEV through multiple lines in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previous research suggested that there may be value in continuing bevacizumab (BEV) beyond progression through multiple lines of therapy. No survival benefit was observed with the use of BEV through multiple lines in patients with glioblastoma who had progressed after first-line treatment (radiotherapy + temozolomide + BEV). No new safety concerns arose from the use of BEV through multiple lines of therapy.

Temozolomide cytoreductive treatment in a giant cabergoline-resistant prolactin-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor.

Dopamine agonists (DAs, especially cabergoline) are recommended as first-line treatment in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas, to reduce hormone secretion and tumor size. Pituitary surgery, suggested in nonresponsive patients, cannot achieve a gross total resection or is not feasible in some cases. Temozolomide (TMZ) has been proposed in patients with aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) who do not respond to conventional treatments. We present a 47-year-old man with a giant (70×51×64 mm) prolactin-secreting PitNET. Cabergoline treatment (at first 1.5 mg/week, and then increased to 3.5 mg/week after 3 months) achieved prolactin suppression; however, magnetic resonance revealed a stable mass. After explanation of surgical complications, the patient rejected the procedure. Therefore, a primary neoadjuvant cytoreductive TMZ treatment was discussed during a meeting of the Pituitary Multidisciplinary Team, and added to cabergoline. After 13 cycles of TMZ (1 year of treatment), we observed dramatic reduction of the PitNET (from 18 cm of adenoma to 6 cm of necrotic tissue). MRI performed 4, 12, and 18 months after TMZ discontinuation revealed a stable residual PitNET, and 1.5 mg/week of cabergoline has been continued until today. Recently, the criteria for developing Pituitary Tumors Centers of Excellence have been proposed, indicating that a multidisciplinary team is the best care for patients. Surgery, rejected by the patient, could only achieve a partial resection; therefore, we decided to combine TMZ and cabergoline. An early initiation of TMZ could be considered in selected cases, especially when surgery could be only partially effective.

A multicenter real-world study of bevacizumab in heavily pretreated malignant gliomas: clinical benefit is a plausible end point?

Aim: This multicenter, retrospective study evaluates the clinical benefit (CB) of bevacizumab, alone or in combination, in recurrent gliomas (RG). Patients & methods: The CB was measured as a reduction of corticosteroid dosage and an improvement ≥20 points in the Karnofsky Performance Status lasting ≥3 months. Results: We collected data of 197 RG patients. A CB was observed in 120, patients without significant differences between patients treated with bevacizumab alone or in combination. The rate of patients who achieved a CB and free from progression at 1 year was 21.5 versus 1.4% in patients who did not report CB. Conclusion: The majority of RG patients treated with bevacizumab reported CB. Moreover, patients with CB showed improved survival.

Conventional brain MRI features distinguishing limbic encephalitis from mesial temporal glioma.

PURPOSE: Radiological hallmark of autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE) is a hyperintense signal in MRI T2-weighted images of mesial temporal structures. We aimed to identify conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features that can help distinguish LE from temporal glioma. METHODS: Brain MRIs of 25 patients affected by antibody-positive autoimmune LE, 24 patients affected by temporal glioma (tumor group), and 5 negative controls were retrospectively blindly evaluated in random order. RESULTS: Ten brain MRIs from the LE group were correctly recognized; one additional patient with mesial temporal hyperintensity with anti-AK5 abs LE was wrongly diagnosed as having a tumor. The brain MRIs of the remaining 14 of the 25 patients with LE were judged negative or, in three cases, showed features not typical for LE. In the tumor group, all MRIs showed pathological alterations diagnosed as tumors in 22/24 cases and as LE in two (2/22, 9%). Unilateral lesions were more common in tumors than in neuroradiologically abnormal LE (96% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). T2/FLAIR hyperintensity of the parahippocampal gyrus was associated more with tumor than with LE (71% vs. 18%) (p = 0,009), as T2/FLAIR hyperintensity of extralimbic structures (p = 0.015), edema (p = 0.041), and mass effect (p = 0.015). Maintenance of gray/white matter distinction was strongly associated with LE (91% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Conventional brain MRI is a fundamental tool in the differential diagnosis between LE and glioma. Bilateral involvement and maintenance of gray/white matter distinction at the cortical/subcortical interface are highly suggestive of LE.