RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tracheobronchial tuberculosis (TBTB) is a common subtype of pulmonary tuberculosis. Concomitant diseases often obscure the diagnosis of senile TBTB. AIM: To characterize senile patients with TBTB and to identify the potential causes of misdiagnosis. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients with senile TBTB who were admitted to the Anhui Chest hospital between May 2017 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as diagnosed group (n = 58) and misdiagnosed group (n = 62). Clinical manifestations, laboratory results, radiographic data, and endoscopic findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in the misdiagnosed group were most commonly diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis (non-TBTB, 29/62, 46.8%), general pneumonia (9/62, 14.5%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8/62, 12.9%), and tracheobronchial carcinoma (7/62, 11.3%). The time elapsed between disease onset and confirmation of diagnosis was significantly longer in the misdiagnosed group [median (first quartile, third quartile): 6.32 (4.94, 16.02) mo vs 3.73 (2.37, 8.52) mo]. The misdiagnosed group had lower proportion of patients who underwent bronchoscopy [33.87% (21/62) vs 87.93% (51/58)], chest computed tomography (CT) scan [69.35% (43/62) vs 98.28% (57/58)], and those who showed CT signs of tuberculosis [27.91% (12/62) vs 50% (29/58)] as compared to that in the diagnosed group (P < 0.05). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to age, gender, occupation, clinical manifestations, or prevalence of comorbid chronic diseases (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Insufficient or inaccurate radiographic or bronchoscopic assessment was the predominant cause of delayed diagnosis of TBTB. Increased implementation and better interpretation of CT scan and early implementation of bronchoscopy can help reduce misdiagnosis of senile TBTB.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) L1 capsid protein detection in cervical exfoliated cells as a proper triage for women with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) genotypes other than HPV 16/18. STUDY DESIGN: From January 2013 to June 2015, a total of 513 women aged 30-65 years infected with non-16/18 hrHPV were enrolled into the study. Primary HPV testing, HPV 16/18 genotyping and Papanicolaou (Pap) test were performed in all eligible women. HPV L1 capsid protein was detected by immunocytochemistry in cervical exfoliated cells. All hrHPV positive women underwent colposcopy and further biopsy if indicated. Relationships between HPV L1 capsid protein expression and histologic diagnosis, as well as cytology were analyzed. RESULTS: The positive expression rate of HPV L1 capsid protein in CIN2+ group was significantly lower than that in CIN1 or better group (16.3% vs. 66.7%, P=0.000). Compared with the Pap test, HPV L1 detection achieved higher sensitivity (83.7% vs. 51.2%, P=0.000), higher negative predictive value (NPV) (95.3% vs. 88.6%, P=0.002), and significant lower specificity (66.7% vs.76.1%, P=0.002) while identifying CIN2+. Compared with the Pap test, HPV L1 detection achieved higher sensitivity (89.7% vs. 51.7%, P=0.008), higher NPV (99.0% vs. 96.2%, P=0.043), and significant lower specificity (61.2% vs.73.8%, P=0.000) while identifying CIN3+. CONCLUSION: Because of its higher sensitivity and NPV than that of Pap test, HPV L1 capsid protein detection in cervical exfoliated cells reduces the missed identification of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women with hrHPV genotypes other than HPV 16/18. HPV L1 capsid protein detection could be a potential triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV infection.