Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Diabetologia ; 60(1): 43-49, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27704166

RESUMO

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: GAD is a major target of the autoimmune response that occurs in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Randomised controlled clinical trials of a GAD + alum vaccine in human participants have so far given conflicting results. METHODS: In this study, we sought to see whether a clearer answer to the question of whether GAD65 has an effect on C-peptide could be reached by combining individual-level data from the randomised controlled trials using Bayesian meta-analysis to estimate the probability of a positive biological effect (a reduction in C-peptide loss compared with placebo approximately 1 year after the GAD vaccine). RESULTS: We estimate that there is a 98% probability that 20 µg GAD with alum administered twice yields a positive biological effect. The effect is probably a 15-20% reduction in the loss of C-peptide at approximately 1 year after treatment. This translates to an annual expected loss of between -0.250 and -0.235 pmol/ml in treated patients compared with an expected 2 h AUC loss of -0.294 pmol/ml at 1 year for untreated newly diagnosed patients. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The biological effect of this vaccination should be developed further in order to reach clinically desirable reductions in insulin loss in patients recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Glutamato Descarboxilase/imunologia , Insulina/metabolismo , Vacinas/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Teorema de Bayes , Criança , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 70(6): 835-839, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28811121

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We characterize emergency department (ED) utilization among perinatal women and identify differences in risk factors and outcomes between women who use versus do not use the ED during the perinatal period. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study comparing patients who used the ED versus did not use the ED during the perinatal period. Patient data were collected from medical chart review and postpartum interviews. RESULTS: Of the 678 participants, 218 (33%) had at least 1 perinatal ED visit. Women who used the ED were more likely than those who did not to be adolescent (relative risk [RR] 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38 to 3.63), of minority race (RR 1.94; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.57), and Medicaid insured (RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.71 to 2.67). They were more likely to smoke prenatally (RR 3.42; 95% CI 2.34 to 4.99), to use recreational drugs prenatally (RR 3.53; 95% CI 1.78 to 7.03), and to have experienced domestic abuse (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.83). They were more likely to have delayed entry to prenatal care (RR 2.01; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.77) and to experience postpartum depression (RR 2.97; 95% CI 1.90 to 4.64). Their infants were nearly twice as likely to be born prematurely (RR 1.92; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.47). CONCLUSION: Results highlight that pregnant patients using the ED are a high-risk, vulnerable population. Routine ED screening and linkage of this vulnerable population to early prenatal care and psychosocial interventions should be considered as a public health strategy worth investigating.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perinatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos Transversais , Violência Doméstica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am J Prev Med ; 58(1): 1-11, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31761513

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Preconception and interconception health care are critical means of identifying, managing, and treating risk factors originating before pregnancy that can harm fetal development and maternal health. However, many women in the U.S. lack health insurance, limiting their ability to access such care. State-level variation in Medicaid eligibility, particularly before and after the 2014 Medicaid expansions, offers a unique opportunity to test the hypothesis that increasing healthcare coverage for low-income women can improve preconception and interconception healthcare access and utilization, chronic disease management, overall health, and health behaviors. METHODS: In 2018-2019, data on 58,365 low-income women aged 18-44 years from the 2011-2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were analyzed, and a difference-in-difference analysis was used to examine the impact of Medicaid expansions on preconception health. RESULTS: Expanded Medicaid eligibility was associated with increased healthcare coverage and utilization, better self-rated health, and decreases in avoidance of care because of cost, heavy drinking, and binge drinking. Medicaid eligibility did not impact diagnoses of chronic conditions, smoking cessation, or BMI. Medicaid eligibility was associated with greater gains in health insurance, utilization, and health among married (vs unmarried) women. Conversely, women with any (vs no) dependent children experienced smaller gains in insurance following the Medicaid expansion, but greater take-up of insurance when eligibility increased and larger behavioral responses to gaining insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Expanded Medicaid coverage may improve access to and utilization of health care among women of reproductive age, which could ultimately improve preconception health.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Reprodutiva , Saúde da Mulher/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Definição da Elegibilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Acad Forensic Pathol ; 7(1): 99-111, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31239962

RESUMO

From 2000 to 2014, drug overdose deaths increased 137% in the United States, and 61% of these deaths included some form of opiate. The vast majority of opiate-related drug fatalities include multiple drugs, although there is scant data quantitatively describing the exact drugs that contribute to deaths due to multiple drugs. In the present study, we sought to quantitatively identify the drugs that occur with opiates in accidental multidrug-related fatalities. We retrospectively explored fatal drug trends in four Michigan counties, with a focus on profiling drugs present concurrently with opiates. Blood and urine toxicology reports for mixed drug fatalities (N=180) were analyzed using frequent item analysis approaches to identify common analyte trends in opiate-related fatalities. Within our cohort, the most prevalent serum analytes included caffeine (n=147), morphine (n=90), alprazolam (n=69), gabapentin (n=46), and tetrahydrocannabinol (n=44). In 100% of cases where gabapentin was present (n=46), an opiate was also present in the serum or urine. The average gabapentin serum concentration was 13.56 µg/mL (SEM =0.33 µg/mL), with a range of 0.5-88.7 µg/mL. Gabapentin was found at very high frequency in accidental mixed drug fatalities. Gabapentin concentrations were generally within the normal therapeutic range (2-20 µg/mL). It is unknown whether a synergistic effect with opioids may contribute to central respiratory depression. Further research is warranted to determine any contributory role of gabapentin in these deaths. Confirmed interactions could have broad implications for future reporting by forensic pathologists as well as prescribing practices by clinicians.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA