Evaluation of an IgM/IgG sensitive enzyme immunoassay and the utility of index values for the screening of syphilis infection in a high-risk population.

BACKGROUND: Increasing interest in the use of enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for syphilis screening has generated a considerable need for data on the performance of such tests. METHODS: We compared the performance of 1 EIA, the TREP-SURE EIA to that of the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA) in the detection of infection with Treponema pallidum. In total, 674 specimens were tested by VDRL and EIA (356 VDRL-nonreactive and 318 VDRL-reactive). All specimens that were found to be reactive by either the VDRL or EIA were subsequently analyzed by TPPA. RESULTS: We found that the TREP-SURE EIA was marginally less sensitive than the VDRL test for screening, but was significantly more specific. All EIA-TPPA discordant specimens were analyzed by multiple tests, including Immunoglobulin M- and G-specific Western blots and an IgM-specific EIA. Signal-to-cutoff ratios (index values) generated by the TREP-SURE EIA were also investigated. It was found that these values may be instructive regarding the interpretation of test results, as they were found to correlate strongly with the probability of positivity on a TPPA assay. Specimens that reacted positively on the EIA with very high index values were found overwhelmingly to be reactive by TPPA, perhaps obviating the need for the testing of most EIA positive specimens with a secondary treponemal test. CONCLUSIONS: An IgM/IgG sensitive EIA would be an effective alternative to VDRL for syphilis screening. Using the EIA index values may provide additional, helpful information to the diagnostic process.

The Multispot rapid HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation assay is comparable with the Western blot and an immunofluorescence assay at confirming HIV infection in a prospective study in three regions of the United States.

BACKGROUND: A new HIV diagnostic algorithm has been proposed which replaces the use of the HIV-1 Western blot and HIV-1 immunofluorescence assays (IFA) as the supplemental test with an HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation assay. OBJECTIVES: To compare an FDA-approved HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation test (Multispot) as a confirmatory test with the HIV-1 Western blot and IFA. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were screened with an HIV-1/HIV-2 combination Antigen/Antibody (Ag/Ab) screening assay. Specimens with repeatedly reactive results were tested with Multispot and either Western blot or IFA. Specimens with discordant screening and confirmatory results were resolved with HIV-1 RNA testing. RESULTS: Individuals (37,876) were screened for HIV infection and 654 (1.7%) had a repeatedly reactive Ag/Ab assay result. On Multispot, 554 (84.7%) were HIV-1 reactive, 0 (0%) were HIV-2 reactive, 1 (0.2%) was reactive for both HIV-1 and HIV-2 (undifferentiated), 9 (1.4%) were HIV-1 indeterminate, and 90 (13.8%) were non-reactive. HIV-1 RNA was detected in 47/90 Multispot non-reactive (52.2%) specimens. Among specimens confirmed to have HIV infection (true positives), Multispot and Western blot detected HIV-1 antibody in a similar proportion of cases (93.7% vs. 94.4% respectively) while Multispot and IFA also detected HIV-1 antibody in a similar proportion of cases (84.5% vs. 83.4% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, Multispot confirmed HIV infections at a similar proportion to Western blot and IFA. Multispot, Western blot, and IFA, however, did not confirm all of the reactive Ag/Ab assay results and underscores the importance of HIV NAT testing to resolve discordant screening and confirmatory results.