Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 113(8): 597-601, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33256419

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: the current indicated first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the quadruple therapy with bismuth (Pylera®), or the quadruple concomitant therapy without bismuth. The triple therapy was abandoned due to its low eradication rates, partly derived from an increase in antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to compare the H. pylori eradication rates guided by antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) versus Pylera®. METHODS: a specimen was taken prospectively for culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) from all patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection using gastroscopy, and they were randomized to receive triple therapy depending on the results of the AST, or quadruple therapy with Pylera®. The eradication rates of both groups were analyzed using fecal antigen. The adherence and side effects of the treatment were also analyzed. RESULTS: of the 108 patients with H. pylori infection, 55 received Pylera® and 53 AST-guided triple therapy. The eradication rates were 92.7 % with Pylera® and 90.6 % in the AST-guided group, and the difference was statistically significant. There were also no differences found in adherence or side effects. CONCLUSIONS: the treatment of H. pylori with AST-guided triple therapy is effective, especially in regions with high rates of antibiotic resistance.


Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Tetraciclina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 110(4): 237-239, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29578350

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: deep sedation with propofol monitored by an endoscopist in different endoscopy units is a controversial subject and the source of conflicts of interest between the various scientific societies of Anesthesiology and Gastroenterology. Many studies have already demonstrated the efficacy, efficiency and low incidence of complications associated with sedation when under the control of a trained endoscopist vs an anesthesiologist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: the rate of severe cardiorespiratory complications during various endoscopic examinations (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] and endoscopic ultrasound [EUS]) where sedation was controlled by an endoscopist within our unit, from 2011 to 2016, was reviewed. RESULTS: during the study period, 33,195 examinations were analyzed. The rate of cardiorespiratory complications was 0.13% and the majority were severe desaturations. Most cases responded to an opening in the airway associated with the interruption of drug infusion and an ambu bag was required in a few cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the different groups, except for mean age, risk by type of examination and ASA risk, where the difference between ERCP and the rest of examinations was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: there is a high level of evidence in the scientific literature suggesting that sedation controlled by a trained endoscopist is safe, effective and efficient. However, further prospective studies are required in order to confirm this conclusion due to the fact that the majority of studies to date are retrospective.


Assuntos
Sedação Consciente/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Cardiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Respiratórios/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Feminino , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Fisiológica , Transtornos Respiratórios/epidemiologia , Transtornos Respiratórios/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 40(2): 80-84, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27184555

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic treatment of Zenker diverticulum is considered feasible, effective and safe. The use of the Ligasure™ vessel sealer provides adequate and quick dissection of tissue, achieving effective haemostasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive study of all patients with Zenker diverticulum who were treated by endoscopic diverticulotomy using Ligasure™. The procedure was performed in the endoscopy unit under deep sedation controlled by the endoscopist. Patients were subsequently admitted for observation and, after discharge, were followed-up in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Eight patients, 5 women and 3 men, mean age 78±15 years, 25% ASA I, 36% ASA II, 14% ASA III and 25% ASA IV. Main symptom: dysphagia. Diverticula size: 1-7cm. Technical success: 100%. COMPLICATIONS: one patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Average stay: 24h. Seven patients: asymptomatic; one patient with partial improvement, requiring repeat endoscopic intervention. Surgery and morbidity and mortality: 0%. CONCLUSION: The treatment of Zenker diverticulum by endoscopic diverticulotomy using the Ligasure™ vessel sealer is highly effective, fast and safe, and could be considered the treatment of choice.


Assuntos
Eletrocirurgia , Divertículo de Zenker/cirurgia , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA