Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Heart J ; 253: 53-58, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35850242

RESUMO

This was a head-to-head comparative study on different electrocardiogram (ECG)-based smartwatches and devices for atrial fibrillation detection. We prospectively included 220 patients scheduled for electrical cardioversion and recorded ECGs with 3 different devices (Withings Move ECG, Apple Watch 5, Kardia Mobile 6-leads) as well as the standard 12-lead ECG (gold standard), both before and after cardioversion. All atrial fibrillation detection algorithms had high accuracy (sensitivity and specificity: 91-99%) but were hampered by uninterpretable recordings (20-24%). In cardiologists' interpretation, the 6-lead device was superior (sensitivity 99%, specificity 97%) to both single-lead smartwatches (P < .05) for atrial fibrillation detection.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Algoritmos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Cardioversão Elétrica , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA