Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Wound J ; 19(4): 871-887, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34713964

RESUMO

A growing number of studies report dermal malignancies mimicking diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). We reviewed clinical cases reporting malignant tumours misdiagnosed to be DFU aiming to identify factors contributing to misdiagnosis. We systematically searched in PubMed for clinical cases reporting on misdiagnosis of DFU in patients with cancer. A chi-square analysis was conducted to show the link between the incidence of initial DFU misdiagnosis and patient age, gender and wound duration. Lesions misdiagnosed to be DFU were subsequently diagnosed as melanoma (68% of the cases), Kaposi's sarcoma (14%), squamous cell carcinoma (11%), mantle cell lymphoma, and diffuse B-cell lymphoma (both by 4%). Older age (≥65 years) was associated with a significantly increased risk of malignancy masked as DFU (OR: 2.452; 95% CI: 1.132 to 5.312; P value = .019). The risk of such suspicion in older patients (age ≥ 65 years) was 145% higher than in younger patients (age < 65 years). Clinicians should maintain a high level of awareness towards potentially malignant foot lesions in elderly patients with diabetes (age ≥ 65).


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Pé Diabético , Úlcera do Pé , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Adulto , Idoso , Pé Diabético/complicações , Erros de Diagnóstico , , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Cutâneas/complicações , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico
2.
Endocrine ; 2024 Jul 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39017835

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most severe complications of type 2 diabetes, which is manifested in chronic skin ulcers of lower extremities. DFU treatment remains complex and expensive despite the availability of well-established protocols. Early prediction of potential DFU development at the onset of type 2 diabetes can greatly improve the aftermath of this complication. METHODS: To assess potential genetic markers for DFU, a group of diabetic patients from Moscow region with and without DFU was genotyped for a number of SNPs previously reported to be associated with the DFU. RESULTS: Obtained results did not confirm previously claimed association of rs1024611, rs3918242, rs2073618, rs1800629, rs4986790, rs179998, rs1963645 and rs11549465 (respectively, in MCP1, MMP9, TNFRSF11B, TNFα, TLR4, eNOS, NOS1AP and HIF1α genes) with the DFU. Surprisingly, the t allele of rs7903146 in the TCF7l2 gene known as one of the most prominent risk factors for type 2 diabetes has shown a protective effect on DFU with OR(95%) = 0.68(0.48-0.96). CONCLUSION: Non-replication of previously published SNP associations with DFU suggests that the role of genetic factors in the DFU onset is either highly variable in different populations or is not as significant as the role of non-genetic factors.

3.
Bioimpacts ; 12(1): 51-55, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35087716

RESUMO

Introduction: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) administration is an effective option for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). However, to date, studies assessing long-term outcomes and evaluating skin parameters after cell-based therapy are lacking. We presented the clinical outcomes of 3 patients, treated for DFUs with the bone marrow MSCs 3 years earlier. Methods: Ultrasound examination was used to compare collagen density and epidermal thickness in areas of healed ulcers in comparison with non-affected skin used as a control. Ultrasound and dermatoscopy were used to exclude neoplasm formation, to assess scar contracture and wound recurrence. Results: In all patients, no ulcer recurrence was detected, which was lower than the expected 60% rate of re-ulceration in diabetic patients in a 3-year period (OD [odds ratio] = 0.095, P = 0.12). No neoplasm formation, no contracture of hypertrophic scar, and adjacent tissue were registered. Collagen ultrasound density was decreased by 57% (P = 0.053) and epidermal thickness was increased by 72% (P = 0.01) in the area of healed ulcers in all patients. Conclusion: MSCs therapy alone did not result in the complete restoration of the skin parameters within a 3-year period. MSCs may represent important adjuvant to the therapy, however, other novel approaches are required to achieve better results.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA