Defining Benchmarks for Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: A Multicentre Analysis of Patients with Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To establish globally applicable benchmark outcomes for pelvic exenteration (PE) in patients with locally advanced primary (LARC) and recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), using outcomes achieved at highly specialised centres. BACKGROUND DATA: PE is established as the standard of care for selected patients with LARC and LRRC. There are currently no available benchmarks against which surgical performance in PE can be compared for audit and quality improvement. METHODS: This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing PE for LARC or LRRC at 16 highly experienced centres between 2018 and 2023. Ten outcome benchmarks were established in a lower-risk subgroup. Benchmarks were defined by the 75th percentile of the results achieved at the individual centres. RESULTS: 763 patients underwent PE, of which 464 patients (61%) had LARC and 299 (39%) had LRRC. 544 patients (71%) who met predefined lower risk criteria formed the benchmark cohort. For LARC patients, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤44%; comprehensive complication index (CCI): ≤30.2; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤4.3%; R0 resection rate: ≥79%. For LRRC patients, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤53%; CCI: ≤34.1; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤6%; R0 resection rate: ≥77%. CONCLUSIONS: The reported benchmarks for PE in patients with LARC and LRRC represent the best available care for this patient group globally and can be used for rigorous assessment of surgical quality and to facilitate quality improvement initiatives at international exenteration centres.

Unfolding the Art of Methodical Approach for Total Sacrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Total sacrectomy is a technically demanding surgery with substantial risks, including high morbidity and mortality due to the likelihood of exsanguination.1-3 Despite the evolution of surgical techniques,4,5 the incidence of postoperative complications remains significant.1 This study presents a systematic approach to total sacrectomy, with a particular focus on a modified technique for isolating the iliac vessels, aimed at effective management of complex sacrococcygeal masses and the reduction of operative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Employing our approach, a 45-year-old male patient presenting with a sacrococcygeal mass involving the lower S1 bone and sacroiliac joint underwent total sacrectomy. A meticulous preoperative workup, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was followed by precise surgical steps: sigmoid colon and rectal mobilization, isolation of the iliac vessels,2,6 lumbosacral nerve trunk preservation, and strategic anterior and posterior osteotomies. The procedure concluded with reconstruction using mesorectal fat and bilateral gluteus maximus flaps.5-7 RESULTS: The patient's operation was conducted successfully without any perioperative complications, culminating in a chordoma resection with clear margins. Postoperative recovery was swift, allowing for discharge on the seventh day. CONCLUSIONS: The application of our systematic sacrectomy method, with particular emphasis on the isolation of the external iliac veins, significantly minimized intraoperative bleeding risks and other perioperative complications. Our technique offers a reproducible and effective strategy for the surgical management of sacrococcygeal masses.

Superior Mesenteric Vein-First Approach for Robotic Salvage Surgery with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography.

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate lymphadenectomy is still a major concern in colon cancer surgery. The superior mesenteric vein (SMV)-first approach is a novel, standardized, reproducible method for robotic complete mesocolic excision surgery. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to present the application of the SMV-first approach principles to facilitate robotic salvage surgery for recurrent disease within the mesocolon. METHODS: A 78-year-old female presented with a malignant lymph node deposit within residual right mesocolonic tissue, approximately 3 months following a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Dissection was initiated with a transverse curvilinear incision along the inferior aspect of the remaining ileocolic pedicle to identify the SMV. Dissection continued along the ventral aspect of the SMV in a cephalad direction to identify and expose the middle colic vessels at their origin. The use of idocyanine green (ICG) confirmed the vascular anatomy, demonstrating the right branch of the middle colic artery traversing the malignant deposit in the residual mesocolon. Following ligation at the origin of the right branch of the middle colic and ileocolic vessels, the retro-mesocolic plane dissection was completed to excise the malignant deposit and the residual mesocolon. RESULTS: The patient was discharged home the following day. The pathological specimen confirmed metastatic poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in one of nine lymph nodes, and the vascular pedicle resection margin was negative for tumor. CONCLUSION: Following the SMV-first approach principles provides a safe plane for dissection, and, in conjunction with ICG, facilitates the delineation of the vascular anatomy, to enable robotic salvage surgery to be performed.1-3.

The Pelvis-First Approach for Robotic Proctectomy in Patients with Redundant Abdominal Colon.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is increasingly performed for low rectal cancer.1 A redundant sigmoid colon makes retraction and pelvic dissection challenging. We present a 'pelvis-first' approach to robotic proctectomy where pelvic dissection occurs prior to colonic mobilization. METHODS: A 26-year-old woman was diagnosed with a clinical T3N1 rectal adenocarcinoma at 3 cm from the anal verge. The patient had Lynch syndrome, with a germline mutation in the PMS2 gene. A near-complete clinical response was observed after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT), and the patient wished to delay surgery and permanent colostomy. Additional FOLFOX was administered and led to a complete clinical response. After 2.5 months of watchful delay of surgery, the tumor regrew, and the patient then underwent robotic abdominoperineal resection (APR). RESULTS: Initial exploration revealed a highly redundant sigmoid colon. A pelvis-first approach was undertaken. The colon was left tethered and outside of the pelvis during the pelvic dissection. The levator ani was divided transabdominally. Vascular dissection and left colon mobilization were completed after pelvic dissection.2 The specimen was removed transanally, obviating the need for abdominal incision. An end colostomy was created laparoscopically, and the perineum was closed primarily after omental flap. The patient recovered without complications. CONCLUSIONS: The 'pelvis-first' approach to proctectomy is advantageous for patients with a highly redundant sigmoid colon. Transabdominal division of the levator ani during APR ensures excellent circumferential margin. Although Lynch syndrome-associated rectal cancer can show excellent response to NCRT,3 patients undergoing watchful delay of surgery require close monitoring and prompt triggering of salvage proctectomy when tumor regrowth is observed.4,5.

Superior Mesenteric Vein-First Approach to Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colectomy: Technique and Preliminary Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: There is growing evidence supporting complete mesocolic excision as the optimal surgical approach for right-sided colon cancer to improve oncologic outcomes in comparison with conventional surgical resection. Although the feasibility of a minimally invasive approach to complete mesocolic excision has been reported, obesity has been associated with increased difficulty for finding the correct plane for dissection and delineating the vascular anatomy. We describe a novel approach with early identification of and dissection along the superior mesenteric vein during robotic complete mesocolic excision surgery, for all patients, regardless of BMI. TECHNIQUE: The dissection is initiated with identification of the superior mesenteric vein as the starting point. Then, the vascular dissection is performed along the anterior superior mesenteric vein plane while observing complete mesocolic excision principles. The anterior superior mesenteric vein plane is an optimal and safe dissection plane because there are no anterior tributaries. The ileocolic vein and artery are ligated separately at their junction with the superior mesenteric vein and superior mesenteric artery. The dissection is then continued cephalad along the superior mesenteric vein, identifying additional colic arteries, including the middle colic arterial trunk as well as the venous tributaries to the superior mesenteric vein such as the gastrocolic trunk. The superior right colic vein is then ligated at the gastrocolic confluence and the middle colic vessels are ligated. After the vascular dissection is completed, the colon is then mobilized. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients received the "superior mesenteric vein-first" approach for robotic colectomy between 2013 and 2018, including 40.9% patients with BMI >30 kg/m. Median lymph node yield was 32 (interquartile range, 25-40). The median distance to the high vascular tie was 12 cm (interquartile range, 7-19). Median estimated blood loss was 33 mL (interquartile range, 25-50). Overall rate of grade ≥3 complications was 3.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Using the superior mesenteric vein-first approach, robotic complete mesocolic excision for right colectomy can be performed on patients with high or low BMI with excellent short-term oncologic outcomes and acceptable morbidity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A960.

Who Should Get Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation?

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, lateral pelvic lymph node recurrence is still an important problem. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the indication for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in post neoadjuvant chemoradiation rectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected institutional database. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer center from January 2006 through December 2017. PATIENTS: Patients who had rectal cancer with suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was pathologic lateral pelvic lymph node positivity. INTERVENTIONS: The associations between lateral pelvic lymph node size on post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation imaging and pathologic lateral pelvic lymph node positivity and recurrence outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were analyzed. The mean lateral pelvic lymph node size before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation was 12.6 ± 9.5 mm and 8.5 ± 5.4 mm. The minimum size of positive lateral pelvic lymph node was 5 mm on post neoadjuvant chemoradiation imaging. Among 13 (20.3%) patients who had a <5 mm lateral pelvic lymph node after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, none were pathologically positive. Among 51 (79.7%) patients who had a ≥5 mm lateral pelvic lymph node after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 33 patients (64.7%) were pathologically positive. Five-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were higher in the histologic lateral pelvic lymph node negative group than in the lateral pelvic lymph node positive group (overall survival 79.6% vs 61.8%, p = 0.122; disease-specific survival 84.5% vs 66.2%, p= 0.088). After a median 39 months of follow-up, there were no patients in the <5 mm group who died of cancer. There were no lateral compartment recurrences in the entire cohort. LIMITATIONS: Being a single-center retrospective study may limit generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation lateral pelvic lymph node size ≥5 mm was strongly associated with pathologic positivity. No patients with size <5 mm had pathologically positive lymph nodes. Following lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, no patients with a positive lateral pelvic lymph node developed lateral compartment recurrence. Therefore, patients who have rectal cancer with clinical evidence of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation lateral pelvic lymph node size ≥5 mm should be considered for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of total mesorectal excision. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B3. ¿QUIéN DEBE RECIBIR LINFADENECTOMíA PéLVICA LATERAL DESPUéS DE LA QUIMIORRADIACIóN NEOADYUVANTE?: A pesar del uso de quimiorradiación neoadyuvante y la escisión total de mesorectao para el cáncer de recto, la recurrencia en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales sigue siendo un problema importante. OBJETIVO: Determinar la indicación para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en el cáncer rectal post quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. DISEÑO:: Análisis retrospectivo de la base de datos institucional prospectivamente recopilada. ESCENARIO: Centro de cáncer de atención terciaria, de enero de 2006 hasta diciembre de 2017. PACIENTES: Pacientes con cáncer de recto con sospecha de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales, que se sometieron a escisión total mesorectal con disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: Positividad de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en histopatología. INTERVENCIONES: Se evaluaron las asociaciones entre el tamaño de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en imagenología postquimiorradiación neoadyuvante y la positividad y recurrencia en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en histopatología. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron un total de 64 pacientes. La media del tamaño de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales antes y después de la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante fue de 12.6 ± 9.5 mm y 8.5 ± 5.4 mm, respectivamente. El tamaño mínimo de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales positivos fue de 5 mm en las imágenes postquimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Entre 13 (20.3%) pacientes que tenían <5 mm de ganglio linfático lateral pélvico después de la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante; ninguno fue positivo en histopatología. Entre 51 (79.7%) pacientes con ganglio linfático pélvico lateral ≥ 5 mm después de la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante; 33 pacientes (64.7%) fueron positivos en histopatología. La supervivencia general a 5 años y la supervivencia específica de la enfermedad fueron mayores en el grupo histológico de ganglio linfático pélvico lateral negativo que en el grupo de ganglio linfático pélvico lateral positivo (Supervivencia general 79.6% vs 61.8%, p = 0.122; Supervivencia específica de la enfermedad 84.5% vs 66.2%, p = 0.088). Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 39 meses, no hubo pacientes en el grupo de <5 mm que hayan fallecido por cáncer. No hubo recurrencias en el compartimento lateral en toda la cohorte. LIMITACIONES: Al ser un estudio retrospectivo en un solo centro puede limitar la generalización. CONCLUSIONES: El tamaño de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales postquimiorradiación neoadyuvante ≥ 5 mm se asoció fuertemente con la positividad histopatológica. Ningún paciente con tamaño <5 mm tuvo ganglios linfáticos histopatológicamente positivos. Después de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales, ningún paciente con ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales positivos desarrolló recurrencia del compartimiento lateral. Por lo tanto, los pacientes con cáncer rectal con evidencia clínica de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales y tamaño de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales postquimiorradiación neoadyuvante ≥ 5 mm deben considerarse para disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en el momento de la escisión total de mesorrecto. Vea el Abstract en video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B3.

Oncological Outcomes After Robotic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Analysis of a Prospective Database.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcomes of robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) at an NCI designated cancer center. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The effectiveness of laparoscopic TME could not be established, but the robotic-assisted approach may hold some promise, with improved visualization and ergonomics for pelvic dissection. Oncological outcome data is presently lacking. METHODS: Patients who underwent total mesorectal excision or tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between April 2009 and April 2016 via a robotic approach were identified from a prospective single-institution database. The circumferential resection margin (CRM), distal resection margin, and TME completeness rates were determined. Kaplan-Meier analysis of disease-free survival and overall survival was performed for all patients treated with curative intent. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients underwent robotic proctectomy during the study period. Robotic surgery was performed initially by 1 surgeon with 3 additional surgeons progressively transitioning from open to robotic during the study period with annual increase in the total number of cases performed robotically. Seven patients had involved circumferential resection margins (2.5%), and there were no positive distal or proximal resection margins. One hundred eighty-six patients had TME quality assessed, and only 1 patient (0.5%) had an incomplete TME. Eighty-three patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 years, with a local recurrence rate of 2.4%, and a distant recurrence rate of 16.9%. Five-year disease-free survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis was 82%, and 5-year overall survival was 87%. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer can be performed with good short and medium term oncological outcomes in selected patients.

Urgent Pelvic Exenteration: Should the Indication Be Extended?

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration carries significant risks of morbidity and mortality. Preoperative management is therefore crucial, and the exenteration procedure is usually performed in an elective setting. In cases of rectal cancer, however, tumor-related complications may cause a patient's condition to deteriorate rapidly, despite optimal management. Urgent pelvic exenteration then may be an option for these patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the outcomes of pelvic exenteration between the urgent and elective settings. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between February 2006 and June 2012. PATIENTS: Fifty-three patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer. They were assigned to urgent and elective setting groups according to their preoperative conditions. The urgent setting group included patients who required urgent pelvic exenteration because of intestinal obstruction, bowel perforation, bleeding, or uncontrolled sepsis, despite optimal management preoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Twenty-six patients were classified in the urgent setting group, and 27 were classified in the elective setting group. Three-year overall and disease-free survivals were compared between the 2 groups. Thirty-day postoperative morbidity and mortality were also studied. RESULTS: Three-year overall survival was 62.2% and 54.4% in the elective and urgent groups (p = 0.7), whereas three-year disease-free survival was 43% and 63.8% (p = 0.33). The median follow-up time was 33 months. Thirty-day morbidity did not differ between the 2 groups (p = 0.49). A low serum albumin level was a significant risk factor for complications. There was no postoperative mortality in this study. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study performed at 1 institution, and it lacked quality-of-life scores. CONCLUSION: Pelvic exenteration in an urgent setting is feasible and could offer acceptable outcomes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A591.

Three Different Approaches to the Inferior Mesenteric Artery during Robotic D3 Lymphadenectomy for Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In rectal cancer surgery, proximal ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) with radical lymphadenectomy is the accepted standard of care.1 Our purpose is to describe three different standardized technical approaches for the management of the IMA during D3 lymphadenectomy.2 METHODS: Operative videos of three robotic D3 lymphadenectomy procedures for rectal cancer were reviewed and annotated with schematic anatomical descriptions for clarification. RESULTS: There are three methods for the management of the IMA during D3 lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer. Standard high ligation is technically the simplest to perform and provides excellent mesenteric length but relies solely on marginal vessel blood supply from the middle colic artery.3 Low ligation with ascending left colic artery preservation is more complex technically but affords excellent vascular supply due to preservation of IMA blood flow, while potentially limiting mesenteric length.4 The central vascular sparing technique is the most complex to perform but allows excellent mesenteric length due to the presence of two separate points of mesenteric division, while also potentially improving blood supply due to decreased vascular resistance and improved collateralization. With each technique, central ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein above the splenic flexure tributary is performed to release the mesentery. CONCLUSIONS: The three methods to manage the IMA vary in their technical complexity, preservation of colonic conduit blood supply, and provision of mesenteric length, with associated advantages and disadvantages. The choice of technique is dependent on anatomical and oncological considerations.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for Fistula in Ano: Lessons Learned From a Decade of Experience.

BACKGROUND: Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract is a well-described sphincter-preserving technique for the management of fistula in ano. In 2007, we reported our early experience demonstrating a primary success rate of 94.4%. These findings have since been supported by several short-term studies, but long-term results and secondary cure rates after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract failure remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report a 10-year experience of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract with extended long-term follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of single-center data from May 2006 to October 2010 was performed. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. PATIENTS: All patients with primary or recurrent fistula in ano who underwent a ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were included. Patients with malignancy, incontinent patients, and patients with rectovaginal fistula were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healing as defined by the absence of symptoms with no visible external opening on clinical examination. Follow-up was continued until May 2016. RESULTS: In total, 251 patients were identified, with a primary healing rate of 87.65% at a median follow-up of 71 months. The healing rates for low transsphincteric, intersphincteric, high transsphincteric, semihorseshoe, and horseshoe fistulas were 92.1%, 85.2%, 60.0%, 89.0%, and 40.0%. Of the 42 patients who had an unhealed fistula after previous non-ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract surgery, 38 (90.48%) healed after the first attempt at ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. There were 31 patients with unhealed fistulas after the first ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. Of these, 3 healed spontaneously, and the rest underwent either repeat ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, fistulotomy (if the recurrence was intersphincteric), or simple curettage (if no internal opening was found). Ultimately, only 2 of the original 251 patients remained unhealed, and there was no change in subjective continence status after surgery. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract is an effective technique for the treatment of fistula in ano, including recurrent or unhealed fistula after other procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A387.

Identification of a novel gut microbiota signature associated with colorectal cancer in Thai population.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. Dysbiosis of human gut microbiota has been linked to sporadic CRC. This study aimed to compare the gut microbiota profiles of 80 Thai volunteers over 50 years of age among 25 CRC patients, 33 patients with adenomatous polyp, and 22 healthy controls. The 16S rRNA sequencing was utilized to characterize the gut microbiome in both mucosal tissue and stool samples. The results revealed that the luminal microbiota incompletely represented the intestinal bacteria at the mucus layer. The mucosal microbiota in beta diversity differed significantly among the three groups. The stepwise increase of Bacteroides and Parabacteroides according to the adenomas-carcinomas sequence was found. Moreover, linear discriminant analysis effect size showed a higher level of Erysipelatoclostridium ramosum (ER), an opportunistic pathogen in the immunocompromised host, in both sample types of CRC patients. These findings indicated that the imbalance of intestinal microorganisms might involve in CRC tumorigenesis. Additionally, absolute quantitation of bacterial burden by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) confirmed the increasing ER levels in both sample types of cancer cases. Using ER as a stool-based biomarker for CRC detection by qPCR could predict CRC in stool samples with a specificity of 72.7% and a sensitivity of 64.7%. These results suggested ER might be a potential noninvasive marker for CRC screening development. However, a larger sample size is required to validate this candidate biomarker in diagnosing CRC.