Identification and Management of Pelvic Fractures in Prehospital and Emergency Department Settings.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to describe the characteristics of patients with a pelvic fracture treated at a level 1 trauma center, the proportion of prehospital undertriage and the use of pelvic circumferential compression device (PCCD). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Prehospital and inhospital medical records of adults (≥16 y old) with a pelvic fracture who were treated at Hopital de l'Enfant-Jesus-CHU de Québec (Quebec City, Canada), a university-affiliated level 1 trauma center, between September 01, 2017 and September 01, 2021 were reviewed. Isolated hip or pubic ramus fracture were excluded. Data are presented using proportions and means with standard deviations. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were included (males: 62.3%; mean age: 54.6 [standard deviation 21.1]). Motor vehicle collision (47.4%) was the main mechanism of injury followed by high-level fall (21.5%). Approximately a third (34.2%) needed at least one blood transfusion. Compared to those admitted directly, transferred patients were more likely to be male (73.0% versus 51.3%, P < 0.001) and to have a surgical procedure performed at the trauma center (71.3% versus 46.9%, P < 0.001). The proportion of prehospital undertriage was 22.6%. Overall, 17.1% had an open-book fracture and would have potentially benefited from a prehospital PCCD. Forty-six transferred patients had a PCCD applied at the referral hospital of which 26.1% needed adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic fractures are challenging to identify in the prehospital environment and are associated with a high undertriage of 22.6%. Reducing undertriage and optimizing the use of PCCD are key opportunities to improve care of patients with a pelvic fracture.

Implementation of an audit and feedback module targeting low-value clinical practices in a provincial trauma quality assurance program: a cost-effectiveness study.

BACKGROUND: Audit and Feedback (A&F) interventions based on quality indicators have been shown to lead to significant improvements in compliance with evidence-based care including de-adoption of low-value practices (LVPs). Our primary aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding a hypothetical A&F module targeting LVPs for trauma admissions to an existing quality assurance intervention targeting high-value care and risk-adjusted outcomes. A secondary aim was to assess how certain A&F characteristics might influence its cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a probabilistic static decision analytic model in the Québec trauma care continuum. We considered the Québec Ministry of Health perspective. Our economic evaluation compared a hypothetical scenario in which the A&F module targeting LVPs is implemented in a Canadian provincial trauma quality assurance program to a status quo scenario in which the A&F module is not implemented. In scenarios analyses we assessed the impact of A&F characteristics on its cost-effectiveness. Results are presented in terms of incremental costs per LVP avoided. RESULTS: Results suggest that the implementation of A&F module (Cost = $1,480,850; Number of LVPs = 6,005) is associated with higher costs and higher effectiveness compared to status quo (Cost = $1,124,661; Number of LVPs = 8,228). The A&F module would cost $160 per LVP avoided compared to status quo. The A&F module becomes more cost-effective with the addition of facilitation visits; more frequent evaluation; and when only high-volume trauma centers are considered. CONCLUSION: A&F module targeting LVPs is associated with higher costs and higher effectiveness than status quo and has the potential to be cost-effective if the decision-makers' willingness-to-pay is at least $160 per LVP avoided. This likely represents an underestimate of true ICER due to underestimated costs or missed opportunity costs. Results suggest that virtual facilitation visits, frequent evaluation, and implementing the module in high-volume centers can improve cost-effectiveness.

Predictors of adverse outcomes in elders hospitalised for isolated orthopaedic trauma: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients >64 years of age now represent more than 51% of injury hospitalisations in Canada. The tools used to identify older patients who could benefit the most from an interdisciplinary approach include complex parameters difficult to collect in the ED, which suggests that better tools with higher accuracy and using items that can be derived from routinely collected data are needed. We aimed to identify variables that are associated with adverse outcomes in older patients admitted to a trauma centre for an isolated orthopaedic injury. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2019 on older patients hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of isolated orthopaedic injury (n=19 928). Data were extracted from the provincial trauma registry (Registre des traumatismes du Québec). We used multilevel logistic regression to estimate the associations between potential predictors and adverse outcomes (extended length of stay, mortality, complications, unplanned readmission and adverse discharge destination). RESULTS: Increasing age, male sex, specific comorbidities, type of orthopaedic injuries, increasing number of comorbidities, severe orthopaedic injury, head injuries and admission in the year before the injury were all significant predictors of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: We identified eight predictors of adverse outcomes in patients >64 years of age admitted to a trauma centre for orthopaedic injury. These variables could eventually be used to develop a clinical decision rule to identify elders who may benefit the most from interdisciplinary care.

A Canadian consensus-based list of urgent and specialized in-hospital trauma care interventions to assess the accuracy of prehospital trauma triage protocols: a modified Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Injury severity scales have traditionally been used to assess the performance of prehospital trauma triage protocols, but they correlate weakly with the urgent needs of specialized trauma care interventions. This study aimed to develop a list of in-hospital urgent and specialized trauma care interventions that require direct transport to the highest-level trauma centre within the catchment area. METHODS: Based on a list of potential participants we obtained using data on training, experience, geographic location, affiliations and role within key trauma organizations, we recruited multidisciplinary trauma experts (including prehospital, emergency, surgery and intensive care clinicians, epidemiologists and clinician/decision-makers) from across Canada to complete a 3-round modified Delphi survey. We conducted a literature review of the criteria used to define urgent and specialized trauma care, and included all diagnostic and therapeutic interventions presented in previously published studies in the list of interventions to present to the panellists. The final list was determined by our advisory committee, 5 clinicians with experience in trauma care. Participants were asked to rate their level of agreement for potentially including the 38 items as urgent and specialized trauma care interventions on a 9-point Likert scale. Interventions were retained if more than 67% of participants moderately or strongly agreed (7-9 on the Likert scale). Interventions that did not reach consensus were presented again in the subsequent round. RESULTS: Twenty-three panellists were recruited. The response rate was 91%, 96% and 83% for the 3 rounds. After the Delphi process, 30 of the 38 interventions, including endotracheal intubation, blood product administration and angioembolization, and abdominal, thoracic, neurosurgical, spinal and/or orthopedic operations (excluding hip or limb surgery, and toe or finger amputation), were selected. Hospital admission to the intensive care unit and/or for observation of brain, spinal, thoracic or abdominal injuries were also retained. CONCLUSION: We developed a Canadian consensus-based list of urgent and specialized in-hospital trauma care interventions requiring direct transportation to a major trauma centre. This list should help standardize assessments of current protocols and derive new triage tools.

Accuracy of Prehospital Trauma Triage to Select Older Adults Requiring Urgent and Specialized Trauma Care.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a 5-step prehospital trauma triage protocol to identify older adults who require urgent and specialized trauma care using different age cut-offs to define an older adult (≥55, ≥65, and ≥75 y old). METHODS: Prehospital and in-hospital medical records were reviewed for injured patients transported by an ambulance to an emergency department (ED) between November 11, 2016 and March 3, 2017 in Quebec City, Canada. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated to assess the accuracy of our prehospital trauma triage protocol to identify patients who required at least one urgent in-hospital trauma intervention. RESULTS: A total of 822 patients were included of which 62.9% were ≥55 y old and 56.3% were female. Fall (65.8%) was the main trauma mechanism. Seventy-six (9.2%) patients required urgent trauma care. This proportion was similar regardless of age (8.9%-9.5%). The proportion of patients who needed to be transported to the level-1 trauma center as per the triage protocol tended to decrease with increasing age (20.6% [whole cohort], 15.3% [≥55 y old], 11.4% [≥65 y old], and 9.0% [≥75 y old]). The sensitivity of the protocol for steps 1, 2, and 3 was 56.6% (whole cohort) and 30.0% for patients aged ≥75 y. The specificity ranged between 83.1% (whole cohort) and 93.1% (≥75 y old). CONCLUSIONS: Our prehospital trauma triage protocol has insufficient sensitivity to identify patients with urgent trauma care needs, particularly in older adults.

Trauma team leader and early mortality: An interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: The trauma team leader (TTL) is a "model" of a specifically dedicated team leader in the emergency department (ED), but its benefits are uncertain. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the TTL on 72-hour mortality. Secondary objectives included 24-hour mortality and admission delays from the ED. METHODS: Major trauma admissions (Injury Severity Score (ISS)≥12) in 3 Canadian Level-1 trauma centres were included from 2003 to 2017. The TTL program was implemented in centre 1 in 2005. An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was performed. Analyses account for the change in patient case-mix (age, sex, and ISS). The two other centres were used as control in sensitivity analyses RESULTS: Among 20,193 recorded trauma admissions, 71.7% (n=14,479) were males. The mean age was 53.5 ± 22.0 years. The median [IQR] ISS was 22 [16-26]. TTL implementation was not associated with a change in the quarterly trends of 72-hour or 24-hour mortality: adjusted estimates with 95% CI were 0.32 [-0.22;0.86] and -0.07 [-0.56;0.41] percentage-point change. Similar results were found for the proportions of patients admitted within 8 hours of ED arrival (0.36 [-1.47;2.18]). Sensitivity analyses using the two other centres as controls yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: TTL implementation was not associated with changes in mortality or admission delays from the ED. Future studies should assess the potential impact of TTL programs on other patient-centred outcomes using different quality of care indicators.

Predictors of neurosurgical intervention in complicated mild traumatic brain injury patients: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the predicting demographic, clinical and radiological factors for neurosurgical intervention in complicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients. METHODS: Design: retrospective multicenter cohort study. Participants: patients aged ≥16 presenting to all level-I trauma centers in Quebec between 09/2016 and 12/2017 with mTBI(GCS 13-15) and complication on initial head CT (intracranial hemorrhage/skull fracture). Procedure: Consecutive medical records were reviewed and separated into two groups: no neurosurgical intervention and neurosurgical intervention (NSI). Main outcome: neurosurgical intervention. Analysis: multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy-eight patients were included and 40 underwent NSI. One patient had radiological deterioration but no clinical deterioration prior to surgery. Subdural hemorrhage ≥4 mm width (OR:3.755 [95% CI:1.290-10.928]) and midline shift (OR:7.507 [95% CI: 3.317-16.989]) increased the risk of NSI. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was associated with a lower risk of NSI (OR:0.312 [95% CI: 0.136-0.713]). All other intracranial hemorrhages were not associated with NSI. CONCLUSION: Radiological deterioration was not associated with the incidence of NSI. Subdural hemorrhage and midline shift should be predicting factors for neurosurgery. Some patients with isolated findings such as subarachnoid hemorrhage could be safely managed in their original center without being transferred to a level-I trauma center.

A Delphi study to identify prehospital and emergency department trauma care modifiers for older adults.

Background: Older patients (age ≥ 65 yr) with trauma have increased morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients; this is partly explained by undertriage of older patients with trauma, resulting in lack of transfer to a trauma centre or failure to activate the trauma team. The objective of this study was to identify modifiers to the prehospital and emergency department phases of major trauma care for older adults based on expert consensus. Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi study between May and September 2019 to identify major trauma care modifiers for older adults based on national expert consensus. The panel consisted of 24 trauma care professionals from across Canada from the prehospital and emergency department phases of care. The survey consisted of 16 trauma care modifiers. Three online survey rounds were distributed. Consensus was defined a priori as a disagreement index score less than 1. Results: There was a 100% response rate for all survey rounds. Three new trauma care modifiers were suggested by panellists. The panel achieved consensus agreement for 17 of the 19 trauma care modifiers. The prehospital modifier with the strongest agreement to transfer to a trauma centre was a respiratory rate less than 10 or greater than 20 breaths/min or need for ventilatory support. The emergency department modifier with the strongest level of agreement was obtaining 12-lead electrocardiography following the primary and secondary survey. Conclusion: Using a modified Delphi process, an expert panel agreed on 17 trauma care modifiers for older adults in the prehospital and emergency department settings. These modifiers may improve the delivery of trauma care for older adults and should be considered when developing local and national trauma guidelines.

Contexte: Les polytraumatisés âgés (≥ 65 ans) sont exposés à un risque plus grand de morbidité et de mortalité comparativement aux jeunes polytraumatisés; cela s'explique en partie par un triage inadéquat des patients âgés victimes de traumatismes, qui fait en sorte qu'on ne les oriente pas vers un centre de traumatologie ou qu'on ne fait pas intervenir l'équipe de traumatologie. L'objectif de la présente étude était d'identifier les éléments de soins à modifier au stade préhospitalier et en médecine d'urgence lors de la prise en charge des cas de traumatismes graves chez les adultes âgés, sur la base d'un consensus d'experts. Méthodes: Nous avons procédé à une analyse Delphi modifiée entre mai et septembre 2019 pour recenser les éléments de soins à modifier chez les polytraumatisés âgés à partir d'un consensus national d'experts. Le panel d'experts se composait de 24 professionnels en traumatologie du Canada entier chargés des soins au stade préhospitalier et en médecine d'urgence. Le questionnaire portait sur 16 éléments à modifier en traumatologie. Trois questionnaires successifs ont été distribués en ligne. Le consensus était défini a priori par un indice de désaccord inférieur à 1. Résultats: Le taux de réponse a été de 100 % pour les 3 questionnaires. Les membres du comité ont suggéré 3 nouveaux éléments à modifier. Le comité est arrivé à un consensus pour 17 des éléments à modifier sur 19. L'élément préhospitalier ayant fait l'objet du plus solide consensus concernant le transfert vers un centre de traumatologie était une fréquence respiratoire inférieure à 10 ou supérieure à 20 respirations/minute ou la nécessité d'une assistance respiratoire. L'élément à modifier parmi les soins prodigués à l'urgence ayant fait l'objet du plus solide consensus après les 2 premiers questionnaires était l'obtention d'un électrocardiogramme à 12 dérivations. Conclusion: À l'aide d'une analyse Delphi modifiée, un comité d'expert s'est entendu sur 17 éléments de soins à modifier chez les polytraumatisés âgés au stade préhospitalier et en médecine d'urgence. Ces éléments pourraient améliorer les soins aux adultes âgés et méritent d'être pris en compte lors de la création de lignes directrices locales et nationales en traumatologie.

Who are the trauma team leaders across Canada? A national survey evaluating the profession in adult and pediatric level one trauma centres.

OBJECTIVES: Trauma Team Leaders (TTLs) are critical for coordinating and leading trauma resuscitations. This survey sought to characterize the demographics and professional practices of Canadian TTLs at level one trauma centres. As a secondary objective, this information will be utilized to inform the operational goals of the Trauma Association of Canada (TAC) TTL Committee. METHODS: A detailed survey, developed by the TAC board of directors and TTL committee leads, was sent to 225 TTLs across Canada's level one trauma centres. TTLs were identified via contacting trauma directors at each level one centre, in addition to public registry searches. This survey captured demographics, professional background, resuscitation practices, trauma team composition, and TTL involvement in trauma responses. RESULTS: The response rate was 41.7%. Mean respondent age was 42 (SD 7.4) and 71.0% were male. Most TTLs trained in emergency medicine (53.1%) or general surgery (25.5%); 63.8% underwent TTL training: either via a trauma surgery fellowship or TTL fellowship. All centres have a massive hemorrhage protocol implemented, and there is no large variation between the rates of use of cryoprecipitate and fibrinogen, nor the ratio of blood products transfused (2:1 vs 1:1). Most TTL respondents intend to participate in a TTL group associated with TAC (85.1%). CONCLUSION: The results of this survey will contribute to the recognition of TTLs as a crucial role in the initial phase of care of severely injured trauma patients and serves as the first publication to document professional backgrounds and practices of Canadian TTLs at level one trauma centres. All the information gathered via this survey will be used by the TAC TTL Committee, which will focus on several initiatives such as the dissemination of best practice guidelines and creation of a TTL stream at the TAC Annual Conference.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Les chefs d'équipe de traumatologie (TTL) sont essentiels pour coordonner et diriger les réanimations traumatiques. Cette enquête visait à caractériser la démographie et les pratiques professionnelles des TTL canadiens dans les centres de traumatologie de niveau 1. À titre d'objectif secondaire, cette information sera utilisée pour éclairer les objectifs opérationnels du Comité TTL de l'Association canadienne de traumatologie (ATC). MéTHODES: Un sondage détaillé, élaboré par le conseil d'administration de l'ATC et les responsables des comités de TTL, a été envoyé à 225 TTL dans les centres de traumatologie de niveau 1 du Canada. Les TTL ont été identifiés en contactant les directeurs de traumatologie de chaque centre de niveau 1, en plus des recherches dans le registre public. Cette enquête a porté sur la démographie, les antécédents professionnels, les pratiques de réanimation, la composition de l'équipe de traumatologie et la participation de la TTL aux réponses traumatologiques. RéSULTATS: Le taux de réponse était de 41,7 %. L'âge moyen des répondants était de 42 ans (ET 7,4) et 71,0 % étaient des hommes. La plupart des TTL ont suivi une formation en médecine d'urgence (53,1%) ou en chirurgie générale (25,5%); 63,8% ont suivi une formation TTL : soit via une bourse en chirurgie traumatologique ou une bourse TTL. Tous les centres ont mis en œuvre un protocole d'hémorragie massive, et il n'y a pas de grande variation entre les taux d'utilisation du cryoprécipité et du fibrinogène, ni entre le rapport des produits sanguins transfusés (2:1 vs 1:1). La plupart des répondants TTL ont l'intention de participer à un groupe TTL associé au TAC ( 85,1 %). CONCLUSION: Les résultats de ce sondage contribueront à la reconnaissance des TTL comme un rôle crucial dans la phase initiale des soins aux patients ayant subi un traumatisme grave et serviront de première publication pour documenter les antécédents et les pratiques professionnelles des TTL canadiens au niveau un centres de traumatologie. Toutes les informations recueillies dans le cadre de cette enquête seront utilisées par le Comité TAC TTL, qui se concentrera sur plusieurs initiatives telles que la diffusion de lignes directrices sur les meilleures pratiques et la création d'un flux TTL à la conférence annuelle TAC.

External validation of the updated Brain Injury Guidelines for complicated mild traumatic brain injuries: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 10% of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have intracranial bleeding (complicated mTBI) and 3.5% eventually require neurosurgical intervention, which is mostly available at centers with a higher level of trauma care designation and often requires interhospital transfer. In 2018, the Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were updated in the United States to guide emergency department care and patient disposition for complicated mild to moderate TBI. The aim of this study was to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the updated BIG (uBIG) for predicting the need for interhospital transfer in Canadian patients with complicated mTBI. METHODS: This study took place at three level I trauma centers. Consecutive medical records of patients with complicated mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 13-15) who were aged ≥ 16 years and presented between September 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a penetrating trauma and those who had a documented cerebral tumor or aneurysm were excluded. The primary outcome was a combination of neurosurgical intervention and/or mTBI-related death. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 477 patients were included, of whom 8.4% received neurosurgical intervention and 3% died as a result of their mTBI. Forty patients (8%) were classified as uBIG-1, 168 (35%) as uBIG-2, and 269 (56%) as uBIG-3. No patients in uBIG-1 underwent neurosurgical intervention or died as a result of their injury. This translates into a sensitivity for predicting the need for a transfer of 100% (95% CI 93.2%-100%) and a specificity of 9.4% (95% CI 6.8%-12.6%). Using the uBIG could potentially reduce the number of transfers by 6% to 25%. CONCLUSIONS: The patients in uBIG-1 could be safely managed at their initial center without the need for transfer to a center with a higher level of neurotrauma care. Although the uBIG could decrease the number of transfers, further refinement of the criteria could improve its specificity.

Validation of Quality Indicators Targeting Low-Value Trauma Care.

Importance: Reducing low-value care has the potential to improve patient experiences and outcomes and free up health care resources. Sixteen quality indicators were recently developed targeting reductions in low-value trauma care based on a synthesis of the best available evidence, expert consensus, and patient preferences. Objective: To assess the validity of quality indicators on low-value trauma care using trauma registry data. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from an inclusive Canadian provincial trauma system were used in this analysis. Included were all admissions for injury to any of the 57 provincial adult trauma centers between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2020. Metrics for quality indicators were developed iteratively with clinical experts. Main Outcomes and Measures: Validity was assessed using a priori criteria based on 5 parameters: frequency (incidence and case volume), discrimination (interhospital variation), construct validity (correlation with quality indicators on high-value care), predictive validity (correlation with quality indicators on risk-adjusted outcomes), and forecasting (correlation over time). Results: The study sample included 136 783 patient admissions (mean [SD] age, 63 [22] years; 68 428 men [50%]). Metrics were developed for 12 of the 16 quality indicators. Six quality indicators showed moderate or high validity on all measurable parameters: initial head, cervical spine, or whole-body computed tomography for low-risk patients; posttransfer repeated computed tomography; neurosurgical consultation for mild complicated traumatic brain injury; and spine service consultation for isolated thoracolumbar process fractures. Red blood cell transfusion in low-risk patients had low frequency but had moderate or high validity on all other parameters. Five quality indicators had low validity on at least 2 parameters: repeated head CT and intensive care unit admission for mild complicated traumatic brain injury, hospital admission for minor blunt abdominal trauma, orthosis for thoracolumbar burst fractures, and surgical exploration in penetrating neck injury without hard signs. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study shows the feasibility of assessing low-value trauma care using routinely collected data. It provided data on quality indicators properties that can be used to decide which quality indicators are most appropriate in a given system. Results suggest that 6 quality indicators have moderate to high validity. Their implementation now needs to be tested.

Evaluation of the feasibility and impacts of in situ simulation in emergency medicine-a mixed-method study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: In situ simulation (ISS) consists of performing a simulation in the everyday working environment with the usual team members. The feasibility of ISS in emergency medicine is an important research question, because ISS offers the possibility for repetitive, regular simulation training consistent with specific local needs. However, ISS also raises the issue of safety, since it might negatively impact the care of other patients in the emergency department (ED). Our hypothesis is that ISS in an academic high-volume ED is feasible, safe and associated with benefits for both staff and patients. METHODS: A mixed-method, including a qualitative method for the assessment of feasibility and acceptability and a quantitative method for the assessment of patients' safety and participants' psychosocial risks, will be used in this study.Two distinct phases are planned in the ED of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus) between March 2021 and October 2021. Phase 1: an ISS programme will be implemented with selected ED professionals to assess its acceptability and safety and prove the validity of our educational concept. The number of cancelled sessions and the reasons for cancellation will be collected to establish feasibility criteria. Semistructured interviews will evaluate the acceptability of the intervention. We will compare unannounced and announced ISS. Phase 2: the impact of the ISS programme will be measured with validated questionnaires for the assessment of psychosocial risks, self-confidence and perceived stress among nonselected ED professionals, with comparison between those exposed to ISS and those that were not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research ethics board has approved this protocol (#2020-5000). Results will be presented to key professionals from our institution to improve patient safety. We also aim to publish our results in peer-reviewed journals and will submit abstracts to international conferences to disseminate our findings.

Tamsulosin for treatment of unilateral distal ureterolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The lifetime prevalence of ureterolithiasis is approximately 13% for men and 7% for women in the United States. Tamsulosin, an α-antagonist, has been used as therapy to facilitate the expulsion of lithiasis. Whether it is a good treatment for distal lithiasis remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of tamsulosin on the passage of distal ureterolithiasis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Trial eligibility was evaluated by two investigators. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tamsulosin to standard therapy or placebo for the treatment of a single distal ureterolithiasis ≤ 10 mm in adult patients with renal colic confirmed by radiographic imaging were included. Data extraction was conducted in duplicate. Primary outcome was the expulsion rate, and secondary outcomes were the mean time for ureterolithiasis expulsion, analgesic requirements, and side effects. Mantel-Haenszel random effect models were used, and heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Data were presented with relative risks (RRs). RESULTS: The search strategy identified 685 articles, of which 22 studies were included. Combined results suggested a benefit for the expulsion of ureterolithiasis (≤ 10 mm) when tamsulosin was used compared to a standard treatment (RR 1.50 [95% CI 1.31-1.71], I²  =  70%). A decrease in the average time of expulsion of the ureterolithiasis of 3.33 days in favour of tamsulosin was observed (95% CI -4.23, -2.44], I²  =  67%). CONCLUSION: Tamsulosin increases the rate of spontaneous passage of distal ureterolithiasis (≤ 10 mm).

Exploring nurses' intention to use a computerized platform in the resuscitation unit: development and validation of a questionnaire based on the theory of planned behavior.

BACKGROUND: In emergency department resuscitation units, writing down information related to interventions, physical examination, vital signs, investigations, and treatments ordered is a crucial task carried out by nurses. To facilitate this task, a team composed of emergency physicians, nurses, and one computer engineer created a novel electronic platform equipped with a tactile screen that allows systematic collection of critical data. This electronic platform also has medical software (ReaScribe+) that functions as an electronic medical record and a clinical decision support system. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a questionnaire that can help evaluate nurses' intention to use a novel computerized platform in an emergency department resuscitation unit, based on Ajzen's theory of planned behavior (TPB). METHODS: The sample for this study was composed of 87 nurses who worked in the resuscitation unit of a tertiary trauma center. We held three focus groups with nurses working in the resuscitation unit to identify the salient modal beliefs regarding their intended use of a new electronic medical charting system for the care of trauma patients. The system included a clinical decision support tool. We developed a questionnaire in which salient modal beliefs were used as items to evaluate the TPB constructs. We also added 13 questions to evaluate nurses' computer literacy. The final questionnaire was composed of 46 questions to be answered on a 7-point Likert scale. All nurses in the resuscitation unit and present during a regular work shift were individually contacted by the principal investigator or a research assistant (phase 1). A subsample of the nurses who completed the questionnaire was invited to complete it a second time 2 weeks later (phase 2). RESULTS: In phase 1, we received 62 of the 70 questionnaires administered (89% response rate). Of the 27 questionnaires administered in phase 2 (retest phase), 25 were completed (93% response rate). The questionnaire showed very good internal consistency, as Cronbach alpha was higher than .7 for all constructs. Temporal stability was acceptable with intraclass correlations between .41 and .66. The intention to use the electronic platform to chart the resuscitation of trauma patients was very high among the respondents. In the logistic regression model, the only construct that predicted nurses' intention to adopt the computerized platform was the professional norm (odds ratio 3.31, 95% confidence interval 1.41-7.78). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a questionnaire that can now be used in other emergency departments prior to implementation of the computerized platform. The intention to adopt was very high among the respondents, which suggests that the implementation of this innovation could be successful at our institution.