Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Cell ; 184(23): 5699-5714.e11, 2021 11 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34735795

RESUMO

Extension of the interval between vaccine doses for the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was introduced in the United Kingdom to accelerate population coverage with a single dose. At this time, trial data were lacking, and we addressed this in a study of United Kingdom healthcare workers. The first vaccine dose induced protection from infection from the circulating alpha (B.1.1.7) variant over several weeks. In a substudy of 589 individuals, we show that this single dose induces severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses and a sustained B and T cell response to the spike protein. NAb levels were higher after the extended dosing interval (6-14 weeks) compared with the conventional 3- to 4-week regimen, accompanied by enrichment of CD4+ T cells expressing interleukin-2 (IL-2). Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection amplified and accelerated the response. These data on dynamic cellular and humoral responses indicate that extension of the dosing interval is an effective immunogenic protocol.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Apresentação Cruzada/imunologia , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Referência , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem , Vacinas de mRNA
2.
Br J Haematol ; 205(2): 440-451, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867615

RESUMO

Immune responses to primary COVID-19 vaccination were investigated in 58 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) as part of the PETReA trial of frontline therapy (EudraCT 2016-004010-10). COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1) were administered before, during or after cytoreductive treatment comprising rituximab (depletes B cells) and either bendamustine (depletes CD4+ T cells) or cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Blood samples obtained after vaccine doses 1 and 2 (V1, V2) were analysed for antibodies and T cells reactive to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using the Abbott Architect and interferon-gamma ELISpot assays respectively. Compared to 149 healthy controls, patients with FL exhibited lower antibody but preserved T-cell responses. Within the FL cohort, multivariable analysis identified low pre-treatment serum IgA levels and V2 administration during induction or maintenance treatment as independent determinants of lower antibody and higher T-cell responses, and bendamustine and high/intermediate FLIPI-2 score as additional determinants of a lower antibody response. Several clinical scenarios were identified where dichotomous immune responses were estimated with >95% confidence based on combinations of predictive variables. In conclusion, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in FL patients is influenced by multiple disease- and treatment-related factors, among which B-cell depletion showed differential effects on antibody and T-cell responses.


Assuntos
Cloridrato de Bendamustina , COVID-19 , Linfoma Folicular , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Linfoma Folicular/imunologia , Linfoma Folicular/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Folicular/terapia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Idoso , Cloridrato de Bendamustina/uso terapêutico , Cloridrato de Bendamustina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/administração & dosagem , Vacina BNT162/administração & dosagem , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia
3.
Clin Exp Immunol ; 212(3): 249-261, 2023 06 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36807499

RESUMO

T cells are important in preventing severe disease from SARS-CoV-2, but scalable and field-adaptable alternatives to expert T-cell assays are needed. The interferon-gamma release assay QuantiFERON platform was developed to detect T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 from whole blood with relatively basic equipment and flexibility of processing timelines. Forty-eight participants with different infection and vaccination backgrounds were recruited. Whole blood samples were analysed using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay in parallel with the well-established 'Protective Immunity from T Cells in Healthcare workers' (PITCH) ELISpot, which can evaluate spike-specific T-cell responses. The primary aims of this cross-sectional observational cohort study were to establish if the QuantiFERON SARS-Co-V-2 assay could discern differences between specified groups and to assess the sensitivity of the assay compared with the PITCH ELISpot. The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 distinguished acutely infected individuals (12-21 days post positive PCR) from naïve individuals (P < 0.0001) with 100% sensitivity and specificity for SARS-CoV-2 T cells, whilst the PITCH ELISpot had reduced sensitivity (62.5%) for the acute infection group. Sensitivity with QuantiFERON for previous infection was 12.5% (172-444 days post positive test) and was inferior to the PITCH ELISpot (75%). Although the QuantiFERON assay could discern differences between unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals (55-166 days since second vaccination), the latter also had reduced sensitivity (44.4%) compared to the PITCH ELISpot (66.6%). The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay showed potential as a T- cell evaluation tool soon after SARS-CoV-2 infection but has lower sensitivity for use in reliable evaluation of vaccination or more distant infection.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Testes de Liberação de Interferon-gama , Vacinação , Anticorpos Antivirais
4.
Br J Haematol ; 198(4): 668-679, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35655410

RESUMO

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients remain at high risk of adverse outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and emerging variants. The optimal prophylactic vaccine strategy for this cohort is not defined. T cell-mediated immunity is a critical component of graft-versus-tumour effect and in determining vaccine immunogenicity. Using validated anti-spike (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and S-specific interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (IFNγ-ELIspot) assays we analysed response to a two-dose vaccination schedule (either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1) in 33 HSCT recipients at ≤2 years from transplant, alongside vaccine-matched healthy controls (HCs). After two vaccines, infection-naïve HSCT recipients had a significantly lower rate of seroconversion compared to infection-naïve HCs (25/32 HSCT vs. 39/39 HCs no responders) and had lower S-specific T-cell responses. The HSCT recipients who received BNT162b2 had a higher rate of seroconversion compared to ChAdOx1 (89% vs. 74%) and significantly higher anti-S IgG titres (p = 0.022). S-specific T-cell responses were seen after one vaccine in HCs and HSCT recipients. However, two vaccines enhanced S-specific T-cell responses in HCs but not in the majority of HSCT recipients. These data demonstrate limited immunogenicity of two-dose vaccination strategies in HSCT recipients, bolstering evidence of the need for additional boosters and/or alternative prophylactic measures in this group.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Fatores Etários , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , Vacina BNT162/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Medula Óssea/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/virologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/farmacologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/imunologia , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunidade Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Imunidade Celular/imunologia , Imunidade Humoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Imunidade Humoral/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Soroconversão , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
5.
Clin Exp Immunol ; 209(1): 90-98, 2022 07 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35522978

RESUMO

T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 following infection and vaccination are less characterized than antibody responses, due to a more complex experimental pathway. We measured T-cell responses in 108 healthcare workers (HCWs) using the commercialized Oxford Immunotec T-SPOT Discovery SARS-CoV-2 assay service (OI T-SPOT) and the PITCH ELISpot protocol established for academic research settings. Both assays detected T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike, membrane, and nucleocapsid proteins. Responses were significantly lower when reported by OI T-SPOT than by PITCH ELISpot. Four weeks after two doses of either Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 AZD1222 vaccine, the responder rate was 63% for OI T-SPOT Panels 1 + 2 (peptides representing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein excluding regions present in seasonal coronaviruses), 69% for OI T-SPOT Panel 14 (peptides representing the entire SARS-CoV-2 spike), and 94% for the PITCH ELISpot total spike. The two OI T-SPOT panels correlated strongly with each other showing that either readout quantifies spike-specific T-cell responses, although the correlation between the OI T-SPOT panels and the PITCH ELISpot total spike was moderate. The standardization, relative scalability, and longer interval between blood acquisition and processing are advantages of the commercial OI T-SPOT assay. However, the OI T-SPOT assay measures T-cell responses at a significantly lower magnitude compared to the PITCH ELISpot assay, detecting T-cell responses in a lower proportion of vaccinees. This has implications for the reporting of low-level T-cell responses that may be observed in patient populations and for the assessment of T-cell durability after vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Linfócitos T , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/imunologia , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Peptídeos , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Vacinação
6.
Med ; 4(3): 191-215.e9, 2023 03 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36863347

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Both infection and vaccination, alone or in combination, generate antibody and T cell responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, the maintenance of such responses-and hence protection from disease-requires careful characterization. In a large prospective study of UK healthcare workers (HCWs) (Protective Immunity from T Cells in Healthcare Workers [PITCH], within the larger SARS-CoV-2 Immunity and Reinfection Evaluation [SIREN] study), we previously observed that prior infection strongly affected subsequent cellular and humoral immunity induced after long and short dosing intervals of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccination. METHODS: Here, we report longer follow-up of 684 HCWs in this cohort over 6-9 months following two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD1222 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) vaccination and up to 6 months following a subsequent mRNA booster vaccination. FINDINGS: We make three observations: first, the dynamics of humoral and cellular responses differ; binding and neutralizing antibodies declined, whereas T and memory B cell responses were maintained after the second vaccine dose. Second, vaccine boosting restored immunoglobulin (Ig) G levels; broadened neutralizing activity against variants of concern, including Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5; and boosted T cell responses above the 6-month level after dose 2. Third, prior infection maintained its impact driving larger and broader T cell responses compared with never-infected people, a feature maintained until 6 months after the third dose. CONCLUSIONS: Broadly cross-reactive T cell responses are well maintained over time-especially in those with combined vaccine and infection-induced immunity ("hybrid" immunity)-and may contribute to continued protection against severe disease. FUNDING: Department for Health and Social Care, Medical Research Council.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacina BNT162 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Pessoal de Saúde , Imunidade Humoral
7.
Pharmacol Ther ; 207: 107454, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31836451

RESUMO

PIM kinases are a class of serine/threonine kinases that play a role in several of the hallmarks of cancer including cell cycle progression, metabolism, inflammation and immune evasion. Their constitutively active nature and unique catalytic structure has led them to be an attractive anticancer target through the use of small molecule inhibitors. This review highlights the enhanced activity of PIM kinases in cancer that can be driven by hypoxia in the tumour microenvironment and the important role that aberrant PIM kinase activity plays in resistance mechanisms to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapies and targeted therapies. We highlight an interaction of PIM kinases with numerous major oncogenic players, including but not limited to, stabilisation of p53, synergism with c-Myc, and notable parallel signalling with PI3K/Akt. We provide a comprehensive overview of PIM kinase's role as an escape mechanism to targeted therapies including PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, MET inhibitors, anti-HER2/EGFR treatments and the immunosuppressant rapamycin, providing a rationale for co-targeting treatment strategies for a more durable patient response. The current status of PIM kinase inhibitors and their use as a combination therapy with other targeted agents, in addition to the development of novel multi-molecularly targeted single therapeutic agents containing a PIM kinase targeting moiety are discussed.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Evasão da Resposta Imune , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-pim-1/antagonistas & inibidores , Animais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias/enzimologia , Neoplasias/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA