Outcomes of Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Athletes.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) performed on athletes at a tertiary care center and to characterize its efficacy and physiological effects. BACKGROUND: The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increased in highly trained athletes and poses unique management challenges. METHODS: Athletes were identified through a database of patients undergoing PVI from January 2000 through October 2015. Outcomes of AF ablation were defined in accordance with published guidelines. Available electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and exercise treadmill testing data were also analyzed. RESULTS: The study population included 144 athletes (93% men; mean age 50.4 ± 8.6 years; 97 paroxysmal, 38 persistent, and 9 long-standing persistent) with median follow-up of 3 years. Single-procedure freedom from arrhythmia was 75%, 68%, and 33% at 1 year for paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent AF, respectively. Multiple-procedure freedom from arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs was 86%, 76%, and 56% in respective groups at the end of follow-up (mean 1.4 ± 0.7 ablations per athlete). Compared with a matched cohort of nonathletes who underwent PVI, there was no difference in arrhythmia recurrence (log-rank p = 0.23). Excluding long-standing persistent AF, longer diagnosis-to-ablation time was the only variable in Cox proportional hazards analyses associated with arrhythmia recurrence (adjusted heart rate per log increase: 1.92; 95% confidence interval: 1.40 to 2.73; p < 0.0001), and PVI within 2 years of diagnosis was notably associated with successful outcomes (log-rank p = 0.002). Sinus rate increased following the index ablation (mean 54 beats/min vs. 64 beats/min at >1 year; p < 0.0001), but maximum metabolic equivalents on exercise treadmill testing were unchanged (13.1 ± 1.2 vs. 12.7 ± 1.4; p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: PVI is an effective therapy in athletes with paroxysmal and persistent AF, and arrhythmia recurrence was no different from that among matched nonathletes. Early ablation was associated with improved success rates. Sustained cardioautonomic effects were observed following ablation, but exercise capacity was preserved.

Effect of Left Ventricular Conduction Delay on All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality (from the PRECISION Trial).

The prognosis associated with prolonged intraventricular conduction on electrocardiogram (ECG) remains uncertain. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of narrow versus prolonged intraventricular conduction on ECG stratified by QRS morphology and cardiovascular disease (CVD) status. A post-hoc analysis was performed of the randomized-control PRECISION trial. Patients with centrally adjudicated, nonpaced baseline ECGs were included. QRS duration was classified narrow (≤100 ms) versus prolonged (>100 ms) with additional categorization into left (LBBB) or right (RBBB) bundle branch block or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). IVCD was subclassified if left ventricular conduction delay (LVCD) was present (L-IVCD) or absent (O-IVCD). The primary outcome was adjudicated all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Of 24,081 patients randomized, 22,067 (92%) were included with follow-up 34 ± 13 months. Study patients were 63 ± 9 years, 64% female, 75% Caucasian, 23% with established CVD. The prevalence of QRS prolongation was 5.6% (1,240): 760 right bundle branch block (3.4%), 313 LBBB (1.4%), and 161 IVCD (0.7%), 95 subclassified L-IVCD (0.4%). After adjustment, LBBB and L-IVCD were similarly associated with increased all-cause (LBBB: 2.3 [1.4 to 3.8], p = 0.001; L-IVCD: 4.0 [2.1 to 7.9], p <0.001) and CV (LBBB: 3.6 [2.0 to 6.5], p <0.001; L-IVCD 3.6 [1.3 to 9.7], p = 0.001) mortality. The presence of LVCD (LBBB or L-IVCD) was associated with all-cause (2.8 [1.8 to 4.2], p <0.001) and CV (3.6 [2.2 to 6.1], p <0.001) mortality exceeding the observed risks of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, or diabetes. The LVCD hazard persisted across QRS durations (100 to 120 vs >120 ms) and CVD status. In conclusion, LVCD, whether LBBB or L-IVCD, was strongly associated with increased mortality in patients with and at-risk for CVD.