A pilot study of oxidative pathways in MS fatigue: randomized trial of N-acetyl cysteine.

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility, tolerability, and safety of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) for fatigue in progressive MS. Secondary objectives evaluated changes in fatigue and oxidative pathway biomarkers on NAC versus placebo. METHODS: Individuals with progressive MS with Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) > t38 were randomized 2:1 to NAC 1250mg TID or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was tolerability and safety. The secondary outcome to evaluate efficacy was MFIS change from baseline to week 4 between groups. Exploratory biomarker outcomes included change in blood GSH/GSSG ratio (reduced-to-oxidized glutathione (GSH)) and in vivo relative GSH using 7T MR spectroscopy (MRS) between groups. Fisher exact test was used for categorical and rank sum for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Fifiteen were randomized (10 NAC, 5 placebo; mean age 56.1 years, 80% female, median EDSS 6.0). At least one adverse event (AE) occurred in 60% on NAC versus 80% on placebo (p = 0.75). There were two AEs attributed to NAC in one patient (abdominal pain and constipation), with 94% adherence to NAC. MFIS decreased in both groups at week 4, with the mean improvement of 11-points on NAC versus 18-points on placebo (p = 0.33). GSH/GSSG ratio decreased on placebo (-0.6) and NAC (-0.1) (p = 0.18). Change in GSH levels to total creatine in anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, insula, caudate, putamen, and thalamus did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: NAC was well-tolerated in progressive MS, although reduction in fatigue on NAC was similar to placebo. Antioxidant blood and MRS biomarkers were not significantly altered by NAC, which could be due to dose, route of administration, time of sample collection, short half-life, or lack of effect. REGISTERED: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02804594.

Safety and efficacy of amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Methylphenidate, modafinil, and amantadine are commonly prescribed medications for alleviating fatigue in multiple sclerosis; however, the evidence supporting their efficacy is sparse and conflicting. Our goal was to compare the efficacy of these three medications with each other and placebo in patients with multiple sclerosis fatigue. METHODS: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, four-sequence, four-period, crossover, double-blind trial, patients with multiple sclerosis who reported fatigue and had a Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) score of more than 33 were recruited at two academic multiple sclerosis centres in the USA. Participants received oral amantadine (up to 100 mg twice daily), modafinil (up to 100 mg twice daily), methylphenidate (up to 10 mg twice daily), or placebo, each given for up to 6 weeks. All patients were intended to receive all four study medications, in turn, in one of four different sequences with 2-week washout periods between medications. A biostatistician prepared a concealed allocation schedule, stratified by site, randomly assigning a sequence of medications in approximately a 1:1:1:1 ratio, in blocks of eight, to a consecutive series of numbers. The statistician and pharmacists had no role in assessing the participants or collecting data, and the participants, caregivers, and assessors were masked to allocation. The primary outcome measure was the MFIS measured while taking the highest tolerated dose at week 5 of each medication period, analysed by use of a linear mixed-effect regression model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03185065 and is closed. FINDINGS: Between Oct 4, 2017, and Feb 27, 2019, of 169 patients screened, 141 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of four medication administration sequences: 35 (25%) patients to the amantadine, placebo, modafinil, and methylphenidate sequence; 34 (24%) patients to the placebo, methylphenidate, amantadine, and modafinil sequence; 35 (25%) patients to the modafinil, amantadine, methylphenidate, and placebo sequence; and 37 (26%) patients to the methylphenidate, modafinil, placebo, and amantadine sequence. Data from 136 participants were available for the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. The estimated mean values of MFIS total scores at baseline and the maximal tolerated dose were as follows: 51·3 (95% CI 49·0-53·6) at baseline, 40·6 (38·2-43·1) with placebo, 41·3 (38·8-43·7) with amantadine, 39·0 (36·6-41·4) with modafinil, and 38·6 (36·2-41·0) with methylphenidate (p=0·20 for the overall medication effect in the linear mixed-effect regression model). As compared with placebo (38 [31%] of 124 patients), higher proportions of participants reported adverse events while taking amantadine (49 [39%] of 127 patients), modafinil (50 [40%] of 125 patients), and methylphenidate (51 [40%] of 129 patients). Three serious adverse events occurred during the study (pulmonary embolism and myocarditis while taking amantadine, and a multiple sclerosis exacerbation requiring hospital admission while taking modafinil). INTERPRETATION: Amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate were not superior to placebo in improving multiple sclerosis fatigue and caused more frequent adverse events. The results of this study do not support an indiscriminate use of amantadine, modafinil, or methylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. FUNDING: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

A retrospective cohort study of plasma exchange in central nervous system demyelinating events in children.

BACKGROUND: Plasma exchange (PLEX) may improve recovery of acute central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating events related to multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), transverse myelitis (TM), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and MOG-antibody associated demyelination (MOG) if recovery with pulse steroids (PS) is incomplete. Although there is a single randomized controlled trial in adults, there are limited case series in children. We aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of PLEX in children with acute events of MS, NMOSD, TM, ADEM, and MOG with limited improvement after PS. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children with acute CNS demyelinating events seen at a single tertiary referral center who received PLEX as a second- or third-line therapy between 2006 and 2018. Through chart review of clinical notes, presence of clinical improvement by physician assessment was recorded pre- and post-PS and pre- and post-PLEX. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were collected pre- and post-PLEX. We evaluated the number who improved clinically with PLEX and compared pre- and post-PLEX EDSS with Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test. RESULTS: 26 patients followed at the Pediatric MS Center at the University of California, San Francisco received PLEX for acute events of MS (n = 15), NMOSD (n = 7), MOG (n = 2), TM (n = 1), and ADEM (n = 1). At time of PLEX initiation, median age was 13.5 years (range 3-17) and median time between the acute event onset and PLEX initiation was 22 days (range 3-94). 14 of 24 patients had documented clinical improvement after PS. Of those who improved during PS (n = 14), 13 had additional improvement after PLEX. Of those with no improvement after PS (n = 10), 8 improved after PLEX. 16 of 26 patients had pre- and post-PLEX EDSS scores available. Median pre-PLEX EDSS score was 4.0 (range 3.0-8.0), and median post-PLEX EDSS score was 3.75 (range 0-8.0) (p = 0.062). 5 patients had improved EDSS scores by 1 or more points. Adverse events during PLEX included hypotension (n = 3), nausea (n = 2), headache (n = 2), hypocalcemia (n = 2), hypofibrinogenemia (n = 2), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), spinal cord hemorrhage (n = 1), acute non-occlusive thrombosis of internal jugular vein (n = 1), occlusion of the central line (n = 1), edema of the neck (n = 1), and gastrointestinal discomfort (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: PLEX is an overall well-tolerated second-line treatment option for pediatric patients with severe acute CNS demyelinating events with limited response to PS.