Predicting Failure of Conservative Airway Management in Infants with Robin Sequence: The EARN Factors.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate infants with Robin Sequence (RS) who were successfully treated with conservative airway measures alone vs. those who failed and eventually underwent surgical airway intervention after a protracted course of conservative management. DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively gathered database. SETTING: Large tertiary care institution. PATIENTS: Infants diagnosed with RS (n = 122) who underwent primary airway management at a single institution from 1994-2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient demographics, nutritional and respiratory status, laboratory values, and polysomnographic results were compared between patients who were discharged after successful conservative airway management (Group 1, n = 61) and patients that underwent surgical airway intervention after failing a prolonged course of conservative management (Group 2, n = 61). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to assess continuous variables that may predict failure of conservative airway management. RESULTS: 122 infants with RS were investigated. While several variables were significantly different between groups, the following polysomnographic EARN factors, with cut points, were identified as most predictive of failed conservative airway management: ETCO2 (max) > 49 mmHg, AHI > 16.9 events/hour, OAHI REM >25.9 events/hour, OAHI Non-REM > 23.6 events/hour. CONCLUSIONS: We identified factors in infants with RS that were associated with severe UAO that failed to improve despite weeks of conservative airway management. Our results may expedite earlier definitive treatment of these critical patients and reduce risks for known complications of prolonged UAO.

Socioeconomic Influence on Surgical Management and Outcomes in Patients with Craniosynostosis - A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Disparities in insurance and socioeconomic status (SES) may impact surgical management and subsequent postoperative outcomes for patients with craniosynostosis. This systematic review summarizes the evidence on possible differences in surgical care, including procedure type, age at surgery, and differences in surgical outcomes such as complications, length of hospital stay, and child development based on SES. DESIGN: The databases Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL were searched between May and July 2022. Following PICO criteria, studies included focused on patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis; corrective surgery for craniosynostosis; comparison of insurance, income, or zip code; and surgical management of postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 724 articles. After three stages of screening, 13 studies were included. Assessed outcomes included: type of procedure (6 articles), age at time of surgery (3 articles), post-operative complications (3 articles), referral delay (2 articles), length of stay (2 articles), hospital costs (2 articles), and child development (1 article). Of the studies with significant results, insurance type was the main SES variable of comparison. While some findings were mixed, these studies indicated that patients with public medical insurance were more likely to experience a delay in referral, undergo an open rather than minimally-invasive procedure, and have more complications, longer hospitalization, and higher medical charges. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that SES may be associated with several differences in the management of patients with craniosynostosis. Further investigation into the impact of SES on the management of patients with craniosynostosis is warranted to identify possible interventions that may improve overall care.

A Rare Case of Dermatofibrosarcoma in a Pediatric Patient.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare malignant fibroblastic tumor. DFSP has an insidious onset, slow growth, and heterogeneous presentation that can create a delay in diagnosis and increase morbidity. In this case report, we present a child with DFSP that presented as a large, slow-growing mass over the dorsum of the left foot. She underwent successful surgical excision with no functional sequelae.

Impact of upper airway obstruction management in Robin Sequence on need for myringotomy tubes.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate an association between upper airway obstruction (UAO) management in Robin Sequence (RS) and need for bilateral myringotomy and tubes (BMT). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of RS patients treated at a tertiary free-standing pediatric hospital from 1995 to 2020 was performed. Patients were grouped based on airway management: conservative, tracheostomy, tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), and mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). Demographic data, cleft palate (CP) association, numbers of BMT and ear infections, and audiogram data including tympanograms were collected. One-way ANOVA and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests were used to compare continuous and categorical data, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis was used to compare BMT rates between treatment groups. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients were included, 70.3 % of which had CP. Most patients (67.6 %) had at least one BMT; 29.1 % required two or more BMT. The rate of BMT was higher in patients with CP compared to those with intact palates (p = 0.003; 95 % CI 1.30-3.57) and those treated with tracheostomy (p = 0.043; 95 % CI 1.01, 2.27). Surgically managed patients were more likely to have hearing loss (67.5 % vs. 35.3 %, p = 0.017) and ear infections (42.1 % vs. 20.0 %, p = 0.014) pre-compared to post-procedure for airway management. CONCLUSION: Most RS patients require at least 1 set of BMT. Those with CP and/or treated with tracheostomy had a higher likelihood of needing BMT. Rate of hearing loss and ear infection was higher in surgically managed RS patients. Patients with RS and overt CP require a statistically higher number of BMTs compared to those with either submucous cleft palate or intact palate.

A Retrospective Review of Patient-reported Outcomes after Postaxial Polydactyly Ligation and Surgical Excision.

Background: Interventions for type B postaxial polydactyly include suture ligation and surgical excision, yet there is a paucity of literature comparing the outcomes of these procedures. This study sought to compare patient-reported long-term outcomes of postaxial digit excision. Methods: A six-question survey was distributed from January 2021 to March 2022 to patients who underwent treatment for type B postaxial polydactyly at a single pediatric institution from 2010 to 2016. Patients were queried about the incidence of pain sensitivity, keloid healing, and/or persistent presence of bump ("nubbin") at the treatment site. Results: A total of 158 responses accounting for 258 digits were attained for a 53% response rate. The majority of digits (67.4%, n = 174) were surgically excised. Median age at procedure was 49 days: 13.0 days for ligation, 63.0 days for surgical excision. Median age at survey was 8 [IQR 5.4-10.2] years. Short-term (<30 days after procedure) complications rate was 1.6%. The rate of a raised or sensitive scar was 39.5% (ligation 51.5% versus surgery 35.4%, P < 0.05). The likelihood of postoperative sensitivity (P = 0.80) was similar among groups. However, the odds of a residual bump or raised scar at the surgical site was significantly higher in the ligation group (P = 0.001). These findings remained significant in the adjusted analysis. Conclusion: This study suggests that suture ligation can be used in select cases without increasing the prevalence of long-term pain or sensitivity, albeit with greater risk of a bump or raised scar at the excision site compared with surgical excision.

Identification and management of prediabetes: results of the Latin America Strategic Prediabetes Meeting / Identificación y manejo de la prediabetes: resultados del Encuentro Estratégico de Prediabetes de América Latina / Identificação e gerenciamento de prediabetes: resultados da Reunião Estratégica de Prediabetes da América Latina

[ABSTRACT]. To understand the status of prediabetes diagnosis and treatment in Latin America and to evaluate the use of metformin for diabetes prevention in this context. A panel of 15 diabetes experts from seven countries in Latin America met on 14 – 15 August 2014 in Lima, Peru, to review the available literature, discuss the role of prediabetes in type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, analyze collected information, and make conclusions for prediabetes diagnosis and treatment in Latin America. Prediabetes diagnosis, screening, and treatment, including lifestyle changes, pharmacological treatment, and cost-effectiveness were discussed. Five resulting statements were issued for Latin America: prediabetes is a clinical and public health problem; health care systems do not currently diagnose/treat prediabetes; use of prediabetes risk detection tools are needed region-wide; treatment includes lifestyle changes, multidisciplinary education, and metformin; and registries of patient records and further studies should be supported. The expert panel concluded that in Latin America, preventive treatment through lifestyle changes and metformin are cost-effective interventions. It is important to improve prediabetes identification and management at the primary care level.

[RESUMO]. Entender o estado do diagnóstico e tratamento do prediabetes na América Latina e avaliar o uso de metformina para prevenção de diabetes neste contexto. Um painel de 15 especialistas em diabetes de sete países da América Latina reuniu-se de 14 a 15 de agosto de 2014 em Lima, Peru, para analisar a literatura disponível, discutir o papel do prediabetes em diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e doenças cardiovasculares, analisar informações coletadas e fazer conclusões para o diagnóstico e tratamento do prediabetes na América Latina. O diagnóstico, rastreio e tratamento pré-diabetes, incluindo mudanças de estilo de vida, tratamento farmacológico e custo-efetividade foram discutidos. Foram emitidas cinco conclusões resultantes para a América Latina: o prediabetes é um problema clínico e de saúde pública; os sistemas de saúde atualmente não diagnosticam/tratam prediabetes; o uso de ferramentas de detecção de risco de prediabetes é necessário em toda a região; o tratamento inclui mudanças de estilo de vida, educação multidisciplinar e metformina; e devem ser suportados registros de pacientes e outros estudos. O painel de especialistas concluiu que na América Latina, o tratamento preventivo através de mudanças de estilo de vida e metformina são intervenções efetivas em relação ao custo. É importante melhorar a identificação e gestão do prediabetes no nível de atenção primária.

[RESUMEN]. Comprender el estado del diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la prediabetes en América Latina y evaluar el uso de la metformina para la prevención de la diabetes en este contexto. Un panel de 15 expertos en diabetes de siete países de América Latina se reunió del 14 al 15 de agosto de 2014 en Lima, Perú, para revisar la literatura disponible, discutir el papel de la prediabetes en la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y la enfermedad cardiovascular, analizar la información recolectada y formular conclusiones para el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la prediabetes en América Latina. Se analizaron el diagnóstico, el tamizaje y el tratamiento de la prediabetes, inclusive los cambios en el estilo de vida, el tratamiento farmacológico y la relación costo-eficacia. Se emitieron cinco conclusiones para América Latina: la prediabetes es un problema clínico y de salud pública; los sistemas de atención de la salud actualmente no diagnostican o no tratan la prediabetes; el uso de herramientas de detección del riesgo de prediabetes es necesario en toda la región; el tratamiento incluye cambios en el estilo de vida, educación multidisciplinaria y metformina; y se debe brindar apoyo para llevar registros de historias clínicas y realizar estudios adicionales. El panel de expertos concluyó que en América Latina el tratamiento preventivo basado en cambios en el estilo de vida y administración de metformina son intervenciones eficaces en relación al costo. Es importante mejorar la identificación y el manejo de la prediabetes en el nivel de atención primaria.

Identification and management of prediabetes: results of the Latin America Strategic Prediabetes Meeting / Identificación y manejo de la prediabetes: resultados del Encuentro Estratégico de Prediabetes de América Latina / Identificação e gerenciamento de prediabetes: resultados da Reunião Estratégica de Prediabetes da América Latina

ABSTRACT To understand the status of prediabetes diagnosis and treatment in Latin America and to evaluate the use of metformin for diabetes prevention in this context. A panel of 15 diabetes experts from seven countries in Latin America met on 14 - 15 August 2014 in Lima, Peru, to review the available literature, discuss the role of prediabetes in type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, analyze collected information, and make conclusions for prediabetes diagnosis and treatment in Latin America. Prediabetes diagnosis, screening, and treatment, including lifestyle changes, pharmacological treatment, and cost-effectiveness were discussed. Five resulting statements were issued for Latin America: prediabetes is a clinical and public health problem; health care systems do not currently diagnose/treat prediabetes; use of prediabetes risk detection tools are needed region-wide; treatment includes lifestyle changes, multidisciplinary education, and metformin; and registries of patient records and further studies should be supported. The expert panel concluded that in Latin America, preventive treatment through lifestyle changes and metformin are cost-effective interventions. It is important to improve prediabetes identification and management at the primary care level.(AU)

RESUMEN Comprender el estado del diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la prediabetes en América Latina y evaluar el uso de la metformina para la prevención de la diabetes en este contexto. Un panel de 15 expertos en diabetes de siete países de América Latina se reunió del 14 al 15 de agosto de 2014 en Lima, Perú, para revisar la literatura disponible, discutir el papel de la prediabetes en la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y la enfermedad cardiovascular, analizar la información recolectada y formular conclusiones para el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la prediabetes en América Latina. Se analizaron el diagnóstico, el tamizaje y el tratamiento de la prediabetes, inclusive los cambios en el estilo de vida, el tratamiento farmacológico y la relación costo-eficacia. Se emitieron cinco conclusiones para América Latina: la prediabetes es un problema clínico y de salud pública; los sistemas de atención de la salud actualmente no diagnostican o no tratan la prediabetes; el uso de herramientas de detección del riesgo de prediabetes es necesario en toda la región; el tratamiento incluye cambios en el estilo de vida, educación multidisciplinaria y metformina; y se debe brindar apoyo para llevar registros de historias clínicas y realizar estudios adicionales. El panel de expertos concluyó que en América Latina el tratamiento preventivo basado en cambios en el estilo de vida y administración de metformina son intervenciones eficaces en relación al costo. Es importante mejorar la identificación y el manejo de la prediabetes en el nivel de atención primaria.(AU)

RESUMO Entender o estado do diagnóstico e tratamento do prediabetes na América Latina e avaliar o uso de metformina para prevenção de diabetes neste contexto. Um painel de 15 especialistas em diabetes de sete países da América Latina reuniu-se de 14 a 15 de agosto de 2014 em Lima, Peru, para analisar a literatura disponível, discutir o papel do prediabetes em diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e doenças cardiovasculares, analisar informações coletadas e fazer conclusões para o diagnóstico e tratamento do prediabetes na América Latina. O diagnóstico, rastreio e tratamento pré-diabetes, incluindo mudanças de estilo de vida, tratamento farmacológico e custo-efetividade foram discutidos. Foram emitidas cinco conclusões resultantes para a América Latina: o prediabetes é um problema clínico e de saúde pública; os sistemas de saúde atualmente não diagnosticam/tratam prediabetes; o uso de ferramentas de detecção de risco de prediabetes é necessário em toda a região; o tratamento inclui mudanças de estilo de vida, educação multidisciplinar e metformina; e devem ser suportados registros de pacientes e outros estudos. O painel de especialistas concluiu que na América Latina, o tratamento preventivo através de mudanças de estilo de vida e metformina são intervenções efetivas em relação ao custo. É importante melhorar a identificação e gestão do prediabetes no nível de atenção primária.(AU)

Experiencia de 18 años de cirugía de obesidad en la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile / Results of bariatric surgery. Experience over 18 years

Background: Bariatric surgery is the gold-standard treatment for morbid obesity because it has low morbidity rates in high-volume centers and generates long term sustained weight loss. Aim: To describe our experience in bariatric surgery since the creation of our bariatric program in 1992. Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients subjected to bariatric surgery from 1992 to December 2010. Data was obtained from the electronic institutional registry. The Procedures per-formed were open and laparoscopic Roux-en-Ygastric bypass (BPGA and BPGL, respectively), laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (BGAL) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (GML). Results: A total of 4943 procedures were performed, 768 (16%) BPGA, 2558 (52%) BPGL, 199 (4%) BGAL and 1418 (29%) GML. The number of procedures progressively increased, from 100 cases in 2000 to over 700 cases in 2008. Proportion of femóles and preoperative mean body mass Índex fluctuated between 69 and 79% and 35 and 43 kg/m², respectively, among the different procedures. Early and late complications fluctuated between Oto 1% (higher on BPGA) and 3 to 32.7% (higher on BGAL), respectively. The excess weight lost atfiveyears was 76.1 % in BPGA, 92.5%o in BPGL and 53.7% in BGAL. The figure for GML at three years was 73.7%. Conclusions: The complication rates ofthis series of patients are similar to those reported in large series abroad. BPGL is still the most effective procedure; however GML is an attractive alternative for less obese patients.

Diagnóstico, evaluación y tratamiento no farmacológico del paciente con sobrepeso u obesidad / Statement about diagnosis assessment ano non pharmacological treatment of obesity

The risk of complications of obesity is proportional to body mass index and is higher in severe or morbid obesities and when abdominal or visceral fat is predominant. In Chile the prevalence of obesity is increasing. According to the World Health Organization, obese subjects must reduce at least a 5 percent of their weight to reduce the risk of complications. Although this amount of reduction is seldom achieved with non pharmacological treatments, better results are obtained with multidisciplinary/ approaches that include a medical, psychosocial and laboratory assessment, to determine obesity level and different factors involved and the associated complications. In a second stage, goals of treatment are set and a personalized treatment is designed including dietary changes and physical activity. The aim is to obtain perdurable lifestyles modifications.

Tratamiento farmacológico o quirúrgico del paciente con sobrepeso u obesidad / Statement about the medical and surgical treatment of overweight and obesity

This is an updated review of the available treatments for obesity, which can be used when lifestyles modifications fail. Using the available information and the experience of the members of this advisory group, a recommendation is given about the most useful treatments, according to the severity of obesity and its complications. With regards to pharmacological treatments, only sibutramine and orlistat are approved on a worldwide basis for the treatment of obesity. These medications achieve a 10 percent higher weight reduction than lifestyles modification. A third medication, rimonobant, is also more effective than lifestyles modifications, but it was withdrawn due to psychological safety issues. The indications for surgical treatment and a brief description of the available techniques, success rates and complications are outlined. Finally, the need to have followed up protocols for patients and the formation of multidisciplinary treatment teams is underscored.