Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr ; 167(4): 905-10, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26256019

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in utilization of pediatric emergency department (PED) resources by patients with mental health concerns over the past 11 [corrected] years at a tertiary care hospital. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of tertiary PED visits from 2002 [corrected] to 2012. All visits with chief complaint or discharge diagnosis related to mental health were included. Variables analyzed included number and acuity of mental health-related visits, length of stay, waiting time, admission rate, and return visits, relative to non-mental health [corrected] PED visits. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. RESULTS: We observed a 47% increase in the number of mental health presentations compared with a 27.5% [corrected] increase in the number of total visits to the PED over the study period. Return visits represented a significant proportion of all mental health-related visits (32.2% [corrected] yearly). The proportion of mental health visits triaged to a high acuity level has decreased whereas the proportion of visits triaged to the mid-acuity level has increased. Length of stay for psychiatric patients was significantly longer than for visits to the PED in general. We also observed a 53.7% [corrected] increase in the number of mental health-related visits resulting in admission. CONCLUSION: Mental health-related visits represent a significant and growing burden for the emergency department at a tertiary care PED. These results highlight the need to reassess the allocation of health resources to optimize acute management, risk assessment, and linkage to mental health services upon disposition from the PED.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Admissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 86: 103833, 2024 Sep 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39299170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients frequently encounter disruptions in their circadian rhythms in the intensive care unit (ICU) environment. New lighting systems have been developed to enhance daytime light levels and to promote circadian alignment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of implementing an innovative lighting technology that mimics natural light and reproduce the colour of the sky. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, non-randomized comparative trial. ICU patients were exposed to either a cutting-edge lighting system based on new technology (intervention group) or a conventional lighting system using fluorescent bulbs (control group). SETTING: An Italian intensive care unit with ten beds and five windowless rooms, thereby denying access to natural light. Three rooms had new lighting technology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The two groups were compared to assess the prevalence or absence of delirium and the need for sedatives during ICU stay. The secondary aim was to assess the presence of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder in patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after ICU discharge. RESULTS: 86 patients were included: 52 (60 %) in the intervention group and 34 (40 %) in the control group. Seventy-nine patients (82 %) were alive at ICU discharge. Fourteen patients (16 %) developed delirium (intervention group: n = 8 [15 %] vs. control group: n = 6 [18 %] in the control group, (P=0.781). The use of sedative drugs and neuromuscular blocking agents was similar in both the groups. No differences in the incidence of anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorders were observed among patients who underwent follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to traditional fluorescent tube lighting, the innovative lighting system did not provide any significant benefit in reducing the frequency of delirium or the necessity for sedative medications. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: A single intervention, the use of lights that mimic sunny light and the sky, did not result in a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of delirium. Delirium has a multifactorial aetiology, necessitating interventions that are multifaceted and address different domains.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA