Potential influence of antisecretory therapy on the development of Candida-associated intraabdominal infection.

BACKGROUND: Concerns surrounding the potential extra gut complication of gastric acid suppression are becoming increasingly realized. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether chronic antisecretory treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or histamine(2)-receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) is associated with the presence of Candida spp. in cases of complicated intraabdominal infection. METHODS: We conducted a case-controlled study of adult surgical intensive care unit patients with complicated intraabdominal infection during a 5-year period. Exclusion criteria consisted of primary peritonitis, diagnosis of intraabdominal infection more than 72 hours before hospital admission, or a stay in the intensive care unit of less than 72 hours. Patients were categorized into either the antisecretory group (H(2)RA or PPI therapy prior to admission) or control group (no prior antisecretory therapy). RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients met inclusion criteria. Chronic antisecretory (n = 41) and control (n = 77) patients were similar except in median age (69.0 vs 59.0 y; p = 0.026) and preadmission antibiotic use (36.6% vs 15.6%; p = 0.010). The 2 groups had a similar proportion of patients with Candida (30.3% vs 32.1%; p = 0.857); the cultures included C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. Yeast was recovered more often in patients diagnosed with community-acquired intraabdominal infection and in patients who had used PPIs before hospital admission (p = 0.066). Additionally, Candida was cultured more often in antisecretory patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery than in control patients (91.7% vs 62.5%; p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was found in the number of patients in the antisecretory and control groups from whom peritoneal Candida was recovered. However, patients with prior abdominal surgery and those in the community with chronic PPI use may be predisposed to Candida-associated intraabdominal infections.

Evaluation of feeding intolerance in patients with pentobarbital-induced coma.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable debate regarding the appropriateness of feeding patients by the enteral route in conjunction with pentobarbital coma therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of feeding intolerance (FI) in patients receiving pentobarbital in conjunction with enteral nutrition (EN). METHODS: A retrospective, observational evaluation of patients (>14 y of age) who received a therapeutic pentobarbital coma in combination with EN was conducted. Patients were divided into groups, based on the occurrence of FI defined as aspiration of gastric residuals greater than 75 mL for 2 consecutive measurements. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent (29 of 61) of patients experienced FI based on our definition. The median pentobarbital infusion rate did not differ significantly between patients who experienced FI versus those who did not (median [intraquartile range, IQR] 1.8 mg/kg/h [1.4, 2.1] vs 1.7 mg/kg/h [1.4, 2.5]; p = 0.680). The total pentobarbital bolus dose during the first 24 hours of therapy was lower in patients who experienced FI (700 mg [225, 980] vs 1000 mg [600, 1475]; p = 0.029). Median duration of pentobarbital therapy was comparable between groups (141.0 h [93.3, 217.3] vs 116.3 h [64.0, 174.8]; p = 0.115). Other factors with the potential to influence FI, such as catecholamines, neuromuscular blockade, and hyperglycemia, were similar between groups. The higher narcotic doses and greater percentage of patients receiving benzodiazepines in the FI group warrants further study. CONCLUSIONS: Pentobarbital therapy did not preclude use of EN in the entire study population. In addition, FI did not occur at a greater frequency in patients who received a higher dosage, a longer duration, or an earlier initiation of pentobarbital therapy.