Effect of Respiratory Events on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Treated with Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Long-term noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can increase or maintain health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF). Evidence from studies systematically assessing how NIV-specific factors influence HRQoL is limited. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe HRQoL measured by the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI) in patients with CHRF treated with long-term NIV and to analyze the associations between HRQoL and hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and respiratory events such as apneas, hypopneas (AHI), and patient ventilator asynchrony (PVA) occurring during long-term NIV. METHODS: We included sixty-seven stable patients with established long-term NIV due to neuromuscular disease or thoracic cage disorders in a prospective cross-sectional study at Oslo University Hospital. Patients answered the SRI and underwent daytime arterial blood gases, nocturnal pulse oximetry, sleep polygraphy, and nocturnal transcutaneous CO2. RESULTS: The mean global SRI for 62 patients was 64.8 ± 14.5, with the highest score in SRI Social Relationships (79.5 ± 15.6). There were no differences in HRQoL between the different patient groups. Compliant patients had a significantly higher score in SRI Attendant and Sleep. Residual nocturnal hypoxemia affected both the subscale SRI "Respiratory Complaints" and SRI "Attendant Symptoms and Sleep." Persisting daytime hypercapnia, nocturnal hypoventilation, and high AHI affected the subscale SRI "Anxiety" negatively, while frequent PVA was associated with a lower score in SRI "Physical Function." CONCLUSION: In a group of patients with long-term NIV, undesired respiratory events during NIV are associated with lower HRQoL in several of the SRI subscales. We suggest designing interventional studies to confirm the possible relationship between HRQoL and respiratory events during long-term NIV.

Effectiveness of nursing interventions for breathlessness in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To critically review and synthesize the findings of studies that evaluated the effectiveness of nursing interventions for improving breathlessness in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of nursing interventions for breathlessness in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have not been specifically addressed. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase was performed for studies published between January 2000 and June 2017. REVIEW METHODS: Risk of bias, data extraction and meta-analysis were conducted using Cochrane methodology. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Twenty papers were included. A meta-analysis of interventions performed at home, including two trials, showed a significant effect in favour of experimental groups for the symptom score of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire compared with controls. A meta-analysis of interventions performed in clinics with home follow-up showed a significant effect in favour of experimental groups for the mastery and fatigue scores of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire compared with controls. In this category of intervention, an additional meta-analysis showed a significant effect in favour of experimental groups for the symptom, activity and total scores of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire compared with controls. The quality of evidence was assessed to be very low to moderate. CONCLUSION: The results are equivocal as to whether nursing interventions performed at home and nursing interventions performed in hospital with follow-up improve breathlessness in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.