RESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify potential factors associated with failed retrieval of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava (IVC) filter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent placement of the Günther Tulip filter with at least one attempt at filter retrieval over a 3-year period. Patient demographics, filter dwell time, filter angulation, and filter leg protrusion were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were included in the study. Primary retrieval success was achieved in 166 patients (88.3%), for an overall retrieval success rate of 94.2%. The overall mean dwell time was 63 days, whereas the mean dwell time in cases of retrieval failure was 95.4 days. A total of seven filters were in place for longer than 6 months, four of which were successfully retrieved. The degree of filter tilt was not found to be significantly related to retrieval success (P = .36), even though filter angulation was commonly cited as a reason for retrieval failure. On venography, 90.9% of filters that could not be retrieved showed leg protrusion beyond the lumen of the IVC. Finally, increasing patient age also correlated with retrieval failure (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged dwell time and increasing patient age are associated with failed filter retrieval. However, even filters in place for extended periods can be safely removed.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Filtros de Veia Cava/estatística & dados numéricos , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the frequency, dimensions, predictors, and sequelae of Günther Tulip filter (GTF) tilt measured at the time of intended retrieval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of all medical records and posteroanterior cavograms of 175 patients who underwent both placement and retrieval of the GTF between August 2003 and July 2007 was performed to assess the frequency, dimensions, predictors, and sequelae of tilt. RESULTS: Tilt occurred at the first retrieval attempt in 159 of the 175 patients (91%). The average degree of tilt was 7.1 degrees (range, 0 degrees-30 degrees), with 87 of the 159 filters with tilt (55%) having a rightward tilt. Compared with the femoral approach, filters placed with a jugular approach demonstrated 4.2 degrees (range of the standard deviation, 3.1 degrees-5.3 degrees) greater tilt at the first retrieval attempt (95% confidence interval=2.6 degrees, 5.7 degrees; P<.001, two-sided Student t test), a greater frequency of tilt of at least 14 degrees (P=.002, two-sided Fisher exact test), and greater rightward tilt predominance (P=.046, one-sided Fisher exact test). Tilt magnitude at the first retrieval attempt correlated positively with the inferior vena cava diameter 40 mm caudal to the renal vein confluence (R=.183, P=.018, Pearson correlation). Within its limitations, this study detected no new cases of pulmonary embolism, caval perforation, or GTF migration. The success rates at the first attempt at retrieval and the cumulative GTF retrieval success rates were 93% (176 of 190 filters) and 97% (181 of 190 filters), respectively. All 29 GTFs with tilt of at least 14 degrees were placed and successfully retrieved by means of a jugular approach with minimal clinical and technical sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent GTF tilt detected at the first retrieval attempt can reach at least 14 degrees and is associated with minimal sequelae. Insertion approach and caval diameter are significant factors in GTF tilt.