Resuscitative Thoracotomy for Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Potential Impact of Resource Constraint on Outcomes and Blood Product Utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) in the setting of traumatic arrest serves as a vital but resource-intensive intervention. The COVID-19 pandemic has created critical shortages, sharpening the focus on efficient resource utilization. This study aims to compare RT performance and blood product utilization before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic for patients in traumatic cardiac arrest. METHODS: All patients undergoing RT for traumatic cardiac arrest in the emergency department at our American College of Surgeons-verified Level 1 trauma center (August 01, 2017-July 31, 2022) were included in this retrospective observational study. Study groups were dichotomized into pre-COVID (before October 03, 2020) versus COVID (from October 03, 2020 on) based on patient arrival date demographics, clinical/injury data, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was blood product transfusion <4 h after presentation. RESULTS: 445 RTs (2% of 23,488 trauma encounters) were performed over the study period: Pre-COVID, n = 209 (2%) versus COVID, n = 236 (2%) (P = 0.697). Survival to discharge was equivalent Pre-COVID versus COVID (n = 22, 11% versus n = 21, 9%, P = 0.562). RT patients during COVID consumed a median of 1 unit less packed red blood cells at the 4 h measurement (3.0 [1.8-7.0] versus 3.9 [2.0-10.0] units, P = 0.012) and 1 unit less of platelets at the 4 h measurement (4.3 [2.6-10.0] versus 5.7 [2.9-14.4] units, P = 0.012) compared to Pre-COVID. These findings were persistent after performing multivariable negative binomial regression. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of RT and survival after RT remained consistent during the pandemic. Despite comparable RT frequency, packed red blood cells and platelet transfusions were reduced, likely reflecting resource expenditure minimization during the severe blood shortages that occurred during the pandemic. RT performance for patients in traumatic arrest may, therefore, be feasible during global pandemics at prepandemic frequencies as long as particular attention is paid to resource expenditure.

BID expression determines the apoptotic fate of cancer cells after abrogation of the spindle assembly checkpoint by AURKB or TTK inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Drugs targeting the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), such as inhibitors of Aurora kinase B (AURKB) and dual specific protein kinase TTK, are in different stages of clinical development. However, cell response to SAC abrogation is poorly understood and there are no markers for patient selection. METHODS: A panel of 53 tumor cell lines of different origins was used. The effects of drugs were analyzed by MTT and flow cytometry. Copy number status was determined by FISH and Q-PCR; mRNA expression by nCounter and RT-Q-PCR and protein expression by Western blotting. CRISPR-Cas9 technology was used for gene knock-out (KO) and a doxycycline-inducible pTRIPZ vector for ectopic expression. Finally, in vivo experiments were performed by implanting cultured cells or fragments of tumors into immunodeficient mice. RESULTS: Tumor cells and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) sensitive to AURKB and TTK inhibitors consistently showed high expression levels of BH3-interacting domain death agonist (BID), while cell lines and PDXs with low BID were uniformly resistant. Gene silencing rendered BID-overexpressing cells insensitive to SAC abrogation while ectopic BID expression in BID-low cells significantly increased sensitivity. SAC abrogation induced activation of CASP-2, leading to cleavage of CASP-3 and extensive cell death only in presence of high levels of BID. Finally, a prevalence study revealed high BID mRNA in 6% of human solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The fate of tumor cells after SAC abrogation is driven by an AURKB/ CASP-2 signaling mechanism, regulated by BID levels. Our results pave the way to clinically explore SAC-targeting drugs in tumors with high BID expression.

And Miles to Go Before We Sleep: EAST Diversity and Inclusivity Progress and Remaining Challenges.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the diversity, equity, and inclusion landscape in academic trauma surgery and the EAST organization. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In 2019, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) surveyed its members on equity and inclusion in the #EAST4ALL survey and assessed leadership representation. We hypothesized that women and surgeons of color (SOC) are underrepresented as EAST members and leaders. METHODS: Survey responses were analyzed post-hoc for representation of females and SOC in academic appointments and leadership, EAST committees, and the EAST board, and compared to the overall respondent cohort. EAST membership and board demographics were compared to demographic data from the Association of American Medical Colleges. RESULTS: Of 306 respondents, 37.4% identified as female and 23.5% as SOC. There were no significant differences in female and SOC representation in academic appointments and EAST committees compared to their male and white counterparts. In academic leadership, females were underrepresented ( P < 0.0001), whereas SOC were not ( P = 0.08). Both females and SOC were underrepresented in EAST board membership ( P = 0.002 and P = 0.043, respectively). Of EAST's 33 presidents, 3 have been white women (9%), 2 have been Black, non-African American men (6%), and 28 (85%) have been white men. When compared to 2017 AAMC data, women are well-represented in EAST's 2020 membership ( P < 0.0001) and proportionally represented on EAST's 2019-2020 board ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The #EAST4ALL survey suggests that women and SOC may be underrepresented as leaders in academic trauma surgery. However, lack of high-quality demographic data makes evaluating representation of structurally marginalized groups challenging. National trauma organizations should elicit data from their members to re-assess and promote the diversity landscape in trauma surgery.

Use of Cold-Stored Whole Blood is Associated With Improved Mortality in Hemostatic Resuscitation of Major Bleeding: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify a mortality benefit with the use of whole blood (WB) as part of the resuscitation of bleeding trauma patients. BACKGROUND: Blood component therapy (BCT) is the current standard for resuscitating trauma patients, with WB emerging as the blood product of choice. We hypothesized that the use of WB versus BCT alone would result in decreased mortality. METHODS: We performed a 14-center, prospective observational study of trauma patients who received WB versus BCT during their resuscitation. We applied a generalized linear mixed-effects model with a random effect and controlled for age, sex, mechanism of injury (MOI), and injury severity score. All patients who received blood as part of their initial resuscitation were included. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, pulmonary complications, and bleeding complications. RESULTS: A total of 1623 [WB: 1180 (74%), BCT: 443(27%)] patients who sustained penetrating (53%) or blunt (47%) injury were included. Patients who received WB had a higher shock index (0.98 vs 0.83), more comorbidities, and more blunt MOI (all P <0.05). After controlling for center, age, sex, MOI, and injury severity score, we found no differences in the rates of acute kidney injury, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism or pulmonary complications. WB patients were 9% less likely to experience bleeding complications and were 48% less likely to die than BCT patients ( P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with BCT, the use of WB was associated with a 48% reduction in mortality in trauma patients. Our study supports the use of WB use in the resuscitation of trauma patients.

Bike Helmet Usage in the Most Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: A Focused Area for Trauma Prevention.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data to describe how neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (NSD) correlates with childhood injuries and outcomes. This study assesses the relationship of NSD to bicycle safety and trauma outcomes among pediatric bicycle versus automobile injuries. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, patients ≤18 y old with bicycle versus automobile injuries from a Level I pediatric trauma center were evaluated. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to measure NSD. Patient demographics, injury, clinical data characteristics, and bike safety were analyzed. Traffic scene data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System were matched to clinical records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess demographic characteristics related to helmet usage. RESULTS: Among 321 patients, 84% were male with a median age of 12 y [interquartile range 9-13], and 44% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Hispanic ethnicity was greater in the most disadvantaged ADI groups (P < 0.001). Mortality occurred in two patients, and most (96%) were discharged home. Of Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System matched traffic records, 81% were at locations without a bike lane. No differences were found in GCS, intensive care unit admission, or length of stay by ADI. Hispanic ethnicity and the highest deprivation group were independently associated with lower odds of wearing a helmet (AOR 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9, P = 0.03; AOR 0.33 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.62; P = 0.001), while patient age and sex were unrelated to helmet usage. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for bike versus auto trauma remains similar across ADI groups. However, bike helmet usage is significantly lower among Hispanic children and those from neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage.

Analysis of Readmission and Complications After Repair of Orbital Fractures Using California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Database.

BACKGROUND: Orbital fractures represent one of the most common trauma-related facial fractures and may present with a variety of concomitant injuries. Many factors including age, associated diagnoses, and fracture complications are important in determining surgical candidacy. We used a statewide database to determine the prevalence of orbital fractures, rates of surgical repair during initial admission, and early patient outcomes. METHODS: A longitudinal analysis of patients with orbital fracture was performed using California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development patient discharge database for admissions occurring between January 2015 and December 2018.Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. The primary risk factor was surgical management of orbital fractures. The primary outcomes of interest were readmission requiring surgical management and complications of the fracture. Survival models were developed to evaluate the risk of a repair at readmission adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Of the 67,408 facial fractures included in our study, 8.7% (n = 5872) were diagnosed with orbital fractures. Among this population, 18.4% (n = 1082) underwent surgical repair during their initial admission. Patients were primarily male (71.1%; n = 4,173) and presented in a nonurgent fashion (93.7%; n = 5501). Less than half (42.8%) of patients with an urgent presentation and 16.8% of patients with a nonurgent presentation underwent repair. Centers of Medicaid & Medicare Services guidelines dictated presentation classification. Repair was associated with a significantly higher survival outcome. Orbital fractures were more frequently repaired in the setting of concomitant zygomatic, nasal, and LeFort I-III fractures. Increased risk in complications was observed in all concomitant fracture groups, and there existed a decreased risk of postsurgical complications in these same cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Although most orbital fractures were managed nonoperatively, our analysis found that rates of repair for orbital floor, maxillary, and zygomatic fractures were greater than for other facial fractures. Concomitant fractures were associated with an increased hazard ratio for complications. Although low in prevalence overall, the most often observed postoperative complications in this population were diplopia, glaucoma, and blindness/low vision.

Using the Disruptive Score to Identify Publications That Changed Plastic Surgery Practice.

PURPOSE: The impact of academic publications is often characterized by the total number of future citations. However, this metric does not adequately characterize the true impact in terms of changing practices or paradigms. A new metric called the "disruption score" (DS) has been developed and validated in nonsurgical publications. This study aims to use the DS to identify the most disruptive publications in plastic surgery.The DS, a ratio of 2 numbers, varies between -1 and +1. Scores closer to -1 are developing papers that summarize the known literature while papers closer to +1 are disruptive-they result in a paradigm shift in the field of study. METHODS: A search was performed for all articles from 1954 to 2014 in the following journals: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Aesthetic Surgery Journal; Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery; Annals of Plastic Surgery; Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; Clinics in Plastic Surgery; and Plastic Surgery. The disruptive score was calculated for each article.The top 100 papers ranked by DS were examined and any editorials/viewpoints, publications with less than 26 citations, or less than 3 references were excluded because of their subjective nature and smaller academic contribution. The remaining 64 publications were analyzed for topic, study type, and citation count. RESULTS: A total of 32,622 articles were found with a DS range from 0.385 to 0.923. The mean score of the top 64 articles was 0.539 with an average citation count of 195 and 9 references. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery had the most disruptive papers with 50. There were no randomized controlled trials with a majority of the studies being technical descriptions or case series. CONCLUSIONS: There are many ways to measure academic success, but there are fewer ways to measure the impact of academic contributions. The DS is a novel measurement that can demonstrate when an article results in a paradigm shift as opposed to just total citation count. When applied to the plastic surgery literature, the DS demonstrates that technical innovation and creativity are the most academically impactful. Future evaluations of academic success should include the DS to measure the quality of academic contributions.

Courtesy Authorship Practices Among First and Senior Authors: Evaluation of Motivations, Gender Bias, and Inequities.

OBJECTIVES: A courtesy author is an individual who has not met authorship criteria but is listed as an author. This practice is common and often seen as victimless. Because publications are used for funding and promotion decisions, it is critical to understand biases in this practice. METHODS: An anonymous survey was conducted from March to October 2020 of first and senior authors of publications from 2014 to 2015 in 8 surgical journals. Authors were surveyed about demographic data, practice setting, and courtesy author practices. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-one authors responded (16% response rate). 75% were from academic practice settings. 14% reported adding courtesy authors 5 or more times in the past year. Courtesy authors were more often male (80%, P = 0.023), older (75%), and of higher academic rank (65%) than first/senior authors. All author groups were >75% white. When a reason was reported, 46% added a courtesy author due to avoid retaliation; 64% to avoid awkwardness. 26% expected reciprocal authorship offers. 92% of respondents acknowledge understanding International Committee of Medical Journal Editors authorship criteria. Women were less common among those added from goodwill than those added from fear (P = 0.039.) When courtesy authors were of a lower rank than first/senior authors, they were nearly twice as likely to be female (P = 0.0056) or non-white (P = 0.0184.). CONCLUSION: Courtesy authors were more often male, older, and higher rank than first/senior authors. Fear of career consequences was a major motivator for including courtesy authors. Understanding the motivations and pressures leading to courtesy authorship will help to correct this practice.

Isolated Intracranial Hemorrhage in Elderly Patients With Pre-Injury Anticoagulation: Is Full Trauma Team Activation Necessary?

BACKGROUND: Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a highly morbid injury, particularly among elderly patients on preinjury anticoagulants (AC). Many trauma centers initiate full trauma team activation (FTTA) for these high-risk patients. We sought to determine if FTTA was superior compared with those who were evaluated as a trauma consultation (CON). METHODS: Patients aged ≥55 on preinjury AC who presented from January 2015 to December 2019 with blunt isolated head injury (non-head AIS ≤2) and confirmed ICH were identified. CON patients and FTTA patients were matched by age and head AIS. Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess patient and injury characteristics with mortality and survivor discharge disposition. REASULTS: There were 45 CON patients and 45 FTTA patients. Mean age was 80 years in both groups. Fall was the most common mechanism (98% CON vs. 92% FTTA). Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was lower in FTTA (14 vs. 15, p<0.01). CON had a significantly longer time from arrival to CT scan (1.3 vs. 0.4 hrs, p<0.01). Hospital days were similar (CON: 3.9 vs. FTTA: 3.7 days). However, CON had increased ventilator use (p=0.03). Lower admission GCS was the only factor associated with increased risk of death. Among survivors, only head AIS increased the risk of discharge to a level of care higher than that of preinjury (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in mortality or adverse discharge disposition between FTTA and CON, although FTTA was associated with a more rapid evaluation and diagnosis. Any alteration in GCS was strongly associated with mortality and should prompt evaluation by FTTA.

A low exhaled nitric oxide level excludes a short-term benefit from inhaled corticosteroids in suspected asthma: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non-invasive biomarker that reflects IL-4/IL-13 production and therefore represents T2 allergic inflammation. FeNO has previously been used to guide inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment in asthma. The purpose of this study was to determine if a low FeNO (≤27 ppb) could be used to reliably identify patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma who would not benefit from initiating treatment with an ICS. METHODS: A total of 180 steroid-naïve adults with healthcare professional suspected asthma and an FeNO of ≤27 ppb were randomized to receive either 400 mcg of budesonide or placebo daily for 3 months. The primary outcome was the difference in the Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 (ACQ7) between treatment groups and the study was powered to determine equivalence. Secondary outcomes were the difference in FEV1 , Medical Research Council and Leicester Cough Questionnaire scores. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four patients (68 budesonide and 66 placebo) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The between-group mean difference in ACQ7 from baseline to the end of the study was -0.25 and the 95% CI around this difference was -0.004 to 0.495 confirming equivalence (p < 0.05). Differences in forced expiratory volume over 1 s and other secondary outcomes were also small and clinically unimportant. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that steroid-naïve patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma and an FeNO ≤ 27 ppb are unlikely to benefit from initiating treatment with an ICS over 3 months. However, further research is recommended to confirm these findings before withholding ICS treatment.

Perceptions of Equity and Inclusion in Acute Care Surgery: From the #EAST4ALL Survey.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize equity and inclusion in acute care surgery (ACS) with a survey to examine the demographics of ACS surgeons, the exclusionary or biased behaviors they witnessed and experienced, and where those behaviors happen. A major initiative of the Equity, Quality, and Inclusion in Trauma Surgery Practice Ad Hoc Task Force of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma was to characterize equity and inclusion in ACS. To do so, a survey was created with the above objectives. METHODS: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods anonymous online survey was sent to all EAST members. Closed-ended questions are reported as percentages with a cutoff of α = 0.05 for significance. Quantitative results were analyzed focusing on mistreatment and bias. RESULTS: Most respondents identified as white, non-Hispanic and male. In the past 12 months, 57.5% of females witnessed or experienced sexual harassment, whereas 48.6% of surgeons of color witnessed or experienced racial/ethnic discrimination. Sexual harassment, racial/ethnic prejudice, or discrimination based on sexual orientation/sex identity was more frequent in the workplace than at academic conferences or in ACS. Females were more likely than males to report unfair treatment due to age, appearance or sex in the workplace and ACS (P ≤ 0.002). Surgeons of color were more likely than white, non-Hispanics to report unfair treatment in the workplace and ACS due to race/ethnicity (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first survey of ACS surgeons on equity and inclusion. Perceptions of bias are prevalent. Minorities reported more inequity than their white male counterparts. Behavior in the workplace was worse than at academic conferences or ACS. Ensuring equity and inclusion may help ACS attract and retain the best and brightest without fear of unfair treatment.

Towards a personalised treatment approach for asthma attacks.

Asthma attacks (exacerbations) are common, accounting for over 90 000 UK hospital admissions per annum. They kill nearly 1500 people per year in the UK, have significant associated direct and indirect costs and lead to accelerated and permanent loss of lung function. The recognition of asthma as a heterogeneous condition with multiple phenotypes has revolutionised the approach to the long-term management of the condition, with greater emphasis on personalised treatment and the introduction of the treatable traits concept. In contrast asthma attacks are poorly defined and understood and our treatment approach consists of bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids. This review aims to explore the current limitations in the description, assessment and management of asthma attacks. We will outline the risk factors for attacks, strategies to modify this risk and describe the recognised characteristics of attacks as a first step towards the development of an approach for phenotyping and personalising the treatment of these critically important events. By doing this, we hope to gradually improve asthma attack treatment and reduce the adverse effects associated with recurrent courses of corticosteroids.

Variations in Courtesy Authorship Perceptions and Practices Among Modern Surgical Journals: The Generation Gap.

BACKGROUND: Academic journals have adopted strict authorship guidelines to eliminate the addition of authors who have not met criteria, also known as "courtesy authors." We sought to analyze current perceptions, practices, and academic rank-related variations in courtesy authorship use among modern surgical journals. METHODS: Authors who published original research articles in 2014-2015 in eight surgical journals were surveyed and categorized as junior (JF) or senior faculty (SF) by years in practice. Responses regarding courtesy authorship perceptions and practices were analyzed. Subanalyses were performed based on journal impact factor. RESULTS: A total of 455 authors responded (34% JF versus 66% SF). SF were older (52 versus 39 y) and more predominantly male (80% versus 61%) versus JF. JF more frequently added a courtesy author to the index publication versus SF (23% versus 13%, P = 0.02), but had similar historical rates of adding courtesy authors (58% versus 51%, P = not significant) or being added as a courtesy author (29% versus 37%, P = not significant). JF felt courtesy authorship was more common in their practice and felt more pressure by superiors to add courtesy authors. Perceptions regarding the practice of courtesy authorship differed significantly, with 70% of JF feeling courtesy authorship use has not declined versus 45% of SF (P < 0.05). Both JF and SF cited courtesy authorship positives, including avoiding author conflicts (17% versus 33%, respectively) and increasing morale (25% versus 45%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Courtesy authorship use continues to be common among both JF and SF. However, perceptions about the benefits, harms, and pressures vary significantly by academic rank and with journal impact factor.

Shock Index as a Predictor of Massive Transfusion and Emergency Surgery on the Modern Battlefield.

BACKGROUND: Shock Index (SI) has been used to predict the need for massive transfusion (MT) and emergency surgical procedures (ESP) in civilian trauma. We hypothesize that SI can reliably identify combat trauma patients that will require MT and ESP when applied to the resource-constrained, combat environment. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (2008-2016). SI was calculated using heart rate and systolic blood pressure on arrival to the initial facility with surgical capabilities. A threshold value of 0.8 was used to stratify patients into two groups (Group I, SI < 0.8; and Group II, SI ≥ 0.8). The need for MT, ESP, and mortality was compared. Regression analyses were conducted to determine the independent association of SI with MT and ESP. RESULTS: A total of 4008 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 25.5 y, and the majority were predominately male (98%). Mechanisms of injury were blunt and blast injury (62%), penetrating injury (36.7%), and burn injury (0.5%). Overall, 77% of patients (n = 3070) were stratified to Group I, and 23% of patients (n = 938) were stratified to Group II, by SI. Group II patients had a significantly greater need for MT (8.4% versus 0.4%) and ESP (30.7% versus 6.5%), both P < 0.001. Regression analysis controlling for age, gender, Injury Severity Score, and Glasgow Coma Score confirmed that SI ≥ 0.8 was an independent risk factor for both MT and need for ESPs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SI is a significant predictor of the need for MT and ESPs in the military trauma population, representing a simple and potentially potent tool for triage and prediction of resource consumption in the resource-limited, austere setting.

Association of Trauma Center Level and Patient Volume with Outcomes for Penetrating Thoracic Trauma.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the potential link between trauma center American College of Surgeons verification level and institutional volume of penetrating thoracic trauma with outcomes for patients with penetrating thoracic trauma. METHODS: Penetrating thoracic injuries were identified in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2013 to 2016. Primary exposures were trauma center American College of Surgeons verification level and annual penetrating trauma caseload by center. Cox models were used to evaluate the association between primary exposures and mortality. Poisson regression was used to evaluate admission and outcome rate differences by trauma center status. RESULTS: Of 68,727 patients identified, 38% were treated at level I centers, 18% at level II centers, and 44% at other centers. Only 3.1% required major surgery for thoracic injury (3.1% at level I, 2.6% at level II, and 3.2% at other). Overall, annual volume of penetrating thoracic trauma was not associated with mortality. For specific injuries, level I centers had superior outcomes for injuries to the thoracic aorta and vena cava compared with other centers. Level I centers also showed improved outcomes for lung/bronchus injuries compared with level II centers. Level I centers had less sepsis/acute respiratory distress syndrome, but more surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, and unplanned operation compared with non-level I centers. CONCLUSIONS: There was no identified impact of penetrating thoracic trauma volume or trauma center verification level on overall mortality. However, level I verification did correlate with improved outcomes for some specific injuries. Further study to identify factors that improve outcomes in patients with high-risk penetrating thoracic mechanisms is warranted.

Large Animal Models of Proximal Aortic Balloon Occlusion in Traumatic Hemorrhage: Review and Identification of Knowledge Gaps Relevant to Expanded Use.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to review and summarize the large animal data on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for traumatic hemorrhage and identify knowledge gaps pertinent to the proposed broader use of the technique in prehospital situations. METHODS: A review of published large animal models of traumatic hemorrhage incorporating REBOA with a primary outcome of the effect of aortic occlusion was performed. Data were collected on experimental protocols, hemodynamic effects, resuscitation requirements, mortality, metabolic and tissue consequences of induced ischemia-reperfusion, and effects on hemorrhage volume and other injuries. RESULTS: A limited number of REBOA studies exist, and there is variability in the species and size of animals used. Various controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage protocols have been studied, and a number of balloon devices used. Hemodynamic effects of occlusion were consistent as were basic systemic physiological effects. Minimal study of the effects of partial aortic occlusion and hemodynamic and metabolic physiology distal to the balloon has been performed, and partial or complete occlusion times >90 min have not been studied. CONCLUSIONS: Significant knowledge gaps exist, which are potentially relevant to the expanded use of REBOA. Investigation into the physiology of partial occlusion and the metabolic effects and potential mitigation strategies for large-scale ischemia and reperfusion are particularly needed.

Microdermal Implants Show No Effect on Surrounding Tissue During Surgery With Electrocautery.

BACKGROUND: Microdermal implants are an increasingly popular form of body jewelry. The potential for electrical conduction burn at the site of metal jewelry left in situ during electrosurgery has prompted surgical societies to recommend routine removal before surgery. To date, however, there is a lack of evidence to support this practice. We assessed in vivo thermal effect and tissue damage around implants during and after electrocautery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stainless steel microdermal anchors were surgically implanted into four swine. After allowing for initial healing, negative controls were excised and evaluated. An electrocautery grounding pad was placed 2 cm caudal to the implant. Continuous electrocautery (coagulation/30 W) for 30 s was applied to the skin 2 cm cranial to the implant. Surface skin temperature was recorded during electrocautery using thermal imaging. Tissue damage was assessed by gross examination and histologic evaluation. The same procedure was then performed to the contralateral nonimplanted side as a sham control. RESULTS: Electrocoagulation raised skin temperature around the electrocautery tip 27.7°C (Tmax 64.8°C). Skin temperature around the dermal implant rose 1.58°C (Tmax 38.6°C) compared with 2.03°C (Tmax 39.2°C) in the nonimplanted control skin (P = 0.627). Skin temperatures at implanted and control sites showed no statistical difference at any recorded time interval. Histologic review of excised tissue samples showed no evidence of thermal injury. CONCLUSIONS: Metallic implants appear to have no effect on skin temperature during the use of electrocautery even when in close proximity to both the electrocautery pen and return pad. Aggressive steps to remove microdermal implants before surgery may be unnecessary.

Idiopathic chronic productive cough and response to open-label macrolide therapy: An observational study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Adult patients with chronic productive cough of unknown cause are commonly seen in respiratory clinics. We have previously described a subgroup of these patients who have a short-lived response to standard antibiotic treatment but a prolonged response to 3 months of low-dose azithromycin therapy. METHODS: This observational study describes the physiological, radiological and pathological features of this patient cohort along with their response to a 12-week open-label trial of 250 mg azithromycin thrice weekly. RESULTS: A total of 30 subjects with a mean age of 57 were recruited. The majority demonstrated airway dilatation on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan without evidence of established bronchiectasis (n = 21) and non-specific chronic inflammatory changes on bronchial biopsy (n = 15/17). Twenty-nine subjects completed 3 months of azithromycin with a significant improvement in median Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score (-6.3 points, P < 0.00001), reduction in median 24-h sputum volume (-5.8 mL, P = 0.0003) and improvement in sputum colour (P = 0.003). Patients responsive to azithromycin (n = 22) demonstrated neutrophilic or paucigranulocytic airway inflammation, whereas five subjects with eosinophilic airways inflammation did not respond symptomatically to azithromycin. CONCLUSION: We describe a cohort of patients with chronic productive cough not adequately described by existing disease labels whose symptoms responded well to low-dose azithromycin. Many of the features are similar to the paediatric condition protracted bacterial bronchitis.