'Humility, Concern, Respect': A Qualitative Study Exploring Parent Perspectives on a Pediatrician's Role in Addressing Racism.

OBJECTIVE: To explore racially minoritized families' perceptions on how, and if, physicians should address children's racial identity and concepts of racism within clinical settings. STUDY DESIGN: Parents of racially minoritized children, ages 5 through 18, were interviewed to explore experiences with racial identity formation, discrimination, and the extent to which they wanted pediatricians to address these topics. Children were included at the discretion of their parents. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed through a critical race theory lens based in constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS: Parents encouraged their children to embrace their racial identities but also wanted to shield them from negative experiences of racism to preserve identity safety. Parents felt pediatricians should address racial issues in a manner specific to their child's situation. Thoughtful inclusion of race-related questions, whether in discussion or on questionnaires, is essential to prevent tension in a therapeutic relationship. There was no consensus on the use of preclinical screening. Instead, families highlighted the importance of embracing humility, trust, and respect. CONCLUSIONS: Participant families have preferences for approaches to address the effects of racism on their children's health. Pediatricians should understand the importance of identity safety and approach their discussions with cultural humility, which includes self-reflection, empathy, active listening, and flexible negotiation. Above all, pediatricians need to create a safe environment for appropriate discussion of these issues.

'The program director's word it's stronger than the word of God': Epistemic injustice revealed through narratives of remediated graduate medical education residents.

BACKGROUND: Though graduate medical education (GME) residency training provides positive experiences for many trainees, it may also result in major stressors and negative experiences, particularly for those requiring remediation. Residents requiring remediation may experience feelings of dismay, shame and guilt that can negatively affect their training, self-efficacy and their medical careers. Power differentials between educators and residents may set the stage for epistemic injustice, which is injustice resulting from the silencing or dismissing a speaker based on identity prejudice. This can lead to decreased willingness of trainees to engage with learning. There is a paucity of literature that explores GME experiences of remediation from the resident perspective. OBJECTIVE: To synthesise the narratives of physician experiences of remediation during residency through the lens of epistemic injustice. METHODS: Between January and July 2022, we interviewed US physicians who self-identified as having experienced remediation during residency. They shared events that led to remediation, personal perspectives and emotions about the process and resulting outcomes. Interviews were analysed using narrative analysis with attention to instances of epistemic injustice. RESULTS: We interviewed 10 participants from diverse backgrounds, specialties and institutions. All participants described contextual factors that likely contributed to their remediation: (1) previous academic difficulty/nontraditional path into medicine, (2) medical disability or (3) minoritised race, gender or sexual identity. Participants felt that these backgrounds made them more vulnerable in their programmes despite attempts to express their needs. Participants reported instances of deflated credibility and epistemic injustices with important effects. CONCLUSIONS: Participant narratives highlighted that deep power and epistemic imbalances between learners and educators can imperil GME trainees' psychological safety, resulting in instances of professional and personal harm. Our study suggests applying an existing framework to help programme directors (PDs) approach remediation with epistemic humility.

Professionalism Policies and Practices as Experienced by First-Generation Medical Students, Residents, and Physicians.

Phenomenon: While professionalism is largely understood to be complex and dynamic, it is oftentimes implemented as if it were static and concrete. As a result, policies and practices reflect dominant historical norms of the medical profession, which can cause tension for trainees from marginalized groups. One such group comprises those who identify as first-generation physicians - those whose parents have not earned an associate's degree or higher. This group is highly diverse in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status; however, their experiences with institutional professionalism policies and practices has not yet been fully explored. In this study, our aims were to understand the ways in which these participants experience professionalism, and to inform how professionalism can be more inclusively conceptualized. Approach: In November 2022-March 2023, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 first-generation medical students, residents, and physicians and analyzed select national and institutional professionalism policies in relation to key themes identified in the interviews. The interviews were designed to elicit participants' experiences with professionalism and where they experienced tension and challenges because of their first-gen identity. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis through a critical perspective, focused on identifying tensions because of systemic and historical factors. Findings: Participants described the ways in which they experienced tension between what was written, enacted, desirable, and possible around the following elements of professionalism: physical appearance; attendance and leaves of absence; and patient care. They described a deep connection to patient care but that this joy is often overshadowed by other elements of professionalism as well as healthcare system barriers. They also shared the ways in which they wish to contribute to changing how their institutions conceptualize professionalism. Insights: Given their unique paths to and through medicine and their marginalized status in medicine, first-generation interviewees provided a necessary lens for viewing the concept of professionalism that has been largely absent in medicine. These findings contribute to our understanding of professionalism conceptually, but also practically. As professionalism evolves, it is important for institutions to translate professionalism's complexity into educational practice as well as to involve diverse voices in refining professionalism definitions and policies.

"I Thought Everyone Was Going to Hate Me for Being Pregnant": The Enduring Influence of the Ideal Worker Image in GME.

Introduction: Patriarchal norms continue to disadvantage women in Graduate Medical Education (GME). These norms are made salient when women trainees are pregnant. Although it is known that pregnant trainees experience myriad challenges, their experiences have not been examined through the lens of gendered organizations. To understand why these challenges persist, this study critically examined the experiences of pregnant trainees and their program directors (PDs) with navigating pregnancy. Methods: From October 2022 to April 2023, we recruited 13 resident or fellow trainees who experienced pregnancy while in training and their corresponding PDs. Data, in the form of semi-structured interviews, were collected, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Guiding the analysis was feminist theory, in particular Acker's conceptualization of the ideal worker. The ideal worker norm promotes a culture of individuals who are singularly dedicated to their work with no external distractions or demands upon their time or effort. Results: Both sets of participants struggled with medicine's image of the ideal worker (i.e., a selfless and untethered professional). Trainees experienced guilt for using entitlements meant to assist them during this time, concern that their requests for help would signal personal weakness, and pressure to sacrifice their own wellbeing for work. While most PDs were aware of these phenomena, they experienced varying degrees of success in combating the negative effects of the ideal worker norm. Discussion: In each case, the image of the ideal worker lurked in the background of medical training, shaping trainees' experiences and PDs' perceptions and guidance. This study shows that even though the number of women has increased in medicine, the profession's underlying culture continues to signal that they must live up to the profession's expectations of the ideal worker.

Conceptualizing and Developing Competence in Newborn Medicine Among Military Pediatricians.

INTRODUCTION: Competence in neonatal care is especially important for military pediatricians because military pediatricians can be asked to serve in remote duty locations with limited resources. We sought to understand how this competence is defined, developed, and assessed by military pediatric training programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, we interviewed educators and recent graduates from every pediatric military training program to construct a shared definition of competence. We then used Kern's Six Steps for curriculum development to understand how competence is taught and assessed. RESULTS: Participants felt that competence for military pediatricians in the neonatal setting meant that learners should be able to provide a full spectrum of newborn care in any military setting. Participants confirmed that this competence was particularly important for military pediatricians because of the possibility of remote duty locations. Participants felt that specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes supported competence. Knowledge domains include distinguishing normal newborns from abnormal newborns, managing normal newborn care, managing common newborn abnormalities, and creating a safe escalation plan for complicated or uncommon newborn abnormalities. Specific skills that support competence are newborn resuscitation, delivery of effective ventilation, and neonatal circumcision. Specific attitudes that support competence are, understanding the personal limits of knowledge and understanding the resources for escalation of care. Educators use a variety of modalities to teach toward competence, including the structured curricula, bedside teaching, and simulation. According to participants, the assessment of learners occurs primarily through narrative assessment and feedback but would ideally occur through direct observation. CONCLUSIONS: Competence in the neonatal setting is particularly important for military pediatricians. Essential skills undergo differential assessment and current assessment methods differ from ideal assessment methods. Future work should focus on how these facets can support a unified curriculum in newborn medicine.

Why Competency Frameworks Are Insufficiently Nuanced for Health Equity Teaching and Assessment.

This article suggests how competency-based medical education should robustly integrate health equity by focusing on physicians' responsibilities to (1) know why and how underlying structural mechanisms contribute to health equity and then (2) take action to achieve health equity in their practice. This article first canvasses currently available frameworks for helping trainees cultivate these 2 specific skills of discernment and action. This article then offers strategies for teaching and assessing these skills in specific learning activities.