Accuracy of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment of mitral prolapse. Is transesophageal echocardiography still mandatory?

BACKGROUND: Segmental analysis in mitral prolapse is important to decide the chances of valvular repair. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the only echocardiographic tool validated for this aim hitherto. The aim of the study was to assess if segmental analysis can be performed with transthoracic real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography as accurately as with TEE, hence representing a valid alternative to TEE. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients diagnosed with mitral prolapse underwent TEE and a complete 3D echocardiography study, including parasternal and apical real-time; apical full-volume; and 3D color full-volume. Investigators performing TEE were blinded to the 3D results. RESULTS: Three-dimensional echocardiogram was feasible in 40 to 41 patients (97.7%). Ages ranged from 15 to 92 years, and all possible anatomical patterns of prolapse were represented. Thirty-seven patients (90.2%) had mitral regurgitation of any degree. The level of agreement was k = 0.93 (P < or = .0001), sensitivity of 96.7%, specificity of 96.7%, likelihood ratio for a positive result of 29.0%, and likelihood ratio for a negative result of 0.03%. Four false positives were found, corresponding to scallops A2 (1), A3 (2), and P3 (1). Four false negatives were found, corresponding to scallops A1 (2) and P1 (2). Sensitivity and specificity in the scallop P2 were 100%. CONCLUSION: Segmental analysis in mitral prolapse can be performed with transthoracic real-time 3D echocardiography as accurately as with TEE. False negatives tend to appear around the anterolateral commissure, whereas false positives tend to appear around the posteromedial commissure. Highest accuracy was reached in central scallops.

[Associated factors to increased sensitivity in the transthoracic echocardiogram for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis]. / Factores asociados a aumento de la sensibilidad del ecocardiograma transtorácico en el diagnóstico de la endocarditis infecciosa.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Echocardiography is considered a basic tool in the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis. Transesophageal echocardiography is more sensitive than transthoracic echocardiography. Our aim was to describe which factors are related to the ability of transthoracic echocardiography to establish the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. The presence of this factors in a patient with a normal transthoracic echocardiography would make unnecessary to perform a transesophageal echocardiography and would suggest to seek for other diagnostic possibilities. METHODS: 127 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis and a complete transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography comprised our study group. Predisposing factors and clinical, echocardiographic and microbiological variables were studied. RESULTS: The presence of a cardiac murmur, the presence of an optimal acoustic window, degenerative valvular disease as the predisposing factor for infective endocarditis and positive blood cultures were related to the ability of transthoracic echocardiography to diagnose the existence of signs of infective endocarditis on its own. Nevertheless, only the presence of a cardiac murmur (RR 2.724; 95% CI 1.071-6.926; p 0,035) and the presence of an optimal acoustic window (RR 5.538; 95% IC 2.75-11.15; p < 0.001) were found as independent factors to detect those patients in which transthoracic echocardiography is able to diagnose signs of infective endocarditis on its own. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography to detect echocardiographic signs of infective endocarditis is high in those patients with cardiac murmur and optimal acoustic window. In those patients with these characteristics, without prosthetic heart valves and a negative transthoracic echocardiography for infective endocarditis other diagnostic possibilities should be ruled out before performing of a transesophageal echocardiography.

Comparative effects of antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or combined therapy in patients with valvular and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of antiplatelet and moderate-intensity anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation associated with recognized risk factors or mitral stenosis. BACKGROUND: Warfarin was more effective than aspirin in preventing stroke in these patients; combined therapy with low anticoagulant intensity was ineffective. Mitral stenosis patients were not investigated. METHODS: We performed a multicenter randomized trial in 1,209 patients at risk. The intermediate-risk group included patients with risk factors or age >60 years: 242 received the cyclooxygenase inhibitor triflusal, 237 received acenocumarol, and 235 received a combination of both. The high-risk group included patients with prior embolism or mitral stenosis: 259 received anticoagulants and 236 received the combined therapy. Median follow-up was 2.76 years. Primary outcome was a composite of vascular death and nonfatal stroke or systemic embolism. RESULTS: Primary outcome was lower in the combined therapy than in the anticoagulant arm in both the intermediate- (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33 [95% confidence interval (CI)0.12 to 0.91]; p = 0.02) and the high-risk group (HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.96]; p = 0.03). Primary outcome plus severe bleeding was lower with combined therapy in the intermediate-risk group. Nonvalvular and mitral stenosis patients had similar embolic event rates during anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The combined antiplatelet plus moderate-intensity anticoagulation therapy significantly decreased the vascular events compared with anticoagulation alone and proved to be safe in atrial fibrillation patients.

Evaluation of myocardial perfusion with grey-scale ultra-harmonic and multiple-frame triggering. The need for quantification.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Contrast echocardiography has been recently introduced as a new technique for evaluating myocardial perfusion in a qualitative basis. The objective of this study was to test whether a visual subjective evaluation of myocardial perfusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography adequately matches the data obtained with an off-line quantification of myocardial perfusion. METHODS: Sixty-one myocardial segments were evaluated by myocardial contrast echocardiography with Ultra-harmonic and Multiframe Triggering in 11 patients 3-7 days after an anterior myocardial infarction, using SH-U 563A (Levovistâ, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) as contrast agent. Myocardial perfusion was classified as grade 1 (absent), 2 (patchy or incomplete) and 3 (complete) in each segment. The quantitative analysis was performed off-line by a different investigator blinded to the qualitative evaluation, using a commercially available software. The quantitative data on grey-scale obtained were compared between grade 1, 2 and 3 segments. RESULTS: Of the 61 segments, 45 (73.8%) were classified as grade 3, whereas the remaining 16 (26.2%) were considered to be abnormally perfused (grade 2: n=12, 19.6%; grade 1: n=4, 6.6%). Segments with grade 1 perfusion had a significantly higher grey-scale value (123.6 +/- 41.3 vs. 70.1 +/- 34.3, p=0.004). However, there were no significant differences between segments with perfusion grade 2 and 3 (76.8 +/- 33.2 vs. 68.3 +/- 34.8, p=0.452). CONCLUSION: Qualitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by Ultra-harmonic and Multiframe Triggering is of limited value, since only myocardial segments with absent perfusion may be reliably identified. This findings support the need of quantification in the evaluation of myocardial perfusion by contrast echocardiography.

Myocardial perfusion in real-time using power modulation. In vivo evidence for microcirculatory damage after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In addition to the myocardium, the microvasculature may be also damaged in acute myocardial infarction. The aim was to evaluate the capability of myocardial contrast echocardiography in the detection of microvasculature damage after myocardial infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with recent acute myocardial infarction and five control subjects with normal coronary arteries and without history of myocardial infarction were studied. Myocardial contrast echocardiography with power modulation was performed, and quantitative data were measured off-line. Power modulation uses a combination of low (0.1) and high (1.7) mechanical indexes, allowing a real-time evaluation of myocardial perfusion. Contrast agent was administered as a 3-min bolus. The quantitative analysis was performed off-line by a different blinded investigator. The refilling velocity was calculated as the difference between the peak myocardial refilling value and the value at 1 s after the impulse divided by the time from the first second after the impulse to the peak refilling value. RESULTS: Eighty-one myocardial segments (75%) were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively in AMI patients, and 18 (60%) in control subjects (P=NS). The peak refilling intensity was not significantly different in patients and control subjects (6.62+/-5.85 vs. 7.53+/-4.06 dB, respectively). However, time to peak refilling intensity was significantly longer (5.25+/-1.57 vs. 4.00+/-0.53, P=0.004) and the velocity of refilling was significantly lower (2.74+/-5.34 vs. 6.58+/-8.02, P=0.028) in patients with myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: There is microvasculature damage after myocardial infarction that is reflected as a delayed velocity of refilling in myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Value of automated segmental motion analysis in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Left ventricular (LV) contraction is slowed in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Although the possible role of LV systolic function abnormalities in the assessment of AS severity has been evaluated, current echocardiographic techniques cannot offer precise quantification of LV motion velocity. The study aim was to evaluate an automated segmental motion analysis (ASMA) system to assess AS severity. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with AS, sinus rhythm and preserved LV ejection fraction were studied prospectively. Patients underwent both conventional Doppler echocardiography to measure transaortic gradient and aortic valve area by the continuity equation, and ASMA of the interventricular septum. The ASMA line graph mode displays changes in area through the cardiac cycle. The RR interval and time from the R-wave to peak maximum area shortening were measured, and an ASMA index was calculated. RESULTS: A significant and strong inverse correlation was found between aortic valve area and ASMA index (r = -0.78; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.55; p <0.001). The area under the ROC curve in the diagnosis of severe AS (aortic valve area < or =0.8 cm2) was 0.97 (95% CI 0.90-1.0). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and overall accuracy for an ASMA index >0.40 were 100, 91.7, 92.3, 100 and 95.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The ASMA system may be valuable in evaluating AS, as it offers a strong correlation with aortic valve area calculated by the continuity equation, and very high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of severe AS.

Differences between endocarditis with true negative blood cultures and those with previous antibiotic treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: High morbidity and mortality are attributed to patients with culture-negative endocarditis. The main reason for negative blood culture in infectious endocarditis (IE) is administration of antibiotics before sample withdrawal. The study aim was to determine any difference in prognosis between patients with 'aborted' culture-negative endocarditis (A-CNE) and those with true culture-negative endocarditis (T-CNE). METHODS: A total of 107 patients with a diagnosis of IE was studied retrospectively. Diagnosis was confirmed pathologically during surgery, at post-mortem examination, or by fulfillment of Duke's criteria. Twenty patients (18.7%) had negative-culture endocarditis and comprised the study population. Of these patients, 14 (70%) had received previous antibiotic therapy (A-CNE), and six (30%) were considered T-CNE cases. In-hospital outcome and clinical characteristics were compared between both patient groups. The main end-point was death or need for surgical repair of the heart valves during hospitalization. RESULTS: There were no significant inter-group differences with respect to mean age, gender distribution, and other clinical characteristics. The composite endpoint of death or surgical repair occurred more frequently in T-CNE patients (100% versus 64%, p = 0.0394). Anatomic complications also occurred more frequently in T-CNE patients, but the difference was statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: Among patients with IE and a negative blood culture, those without previous antibiotic therapy (T-CNE) have the worse prognosis.

Influence of diabetes mellitus on short- and long-term outcome in patients with active infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The incidence and severity of certain infections appear to be increased in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). The study aim was to evaluate the effect of DM on short- and long-term outcome in patients with active infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: A total of 151 patients with IE was included and followed up for a mean of 3.1 years. Of these patients, 13 (9%) were diabetics. The outcome of patients with or without DM was compared at short-term (in-hospital) and long-term follow up. RESULTS: Patients with DM were older (66 +/- 11 versus 50 +/- 19 years, p < 0.01) and had a lower frequency of intravenous drug abuse (0 versus 30%, p <0.01) and tricuspid valve involvement (0 versus 20%, p = 0.02) than non-DM patients. Mortality was higher in DM patients both in hospital (31% versus 15%, p = NS) and at a mean follow up of 3.1 years (54% versus 31%, p = 0.002). DM patients also had a significantly higher rate of cardiac failure (69% versus 38%, p = 0.03) and renal failure (62% versus 20%, p <0.01) during hospitalization. Incidences of anatomic complications (abscess, pseudoaneurysm) (15.4% versus 20.3%), valve rupture or perforation (7.7% versus 16.7%) and need for surgical repair (46.2% versus 45.7%) were similar in both DM and non-DM patients. DM, without secondary pathology like renal failure, did not appear to be an independent risk factor for mortality at either short- or long-term follow up. CONCLUSION: Although mortality and morbidity in IE were greater in DM than in non-DM patients, diabetes itself does not constitute an independent risk factor.

[Coronary Spasm after Administration of Propranolol during Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography]. / Espasmo coronario tras infusión de propranolol durante un ecocardiograma de estrés con dobutamina.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography, a highly useful and safe challenge test for myocardial ischemia, is being used increasingly. We report the case of a 37-year-old man with rest angina, repolarization abnormalities in precordial leads and normal coronary arteries who was referred for dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography, which was negative for ischemia. However, after testing, upon injection of propranolol, the patient suffered chest pain associated with ST elevation and severe regional systolic abnormalities. After intravenous nitroglycerin administration, chest pain and electrocardiographic abnormalities disappeared quickly, and systolic motion became normal. This complication was interpreted as a coronary spasm. We discuss the causes for the spasm and the role that might have been played by the drugs employed.

[Infective endocarditis in patients with chronic liver disease: clinical and prognostic assessment]. / Endocarditis infecciosa en pacientes con hepatopatía crónica: valoración clínica y pronóstica.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic liver disease increases the susceptibility to bacterial infections and infective endocarditis. Our aim was to determine the clinical and microbiological features and the prognosis in patients with chronic liver disease who also had infective endocarditis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: One hundred and seventy-four consecutive inpatients at our institution were recruited and followed. Thirty of them had chronic liver disease. Clinical, microbiological and echocardiographic variables were analyzed and, in some cases, histological variables were also recorded. RESULTS: Patients with chronic liver disease were younger (36 11 vs 54 18 years; p < 0.01) and had a larger proportion of intravenous drug users (73 vs 16%; p < 0.01), HIV infection (47 vs 10%; p < 0.01), right valve involvement and spleen enlargement, but heart failure appeared less often (7 vs 34%; p = 0.003). Thirty percent of the patients with and 51% of patients without chronic liver disease underwent surgery for infective endocarditis. Total mortality among patients with and without chronic liver disease was 40% and 31%, respectively. After adjustment for age and for the incidence of congestive heart failure, chronic liver disease doubled mid-term mortality with a RR = 2.45 (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic liver disease has a significant impact on the prognosis in patients with infective endocarditis, and these patients should therefore be considered a high risk group.

Diastolic heart failure in the elderly: in-hospital and long-term outcome after the first episode.

Our aim was to describe the incidence and predictors of in-hospital mortality and long-term mortality and morbidity in elderly patients after a first admission due to diastolic HF (DHF). Six hundred and seventy nine consecutive elderly patients with a first admission to hospital due to DHF comprised our study group. Mean age was 83.3+/-6.7 (464 women--68.3%). A history of dilated cardiomyopathy was associated to increased in-hospital mortality and age and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were identified as independent markers of bad long-term outcome. Thus, patients with DHF have high mortality during and after the first admission.

Prognostic factors and predictors of in-hospital mortality of patients with heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To date, in-hospital mortality predictors of patients with heart failure and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction are well known. Nevertheless, this is not the case of patients suffering from heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Our aim is to describe the incidence and predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients during the first admission due to preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. METHODS: Seven hundred and seventy-one consecutive patients with a first admission to hospital due to preserved left ventricular ejection fraction between January 2002 and September 2003 comprised our study group. Cardiovascular risk factors, clinical, electrical and echocardiographic variables were studied. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to obtain those factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The mean age was 82.6 +/- 43.6 years (551 women, 66.3%). Variables in both groups were similar except for the history of ischaemic heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy and the presence of normal sinus rhythm. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a history of ischaemic heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy and a cardiac rhythm different from normal sinus rhythm are associated with an increased in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction have high in-hospital mortality during the first admission. A history of ischaemic heart disease, a history of dilated cardiomyopathy and the presence of a cardiac rhythm different from the normal sinus rhythm (atrial fibrillation or flutter or paced rhythm) are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in these patients. These factors must especially be considered during the admission of such patients.

[Quantification of aortic valve area using three-dimensional echocardiography]. / Utilidad de la ecocardiografía tridimensional en la cuantificación del área valvular aórtica.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the reproducibility of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area measurement is greater with three-dimensional echocardiographic (3D-echo) planimetry than with conventional 2D-echo. To determine the LVOT circularity index by means of 3D-echo. To determine the usefulness of measuring the LVOT area by 3D-echo for quantifying the severity of valvular aortic stenosis. METHODS: The study included 40 patients, of whom 22 had an aortic stenosis. The LVOT area was measured using both 2D-echo and 3D-echo, and the circularity index, using 3D-echo alone. In addition, the severity of valvular aortic stenosis was categorized using both 2D-echo and 3D-echo. RESULTS: The levels of inter- and intra-observer agreement on LVOT area measurements were better with 3D-echo. The circularity index was 1.50 (0.25), and there was a very poor linear correlation with LVOT area (r=-0.34; P=.47). Patients with valvular aortic stenosis were categorized according to the severity of their stenoses using both 2D-echo and 3D-echo. The level of agreement between the two techniques was poor (kappa=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the LVOT area made using 3D-echo were more reproducible than those made using 2D-echo. Consequently, 3D-echo may be a better technique for assessing the LVOT area. In addition, 3D-echo showed that the LVOT is elliptical in form and that its size is not related to its circularity. Moreover, 3D-echo could also be helpful in classifying the severity of valvular aortic stenosis.

Which method should be the reference method to evaluate the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis? Gorlin's method versus 3D-echo.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown a wide variability among different methods to determine the valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate if 3D-echo planimetry is more accurate than the Gorlin method to measure the valve area. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with mitral stenosis underwent 2D and 3D-echo echocardiographic examinations and catheterization. Valve area was estimated by different methods. A median value of the mitral valve area, obtained from the measurements of three classical non-invasive methods (2D planimetry, pressure half-time and PISA method), was used as the reference method and it was compared with 3D-echo planimetry and Gorlin's method. RESULTS: Our results showed that the accuracy of 3D-echo planimetry is superior to the accuracy of the Gorlin method for the assessment of mitral valve area. CONCLUSIONS: We should keep in mind the fact that 3D-echo planimetry may be a better reference method than the Gorlin method to assess the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis.

Morphological determinants of subaortic stenosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: insights from real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography.

Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography allows a comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The anterior segment of the anterior mitral leaflet is essential in the development of the LVOT pressure gradient.

Identifying patients without favourable long-term outcome among those with medically stabilized unstable angina and a negative dipyridamole stress echocardiogram.

AIMS: Patients with medically stabilized unstable angina and a negative stress echocardiogram have a favourable outcome as a whole. This study sought to identify which subsets of patients are associated with serious events at long-term within this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied and followed-up 128 patients (mean 2.2 +/- 1.3 years) with medically stabilized unstable angina and a negative dipyridamole stress echocardiogram. Cumulative survival rates were 98.2 +/- 1.3%, 96.0 +/- 2.2% and 93.2 +/- 3.2%, at 1, 2 and 4 years, respectively. Freedom from events (death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization) were 98.2 +/- 1.3%, 96.0 +/- 2.2% and 86.3 +/- 6.0%, at 1, 2, and 4 years, respectively. Cumulative mortality rate was higher in men (3.6 +/- 2.5%, 8.5 +/- 4.1%, and 12.2 +/- 5.4% at 1, 2, and 4 years, vs. 0% at the end of the follow-up in women; p = 0.034), and in those with previous myocardial infarction (4.3 +/- 4.3%, 9.1 +/- 6.2%, and 18.2 +/- 2.3% at 1, 2 and 4 years, vs. 1.1 +/- 1.1%, 2.9 +/- 2.1%, and 2.9 +/- 2.1% in those without previous myocardial infarction, respectively; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Among patients with medically stabilized unstable angina and a negative dipyridamole stress echocardiogram, male gender and previous myocardial infarction are associated with a non-favourable outcome.

Contrast agents provide a faster learning curve in dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

AIM: Interobserver variability is an important limitation of the stress echocardiography and depends on the echocardiographer training. Our aim was to evaluate if the use of contrast agents during dipyridamole stress echocardiography would improve the agreement between an experienced and a non-experienced observer in stress echo and therefore if contrast would affect the learning period of dypyridamole stress echo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two independent observers without knowledge of any patient data interpreted all stress studies. One observer was an experienced one and the other had experience in echocardiography but not in stress echo. Two observers analysed 87 non-selected and consecutive studies. Out of the 87 studies, 46 were performed without contrast administration, whereas i.v. contrast (2.5 g Levovist by two bolus at rest and at peak stress) was administered in 41. In all cases, second harmonic imaging and stress digitalisation pack was used. The agreement between observers showed a kappa index of 0.58 and 0.83 without and with contrast administration, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of contrast agents provides a better agreement in the evaluation of stress echo between an experienced and a non-experienced observer in stress echo. Adding routinely contrast agents could probably reduce the number of exams required for the necessary learning curve in stress echocardiography.

Factores asociados a aumento de la sensibilidad del ecocardiograma transtorácico en el diagnóstico de la endocarditis infecciosa / Associated factors to increased sensitivity in the transthoracic echocardiogram for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Echocardiography is considered a basic tool in the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis. Transesophageal echocardiography is more sensitive than transthoracic echocardiography. Our aim was to describe which factors are related to the ability of transthoracic echocardiography to establish the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. The presence of this factors in a patient with a normal transthoracic echocardiography would make unnecessary to perform a transesophageal echocardiography and would suggest to seek for other diagnostic possibilities. METHODS: 127 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis and a complete transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography comprised our study group. Predisposing factors and clinical, echocardiographic and microbiological variables were studied. RESULTS: The presence of a cardiac murmur, the presence of an optimal acoustic window, degenerative valvular disease as the predisposing factor for infective endocarditis and positive blood cultures were related to the ability of transthoracic echocardiography to diagnose the existence of signs of infective endocarditis on its own. Nevertheless, only the presence of a cardiac murmur (RR 2.724; 95% CI 1.071-6.926; p 0,035) and the presence of an optimal acoustic window (RR 5.538; 95% IC 2.75-11.15; p < 0.001) were found as independent factors to detect those patients in which transthoracic echocardiography is able to diagnose signs of infective endocarditis on its own. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography to detect echocardiographic signs of infective endocarditis is high in those patients with cardiac murmur and optimal acoustic window. In those patients with these characteristics, without prosthetic heart valves and a negative transthoracic echocardiography for infective endocarditis other diagnostic possibilities should be ruled out before performing of a transesophageal echocardiography.