Impact of the Medication Shortages on Psychiatric Patients: Exploring the Consequences of Lorazepam Injection Scarcity.

Objective: This study reviewed the cases of 13 patients in a psychiatric hospital during the 2022 lorazepam injection shortage in the United States (US). The objective was to determine if there were any patterns to the management of the medication shortage of an essential psychiatric medication at a psychiatric hospital. Methods: A retrospective review of eligible patients who had an order for lorazepam injection prescribed as needed (PRN) between July and October 2022 were divided into, and compared between, two groups: those who had orders permitting continued PRN administration of the medication and those who were discontinued. Results: No negative behavioral issues were seen in the patients who had their doses discontinued. Conclusion: The absence of negative psychiatric consequences suggests that either nonpharmacotherapeutic interventions were alternatively stabilizing or that the standing PRN orders for lorazepam injection were not needed for these patients. A proactive emergency management plan to address critical medication shortages has become an increasingly necessary contingency and would have been appropriate for use during this national shortage.

Impact of COVID-19 on the Mental Health of Psychiatric Inpatients.

Purpose: The perceptions and responses to acute states of emergency may vary for people experiencing serious mental illness (SMI). Therefore, studying the mental health toll of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric inpatients can inform psychiatric care in the event of future global crises. The objective of this study was to determine if there was a difference in the incidence of mental health manifestations in an adult inpatient state psychiatric facility during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the immediately preceding year. Methods: Medication administration history for patients who utilized an as needed (PRN) medication for anxiety, agitation, or psychosis between March 1, 2020, and February 28, 2021, were analyzed. Secondary data on the incidence of restraints and seclusions were also examined. Results: The total number of PRN medications was higher during the pre-COVID-19 time frame than during the pandemic (8,139 vs. 7,630), but this was not statistically significant. The following assessments were statistically significant: predominance of psychosis as a psychiatric symptom during the COVID-19 time frame (557 vs. 389), and the difference in PRN medication administration times between time frames as categorized by day (3,741 vs. 2,623), evening (3,844 vs. 4,239), and night (554 vs. 768). Conclusion: During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of PRN medications for psychosis increased and the use of PRN medications for anxiety and agitation decreased among inpatients at a state psychiatric hospital. These results suggest that experiencing a worldwide pandemic in a psychiatric inpatient facility may be protective in some respects but may exacerbate symptoms of psychosis.

Evaluation of a Pharmacy Summer Camp to Recruit Students to the Field of Pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE: A 3-day pharmacy summer camp for high school and college students was implemented, which included active learning and information on the pharmacy curriculum, preparatory coursework, and the university community. The program served as a recruitment tool for participants to enter the pharmacy profession and our Doctor of Pharmacy program. Enrollment data from 4 cohorts (2016-2019) were examined, along with assessment data collected from 1 cohort (summer 2022). METHODS: Enrollment data were collected for the 194 participants from 2016 to 2019 to examine the number that applied to the university and to a pharmacy program. All participants from the summer 2022 cohort (n = 55) were asked to complete a knowledge assessment and survey after camp completion. The knowledge assessment contained items related to content covered in the camp. The survey used a self-report retrospective pre-and-post format to assess self-efficacy, and career and degree intentions. In addition, there were items asking participants to evaluate the camp, including 2 open-ended items. RESULTS: Data show that overall, 33% of past participants enrolled at the University at Buffalo, and 15% enrolled or intended to enroll in the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. There were 50 respondents to the evaluation survey (91% response rate). Scores on the knowledge assessment suggested participants understood the content. There were statistically significant increases from pre to post on the self-efficacy and intentions scales with the largest change in intentions to pursue a career in pharmacy and to pursue a degree in pharmacy at this university. On the evaluation, 90% agreed that they would recommend the camp to other students interested in pharmacy. Of the 30 comments regarding changes to improve the camp, 17 (57%) were related to including more interactive activities. CONCLUSION: Students who participated in a pharmacy hands-on educational camp demonstrated knowledge of and increased interest in the pharmacy profession.