Changes in Utilization of Bariatric Surgery in the United States From 1993 to 2016.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to obtain estimates of changes in perioperative outcomes and utilization of bariatric surgery in the United States from 1993 to 2016. BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has evolved over the past 2 decades. Nationally representative information on changes of perioperative outcomes and utilization of surgery in the growing eligible population (class III obesity or class II obesity with comorbidities) is lacking. METHODS: Adults with obesity diagnosis who underwent primary bariatric surgery in the United States from 1993 to 2016 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database. Estimates of the yearly number, types and cost of surgeries, patients' and hospital characteristics, complications and mortality rates were obtained. Prevalence of obesity and comorbidities were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and changes in utilization of surgery were estimated. RESULTS: An estimated 1,903,273 patients underwent bariatric surgery in the United States between 1993 and 2016. Mean age was 43.9 years (79.9% women, 70.9% white race, 70.7% commercial insurance); these and other characteristics changed over time. Surgeries were exclusively open operations in 1993 (n = 8,631; gastric bypass and vertical banded gastroplasty, 49% each) and 98% laparoscopic (n = 162,969; 69.8% sleeve gastrectomy and 27.8% gastric bypass) in 2016. Complication and mortality rates peaked in 1998 (11.7% and 1%) and progressively decreased to 1.4% and 0.04% in 2016. Utilization increased from 0.07% in 1993 to 0.62% in 2004 and remained low at 0.5% in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative safety of bariatric surgery improved over the last quarter-century. Despite growth in number of surgeries, utilization has only marginally increased. Addressing barriers for utilization may allow for greater access to surgical therapy.

ADC as a predictor of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is part of clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a predictor of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy (nCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched for studies using ADC to evaluate response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with EC. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated with the QUADAS tool. Data from eligible studies were extracted and evaluated by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed comparing mean ADC values between responders and non-responders to nCRT in three different scenarios: baseline (BL) absolute values; percent change between intermediate (IM) values and BL; and percent change between final follow-up (FU) value and baseline BL. RESULTS: Seven studies (n = 158 patients) were included. Responders exhibited a statistically significant percent increase in ADC during nCRT (mean difference [MD] 21.06%, 95%CI = 13.04-29.09; I2 = 49%; p = 0.12). A similar increase was identified in the complete pathologic response (pCR) versus non-complete pathologic response (npCR) subgroup (MD = 25.68%, 95%CI = 18.87-32.48; I2 = 0%; p = 0.60). At the end of treatment, responders also exhibited a statistically significant percent increase in ADC (MD = 22.49%, 95%CI = 9.94-35.05; I2 = 0%; p = 0.46). BL ADC was not associated with any definition of pathologic response (MD = 0.11%, 95%CI = - 0.21-0.42; I2 = 85%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ADC can be used as a predictor of pathologic response, with a statistically significant association between percent ADC increase during and after treatment and pCR. ADC may serve as a tool to help in guiding clinical decisions. KEY POINTS: • DWI is routinely included in MRI oncological protocols. • ADC can be used as a predictor of pathologic response, with a statistically significant association between percent ADC increase during and after treatment and pCR.

Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has increased in recent years, but randomized or prospective studies comparing outcomes and cost of laparoscopic and Robotic-IHR are still lacking. With conflicting results from only five retrospective series available in the literature comparing the two approaches, the question remains whether current robotic technology provides any added benefits to treat inguinal hernias. We aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and costs of Robotic-IHR versus laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal IHR (Laparoscopic-IHR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent Robotic-IHR or Laparoscopic-IHR at a dedicated MIS unit in the USA from February 2015 to June 2017. Demographics, anthropometrics, the proportion of bilateral and recurrent hernias, operative details, cost, length of stay, 30-day readmissions and reoperations, and rates and severity of complications were compared. RESULTS: 183 patients had surgery: 45 (24.6%) Robotic-IHR and 138 (75.4%) Laparoscopic-IHR. There were no differences between groups in age, gender, BMI, ASA class, the proportion of bilateral hernias and recurrent hernias, and length of stay. Operative time (Robotic-IHR: 116 ± 36 min, vs. Laparoscopic-IHR: 95±44 min, p < 0.01), reoperations (Robotic-IHR: 6.7%, vs. Laparoscopic-IHR: 0%, p = 0.01), and readmissions rates were greater for Robotic-IHR. While the overall perioperative complication rate was similar in between groups (Robotic-IHR: 28.9% vs. Laparoscopic-IHR: 18.1%, p = 0.14), Robotic-IHR was associated with a significantly greater proportion of grades III and IV complications (Robotic-IHR: 6.7% vs. Laparoscopic-IHR: 0%, p = 0.01). Total hospital cost was significantly higher for the Robotic-IHRs ($9993 vs. $5994, p < 0.01). The added cost associated with the robotic device itself was $3106 per case and the total cost of disposable supplies was comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting in which it was studied, the outcomes of Laparoscopic-IHR were significantly superior to the Robotic-IHR, at lower hospital costs. Laparoscopic-IHR remains the preferred minimally invasive surgical approach to treat inguinal hernias.

Significant and Distinct Impacts of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Esophageal Acid Exposure, Esophageal Motility and Endoscopic Findings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To study esophageal acid exposure, esophageal motility, and endoscopic findings before and after Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB BACKGROUND: The lack of standardized objective assessment of esophageal physiology and anatomy contributes to the controversies regarding the impact of SG and RYGB on gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting at least one objective measure of esophageal physiology and/or EGD, at baseline and after SG or RYGB. The changes in pH-test, manometry, and EGD parameters were summarized. RESULTS: Acid exposure time (AET) and DeMeester Score (DMS) significantly increased after SG: Mean Difference (MD) 2.1 (95%CI 0.3 to 3.9) and 8.6 (95%CI 2 to 15.2), respectively. After RYGB, both AET and DMS significantly decreased: MD -4.2 (95%CI -6.1 to -2.3) and - 16.6 (95%CI -25.4 to -7.8). Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and length significantly decreased following SG: MD - 2.8 (95%CI - 4.6 to - 1.1) and - 0.1 (95%CI - 0.2 to - 0.02), respectively. There were no significant changes in esophageal manometry after RYGB. The Relative Risk of erosive esophagitis after SG was 2.3 (95%CI 1.5 to 3.5), while after RYGB it was 0.4 (95%CI 0.2 - 0.8). The prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus changed from 0% to 3.6% after SG, and from 2.7% to 1.4% after RYGB. CONCLUSIONS: SG resulted in worsening of all objective parameters, while RYGB showed improvement in AET, DMS, and EGD findings. Determining the risk factors associated with those outcomes could aid in surgical choice.

Perioperative outcomes of inpatient laparoscopic Heller myotomy and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Per-oral endoscopic myotomy is an alternative to pneumatic dilation and laparoscopic Heller myotomy to treat lower esophageal sphincter diseases. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and per-oral endoscopic myotomy perioperative outcomes data come from relatively small retrospective series and 1 randomized trial. We aimed to estimate the number of inpatient procedures performed in the United States and compare perioperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and per-oral endoscopic myotomy using a nationally representative database. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for laparoscopic Heller myotomy or per-oral endoscopic myotomy from October 2015 through December 2018 in the National Inpatient Sample. Patient and hospital characteristics, concurrent antireflux procedures, perioperative adverse events (any adverse event and those associated with extended length of stay ≥3 days), mortality, length of stay, and costs were compared. Logistic regression evaluated factors independently associated with adverse events. RESULTS: An estimated 11,270 patients had laparoscopic Heller myotomy (n = 9,555) or per-oral endoscopic myotomy (n = 1,715) without significant differences in demographics and comorbidities. A concurrent anti-reflux procedure was more frequent with laparoscopic Heller myotomy (72.8% vs 15.5%, P < .001). Overall adverse event rate was higher with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (13.3% vs 24.8%, P < .001), and mortality was similar. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy had higher rates of adverse events associated with extended length of stay (9.3% vs 16.6%, P < .001), infectious adverse events (3.5% vs 8.2%, P < .001), gastrointestinal bleeding (3.4% vs 5.8%, P = .04), accidental injuries (3% vs 5.5%, P = .03), and thoracic adverse events (4.5% vs 9%, P < .01). Rates of adverse events of both procedures remained similar during the years of the study. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy was independently associated with adverse events. Length of stay (laparoscopic Heller myotomy: 3.2 ± 0.1 vs per-oral endoscopic myotomy: 3.7 ± 0.3 days, P = .17) and costs (laparoscopic Heller myotomy: $15,471 ± 406 vs per-oral endoscopic myotomy: $15,146 ± 1,308, P = .82) were similar. CONCLUSION: In this national database review, laparoscopic Heller myotomy had a lower rate of perioperative adverse events at similar length of stay and costs than per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy remains a safer procedure than per-oral endoscopic myotomy for a myotomy of the distal esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter in the United States.

AI-assisted discovery of an ethnicity-influenced driver of cell transformation in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.

Although Barrett's metaplasia of the esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor lesion to esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs), drivers of cellular transformation in BE remain incompletely understood. We use an artificial intelligence-guided network approach to study EAC initiation and progression. Key predictions are subsequently validated in a human organoid model, in patient-derived biopsy specimens of BE, a case-control study of genomics of BE progression, and in a cross-sectional study of 113 patients with BE and EACs. Our model classified healthy esophagus from BE and BE from EACs in several publicly available gene expression data sets (n = 932 samples). The model confirmed that all EACs must originate from BE and pinpointed a CXCL8/IL8↔neutrophil immune microenvironment as a driver of cellular transformation in EACs and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. This driver is prominent in White individuals but is notably absent in African Americans (AAs). Network-derived gene signatures, independent signatures of neutrophil processes, CXCL8/IL8 expression, and an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) are associated with risk of progression. SNPs associated with changes in ANC by ethnicity (e.g., benign ethnic neutropenia [BEN]) modify that risk. Findings define a racially influenced immunological basis for cell transformation and suggest that BEN in AAs may be a deterrent to BE→EAC progression.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Downregulates Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Gene Expression in Subcutaneous White Adipose Tissue: A Putative Protective Mechanism Against Severe COVID-19.

The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the receptor for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is highly expressed in adipose tissue, possibly associated with progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in obese subjects. We searched the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and reanalyzed the GSE59034 containing microarray data from subcutaneous white adipose tissue (sWAT) biopsies from 16 women before and 2 years after RYGB, and 16 controls matched by sex, age, and BMI. After RYGB, there was a significant decrease in sWAT ACE2 gene expression (logFC=-0.4175, P=0.0015). Interestingly, after RYGB the sWAT ACE2 gene expression was significantly lower than in non-obese matched controls (LogFC=-0.32875, P=0.0014). Our data adds to the well-known benefits of RYGB, a potential protective mechanism against COVID-19.

ASMBS position statement on the rationale for performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery.

The following position statement is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in response to inquiries made to the Society by patients, physicians, society members, hospitals, health insurance payors, the media, and others regarding the need and possible strategies for screening endoscopic examination before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), as well as the rationale, indications, and strategies for postoperative surveillance for mucosal abnormalities, including gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated esophageal mucosal injuries (erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus) that may develop in the long term after MBS, specifically for patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The general principles described here may also apply to procedures such as biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and BPD with duodenal switch (DS); however, the paucity of procedure-specific literature for BPD and DS limits the value of this statement to those procedures. In addition, children with obesity undergoing MBS may have unique considerations and are not specifically addressed in this position statement. This recommendation is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The statement is not intended to be and should not be construed as stating or establishing a local, regional, or national standard of care. The statement will be revised in the future as additional evidence becomes available.

Gastric Bypass Increases Circulating Bile Acids and Activates Hepatic Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) but Requires Intact Peroxisome Proliferator Activator Receptor Alpha (PPARα) Signaling to Significantly Reduce Liver Fat Content.

BACKGROUND: We interrogate effects of gastric bypass (RYGB), compared with a low-calorie diet, on bile acid (BA), liver fat, and FXR, PPARα, and targets in rats with obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: Male Wistar rats received a high-fat diet (obese/NAFLD, n=24) or standard chow (lean, n=8) for 12 weeks. Obese/NAFLD rats had RYGB (n=11), sham operation pair-fed to RYGB (pair-fed sham, n=8), or sham operation (sham, n=5). Lean rats had sham operation (lean sham, n=8). Post-operatively, five RYGB rats received PPARα antagonist GW6417. Sacrifice occurred at 7 weeks. We measured weight changes, fasting total plasma BA, and liver % steatosis, triglycerides, and mRNA expression of the nuclear receptors FXR, PPARα, and their targets SHP and CPT-I. RESULTS: At sacrifice, obese sham was heavier (p<0.01) than all other groups that had lost similar weight loss. Obese sham had lower BA levels and lower hepatic FXR, SHP, and CPT-I mRNA expression than lean sham (P<0.05, for all comparisons). RYGB had increased BA levels compared with obese and pair-fed sham (P<0.05, for both), while pair-fed sham had BA levels, similar to obese sham. Compared with pair-fed sham, RYGB animals had increased liver FXR and PPARα expression and signaling (P<0.05). Percentage of steatosis was lower in RYGB and lean sham, relative to obese and pair-fed sham (P<0.05, for all comparisons). PPARα inhibition after RYGB resulted in similar weight loss but higher liver triglyceride content (P=0.01) compared with RYGB alone. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB led to greater liver fat loss than low-calorie diet, an effect associated to increased fasting BA levels and increased expression of modulators of liver fat oxidation, FXR, and PPARα. However, intact PPARα signaling was necessary for resolution of NAFLD after RYGB.

Serum levels of S100B and NSE proteins in Alzheimer's disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease is the most common dementia in the elderly, and the potential of peripheral biochemical markers as complementary tools in the neuropsychiatric evaluation of these patients has claimed further attention. METHODS: We evaluated serum levels of S100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in 54 mild, moderate and severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and in 66 community-dwelling elderly. AD patients met the probable NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Severity of dementia was ascertained by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, cognitive function by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and neuroimage findings with magnetic resonance imaging. Serum was obtained from all individuals and frozen at -70 degrees C until analysis. RESULTS: By comparing both groups, serum S100B levels were lower in AD group, while serum NSE levels were the same both groups. In AD patients, S100B levels were positively correlated with CDR scores (rho = 0.269; p = 0.049) and negatively correlated with MMSE scores (rho = -0.33; P = 0.048). NSE levels decreased in AD patients with higher levels of brain atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that serum levels of S100B may be a marker for brain functional condition and serum NSE levels may be a marker for morphological status in AD.

Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Marker of Progression from Non-Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: a Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Immune imbalance and inflammation have been suggested as key factors of Barrett's esophagus (BE) pathway towards adenocarcinoma. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) indirectly reflects the relation between innate and adaptive immune systems and has been studied in premalignant conditions as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis. Our aim was to investigate if increasing values of NLR correlated with advancing stages of BE progression to dysplasia and neoplasia. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with biopsies reporting BE between 2013 and 2017 and with a complete blood count within 6 months from the endoscopy, as well as patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). NLR was calculated as neutrophil count/lymphocyte count. Cases (n = 113) were classified as non-dysplastic BE (NDBE, n = 72), dysplastic BE (DBE, n = 11) and EAC (n = 30). RESULTS: NLR progressively increased across groups (NDBE, 1.92 ± 0.7; DBE, 2.92 ± 1.1; EAC 4.54 ± 2.9), with a significant correlation between its increasing value and the presence of dysplasia or neoplasia (r = 0.53, p < 0.001). NLR > 2.27 was able to diagnose EAC with 80% sensitivity and 71% specificity (area under the curve = 0.8). CONCLUSION: NLR correlates with advancing stages of BE progression, a finding that reinforces the role of immune imbalance in EAC carcinogenesis and suggests a possible use of this marker for risk stratification on surveillance strategies.

Population Diversity Challenge the External Validity of the European Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Europe recently showed similar weight loss and rates of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission following laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). However, results from observational studies in the United States (US) have discordant results. We compared 1-year weight loss and T2D remission between LRYGB and LSG in a heterogeneous patient cohort from the US, albeit with similar inclusion and exclusion criteria to the European RCTs. METHODS: Logistic regression was used to propensity match LSG and LRYGB patients according to age, gender, race, preoperative BMI, and T2D. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were adopted from the two European RCTs. Demographic, anthropometric, weight outcomes, and comorbidities prevalence were compared at baseline and 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: We included 278 patients (139 LSG and 139 RYGB; median age 42 years, 89% female, 57% black race, 22% with public health insurance, and 25% with T2D). One year after surgery, mean %EWL was 77.3 ± 19.5% with LRYGB and 63.1 ± 21% with LSG (P < 0.001). Mean %TWL was 34.2 ± 7.3% after LRYGB and 28.1 ± 8.2% after LSG, (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who achieved T2D remission was comparable between surgeries (LRGYB: 68.6% vs. LSG: 66.7%, P = 0.89). LSG, older age, black race, and higher preoperative BMI were independently associated with lower %EWL. Independent correlates of weight loss were different for LRYGB and LSG. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss, but not the likelihood of T2D remission, was greater with LRYGB than LSG in a diverse patient cohort in the US. Further research efforts connecting population diversity to discordant results across studies is needed to better counsel patients with regards to expected postoperative outcomes.

Factors Mediating Type 2 Diabetes Remission and Relapse after Gastric Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Defining factors associated with remission and relapse of type 2 diabetes (T2D) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) can allow targeting modifiable factors. We investigated factors associated with T2D remission and relapse after RYGB. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients with T2D who underwent RYGB between 1993 and 2017. T2D remission was defined as medication discontinuation and/or hemoglobin A1c <6.5%. Relapse was defined as recurrence medication use and/or hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5%. Independent correlates of T2D remission and relapse were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty-one patients (aged 46.7 ± 10.6 years; 30% on insulin; BMI 49.8 ± 8.3 kg/m2) had at least 1-year follow-up. Median follow-up was 4.9 years (range 1 to 23.6 years). Prevalence of T2D remission was 74% at 1 year, 73% from 1 to 3 years, 63% between 3 and 10 years, and 47% beyond 10 years. Ninety-three percent of remissions occurred within 3 years of RYGB, 25% relapsed. Median time to relapse was 5.3 years (interquartile range 3 to 7.8 years) after remission. Higher 1-year percentage total body weight loss, lack of preoperative insulin use, and younger age at operation were independently associated with T2D remission. Preoperative insulin use, lower percentage total body weight loss at 1 year, and greater percentage total body weight regain after 1 year were independently associated with T2D relapse. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal retrospective analysis shows that preoperative insulin use and age, 1-year weight loss, and regain after that influence T2D remission and relapse after RYGB. Referring patients at a younger age, before insulin is needed, and optimizing weight loss and preventing weight regain after RYGB can improve the rates and durability of T2D remission.

Factors Associated to Abnormal Distal Esophageal Exposure to Acid and Esophagitis in Individuals Seeking Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) impacts choice and outcomes of bariatric surgery. However, GERD diagnosis based solely on symptoms yields inaccurate results. OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors associated with a positive 24h pH-monitoring (pH-test) or esophagitis in patients with severe obesity seeking bariatric surgery. SETTING: Private practice. METHODS: 93 patients with severe obesity underwent prospective evaluation for GERD symptoms, body composition, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry and pH-test. Correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: 50 patients (53.8%) had GERD symptoms, 49 (52.7%) had esophagitis and 33 (35.5%) had a positive pH-test. Among patients with GERD symptoms, 18% had normal pH-test and no esophagitis, while 34.9% of patients without GERD symptoms had positive pH-test, esophagitis or both. Factors independently associated with positive pH-test were esophagitis (PR:3.08, 95%CI: 1.4-6.9, P = 0.006) and defective lower esophageal sphincter (PR:1.88, 95%CI: 1.09-3.21, P = 0.02). Factors independently associated with esophagitis were hiatal hernia (PR: 2.46; 95%CI: 1.6-3.7, P<0.001), GERD symptoms (PR:2.09; 95%CI: 1.3-3.4, P = 0.003) and positive pH-test (PR:1.82; 95%CI: 1.2-2.7, P = 0.003). The combined presence of GERD symptoms and esophagitis had a low positive predictive value for a positive pH-test (57%). On the other hand, the absence of both GERD symptoms and esophagitis had a 90% predictive value for a negative pH-test. CONCLUSIONS: Investigation for GERD before bariatric surgery should consist of routine upper endoscopy and GERD symptom evaluation in all patients. Patients with GERD symptoms and no esophagitis may need a pH-test for GERD diagnosis. Prospective studies are needed to understand significance of GERD diagnosis prior to bariatric surgery.

Concomitant PPARα and FXR Activation as a Putative Mechanism of NASH Improvement after Gastric Bypass Surgery: a GEO Datasets Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Compared to non-surgical weight loss (Diet), weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) results in greater rates of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) resolution. Changes in bile acid physiology and farnesoid X receptor (FXR) signaling are suspected mediators of postoperative NASH improvement. Recent experimental evidence suggests that upregulation of hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) activity might also impact NASH improvement. As FXR partly regulates PPARα, we compared resolution of NASH and changes in hepatic PPARα and FXR gene expression following Diet and RYGB. METHODS: We searched the Gene Expression Omnibus database to identify human studies with liver biopsies containing genomic data and histologic NASH features, at baseline and after Diet or RYGB. Microarray data were extracted for PPARα and FXR gene expression analyses using GEOquery R package v.2.42.0. RESULTS: We identified one study (GSE83452) where patients underwent either Diet (n = 29) or RYGB (n = 25). NASH prevalence was similar at baseline (Diet 76% versus RYGB 60%, P = ns). After 1 year, NASH resolved in 93.3% of RYGB but only in 27.3% of Diet (P < 0.001). Hepatic PPARα and FXR gene expression increased only after RYGB (P < 0.001). These changes were also found when analyzing only patients that resolved NASH (P < 0.01), and patients without NASH at baseline and follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to Diet, RYGB results in greater NASH resolution with concurrent upregulation of hepatic PPARα and FXR. Our findings point to concurrent PPARα and FXR activation, triggered by RYGB, as a potential mechanism to improve NASH.

Early small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a surgical emergency.

BACKGROUND: Early small bowel obstruction (ESBO; within 30 d of surgery) after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) is reported in .5% to 5.2% of primary cases, but it is associated with significant morbidity, and the treatment is not standardized. OBJECTIVES: To review prevalence, causes, management, and outcomes of patients treated for ESBO after LRYGB. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: Retrospective review to identify consecutive patients who underwent primary LRYGB and those who developed ESBO from January 2000 through June 2017. Data included demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, LRYGB technical details, and ESBO clinical presentation, location, causes, treatment, and outcomes. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred seventeen patients (84.2% females) had LRYGB. Mean age and body mass index was 42.4 ± 11.1 years and 48.2 ± 7.3 kg/m2, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (1.7%) had ESBO. All patients presented with symptoms, most commonly nausea and vomiting (n = 17), on average 4.1 ± 5.9 days postoperatively; most required reoperation (n = 23, 79.3%) and 5 required >1 reoperation. Location of the obstruction and treatment used were the following: (1) jejuno-jejunostomy (n = 17, 58.6%; narrowing or clot), treated with reoperation in 11; and (2) other than at the jejuno-jejunostomy (n = 12, 41.4%; trocar site, incisional or internal hernia, adhesions, mesenteric ischemia), treated with reoperation in all. All ESBO patients had additional complications, 6 (20.1%) developed an anastomotic leak, and 2 (6.9%) died. CONCLUSION: ESBO infrequently occurs after LRYGB; many causes are technique related and possibly preventable. However, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A high index of clinical suspicion, rapid and appropriate imaging, and prompt operative intervention are recommended.

Increased S100B serum levels in dilated cardiomyopathy patients.

BACKGROUND: The S100B protein is considered a biochemical marker for brain injuries. However, our group demonstrated that the isolated rat heart releases S100B. In this study, we investigated the serum levels of S100B in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients to evaluate its levels in heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected DCM patients, excluding any condition that could influence S100B serum levels. Control individuals were sex and age matched. Both groups were submitted to clinical evaluation and echocardiography. We measured the S100B and NT-proBNP serum levels (expressed as median [interquartile range]). NT-proBNP levels in patients group (1462 pg/mL [426-3591]) were higher than in controls (35 pg/mL [29-55]), P < .001. S100B serum levels were higher in patients group (0.051 microg/L [0.022-0.144]) than in controls (0.017 microg/L [0.003-0.036]), P = .009. Additionally, we found a positive correlation between S100B and NT-proBNP serum levels only in patients group (Spearman's coefficient r = 0.534; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Although we cannot rule out the influence of S100B from brain, the positive correlation between S100B and NT-proBNP levels in DCM patients points to the myocardium as the main source for the rise in S100B serum levels.