Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Associated With Low Cardiovascular Mortality With Contemporary Management Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Youthful age has been considered the time of greatest risk for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), largely because of the possibility of sudden death. The last 2 decades have witnessed more reliable identification of at-risk patients and utilization of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for prevention of sudden death, and other contemporary treatment options. Whether such management advances have significantly altered the considerable mortality rate for young HCM patients remains unresolved. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied long-term outcome in 474 consecutive HCM patients between 7 and 29 years of age presenting at 2 referral institutions. Over 7.1±5.1 years of follow-up (6.0 [3.0, 10.0]), 452 patients (95%) survived, with 95% experiencing no or mild symptoms. HCM-related death occurred in 18 patients (3%; 0.54%/y): arrhythmic sudden death (n=12), progressive heart failure and heart transplant complications (n=5), or postoperatively (n=1). In contrast, aborted life-threatening events occurred in 63 other high-risk patients (13%) with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (n=31), resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=20), or heart transplant for advanced heart failure (n=12), 1.8%/y, 3-fold higher than HCM mortality. Five- and 10-year survival (considering only HCM deaths) was high (97% and 94%, respectively), virtually identical to that reported in middle-aged adult HCM patients (98% and 94%, P=0.23). CONCLUSIONS: In a large hospital-based cohort of young HCM patients, representing an age group considered at greatest risk, low mortality rates can be achieved with the application of contemporary cardiovascular treatment strategies, largely because of reliable identification of high-risk patients who benefited from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for sudden death prevention, thereby creating the opportunity for extended longevity and good quality of life.

Early Survey Results from the Minnesota Medical Cannabis Program.

As part of its legislative mandate, the Minnesota Department of Health's Office of Medical Cannabis (OMC) is required to study and report on the state's medical cannabis program. This article describes preliminary findings from the OMC's research about who is using the program and whether patients and their certifying health care practitioners are noticing benefits and harms.

Failure of a novel silicone-polyurethane copolymer (Optim™) to prevent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead insulation abrasions.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine if Optim™, a unique copolymer of silicone and polyurethane, protects Riata ST Optim and Durata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads (SJM, St Jude Medical Inc., Sylmar, CA, USA) from abrasions that cause lead failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Manufacturers and User Device Experience (MAUDE) database on 13 April 2012 using the simple search terms 'Riata ST Optim™ abrasion analysis' and 'Durata abrasion analysis'. Lead implant time was estimated by subtracting 3 months from the reported lead age. The MAUDE search returned 15 reports for Riata ST Optim™ and 37 reports for Durata leads, which were submitted by SJM based on its analyses of returned leads for clinical events that occurred between December 2007 and January 2012. Riata ST Optim™ leads had been implanted 29.1 ± 11.7 months. Eight of 15 leads had can abrasions and three abrasions were caused by friction with another device, most likely another lead. Four of these abrasions resulted in high-voltage failures and one death. One failure was caused by an internal insulation defect. Durata leads had been implanted 22.2 ± 10.6 months. Twelve Durata leads had can abrasions, and six leads had abrasions caused by friction with another device. Of these 18 can and other device abrasions, 13 (72%) had electrical abnormalities. Low impedances identified three internal insulation abrasions. CONCLUSIONS: Riata ST Optim™ and Durata ICD leads have failed due to insulation abrasions. Optim™ did not prevent these abrasions, which developed ≤ 4 years after implant. Studies are needed to determine the incidence of these failures and their clinical implications.

Impact of Medical Cannabis on Patient-Reported Symptoms for Patients With Cancer Enrolled in Minnesota's Medical Cannabis Program.

PURPOSE: Minnesota's medical cannabis program is unique, in that it routinely collects patient-reported scores on symptoms. This article focuses on changes in symptom severity reported by patients with cancer during their first 4 months of program participation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with cancer in Minnesota's medical cannabis program reported symptoms (anxiety, lack of appetite, depression, disturbed sleep, fatigue, nausea, pain, and vomiting) at their worst over the last 24 hours before each medical cannabis purchase. Baseline scores on each of the eight symptoms were statistically compared with the average symptom scores reported in the first 4 months of program participation. Symptom scores were also calculated as percent change from baseline, with patients achieving and maintaining at least a 30% reduction in symptoms reported in this article. Patients also reported intensity of adverse effects. RESULTS: A significant reduction in scores was found across all symptoms when comparing baseline scores with the average score submitted within the first 4 months of program participation (all Ps < .001). The proportion of patients achieving 30% or greater symptom reduction within the first 4 months of program participation varied from 27% (fatigue) to 50% (vomiting), with a smaller proportion both achieving and maintaining those improvements. Adverse effects were reported in a small proportion of patients (10.5%). CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer enrolled in Minnesota's medical cannabis program showed significant reduction across all eight symptoms assessed within 4 months of program participation. Medical cannabis was well tolerated, and some patients attained clinically meaningful and lasting levels of improvement.

Transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead reliability: implications for postmarket surveillance.

BACKGROUND: As implantable cardioverter-defibrillator technology evolves, clinicians and patients need reliable performance data on current transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. In addition, real-world reliability data could inform postmarket surveillance strategies directed by regulators and manufacturers. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated Medtronic Sprint Quattro, Boston Scientific Endotak, and St Jude Medical Durata and Riata ST Optim leads implanted by participating center physicians between January 1, 2006 and September 1, 2012. Our analytic sample of 2653 patients (median age 65, male 73%) included 445 St Jude, 1819 Medtronic, and 389 Boston Scientific leads. After a median of 3.2 years, lead failure was 0.28% per year (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.43), with no statistically significant difference among manufacturers. Simulations based on these results suggest that detecting performance differences among generally safe leads would require nearly 10 000 patients or very long follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Currently marketed implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads rarely fail, which may be reassuring to clinicians advising patients about risks and benefits of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. Regulators should consider the sample size implications when designing comparative effectiveness studies and evaluating new technology for preventing sudden cardiac death.

Peripheral artery disease is an independent predictor of mortality after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

The impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on survival in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients is poorly understood. Thus, we assessed the risk of PAD in our adult ICD patients with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] ≤35%). Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test; a Cox proportional hazards model assessed the effects of clinical variables on survival. Average age and EF of 1399 patients were 67.0 ± 12.1 years and 23.8% ± 7.2%, respectively. The ICD patients with PAD had significantly worse survival than those without (unadjusted P < .0001). The multivariate predictors of survival at implant were (hazard ratio, HR [95% confidence interval]) age (HR 1.05 [1.04-1.07] P < .0001), PAD (HR 2.07 [1.53-2.80] P < .0001), class III/IV heart failure (HR 1.36 [1.06-1.76] P = .016), creatinine 1.4-2.0 mg/dL (HR 1.36 [1.05-1.76] P = .019), and creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL (HR 2.01 [1.42-2.85] P < .0001). The PAD is an independent predictor of mortality and should be considered in the preimplant risk assessment.

Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure: analysis of explanted leads with a unique insulation defect.

BACKGROUND: The Riata family of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads (St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) appears prone to a unique failure mechanism whereby the conductor cables wear through the silicone insulation from inside-out and are seen outside the lead body (externalized conductors). OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of Riata lead damage associated with inside-out insulation defects and their clinical consequences. METHODS: In September 2011, we searched the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturers and User Defined Experience medical device database for reports describing Riata lead failures that had been analyzed by the manufacturer. RESULTS: The Manufacturers and User Defined Experience search identified 105 leads that had inside-out insulation defects. Eight-French single-coil Riata leads accounted for a higher-than-expected proportion (25.7%) of the leads with this defect. A total of 226 insulation defects were found in the 105 leads (2.2 defects per lead), including 143 inside-out defects (1.4 defects per lead). The most common location of insulation defects was distal to the proximal coil (n = 108). Twenty-eight leads (26.7%) had inside-out insulation defects underneath the shocking coils. Of 43 leads whose cables were assessed for the integrity of the ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene cable coating, 22 (51.2%) were found to be abraded, exposing the conductor surfaces. On X-ray radiography or fluoroscopy, 7 leads were found to have externalized cables; 2 of these leads had no electrical abnormalities, while 4 exhibited noise or increased impedance. Inappropriate shocks were experienced by 31 of the 105 patients (29.5%). CONCLUSION: Riata leads that have inside-out insulation defects often have multiple defects, including additional inside-out abrasions along the body of the lead and beneath the shocking coils. Eight-French single-coil Riata models may be more prone to externalized cables than are dual-coil and 7-F designs. Externalized cables are but one manifestation of interior insulation damage. Our findings question the durability of the ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene cable coating on exposed cables.

Deaths caused by the failure of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.

BACKGROUND: Riata and Riata ST leads (St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) were recalled in 2011. These leads are prone to externalized conductors. However, it is electrical malfunctions that may result in serious adverse events, including death. OBJECTIVE: To assess the deaths of patients with Riata and Riata ST leads that have been reported to the Food and Drug Administration to determine whether they were due to lead malfunction. A similar analysis was performed for Quattro Secure leads (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN). METHODS: In February 2012, we searched the Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturers and User Facility Device Experience database for deaths associated with Riata, Riata ST, and Quattro Secure leads. A lead-related death was a sudden or unexpected death accompanied by evidence of lead malfunction; an indeterminate death was a death that was nonsudden or evidence of lead malfunction was not provided; a not lead-related death was a death that was nonsudden and/or there was no evidence that the lead contributed to the patient's demise. RESULTS: The Manufacturers and User Facility Device Experience database search found 133 deaths; of these, 22 were caused by Riata or Riata ST lead failure and 5 were caused by Quattro Secure lead failure. Riata and Riata ST lead failure deaths were typically caused by short circuits between high-voltage components. No death was due to externalized conductors. CONCLUSIONS: Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads are prone to high-voltage failures that have resulted in death. These failures appeared to have been caused by insulation defects that resulted in short circuiting between high-voltage components. Externalized conductors were not a factor in these deaths.

Early detection of an underperforming implantable cardiovascular device using an automated safety surveillance tool.

BACKGROUND: Postmarket medical device surveillance in the United States depends largely on voluntary reporting of adverse events. Consequently, early safety signals may be missed, exposing patients to potentially hazardous products. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using an automated safety surveillance tool to detect early signals that a marketed implantable cardiac device was underperforming. METHODS AND RESULTS: For this purpose, we performed simulated prospective monthly full-cohort and propensity-matched comparative survival analyses on our 3-center database of Sprint Fidelis and Quattro Secure implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads, using a commercially available automated surveillance tool that was preset to trigger an alert if the log rank probability value was <0.05. During the study, 84 of 1035 Fidelis (8.1%) and 23 of 1675 Quattro (1.4%) leads failed. The simulated full-cohort analysis triggered a sustained alert for Fidelis leads beginning 13 months after the first implant and 2 years before Fidelis leads were removed from the market. Of the 1035 patients who had Fidelis leads, up to 969 (93.6%) were successfully matched to Quattro patients. In the propensity-matched analysis, the alert triggered 22 months after the first Fidelis implant and more than 1 year before the lead was recalled. CONCLUSIONS: An active automated safety surveillance system could have identified this implantable cardiovascular device problem substantially sooner than was achieved through existing postmarket surveillance methods. Such a tool, when applied to clinical registries and remote monitoring databases, may limit the exposure of large populations to underperforming and potentially hazardous cardiovascular devices.