Cone-Beam CT with Fluoroscopic Overlay Versus Conventional CT Guidance for Percutaneous Abdominopelvic Abscess Drain Placement.

PURPOSE: To compare technical success and procedure time for percutaneous abscess drain placement with fluoroscopic cone-beam computed tomography (CT) and two-axis needle guidance versus conventional CT guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 85 consecutive patients undergoing abdominopelvic abscess drain placement guided by fluoroscopic cone-beam CT or conventional CT were retrospectively reviewed over a 2-year period. Forty-three patients underwent drain placement with cone-beam CT using XperGuide navigation and 42 underwent placement with conventional 64-slice CT. Patient characteristics, median abscess size (6.8 cm vs 7.8 cm; P = .14), and depth to abscess (7.2 cm vs 7.7 cm; P = .88) were similar between groups. RESULTS: Technical success rates were 98% (42 of 43) in the cone-beam CT group and 100% (42 of 42) in the conventional CT group (P = .32), with a 10-F pigtail drainage catheter inserted in the majority of cases. There were no complications in either group. There was no significant difference in effective dose between groups (9.6 mSv vs 10.7 mSv; P = .30). Procedure times were significantly shorter in the cone-beam CT group (43 min vs 62 min; P = .02). In addition, during the study period, there was a gradual improvement in procedure time in the cone-beam CT group (50% reduction), whereas procedure time did not change for the conventional CT group. CONCLUSIONS: Cone-beam CT guidance appears to be equivalent to conventional CT guidance for drain placement into medium-sized abdominopelvic collections, yielding similar technical success rates and radiation doses, with the additional benefit of reduced procedure times.

Pediatric Percutaneous Osteoid Osteoma Ablation: Cone-Beam CT with Fluoroscopic Overlay Versus Conventional CT Guidance.

PURPOSE: To compare technical success, clinical success, complications, radiation dose, and total room utilization time for osteoid osteoma thermal (radiofrequency or microwave) ablation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with two-axis fluoroscopic navigational overlay versus conventional computed tomography (CT) guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all osteoid osteoma ablations performed over a 5.5-year period at a single tertiary care pediatric hospital. Twenty-five ablations (15 radiofrequency and 10 microwave) in 23 patients undergoing fluoroscopic CBCT-guided osteoid osteoma ablation were compared to 35 ablations (35 radiofrequency) in 32 patients undergoing ablation via conventional CT guidance. Dose area product and dose length product were recorded for CBCT and conventional CT, respectively, and converted to effective doses. Technical success, clinical success (cessation of pain and medication use 1 month after ablation), complications, radiation dose, and total room utilization time were compared. RESULTS: All procedures were technically successful. Twenty-two of 25 (88.0%) CBCT and 31 of 35 (88.6%) conventional CT-guided ablations achieved immediate clinical success. There were two minor complications in each group and no major complications. Mean effective radiation dose was significantly lower for CBCT compared to CT guidance (0.12 vs. 0.39 mSv, p = 0.02). Mean total room utilization time for CBCT was longer (133.5 vs. 97.5 min, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopic CBCT guidance for percutaneous osteoid osteoma ablation yields similar technical and clinical success, reduced radiation dose, and increased total room utilization time compared to conventional CT guidance.