Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care Med ; 47(11): 1477-1484, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31135500

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess clinician perceptions of a machine learning-based early warning system to predict severe sepsis and septic shock (Early Warning System 2.0). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital in Philadelphia, PA. PATIENTS: Non-ICU admissions November-December 2016. INTERVENTIONS: During a 6-week study period conducted 5 months after Early Warning System 2.0 alert implementation, nurses and providers were surveyed twice about their perceptions of the alert's helpfulness and impact on care, first within 6 hours of the alert, and again 48 hours after the alert. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For the 362 alerts triggered, 180 nurses (50% response rate) and 107 providers (30% response rate) completed the first survey. Of these, 43 nurses (24% response rate) and 44 providers (41% response rate) completed the second survey. Few (24% nurses, 13% providers) identified new clinical findings after responding to the alert. Perceptions of the presence of sepsis at the time of alert were discrepant between nurses (13%) and providers (40%). The majority of clinicians reported no change in perception of the patient's risk for sepsis (55% nurses, 62% providers). A third of nurses (30%) but few providers (9%) reported the alert changed management. Almost half of nurses (42%) but less than a fifth of providers (16%) found the alert helpful at 6 hours. CONCLUSIONS: In general, clinical perceptions of Early Warning System 2.0 were poor. Nurses and providers differed in their perceptions of sepsis and alert benefits. These findings highlight the challenges of achieving acceptance of predictive and machine learning-based sepsis alerts.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Aprendizado de Máquina , Sepse/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico por Computador , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Envio de Mensagens de Texto
2.
Crit Care Med ; 47(11): 1485-1492, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31389839

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Develop and implement a machine learning algorithm to predict severe sepsis and septic shock and evaluate the impact on clinical practice and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort for algorithm derivation and validation, pre-post impact evaluation. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital system in Philadelphia, PA. PATIENTS: All non-ICU admissions; algorithm derivation July 2011 to June 2014 (n = 162,212); algorithm validation October to December 2015 (n = 10,448); silent versus alert comparison January 2016 to February 2017 (silent n = 22,280; alert n = 32,184). INTERVENTIONS: A random-forest classifier, derived and validated using electronic health record data, was deployed both silently and later with an alert to notify clinical teams of sepsis prediction. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULT: Patients identified for training the algorithm were required to have International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition codes for severe sepsis or septic shock and a positive blood culture during their hospital encounter with either a lactate greater than 2.2 mmol/L or a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg. The algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 26% and specificity of 98%, with a positive predictive value of 29% and positive likelihood ratio of 13. The alert resulted in a small statistically significant increase in lactate testing and IV fluid administration. There was no significant difference in mortality, discharge disposition, or transfer to ICU, although there was a reduction in time-to-ICU transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Our machine learning algorithm can predict, with low sensitivity but high specificity, the impending occurrence of severe sepsis and septic shock. Algorithm-generated predictive alerts modestly impacted clinical measures. Next steps include describing clinical perception of this tool and optimizing algorithm design and delivery.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Diagnóstico por Computador , Aprendizado de Máquina , Sepse/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Envio de Mensagens de Texto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA