Haemophilia in the era of novel therapies: Where do inhibitors feature in the new landscape?

INTRODUCTION: The advent of therapeutic recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) protein infusions revolutionized the care of persons with haemophilia in the 1990s. It kicked off an era with the increasing use of prophylactic factor infusions for patients and transformed conversations around the ideal trough activity levels as well as the ultimate goals in tailored, individualized care. Our knowledge surrounding the immunologic basis of inhibitor development and treatment derives from a time when patients were receiving frequent factor infusions and focused on immune tolerance induction following inhibitor development. DISCUSSION: More recently, care was revolutionized again in haemophilia A with the approval of emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated FVIII function, to prevent bleeding. The use of emicizumab prophylaxis has resulted in a significantly slower accumulation of factor exposure days and continued effective prophylaxis in the case of inhibitor development. While emicizumab is effective at reducing the frequency of bleeding events in patients with haemophilia A, management of breakthrough bleeds, trauma, and surgeries still requires additional treatment. Ensuring that FVIII is a therapeutic option, particularly for life-threatening bleeding events and major surgeries is critical to optimizing the care of persons with haemophilia A. Other novel non-factor concentrate therapies, including rebalancing agents, will dramatically change the landscape for persons with haemophilia B with inhibitors. CONCLUSION: This review discusses the changing landscape regarding the timing of inhibitor development and management strategies after inhibitor development, stressing the importance of education across the community to continue to vigilantly monitor for inhibitors and be prepared to treat persons with inhibitors.

Inhibitors: Diagnostic challenges, unknowns of inhibitor development, treatment of bleeding and surgery, and insights into diagnosis and treatment in China.

Factor (F) VIII inhibitors develop in around 30% of previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia, to a lesser extend in moderate and mild haemophilia A and in up to 10% in severe haemophilia B. Diagnostic challenges and questions remain including access to high quality testing, the role for functional inhibitor testing and binding antibody testing, and the adaptations needed in the presence of non-factor replacement therapy. Despite significant gains in knowledge there are still many unanswered questions underlying the immunologic mechanisms of inhibitor development and tolerance. Therapeutic options include eradication of inhibitors using immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI), prophylaxis with bypassing agents (i.e., recombinant activated factor VII /rFVIIa or activated prothrombin complex concentrate/aPCC) or non-factor replacement therapies (e.g., emicizumab) and treatment of bleeds or coverage of surgeries/invasive procedure. Recently a haemophilia centre capacity building program was launched in China to further develop the infrastructure and support needed to improve the diagnosis of haemophilia, detection of inhibitors, and continue to improve the care of patients with haemophilia and inhibitors.

Eptacog beta efficacy and safety in the treatment and control of bleeding in paediatric subjects (<12 years) with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Eptacog beta is a new recombinant activated human factor VII bypassing agent approved in the United States for the treatment and control of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors 12 years of age or older. AIM: To prospectively assess in a phase 3 clinical trial (PERSEPT 2) eptacog beta efficacy and safety for treatment of bleeding in children <12 years of age with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors. METHODS: Using a randomised crossover design, subjects received initial doses of 75 or 225 µg/kg eptacog beta followed by 75 µg/kg dosing at predefined intervals (as determined by clinical response) to treat bleeding episodes (BEs). Treatment success criteria included a haemostasis evaluation of 'excellent' or 'good' without use of additional eptacog beta, alternative haemostatic agent or blood product, and no increase in pain following the first 'excellent' or 'good' assessment. RESULTS: Treatment success proportions in 25 subjects (1-11 years) who experienced 546 mild or moderate BEs were 65% in the 75 µg/kg initial dose regimen (IDR) and 60% in the 225 µg/kg IDR 12 h following initial eptacog beta infusion. By 24 h, the treatment success proportions were 97% for the 75 µg/kg IDR and 98% for the 225 µg/kg IDR. No thrombotic events, allergic reactions, neutralising antibodies or treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Both 75 and 225 µg/kg eptacog beta IDRs provided safe and effective treatment and control of bleeding in children <12 years of age.

Successful Perioperative Management of Orthotopic Cardiac Transplantation in a Pediatric Patient With Concurrent Congenital von Willebrand Disease and Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome Using Recombinant von Willebrand Factor.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common bleeding disorder and reportedly affects 1:1,000 of the world's population. There are three subtypes of VWD characterized by a quantitative defect (types 1 and 3 VWD) or a qualitative defect (type 2 VWD). Type 1 VWD results in a partial deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and affects approximately 75% of individuals with VWD, whereas type 3 VWD results in a severe or complete deficiency of VWF. Individuals with type 2 VWD subtypes (types 2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N VWD) express a dysfunctional VWF protein that has impaired interactions with platelets or factor VIII. The majority of individuals with VWD have mild type 1 VWD and occasionally require bolus infusions of VWF for severe bleeding or major surgery. A subset of patients, especially those with type 2A or 3 VWD, may require more frequent VWF replacement or prophylaxis for refractory bleeding or bleeding prevention, respectively. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a rare bleeding disorder that primarily occurs as a result of an underlying disease or other pathologic mechanism. Cases of AVWS associated with heart valve defects, left ventricular assist devices, or congenital cardiac disease result from high shear stress in the circulation that induces VWF unfolding and subsequent proteolysis of high-molecular-weight multimers by ADAMTS-13. In rare instances, plasma-derived factor VIII-containing VWF concentrates have been administered to individuals with AVWS for persistent or challenging bleeding events. In this case report, the hemostatic challenges and the perioperative management of cardiac transplantation surgery using a novel recombinant VWF product in a pediatric patient diagnosed with AVWS concomitant with congenital type 1 VWD are described. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's mother for this case report. The diagnosis of congenital VWD remains a challenge because of multiple potential modifiers that can alter VWF laboratory results. Concurrent conditions, such as congenital heart disease and the rare secondary condition of AVWS, in addition to congenital VWD, can further affect interpretation of coagulation studies. This can result in delays in diagnosis, increase severity of the bleeding phenotype, and complicate hemostatic management in individuals at risk for bleeding and thrombosis. A multidisciplinary approach, including anesthesiologists, cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, hematologists, and pharmacists, is critical to achieving optimal patient outcomes, as highlighted in this case report. As diagnostic capabilities and understanding of VWD broaden, future studies evaluating alternative treatment approaches for individuals with various types of VWD would be of great benefit to the medical community.

Emerging benefits of Fc fusion technology in the context of recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy.

Although the primary reason for recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) development was to reduce treatment burden associated with routine prophylaxis, new evidence suggests additional benefits of Fc fusion technology in the treatment of people with haemophilia A. Preclinical research has been utilized to characterize the potential immunomodulatory properties of rFVIIIFc, including an ability to reduce inflammation and induce tolerance to factor VIII. This has since been expanded into clinical research in immune tolerance induction (ITI) with rFVIIIFc, results of which suggest the potential for rapid tolerization in first-time ITI patients and therapeutic benefit in patients undergoing rescue ITI. The potential for improved joint health through the anti-inflammatory properties of rFVIIIFc has also been suggested. In addition, a new avenue of research into the role of rFVIIIFc in promoting bone health in patients with haemophilia A, potentially through reduced osteoclast formation, has yielded encouraging results that support further study. This review summarizes the existing preclinical and clinical studies of immunomodulation and tolerization with rFVIIIFc, as well as studies in joint and bone health, to elucidate the potential benefits of rFVIIIFc in haemophilia A beyond the extension of factor VIII half-life.

Marginal zone B cells are critical to factor VIII inhibitor formation in mice with hemophilia A.

Although factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy can be lifesaving for patients with hemophilia A, neutralizing alloantibodies to FVIII, known as inhibitors, develop in a significant number of patients and actively block FVIII activity, making bleeding difficult to control and prevent. Although a variety of downstream immune factors likely regulate inhibitor formation, the identification and subsequent targeting of key initiators in inhibitor development may provide an attractive approach to prevent inhibitor formation before amplification of the FVIII immune response occurs. As the initial steps in FVIII inhibitor development remain incompletely understood, we sought to define early regulators of FVIII inhibitor formation. Our results demonstrate that FVIII localizes in the marginal sinus of the spleen of FVIII-deficient mice shortly after injection, with significant colocalization with marginal zone (MZ) B cells. FVIII not only colocalizes with MZ B cells, but specific removal of MZ B cells also completely prevented inhibitor development following FVIII infusion. Subsequent rechallenge with FVIII following MZ B-cell reconstitution resulted in a primary antibody response, demonstrating that MZ B-cell depletion did not result in FVIII tolerance. Although recipient exposure to the viral-like adjuvant polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid enhanced anti-FVIII antibody formation, MZ B-cell depletion continued to display similar effectiveness in preventing inhibitor formation following FVIII infusion in this inflammatory setting. These data strongly suggest that MZ B cells play a critical role in initiating FVIII inhibitor formation and suggest a potential strategy to prevent anti-FVIII alloantibody formation in patients with hemophilia A.

The evolution of factor VIIa in the treatment of bleeding in haemophilia with inhibitors.

The use of activated factor VII (FVIIa) for the treatment of bleeding events in haemophilia patients with inhibitors was first reported over 30 years ago. Since then clinical trials, registries, case series, real-world experience and an understanding of its mechanism of action have transformed what was originally a scientific curiosity into one of the major treatments for inhibitor patients, with innovative therapeutic regimens, dose optimization and individualized care now widely practiced. Given current understanding and use, it might be easy to forget the years of clinical research that led up to this point; in this review, we lay out changes based on broad eras of rFVIIa use. These eras cover the original uncertainty associated with dosing, efficacy and safety; the transformation of care ushered in with its widespread use; and the optimization and individualization of patient care and the importance of specialized support provided by haemophilia treatment centres. Today with the introduction of novel prophylactic agents such as emicizumab, we once again find ourselves dealing with the uncertainties of how best to utilize rFVIIa and newer investigational variants such as marzeptacog alfa and eptacog beta; we hope that the experiences of the past three decades will serve as a guide for this new era of care.

The national blueprint for future basic and translational research to understand factor VIII immunogenicity: NHLBI State of the Science Workshop on factor VIII inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Inhibitor formation against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is an unresolved serious problem in replacement therapy for the X-linked bleeding disorder haemophilia A. Although FVIII inhibitors have been extensively studied, much of the basic mechanism of this immune response remains to be uncovered. AIM: Within the NHLBI State of the Science Workshop on Factor VIII Inhibitors, Working Group 3 identified three scientific priorities for basic and translational research on FVIII inhibitor formation. METHODS: A larger list of potential areas of research was initially developed as a basis for subsequent prioritization. Each scientific goal was further evaluated based on required effort, potential impact, approach, methods, technologies and models. RESULTS: The three priorities include the following: activation signals and immune regulation that shape the response to FVIII (including innate immunity, microbiome, adaptive immunity and regulatory T cell studies in humans); utility of animal models and non-animal approaches (in silico, genetic, single-cell/sorted population "omics," in vitro) to help predict inhibitor formation and identify novel therapeutics; and impact of the source of FVIII, its structure and von Willebrand factor on immunogenicity and tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Early interactions between FVIII and the immune system, biomarker development and studies in different patient groups (previously treated or untreated, with or without inhibitor formation, patients undergoing immune tolerance induction or gene therapy) deserve particular emphasis. Finally, linking basic to clinical studies, development of a repository for biospecimens and opportunities for interdisciplinary research training are important components to solving the urgent problem of inhibitor formation.

Immune tolerance induction in paediatric patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: The formation of neutralizing antifactor VIII (fVIII) antibodies, called inhibitors, is the most common complication in modern haemophilia A care. Novel non-factor replacement therapies, such as emicizumab, have sought to address the limitations of bypassing agents for bleeding management in patients with inhibitors. However, immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the primary method for eradicating inhibitors and restoring the hemostatic response to fVIII. AIM: The aim of this study was to review a case series of paediatric patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors who have received ITI for inhibitor eradication concomitantly with emicizumab prophylaxis for bleeding prevention. METHODS: Single institution retrospective chart review of paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A receiving ITI and emicizumab. RESULTS: Seven patients were included in this cohort. Six patients used three different recombinant fVIII products at 100 IU/kg three times per week, and one patient used a plasma-derived fVIII product at an initial dose of 50 IU/kg three times per week. Three patients achieved a negative inhibitor titre <0.6 Chromogenic Bethesda Units per mL (CBU/mL), and two patients achieved a normal fVIII recovery ≥66%. There were nine bleeding events in four patients, but no thrombotic events. All patients remained on ITI and emicizumab. CONCLUSION: Immune tolerance induction while on emicizumab prophylaxis is a feasible approach in paediatric haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. This is the first report of the concomitant use of ITI in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis described as the 'Atlanta Protocol'.

A subset of high-titer anti-factor VIII A2 domain antibodies is responsive to treatment with factor VIII.

The primary B-cell epitopes of factor VIII (fVIII) are in the A2 and C2 domains. Within the C2 domain, antibody epitope and kinetics are more important than inhibitor titer in predicting pathogenicity in a murine bleeding model. To investigate this within the A2 domain, the pathogenicity of a diverse panel of antihuman fVIII A2 domain monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was tested in the murine model. MAbs were injected into hemophilia A mice, followed by injection of human B domain-deleted fVIII. Blood loss after a 4-mm tail snip was measured. The following anti-A2 MAbs were tested: high-titer type 1 inhibitors 4A4, 2-76, and 1D4; 2-54, a high-titer type 2 inhibitor; B94, a type 2 inhibitor; and noninhibitory MAbs GMA-012, 4C7, and B25. All high-titer type 1 MAbs produced blood loss that was significantly greater than control mice, whereas all non-inhibitory MAbs produced blood loss that was similar to control. The type 2 MAbs were not pathogenic despite 2-54 having an inhibitor titer of 34 000 BU/mg immunoglobulin G. In addition, a patient with a high-titer type 2 anti-A2 inhibitor who is responsive to fVIII is reported. The discrepancy between inhibitor titer and bleeding phenotype combined with similar findings in the C2 domain stress the importance of inhibitor properties not detected in the standard Bethesda assay in predicting response to fVIII therapy.

High-affinity, noninhibitory pathogenic C1 domain antibodies are present in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors.

Inhibitor formation in hemophilia A is the most feared treatment-related complication of factor VIII (fVIII) therapy. Most inhibitor patients with hemophilia A develop antibodies against the fVIII A2 and C2 domains. Recent evidence demonstrates that the C1 domain contributes to the inhibitor response. Inhibitory anti-C1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been identified that bind to putative phospholipid and von Willebrand factor (VWF) binding epitopes and block endocytosis of fVIII by antigen presenting cells. We now demonstrate by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry that 7 of 9 anti-human C1 mAbs tested recognize an epitope distinct from the C1 phospholipid binding site. These mAbs, designated group A, display high binding affinities for fVIII, weakly inhibit fVIII procoagulant activity, poorly inhibit fVIII binding to phospholipid, and exhibit heterogeneity with respect to blocking fVIII binding to VWF. Another mAb, designated group B, inhibits fVIII procoagulant activity, fVIII binding to VWF and phospholipid, fVIIIa incorporation into the intrinsic Xase complex, thrombin generation in plasma, and fVIII uptake by dendritic cells. Group A and B epitopes are distinct from the epitope recognized by the canonical, human-derived inhibitory anti-C1 mAb, KM33, whose epitope overlaps both groups A and B. Antibodies recognizing group A and B epitopes are present in inhibitor plasmas from patients with hemophilia A. Additionally, group A and B mAbs increase fVIII clearance and are pathogenic in a hemophilia A mouse tail snip bleeding model. Group A anti-C1 mAbs represent the first identification of pathogenic, weakly inhibitory antibodies that increase fVIII clearance.

Toward optimal therapy for inhibitors in hemophilia.

Treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B has undergone significant advances during the past 2 decades. However, despite these advances, the development of antibodies that inhibit the function of infused clotting factor remains a major challenge and is considered the most significant complication of hemophilia treatment. This chapter reviews current tools available for the care of patients with inhibitors and highlights areas where progress is imminent or strongly needed. For management of bleeding, bypassing agents remain the mainstay of therapy. Recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrates are similarly effective in populations of patients with hemophilia and inhibitors; however, individuals may show a better response to one agent over another. Recent studies have shown that prophylaxis with bypassing agents can reduce bleeding episodes by ∼50%-80%. The prophylactic use of bypassing agents is an important tool to reduce morbidity in patients before they undergo immune tolerance induction (ITI) and in those with persistent high titer inhibitors, but cost and lack of convenience remain barriers. Because of the significant burden that inhibitors add to the individual patient and the health care system, inhibitor eradication should be pursued in as many patients as possible. ITI is an effective tool, particularly in patients with severe hemophilia A and good risk profiles, and leads to a return to a normal factor VIII response in ∼60% of patients. However, for the group of patients who fail to respond to ITI or have hemophilia B, new and improved tools are needed.

High-resolution mapping of epitopes on the C2 domain of factor VIII by analysis of point mutants using surface plasmon resonance.

Neutralizing anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies that develop in patients with hemophilia A and in murine hemophilia A models, clinically termed "inhibitors," bind to several distinct surfaces on the FVIII-C2 domain. To map these epitopes at high resolution, 60 recombinant FVIII-C2 proteins were generated, each having a single surface-exposed residue mutated to alanine or a conservative substitution. The binding kinetics of these muteins to 11 monoclonal, inhibitory anti-FVIII-C2 antibodies were evaluated by surface plasmon resonance and the results compared with those obtained for wild-type FVIII-C2. Clusters of residues with significantly altered binding kinetics identified "functional" B-cell epitopes, defined as those residues contributing appreciable antigen-antibody avidity. These antibodies were previously shown to neutralize FVIII activity by interfering with proteolytic activation of FVIII by thrombin or factor Xa, or with its binding to phospholipid surfaces, von Willebrand factor, or other components of the intrinsic tenase complex. Fine mapping of epitopes by surface plasmon resonance also indicated surfaces through which FVIII interacts with proteins and phospholipids as it participates in coagulation. Mutations that significantly altered the dissociation times/half-lives identified functionally important interactions within antigen-antibody interfaces and suggested specific sequence modifications to generate novel, less antigenic FVIII proteins with possible therapeutic potential for treatment of inhibitor patients.

The diversity of the immune response to the A2 domain of human factor VIII.

Approximately 30% of patients with severe hemophilia A develop inhibitory anti-factor VIII (fVIII) antibodies (Abs). We characterized 29 anti-human A2 monoclonal Abs (mAbs) produced in a murine hemophilia A model. A basis set of nonoverlapping mAbs was defined by competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, producing 5 major groups. The overlapping epitopes covered nearly the entire A2 surface when mapped by homolog-scanning mutagenesis. Most group A mAbs recognized a previously described epitope bounded by Arg484-Ile508 in the N-terminal A2 subdomain, resulting in binding to activated fVIII and noncompetitive inhibition of the intrinsic fXase complex. Group B and C mAbs displayed little or no inhibitory activity. Group D and E mAbs recognized epitopes in the C-terminal A2 subdomain. A subset of group D mAbs inhibited the activation of fVIII by interfering with thrombin-catalyzed cleavage at Arg372 at the A1-A2 domain junction. Other group D mAbs displayed indeterminate or no inhibitory activity despite inhibiting cleavage at Arg740 at the A2-B domain junction. Group E mAbs inhibited fVIII light-chain cleavage at Arg1689. Inhibition of cleavages at Arg372 and Arg1689 represent novel mechanisms of inhibitor function and, along with the extensive epitope spectrum identified in this study, reveal hitherto unrecognized complexity in the immune response to fVIII.

Structure of the factor VIII C2 domain in a ternary complex with 2 inhibitor antibodies reveals classical and nonclassical epitopes.

The factor VIII C2 domain is a highly immunogenic domain, whereby inhibitory antibodies develop following factor VIII replacement therapy for congenital hemophilia A patients. Inhibitory antibodies also arise spontaneously in cases of acquired hemophilia A. The structural basis for molecular recognition by 2 classes of anti-C2 inhibitory antibodies that bind to factor VIII simultaneously was investigated by x-ray crystallography. The C2 domain/3E6 FAB/G99 FAB ternary complex illustrates that each antibody recognizes epitopes on opposing faces of the factor VIII C2 domain. The 3E6 epitope forms direct contacts to the C2 domain at 2 loops consisting of Glu2181-Ala2188 and Thr2202-Arg2215, whereas the G99 epitope centers on Lys2227 and also makes direct contacts with loops Gln2222-Trp2229, Leu2261-Ser2263, His2269-Val2282, and Arg2307-Gln2311. Each binding interface is highly electrostatic, with positive charge present on both C2 epitopes and complementary negative charge on each antibody. A new model of membrane association is also presented, where the 3E6 epitope faces the negatively charged membrane surface and Arg2320 is poised at the center of the binding interface. These results illustrate the potential complexities of the polyclonal anti-factor VIII immune response and further define the "classical" and "nonclassical" types of antibody inhibitors against the factor VIII C2 domain.

Characterization and solution structure of the factor VIII C2 domain in a ternary complex with classical and non-classical inhibitor antibodies.

The most significant complication for patients with severe cases of congenital or acquired hemophilia A is the development of inhibitor antibodies against coagulation factor VIII (fVIII). The C2 domain of fVIII is a significant antigenic target of anti-fVIII antibodies. Here, we have utilized small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) and biochemical techniques to characterize interactions between two different classes of anti-C2 domain inhibitor antibodies and the isolated C2 domain. Multiple assays indicated that antibodies 3E6 and G99 bind independently to the fVIII C2 domain and can form a stable ternary complex. SAXS-derived numerical estimates of dimensional parameters for all studied complexes agree with the proportions of the constituent proteins. Ab initio modeling of the SAXS data results in a long kinked structure of the ternary complex, showing an angle centered at the C2 domain of ∼130°. Guided by biochemical data, rigid body modeling of subunits into the molecular envelope of the ternary complex suggests that antibody 3E6 recognizes a C2 domain epitope consisting of the Arg(2209)-Ser(2216) and Leu(2178)-Asp(2187) loops. In contrast, antibody G99 recognizes the C2 domain primarily through the Pro(2221)-Trp(2229) loop. These two epitopes are on opposing sides of the fVIII C2 domain, are consistent with the solvent accessibility in the context of the entire fVIII molecule, and provide further structural detail regarding the pathogenic immune response to fVIII.

A major determinant of the immunogenicity of factor VIII in a murine model is independent of its procoagulant function.

A main complication of treatment of patients with hemophilia A is the development of anti-factor VIII (fVIII) antibodies. The immunogenicity of fVIII potentially is a function of its procoagulant activity, which may result in danger signals that drive the immune response. Alternatively, intrinsic structural elements in fVIII may be particularly immunogenic. Finally, VWF, the carrier protein for fVIII in plasma, may play a role in immune recognition. We compared the immunogenicity of wild-type (wt) B domain-deleted fVIII and 2 inactive fVIII molecules, R372A/R1689A fVIII and V634M fVIII in fVIII(-/-) and fVIII(-/-)/VWF(-/-) mice. R372A/R1689A fVIII lacks proteolytic recognition sites and is not released from VWF. In contrast, V634M fVIII undergoes proteolytic cleavage and dissociation from VWF. No significant difference was observed in the immunogenicity of wt fVIII and V634M fVIII. R372A/R1689A fVIII was slightly less immunogenic in a subset of immunization regimens tested. High doses of wt fVIII were required to produce an immune response in fVIII(-/-)/VWF(-/-) mice. Our results indicate that a main component of the immune response to fVIII is independent of its procoagulant function, is both positively and negatively affected by its association with VWF, and may involve intrinsic elements of fVIII structure.

Nanobody activator improves sensitivity of the von Willebrand factor activity assay to multimer size.

BACKGROUND: The activity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in facilitating platelet adhesion and aggregation correlates with its multimer size. Traditional ristocetin-dependent functional assays lack sensitivity to multimer sizes. Recently, nanobodies targeting the autoinhibitory module and activating VWF were identified. OBJECTIVES: To develop an assay that can differentiate the platelet-binding activity of VWF multimers. METHODS: A novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (nanobody-triggered glycoprotein Ib binding assay [VWF:GPIbNab]) utilizing a VWF-activating nanobody was developed. Recombinant VWF, plasma-derived VWF (pdVWF), and selected gel-filtrated fractions of pdVWF were evaluated for VWF antigen and activity levels. A linear regression model was developed to estimate the specific activity of VWF multimers. RESULTS: Of the 3 activating nanobodies tested, 6C11 with the lowest activation effect exhibited the highest sensitivity for high-molecular-weight multimers (HMWMs) of VWF. VWF:GPIbNab utilizing 6C11 (VWF:GPIbNab6C11) produced significantly higher activity/antigen ratios for recombinant VWF (>2.0) and HMWM-enriched pdVWF fractions (>2.0) than for pdVWF (∼1.0) or fractions enriched with shorter multimers (<1.0). The differences were much larger than those produced by VWF:GPIbNab utilizing other nanobodies, VWF:GPIbM, VWF:GPIbR, or VWF:CB assays. Linear regression analysis of 5 pdVWF fractions of various multimer sizes produced an estimated specific activity of 2.7 for HMWMs. The analysis attributed >90% of the VWF activity measured by VWF:GPIbNab6C11 to that of HMWMs, which is significantly higher than all other activity assays tested. CONCLUSION: The VWF:GPIbNab6C11 assay exhibits higher sensitivity to HMWMs than ristocetin-based and collagen-binding assays. Future studies examining the application of this assay in clinical settings and any associated therapeutic benefit of doing so are warranted.

Factor VIII A3 domain substitution N1922S results in hemophilia A due to domain-specific misfolding and hyposecretion of functional protein.

A point mutation leading to amino acid substitution N1922S in the A3 domain of factor VIII (fVIII) results in moderate to severe hemophilia A. A heterologous expression system comparing N1922S-fVIII and wild-type fVIII (wt-fVIII) demonstrated similar specific coagulant activities but poor secretion of N1922S-fVIII. Immunocytochemical analysis revealed that intracellular levels of N1922S-fVIII were similar to those of wt-fVIII. The specific activity of intracellular N1922S-fVIII was 10% of that of wt-fVIII, indicating the presence of large amounts of a nonfunctional N1922S-fVIII-folding intermediate. wt-fVIII colocalized with both endoplasmic reticulum (ER)- and Golgi-resident proteins. In contrast, N1922S-fVIII colocalized only with ER-resident proteins, indicating a block in transit from the ER to the Golgi. A panel of conformation-dependent monoclonal antibodies was used to determine native or nonnative folding of N1922S-fVIII. Intracellular N1922S-fVIII but not secreted N1922S-fVIII displayed abnormal folding in the A3 and C1 domains, indicating that the A1, A2, and C2 domains fold independently into antigenically intact tertiary structures, but that folding is stalled in the mutant A3 and its contiguous C1 domain. In summary, the N1922S substitution results in poor secretion of a functional protein, and the domain-specific defect in folding and intracellular trafficking of N1922S-fVIII is a novel mechanism for secretion defects leading to hemophilia A.

Factor VIII antibody immune complexes modulate the humoral response to factor VIII in an epitope-dependent manner.

Introduction: Soluble antigens complexed with immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies can induce robust adaptive immune responses in vitro and in animal models of disease. Factor VIII immune complexes (FVIII-ICs) have been detected in individuals with hemophilia A and severe von Willebrand disease following FVIII infusions. Yet, it is unclear if and how FVIII-ICs affect antibody development over time. Methods: In this study, we analyzed internalization of FVIII complexed with epitope-mapped FVIII-specific IgG monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) by murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) in vitro and antibody development in hemophilia A (FVIII-/-) mice injected with FVIII-IC over time. Results: FVIII complexed with 2-116 (A1 domain MAb), 2-113 (A3 domain MAb), and I55 (C2 domain MAb) significantly increased FVIII uptake by BMDC but only FVIII/2-116 enhanced antibody titers in FVIII-/- mice compared to FVIII alone. FVIII/4A4 (A2 domain MAb) showed similar FVIII uptake by BMDC to that of isolated FVIII yet significantly increased antibody titers when injected in FVIII-/- mice. Enhanced antibody responses observed with FVIII/2-116 and FVIII/4A4 complexes in vivo were abrogated in the absence of the FVIII carrier protein von Willebrand factor. Conclusion: These findings suggest that a subset of FVIII-IC modulates the humoral response to FVIII in an epitope-dependent manner, which may provide insight into the antibody response observed in some patients with hemophilia A.