RESUMO
Background: Volume overload (VO) is common in the intensive care unit (ICU) and associated with negative outcomes. Approaches have been investigated to curtail VO; however, none specifically focused on medication diluent volume optimization. Objective: Investigate the impact of a pharmacist-driven medication diluent volume optimization protocol on fluid balance in critically ill patients. Methods: A prospective, pilot study was conducted in a medical ICU during October 2021 to December 2021 (pre) and February 2022 to April 2022 (post). A pharmacist-driven medication diluent volume optimization protocol focusing on vasopressor and antimicrobial diluent volumes was implemented. Demographics and clinical data were collected during ICU admission up to 7 days. The primary outcome was net fluid balance on day 3. Secondary outcomes were medication volumes administered, net fluid balance, ICU length of stay, and mortality. Results: Supply chain shortages caused the study to stop at the end of February 2022. Overall, 152 patients were included (123 pre group, 29 post group). The most common admission diagnosis was acute respiratory failure (35%). Vasopressors and antimicrobials were utilized in 47% and 66% of patients, respectively. Net fluid balance on day 3 was greater but not significant in the post group (227.1 mL [-1840.3 to 3483.7] vs 2012.3 mL [-2686.0 to 4846.0]; P = .584). Antimicrobial diluent volumes were significantly less in the post group. No differences were seen in other secondary outcomes. Protocol group assignment was not associated with net fluid balance on day 3. Conclusion: Despite decreasing antimicrobial volume contributions, optimizing diluent volumes alone did not significantly impact overall volume status. Future studies should focus on comprehensive approaches to medication diluent optimization and fluid stewardship.
RESUMO
Introduction: Cefepime induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is commonly associated with renal dysfunction, however CIN can occur in patients with normal renal function or renally dose-adjusted regimens. Few reports of this kind have obtained cefepime concentrations to assist in diagnosis. Patient Case: A 42-year old female with a complex past medical history was transferred to our facility with chief complaint of worsening shock and respiratory failure, and the patient was also noted to be hypernatremic, experiencing diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and acute kidney injury (AKI). Her DKA resolved and hypernatremia and AKI began to improve. As a result, cefepime was dose-adjusted for renal function estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation. Her hospital course was complicated by persistent altered mental status (AMS), preventing extubation. Cefepime was discontinued due to concern for CIN, and a concentration was obtained 13-hours after the last dose which was elevated at 49 µg/mL. Two days following cefepime discontinuation, the patient's mental status improved allowing for successful extubation. The patient remained stable and was discharged to an acute care floor and then ultimately back to home. Conclusion: CIN should be part of a wider differential diagnosis for patients experiencing encephalopathy, and inaccurate renal function estimation may be a risk factor for developing CIN. Furthermore, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may serve as an important clinical tool in diagnosing and managing CIN.