The emergence noise reduction quality improvement initiative to enhance patient safety and quality of care.

BACKGROUND: Operating room noise levels may hinder staff communication and cause distractions for providers, endangering patient safety. Owing to concerns of unacceptable noise levels during emergence from general anesthesia, our institution developed a quality improvement project. The SMART aim of this initiative was to decrease the average decibel noise level measured during emergence from general anesthesia in our operating rooms from 65.65 to 63 decibels and the maximum decibel noise level from 81.64 to 75 decibels over approximately 3 months. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team completed this project utilizing improvement science methodology from The Model for Improvement, including interventions tested via Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Data were measured, collected manually, and entered in an Excel spreadsheet. Data were analyzed using statistical process control methods, including a Run Chart. Our measures were the average and maximum decibel noise levels during emergence from general anesthesia. RESULTS: Several interventions were associated with a decrease in the average and maximum decibel noise levels. Interventions included educational presentations to perioperative staff; the operating room nurse taking the role of pausing any music; and the utilization of an audible and visual decibel alarm meter to sound and blink lights when the noise level is too high. During the initiative, the average (and maximum) decibel noise levels during emergence from general anesthesia in our operating rooms decreased from 65.65 (81.84) to 61.5 (76.44). CONCLUSIONS: This improvement project was associated with a decrease in decibel noise levels during emergence. We enhanced a process and encouraged culture change at an academic pediatric hospital to enhance the safety of our care.

Antifibrinolytics Are Not Associated With Reduced Blood Loss in Minimally-Invasive Endoscopic-Assisted Craniectomy for Repair of Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.

ABSTRACT: Minimally-invasive endoscopic-assisted craniectomy (EAC) achieves similar functional and cosmetic outcomes, whereas reducing morbidity risk that is often associated with complex cranial vault reconstruction. Antifibrinolytics (AF) usage to limit blood loss and transfusion requirements during complex cranial vault reconstruction has been studied extensively; however, studies are limited for AF therapy in EAC. The aim of this single-center retrospective observational cohort pilot study was to evaluate whether the use of AF was associated with reduced blood loss in infants undergoing EAC. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in blood loss between patients who received AF and those that did not receive AF during EAC. Non-syndromic patients who underwent single-suture EAC were retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcome measure was intraoperative calculated blood loss (mL/kg). Secondary outcome measures included perioperative red blood cells transfusion volumes, number of blood donor exposures, and pediatric intensive care unit and total hospital length of stay. Study cohort demographic and outcome data were analyzed; Fisher exact test was used for categorical data, Student t test was used for continuous data. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Forty-nine EAC patients were included in the study with 34 patients in the AF cohort and 15 patients in the non-AF cohort. There were no significant differences in demographics between the 2 groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in intraoperative calculated blood loss or any secondary outcome measure. In our single-suture EAC study cohorts, AF administration was not associated with a decrease in blood loss when compared to those that did not receive AF therapy.

Emergence Agitation and Delirium: Considerations for Epidemiology and Routine Monitoring in Pediatric Patients.

Emergence from anesthesia can be associated with a wide spectrum of cognitive and behavioral dysregulation in children, including delirium or acute brain dysfunction. This period of neurobehavioral recovery can be further confounded by pain, anxiety, and fear. The implementation of monitoring for level of consciousness, pain, and delirium using valid pediatric tools is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis due to overlapping symptomatology and support appropriate management. Understanding the epidemiology of delirium in the postoperative setting will require consistent use of accurate terminology in the medical literature. The current interchangeable use of the terms "emergence agitation" and "emergence delirium" needs to be highlighted and awareness of differences in patient conditions and assessment tools is essential. We discuss epidemiology of emergence agitation and delirium in the pediatric population, and the challenges for future delineation of monitoring and management. Furthermore, we describe the possible impact of long-term consequences of emergence delirium among infants and children, and the necessary areas of future research.

Successful utilisation of epidural analgesia for perioperative pain management in a child with sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit (SCN1A) gene mutation.

Sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit (SCN1A) gene mutation is a rare disorder with a large spectrum of clinical presentations. Little is known regarding anaesthetic and analgesic management of these patients. We present a case of a child with SCN1A gene mutation that was successfully managed with an epidural for perioperative analgesia for an abdominal surgery.

Cry presence and amplitude do not reflect cortical processing of painful stimuli in newborns with distinct responses to touch or cold.

OBJECTIVE: Newborns requiring hospitalisation frequently undergo painful procedures. Prevention of pain in infants is of prime concern because of adverse associations with physiological and neurological development. However, pain mitigation is currently guided by behavioural observation assessments that have not been validated against direct evidence of pain processing in the brain. The aim of this study was to determine whether cry presence or amplitude is a valid indicator of pain processing in newborns. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Newborn nursery. PATIENTS: Healthy infants born at >37 weeks and <42 weeks gestation. INTERVENTIONS: We prospectively studied newborn cortical responses to light touch, cold and heel stick, and the amplitude of associated infant vocalisations using our previously published paradigms of time-locked electroencephalogram (EEG) with simultaneous audio recordings. RESULTS: Latencies of cortical peak responses to each of the three stimuli type were significantly different from each other. Of 54 infants, 13 (24%), 19 (35%) and 35 (65%) had cries in response to light touch, cold and heel stick, respectively. Cry in response to non-painful stimuli did not predict cry in response to heel stick. All infants with EEG data had measurable pain responses to heel stick, whether they cried or not. There was no association between presence or amplitude of cries and cortical nociceptive amplitudes. CONCLUSIONS: In newborns with distinct brain responses to light touch, cold and pain, cry presence or amplitude characteristics do not provide adequate behavioural markers of pain signalling in the brain. New bedside assessments of newborn pain may need to be developed using brain-based methodologies as benchmarks in order to provide optimal pain mitigation.