[Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chile, Colombia, and Peru from a children's rights perspectiveResposta à pandemia de COVID-19 no Chile, Colômbia e Peru com foco nos direitos da criança]. / Respuesta con enfoque de derechos de la niñez frente a la pandemia por COVID-19 en Chile, Colombia y Perú.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the strategies established by Chile, Colombia, and Peru during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them from a children's rights perspective. METHODS: A qualitative study with comparative analysis of public policies was conducted around seven cat-egories constructed by the Latin American Chapter of the International Society for Social Pediatrics and Child Health, based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Country documents were selected based on convenience sampling and were analyzed in deliberative dialogues. RESULTS: 173 documents from the three countries were reviewed. There was convergence around: prioritization of prevention of community transmission of the virus over promotion of the exercise of children's rights; lack of participation of children and adolescents in the process of developing public policies; and lack of progress in the recognition and protection of the exercise of children's rights overall. There were no major divergences beyond identified inequality gaps grounded in the reality of each country. CONCLUSION: The pandemic has affected the functioning of the economic, social, health, education, environmental, and governance systems in these three countries. While this study shows progress in the inclusion of the children's rights approach in formulated policies, the recognition of children and adolescents as holders of social and political rights could allow the construction of collective alternatives that guarantee health and well-being for all people throughout the life course.

OBJETIVO: Descrever as estratégias que foram utilizadas por Chile, Colômbia e Peru durante o primeiro ano da pandemia de COVID-19 e compará-las a partir da perspectiva dos direitos da criança. MÉTODOS: Realizou-se um estudo qualitativo de análise comparativa de políticas públicas, tomando como eixo sete categorias construídas pelo Capítulo Latino-americano da International Society for Social Pediatrics & Child Health a partir da Convenção sobre os Direitos da Criança (CDC). A seleção de documentos dos países foi feita por conveniência, e sua análise ocorreu mediante diálogos deliberativos. RESULTADOS: Foram revisados 173 documentos dos três países. A prioridade da prevenção da transmissão comunitária do vírus destaca-se por sua convergência, em detrimento da promoção do exercício dos direitos da criança, da falta de participação de crianças e adolescentes no processo de formulação de políticas públicas e da falta de progresso no reconhecimento e proteção da efetivação de todos os seus direitos. Não houve grandes divergências além das lacunas de desigualdade identificadas com base na realidade de cada país. CONCLUSÕES: A pandemia afetou o funcionamento dos sistemas econômico, social, de saúde, educação, meio ambiente e governança desses três países. Embora este estudo mostre avanços na inclusão da perspectiva dos direitos da criança e do adolescente nas políticas formuladas, a compreensão deles como sujeitos sociais e políticos titulares de direitos pode permitir a construção de alternativas coletivas que garantam saúde e bem-estar a todas as pessoas ao longo do curso da vida.

Associated factors for mortality in a COVID-19 colombian cohort: is the third wave relevant when Mu variant was predominant epidemiologically?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between Colombia's third wave when the Mu variant was predominant epidemiologically (until 75%) in Colombia and COVID-19 all-cause in-hospital mortality. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, we included hospitalized patients ≥18 years with SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 2020 to September 2021 in ten hospitals from three cities in Colombia. Description analysis, survival, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the third epidemic wave and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 25,371 patients were included. The age-stratified time-to-mortality curves showed differences according to epidemic waves in patients ≥75 years (log-rank test p = 0.012). In the multivariate Cox analysis, the third wave was not associated with increased mortality relative to the first wave (aHR 0.95; 95%CI 0.84-1.08), but there was an interaction between age ≥75 years and the third wave finding a lower HR for mortality (aHR 0.56, 95%CI 0.36-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an increase in in-hospital mortality during the third epidemic wave in which the Mu variant was predominant in Colombia. The reduced hazard in mortality in patients ≥75 years hospitalized in the third wave could be explained by the high coverage of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this population and patients with underlying conditions.

COVID-19 in children and the influence on the employment activity of their female caregivers: A cross sectional gender perspective study.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, women disproportionately assume more unpaid activities, affecting their employment. Objective: Describe the influence of COVID-19 on the employment of caregivers of children and adolescents from a gender perspective. Methods: Cross-sectional study in three high-complexity hospitals in Bogotá, Colombia from April 2020 to June 2021. A subsample of the FARA cohort was taken, including those patients with a positive test for SARS-COV2. We took as our analysis category children older than 8 years and younger than 18 years who had a positive SARS-COV2 test, as well as, caregivers of all children with a positive SARS-COV2 test. This subsample was drawn from the FARA cohort. A survey was applied to them. We carried out a descriptive and stratified analysis by age group, educational, and socioeconomic level. Results: We included 60 surveys of caregivers and 10 surveys of children. The main caregiver in 94.8% of the cases was a female. At the beginning of the pandemic, 63.3% of the caregivers were employed, and 78.9% of those lost their employment. The vast majority of these caregiver were women (96.6%, n = 29). A predominance of loss of work activity was documented in caregivers of children in early childhood 66.6% (n = 20), with lower education 66.6% (n = 20), and from lower strata 56.6% (n = 17). Conclusion: Caregivers of children with COVID-19 with low educational levels and lower socioeconomic conditions, as well as those with children under 5 years showed greater likelihood of employment loss between the interviewed subsample.

Respuesta con enfoque de derechos de la niñez frente a la pandemia por COVID-19 en Chile, Colombia y Perú

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Describir las estrategias que fueron establecidas por Chile, Colombia y Perú durante el primer año de la pandemia por COVID-19 y compararlas desde el enfoque de derechos de la niñez. Métodos. Se realizó un estudio cualitativo de análisis comparado de políticas públicas, tomando como eje siete categorías construidas por el Capítulo Latinoamericano de la International-Society-for-Social-Pediatrics-and-Child-Health a partir de la Convención de Derechos de la Niñez (CDN). La selección de los documentos de los países se realizó por conveniencia y su análisis en diálogos deliberativos. Resultados. Se revisaron 173 documentos de los tres países. Destaca como convergencia la priorización de la prevención de la transmisión comunitaria del virus, por sobre la promoción del ejercicio de derechos de la niñez, la falta de participación de niños, niñas y adolescentes (NNA) en el proceso de elaboración de las políticas públicas, y la falta de avance en el reconocimiento y protección del ejercicio de todos sus derechos. No hubo mayores divergencias más allá de brechas de desigualdad identificadas con base a la realidad de cada país. Conclusión. La pandemia ha afectado el funcionamiento de los sistemas económicos, sociales, de salud, educación, medioambiente y gobernanza de estos tres países. Si bien este estudio muestra un avance en la inclusión del enfoque de derechos de NNA en las políticas formuladas, su comprensión como sujetos sociales y políticos titulares de derecho podría permitir la construcción de alternativas colectivas que garanticen la salud y el bienestar para todas las personas en el curso de vida.

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. Describe the strategies established by Chile, Colombia, and Peru during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them from a children's rights perspective. Methods. A qualitative study with comparative analysis of public policies was conducted around seven categories constructed by the Latin American Chapter of the International Society for Social Pediatrics and Child Health, based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Country documents were selected based on convenience sampling and were analyzed in deliberative dialogues. Results. 173 documents from the three countries were reviewed. There was convergence around: prioritization of prevention of community transmission of the virus over promotion of the exercise of children's rights; lack of participation of children and adolescents in the process of developing public policies; and lack of progress in the recognition and protection of the exercise of children’s rights overall. There were no major divergences beyond identified inequality gaps grounded in the reality of each country. Conclusion. The pandemic has affected the functioning of the economic, social, health, education, environmental, and governance systems in these three countries. While this study shows progress in the inclusion of the children's rights approach in formulated policies, the recognition of children and adolescents as holders of social and political rights could allow the construction of collective alternatives that guarantee health and well-being for all people throughout the life course.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Descrever as estratégias que foram utilizadas por Chile, Colômbia e Peru durante o primeiro ano da pandemia de COVID-19 e compará-las a partir da perspectiva dos direitos da criança. Métodos. Realizou-se um estudo qualitativo de análise comparativa de políticas públicas, tomando como eixo sete categorias construídas pelo Capítulo Latino-americano da International Society for Social Pediatrics & Child Health a partir da Convenção sobre os Direitos da Criança (CDC). A seleção de documentos dos países foi feita por conveniência, e sua análise ocorreu mediante diálogos deliberativos. Resultados. Foram revisados 173 documentos dos três países. A prioridade da prevenção da transmissão comunitária do vírus destaca-se por sua convergência, em detrimento da promoção do exercício dos direitos da criança, da falta de participação de crianças e adolescentes no processo de formulação de políticas públicas e da falta de progresso no reconhecimento e proteção da efetivação de todos os seus direitos. Não houve grandes divergências além das lacunas de desigualdade identificadas com base na realidade de cada país. Conclusões. A pandemia afetou o funcionamento dos sistemas econômico, social, de saúde, educação, meio ambiente e governança desses três países. Embora este estudo mostre avanços na inclusão da perspectiva dos direitos da criança e do adolescente nas políticas formuladas, a compreensão deles como sujeitos sociais e políticos titulares de direitos pode permitir a construção de alternativas coletivas que garantam saúde e bem-estar a todas as pessoas ao longo do curso da vida.