Biomarkers of Migraine and Cluster Headache: Differences and Similarities.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers that differentiate migraine from cluster headache patients and imaging features that are shared. METHODS: Clinical, functional, and structural MRI data were obtained from 20 migraineurs, 20 cluster headache patients, and 15 healthy controls. Support vector machine algorithms and a stepwise removal process were used to discriminate headache patients from controls, and subgroups of patients. Regional between-group differences and association between imaging features and patients' clinical characteristics were also investigated. RESULTS: The accuracy for classifying headache patients from controls was 80%. The classification accuracy for discrimination between migraine and controls was 89%, and for cluster headache and controls it was 98%. For distinguishing cluster headache from migraine patients, the MRI classifier yielded an accuracy of 78%, whereas MRI-clinical combined classification model achieved an accuracy of 99%. Bilateral hypothalamic and periaqueductal gray (PAG) functional networks were the most important MRI features in classifying migraine and cluster headache patients from controls. The left thalamic network was the most discriminative MRI feature in classifying migraine from cluster headache patients. Compared to migraine, cluster headache patients showed decreased functional interaction between the left thalamus and cortical areas mediating interoception and sensory integration. The presence of restlessness was the most important clinical feature in discriminating the two groups of patients. INTERPRETATION: Functional biomarkers, including the hypothalamic and PAG networks, are shared by migraine and cluster headache patients. The thalamocortical pathway may be the neural substrate that differentiates migraine from cluster headache attacks with their distinct clinical features. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:729-742.

Effectiveness and safety of monthly versus quarterly fremanezumab for migraine prevention: An Italian, multicenter, real-life study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fremanezumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide for migraine prevention, is available in monthly (225 mg) and quarterly (675 mg) doses. Previous studies showed efficacy and safety for both regimens, but a real-life comparison is lacking. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of monthly and quarterly fremanezumab in a real-life setting. METHODS: This Italian, prospective, multicenter study enrolled 95 migraine patients. During a 3-month treatment period, patients received either monthly or quarterly fremanezumab (49 monthly, 46 quarterly). A 6-month treatment period involved 79 patients (43 monthly, 36 quarterly). Monthly headache (MHD) and migraine days (MMD), number of days (AMD) and pills (AMP) of acute medication intake, and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) test, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores were recorded at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Adverse events (AEs), responder rates, and medication overuse were also investigated. RESULTS: Both monthly and quarterly treatments led to significant reductions in MMD, MHD, AMP, AMD, HIT-6, MIDAS, and NRS scores after 3 and 6 months. The monthly regimen exhibited a slightly greater reduction in MMD and MHD after the first quarter, with no significant difference observed after 6 months. The most common AE was transient injection-site reaction, without between-group differences. Responder rates and resolution of medication overuse did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both monthly and quarterly regimens were effective and safe, with a tendency for an advantage of the monthly regimen only in the first quarter of treatment.

Influence of next-generation artificial intelligence on headache research, diagnosis and treatment: the junior editorial board members' vision - part 1.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the field of biomedical research and treatment, leveraging machine learning (ML) and advanced algorithms to analyze extensive health and medical data more efficiently. In headache disorders, particularly migraine, AI has shown promising potential in various applications, such as understanding disease mechanisms and predicting patient responses to therapies. Implementing next-generation AI in headache research and treatment could transform the field by providing precision treatments and augmenting clinical practice, thereby improving patient and public health outcomes and reducing clinician workload. AI-powered tools, such as large language models, could facilitate automated clinical notes and faster identification of effective drug combinations in headache patients, reducing cognitive burdens and physician burnout. AI diagnostic models also could enhance diagnostic accuracy for non-headache specialists, making headache management more accessible in general medical practice. Furthermore, virtual health assistants, digital applications, and wearable devices are pivotal in migraine management, enabling symptom tracking, trigger identification, and preventive measures. AI tools also could offer stress management and pain relief solutions to headache patients through digital applications. However, considerations such as technology literacy, compatibility, privacy, and regulatory standards must be adequately addressed. Overall, AI-driven advancements in headache management hold significant potential for enhancing patient care, clinical practice and research, which should encourage the headache community to adopt AI innovations.

Evaluating the efficacy of CGRP mAbs and gepants for the preventive treatment of migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Several novel treatments targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway have been developed for migraine. We evaluated the efficacy of these medications, including atogepant, rimegepant, erenumab, eptinezumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab, for the prevention of migraine via network meta-analysis. METHODS: Databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central, were systematically reviewed, and all eligible phase 3 randomised controlled trials were included. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (n = 14,584 participants) were included. Studies included episodic (n = 11) and chronic (n = 4) migraine or both (n = 4). All interventions, except for eptinzumab 30 mg, significantly reduced mean monthly migraine days compared to placebo. All medications had a higher ≥50% responder rate than placebo and results were statistically significant in those with the subcutaneous or intravenous route of administrations, but not with the oral one. All medications significantly reduced mean monthly headache days, although no data for this outcome was available for rimegepant, and mean monthly acute medication days, with no data for eptinezumab. CONCLUSION: The results show that medications targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide were effective in preventing migraine compared to placebo. Considering limitations of single studies, different populations such as episodic and chronic migraine, and the absence of head-to-head trials, all novel treatments decreased mean monthly migraine and headache days, and showed higher 50%, 75% and 100% responder rates than placebo.Trial registration: PROSPERO registration: CRD42022310579.

Safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway and gepants in migraine prevention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Direct comparisons of the tolerability and safety of migraine preventive treatments targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway are lacking. This study aimed to compare the safety and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and gepants in migraine prevention. METHODS: A network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials assessing the safety and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, eptinezumab, fremanezumab, or galcanezumab) and gepants (atogepant, rimegepant) in migraine prevention was performed. Primary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included any adverse events, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and individual adverse events. RESULTS: We included 19 randomized controlled trials, comprising 14,584 patients. Atogepant 120 mg (OR 2.22, 95% CI [1.26, 3.91]) and galcanezumab 240 mg (OR 1.63, 95% CI [1.33, 2.00]) showed the largest odds of treatment-emergent adverse events compared to placebo. While eptinezumab 30 mg had greater odds of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (OR 2.62, 95% CI [1.03,6.66]). No significant differences in serious adverse events were found between active treatments and placebo. Eptinezumab was associated with the lowest odds of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events compared to placebo, whereas erenumab was associated with the lowest odds of any adverse events and quarterly fremanezumab with the lowest odds of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway and gepants are a safe and well tolerated option for migraine prevention.

Health equity, care access and quality in headache - part 2.

BACKGROUND: Headache disorders are a global public health concern affecting diverse populations. This review examines headache service organizations in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. It addresses global challenges in pharmacological headache treatment, with a focus on safety, tolerability, reproductive and child health, and outlines disparities in accessing innovative treatments worldwide. MAIN BODY: Organized headache services are essential due to the wide prevalence and varying severity of headache disorders. The tiered headache service model is globally recognized, although its implementation varies based on financial and workforce considerations. Headache burden affects well-being, causing disability, economic challenges, and work limitations, irrespective of location or income. All nations still require improved diagnosis and treatment, and the majority of countries face obstacles including limited access, awareness, economic barriers, and inadequate health policies. Provided adequate internet availability, telemedicine could help improve health equity by expanding access to headache care, since it can offer patients access to services without lengthy waiting times or extensive travel and can provide healthcare unavailable in underserved areas due to staff shortages. Numerous health disparities restrict global access to many headache medications, especially impacting individuals historically excluded from randomized controlled trials, such as those with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular conditions, as well as pregnant women. Furthermore, despite advancements in researching migraine treatments for young patients, the options for treatment remain limited. Access to headache treatment relies on factors like medication availability, approval, financial coverage, and healthcare provider expertise. Inadequate public awareness leads to neglect by policymakers and undertreatment by patients and healthcare providers. Global access discrepancies are exacerbated by the introduction of novel disease-specific medications, particularly impacting Asian, African, and Latin American nations excluded from clinical trials. While North America and Europe experience broad availability of migraine treatments, the majority of countries worldwide lack access to these therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare disparities, treatment access, and medication availability are concerning issues in headache medicine. Variations in national healthcare systems impact headache management, and costly innovative drugs are widening these gaps. Healthcare practitioners and experts should acknowledge these challenges and work towards minimizing access barriers for equitable global headache care in the future.

Functional MRI in migraine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The underlying mechanisms of migraine are complex and heterogenous. Advances in neuroimaging techniques during the past few decades have contributed to our understanding of migraine pathophysiology. Brain function in migraine patients has been widely explored using functional MRI (fMRI). This review will highlight the major fMRI findings that characterize the different phases of migraine. RECENT FINDINGS: The migraine attack starts with hypothalamic hyperexcitability and early reorganization of the common ascending pain and central trigeminovascular pathways. Moreover, the visual cortex becomes hyperexcitable during the aura phase. During the headache phase, further disruptions of the pontine, thalamic, sensorimotor and visual networks occur, although the hypothalamic activity and connectivity normalizes. The visual cortex remains hyperexcitable during the postdromal phase. Asymptomatic migraine patients can also experience functional alternations of pain and visual processing brain areas. At present, the heterogeneity of the asymptomatic phase and fMRI findings make it difficult to find common denominator. SUMMARY: fMRI studies have captured functional brain changes associated with migraine phases, leading to an improvement of our understanding of migraine pathophysiology. Further MRI studies are needed to disclose whether the migraine attack is triggered by intrinsic brain dysfunction or external factors.

Neural correlates of visuospatial processing in migraine: does the pain network help?

Migraine patients frequently report cognitive symptoms during the different phases of migraine. The most affected cognitive domains are visuospatial abilities, processing speed, attention and executive functions. We explored migraine patients' performance during a visuospatial task and investigated the activity of brain areas involved in visuospatial processing. A functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) visuospatial task, including an angle and a colour discrimination paradigm, was administrated to 17 headache-free migraine patients and 16 controls. Correlations between functional MRI abnormalities and subjects' performance, clinical and neuropsychological variables were also investigated. Deficits at visuospatial cognitive tests were present in around 20% of patients. Migraine patients maintained a preserved behavioural performance (reaction time and number of correct responses) during the angle discrimination task, while they performed less correctly in the colour task compared to controls (p = 0.05).The comparison of angle vs. colour task revealed an increased activity of the right insula, bilateral orbitofrontal cortex and medial frontal gyrus, and decreased activity of the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex in migraine patients compared to controls. In migraine patients, a better performance in the angle task was associated with higher activation of the right insula and orbitofrontal cortex, as well as with decreased activation of the right posterior cingulate cortex. Our results suggest an adaptive functional plasticity that might help migraine patients to overcome impaired visuospatial skills and preserve an adequate performance during a visuospatial task. These compensatory mechanisms seem to take advantage of recruiting brain areas that are commonly involved also in nociception.

Clinical correlates of hypothalamic functional changes in migraine patients.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the hypothalamic involvement in episodic migraine and investigate the association between hypothalamic resting state functional connectivity changes and migraine patients' clinical characteristics and disease progression over the years. METHODS: Ninety-one patients with episodic migraine and 73 controls underwent interictal resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty-three patients and controls were re-examined after a median of 4.5 years. Hypothalamic resting state functional connectivity changes were investigated using a seed-based correlation approach. RESULTS: At baseline, a decreased functional interaction between the hypothalamus and the parahippocampus, cerebellum, temporal, lingual and orbitofrontal gyrus was found in migraine patients versus controls. Increased resting state functional connectivity between the hypothalamus and bilateral orbitofrontal gyrus was demonstrated in migraine patients at follow-up versus baseline. Migraine patients also experienced decreased right hypothalamic resting state functional connectivity with ipsilateral lingual gyrus. A higher migraine attack frequency was associated with decreased hypothalamic-lingual gyrus resting state functional connectivity at baseline, while greater headache impact at follow-up correlated with decreased hypothalamic-orbitofrontal gyrus resting state functional connectivity at baseline. At follow-up, a lower frequency of migraine attacks was associated with higher hypothalamic-orbitofrontal gyrus resting state functional connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: During the interictal phase, the hypothalamus modulates the activity of pain and visual processing areas in episodic migraine patients. The hypothalamic-cortical interplay changes dynamically over time according to patients' clinical features.

Alterations of brain structural MRI are associated with outcome of surgical treatment in trigeminal neuralgia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alterations occurring in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and to explore the predictive ability of MRI for initial surgical outcome and long-term pain relief/recurrence after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS). METHODS: Thirty patients with idiopathic or classic TN, who underwent GKS and were followed for at least 24 months, were retrospectively included. Pre-treatment structural MRI and pre- and serial, postoperative clinical features were investigated. Fifteen age- and sex-matched healthy controls were also enrolled. Cortical thickness and gray matter (GM) volumes were assessed in TN patients relative to controls, as well as between patient subgroups according to treatment outcomes (initial responders/non-responders, patients with pain recurrence/long-lasting pain relief at the last follow-up). Clinical and MRI predictors of treatment outcomes were explored. RESULTS: Cortical thinning of temporal, prefrontal, cingulate, somatosensory and occipital areas bilaterally was found in TN patients relative to controls. No cortical thickness and GM volume differences were observed when TN initial responders and non-responders were compared. Patients who experienced TN recurrence after initial pain relief were characterized by thicker parahippocampal and temporal cortices bilaterally and greater volume of right amygdala and hippocampus compared to patients with long-lasting pain relief. In TN patients, disease duration and baseline cortical thinning of right parahippocampal, left fusiform and middle temporal cortices were associated with poor outcome after GKS at the last follow-up (R2 =0.57, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The study provides novel insights into structural brain alterations of TN patients, which might contribute to disease development and pain maintenance.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of erenumab between over and under 65-year-old refractory migraine patients: a pivotal study.

Previous studies reported a positive effect of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in migraine prevention, either in over (O65) and under (U65) 65-year-aged patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare real-life efficacy and safety of mAbs between young and elder migraine patients. Fifteen O65 and fifteen U65 patients, treated with monthly mAbs for 6 months, were enrolled and matched for sex, monthly headache days (MHD), and monthly migraine days (MMD) at baseline. Between-group differences in MHD and MMD, number of pills and days of acute medication intake, HIT-6, MIDAS, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12) were assessed after 3 (M3) and 6 (M6) months of treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were also investigated. In each group, thirteen patients (87%) were women and nine (60%) had chronic migraine. Baseline mean MHD and MMD of both groups were 20 (SD 9.6). Mean age was 70 (65-76) and 45 (19-55) in the O65 and U65 group, respectively. Before starting mAbs, patients have tried an average of 4 preventives in both groups. After 3 and 6 months of treatment, both groups had a reduction of all clinical features under examination, without statistically significant differences between groups. A similar proportion of patients in each group complained of AEs (M3 and M6, p = 1.0). Our real-life data showed that treatment with mAbs is as effective and safe in O65 as U65 migraine patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Tracking the evolution of non-headache symptoms through the migraine attack.

BACKGROUND: The migraine attack is classically divided into the prodromal, aura, headache and postdromal phase. Previous studies have highlighted non-headache symptoms associated with migraine occurring during the prodromal or postdromal phase. This study aimed to track the evolution of non-headache symptoms throughout all phases of the migraine attack. We also wished to delineate the phenotype of patients with more symptomatic migraine episodes and explore the association between non-painful symptoms and migraine disease activity and patients' disability. METHODS: Two-hundred and twenty-five migraine patients were enrolled and were asked to recall retrospectively whether non-headache symptoms occurred during the prodromal, headache and postdromal phase of their attacks. The occurrence of symptoms during the different migraine phases was tested using the Cochran's Q tests, Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa. Differences between groups according to the presence of non-headache symptoms through the entire migraine attack and correlations between the frequency of non-headache symptoms experienced during all phases and patients' disease activity and disability were also assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine percent of patients reported having at least one non-headache symptom in one phase of the migraine attack and 54% of patients had at least one non-headache symptom occurring during all phases of migraine. The occurrence of non-headache symptoms was different throughout the three phases of migraine, being higher during the headache phase than during the prodromal and postdromal phases. Symptoms with the highest co-occurrence throughout all migraine phases were neck stiffness, thirst and abdominal pain. Patients who experienced non-headache symptoms during all three phases of migraine were more frequently females, had a higher disability, were suffering from chronic migraine and had more frequently medication overuse headache. CONCLUSION: Migraine is a complex neurological disorder with a wide constellation of non-headache symptoms that can affect the burden of the disease. A better characterization of the evolution of non-headache symptoms through the different phases of migraine can enrich our knowledge on migraine pathophysiology and improve the management of the disease.

Predictors of response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a 24-week, multicenter, prospective study on 864 migraine patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The identification of predictors of response to antiCGRP mAbs could favor tailored therapies and personalized treatment plans. This study is aimed at investigating predictors of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% response at 24 weeks in patients with high-frequency episodic (HFEM: 8-14 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM). METHODS: This is a large, multicenter, cohort, real-life study. We considered all consecutive adult patients affected by HFEM or CM who were prescribed antiCGRP mAbs for ≥ 24 weeks in 20 headache centers. Patients were interviewed face-to-face using a shared semi-structured questionnaire carefully exploring socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Patients received subcutaneous erenumab (70 mg or140 mg, monthly), galcanezumab (120 mg monthly, following a 240 mg loading dose), or fremanezumab (225 mg, monthly or 675 mg, quarterly) according to drug market availability, physician's choice, or patient's preference. The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of ≥ 50% response predictors at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included ≥ 75% and 100% response predictors at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-four migraine patients had been treated with antiCGRP mAbs for ≥ 24 weeks (erenumab: 639 pts; galcanezumab: 173 pts; fremanezumab: 55 pts). The ≥50% response (primary endpoint) in HFEM was positively associated with unilateral pain (UP) + unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms (UAs) (OR:4.23, 95%CI:1.57-11.4; p = 0.004), while in CM was positively associated with UAs (OR:1.49, 95%CI:1.05-2.11; p = 0.026), UP + UAs (OR:1.90, 95%CI:1.15-3.16; p = 0.012), UP + allodynia (OR:1.71, 95%CI:1.04-2.83; p = 0.034), and negatively associated with obesity (OR:0.21, 95%CI:0.07-0.64; p = 0.006). The 75% response (secondary endpoint) was positively associated with UP + UAs in HFEM (OR:3.44, 95%CI:1.42-8.31; p = 0.006) and with UP + UAs (OR:1.78, 95%CI:1.14-2.80; p = 0.012) and UP + allodynia (OR:1.92, 95%CI:1.22-3.06; p = 0.005) in CM. No predictor of 100% response emerged in patients with HFEM or CM. CONCLUSIONS: A critical evaluation of headache characteristics indicating peripheral or central sensitization may help in predicting responsiveness to antiCGRP mAbs in HFEM and CM. A more precise pain profiling may represent a steppingstone for a mechanism-based approach and personalized treatment of migraine with compounds targeting specific molecular mechanisms.

Long-term (48 weeks) effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine in a real world: Results of the EARLY 2 study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in a real-world migraine population, looking for putative predictors of responsiveness. BACKGROUND: Erenumab proved to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in the prevention of episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) in long-term extension studies of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with no more than two (EM) or three (CM) prior preventive treatment failures. METHODS: A 48-week, multicenter, longitudinal cohort real-life study was conducted at 15 headache centers across eight Italian regions between December 20, 2018 and July 31, 2020. We considered all consecutive patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or CM aged 18-65 years. Each patient was treated with erenumab 70 mg, administered monthly. The dose was switched to 140 mg in nonresponders and in responders who had become nonresponders for at least 4 weeks. Change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) or monthly headache days (MHDs) at Weeks 45-48 compared with baseline was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints encompassed variation in monthly analgesic intake, achievement of a ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% reduction in migraine or headache days, and any change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Headache Impact Test-6 scores (HIT-6) during the same time interval. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients with migraine received at least one dose of erenumab 70 mg and were considered for safety analysis, whereas 221 received a monthly erenumab dose for ≥48 weeks and were included in the effectiveness and safety analysis set. All patients had previously been treated unsuccessfully with ≥3 migraine-preventive medication classes. From baseline to Weeks 45-48, erenumab treatment reduced MMD by 4.3 ± 5.3 (mean ± SD) in patients with HFEM, and MHD by 12.8 ± 8.9 (mean ± SD) in subjects with CM. VAS and HIT-6 scores were decreased by 1.8 ± 1.9 (mean ± SD) and 12.3 ± 11 (mean ± SD) in HFEM, and by 3.0 ± 2.2 (mean ± SD) and 13.1 ± 11.2 (mean ± SD) in CM. Median monthly analgesic intake passed from 11.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 10.0-13.0) to 5 (IQR 2.0-8.0) in HFEM and from 20.0 (IQR 15.0-30.0) to 6.0 (IQR 3.8-10.0) in CM. The ≥50% responders were 56.1% (32/57) in HFEM and 75.6% (124/164) in CM; ≥75% responders were 31.6% (18/57) and 44.5% (73/164); and 100% responders were 8.8% (5/57) and 1.2% (2/164), respectively. At Week 48, 83.6% (137/164) of patients with CM had reverted to EM. Erenumab was safe and well tolerated. Responsiveness to erenumab was positively associated with cutaneous allodynia (OR: 5.44, 95% CI: 1.52-19.41; p = 0.009) in HFEM. In patients with CM, ≥50% responsiveness was positively associated with male sex (OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.03-8.7; p = 0.044) and baseline migraine frequency (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20; p = 0.001) and negatively associated with psychiatric comorbidities (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; p = 0.023) and prior treatment failures (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term (48-week) erenumab treatment provides sustained effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in real-life patients with HFEM or CM with ≥3 prior preventive treatment failures. The dose of 140 mg was required in most patients along the study and should be taken into consideration as the starting dose. Allodynia (in HFEM), male sex, and baseline migraine frequency (in CM) might represent positive responsiveness predictors. Conversely, psychiatric comorbidities and multiple prior preventive treatment failures could be negative predictors in patients with CM.

Kidney Biopsy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Critical Reflections on Present Indications and Diagnostic Alternatives.

Roughly 3% of patients worldwide with a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) already have an overt nephropathy at diagnosis and about 20-30% of the remaining ones develop a complication of this kind later in life. The early identification of kidney disease in diabetic patients is important as it slows its progression, which is important not only because this reduces the need for renal replacement therapy, but also because it decreases the high rate of mortality and morbidity associated with a reduction in kidney function. The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes and the consequent greater probability of finding different types of kidney diseases in diabetic patients frequently gives rise to overlapping diagnoses, a definition encompassing the differential diagnosis between diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease. The issue is made more complex by the acknowledgement of the increasing frequency of presentations of what is termed "diabetic kidney disease" without relevant proteinuria, in particular in T2DM patients. Distinguishing between diabetes related and non-diabetes related forms of kidney disease in diabetic patients is not only a semantic question, as different diseases require different clinical management. However, while the urologic and macrovascular complications of diabetes, as well as overlapping parenchymal damage, can be diagnosed by means of imaging studies, often only a kidney biopsy will make a differential diagnosis possible. In fact, the coexistence of typical diabetic lesions, such as nodular glomerulopathy or glomerulosclerosis, with different glomerular, vascular and tubulo-interstitial alterations has been extensively described, and an analysis of the dominant histological pattern can contribute to determining what therapeutic approach should be adopted. However, due to the high frequency of kidney diseases, and to the fact that T2DM patients are often affected by multiple comorbidities, a kidney biopsy is not generally performed in T2DM patients. What follows is a review aiming to discuss the diagnostic work-up, on the base of clinical, laboratory and imaging criteria, and evaluate the present indications and alternatives to renal biopsy.

Discontinuing monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP pathway after one-year treatment: an observational longitudinal cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (mAbs anti-CGRP) pathway are effective and safe on migraine prevention. However, some drug agencies limited these treatments to one year due to their high costs. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of discontinuing mAbs anti-CGRP on monthly migraine days (MMDs) and disability in high-frequency episodic (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) patients. METHODS: This observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted at 10 Italian headache centres. Consecutive adult patients were followed-up for three months (F-UP1-3) after discontinuation of a one-year erenumab/galcanezumab treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in F-UP MMDs. Secondary endpoints included variation in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS), monthly acute medication intake (MAMI), and HIT-6 scores. We also assessed from F-UP1 to 3 the ≥50% response rate, relapse rate to CM, and recurrence of Medication Overuse (MO). RESULTS: We enrolled 154 patients (72.1% female, 48.2 ± 11.1 years, 107 CM, 47 HFEM); 91 were treated with erenumab, 63 with galcanezumab. From F-UP1 to F-UP3, MMDs, MAMI, NRS, and HIT-6 progressively increased but were still lower at F-UP3 than baseline (Friedman's analysis of rank, p < .001). In the F-UP1-3 visits, ≥50% response rate frequency did not differ significantly between CM and HFEM patients. However, the median reduction in response rate at F-UP3 was higher in HFEM (- 47.7% [25th, - 79.5; 75th,-17.0]) than in CM patients (- 25.5% [25th, - 47.1; 75th, - 3.3]; Mann-Whitney U test; p = .032). Of the 84 baseline CM patients who had reverted to episodic migraine, 28 (33.3%) relapsed to CM at F-UP1, 35 (41.7%) at F-UP2, 39 (46.4%) at F-UP3. Of the 64 baseline patients suffering of medication overuse headache ceasing MO, 15 (18.3%) relapsed to MO at F-UP1, 26 (31.6%) at F-UP2, and 30 (42.3%, 11 missing data) at F-UP3. Lower MMDs, MAMI, NRS, and HIT-6 and higher response rate in the last month of therapy characterized patients with ≥50% response rate at F-UP1 and F-UP3 (Mann-Whitney U test; consistently p < .01). CONCLUSION: Migraine frequency and disability gradually increased after mAbs anti-CGRP interruption. Most patients did not relapse to MO or CM despite the increase in MMDs. Our data suggest to reconsider mAbs anti-CGRP discontinuation.

CGRP - a target for acute therapy in migraine: Clinical data.

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the migraine attack has reinforced the concept that migraine is a complex brain disease, and has paved the way for the development of new migraine specific acute treatments. In recent years, targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide and its receptors has been one of the most promising pharmacological strategies for both acute and preventive treatment of migraine. FINDINGS: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated the superiority of small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants) over placebo in treating acute migraine attacks measured as the two-hour pain free endpoint. Gepants also improved migraine associated symptoms, such as nausea, photophobia and phonophobia. Two of the class have had their development stopped because of hepatotoxicity, which is emerging as being due to metabolites. Gepants have a good tolerability and can be safely used in patients with stable cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSION: Exciting results have been obtained targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway to abort acute migraine attacks, thus reinforcing the relevance of mechanism-based treatments specific for migraine.

Imaging the migrainous brain: the present and the future.

In the last 20 years, we observed significant improvements in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of patients affected by migraine. Before these technological advances, knowledge of the pathogenesis of migraine was particularly based on clinical assessment. Complementary to clinical evaluation, conventional MRI provides both specific information for differential diagnosis (particularly if cortical or subcortical lesions are detected in the migrainous brain) and unsurpassable opportunities in migraine research. However, the correlations between brain structural and functional alterations and both the clinical manifestation of the disease and the individual history of the patient remains uncertain. Both quantitative and functional MR-based techniques have a great potential to better provide insights into human brain structures and possible links between brain areas and complex brain networks that could be involved in the pathophysiology of migraine. Morphometric and functional MRI approaches are contributing to better elucidate the mechanisms that underlie the pain mechanisms and functional adaptation in migraine patients. All these information support the view of migraine as a complex brain disorder involving different cortical and subcortical areas.

Recent advances in headache neuroimaging.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Primary headaches, such as migraine and cluster headache, are one of the most common and disabling neurological diseases worldwide. Neuroimaging studies have changed the way we understand these diseases and have enriched our knowledge of the mechanisms of actions of currently available therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: The present review highlights the major findings reported in migraine and cluster headache neuroimaging over the last year. Widespread structural and functional abnormalities in cortical and subcortical areas involved in multisensory, including pain, processing have been shown in migraine and cluster headache patients during different phases of the disease. Beyond the involvement of single brain areas, dysfunctional brain networks contribute to their pathophysiology. New central mechanisms of action of headache preventive treatments have also been explored. SUMMARY: A better understanding of migraine and cluster headache biology has paved the way for the development of new improved treatments for both these conditions. Although significant advances have been made over the last year, there are still many unsolved questions to address.

Cervical Cord T1-weighted Hypointense Lesions at MR Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis: Relationship to Cord Atrophy and Disability.

Purpose To characterize the spatial distribution of cervical cord T1-weighted hypointense lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and analyze their association with cord atrophy and disability. Materials and Methods For this prospective study that took place between 2014 and 2016, 3.0-T high-resolution T1-weighted cervical cord magnetic resonance (MR) images and clinical evaluations were obtained from 82 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 33 patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS), 25 patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS), and 35 sex-matched healthy control participants. Hypointense cord lesions on T1-weighted imaging were identified and corresponding lesion masks were produced. A semiautomatic method on the basis of active surfaces was used to perform voxel-wise assessment (by using statistical parametric mapping and full factorial models) of T1-weighted hypointense lesion distribution and cord atrophy. Results T1-weighted hypointense cervical cord lesions were detected in 122 of 140 (87.1%) patients with MS. Lesions were preferentially located in the posterior (P = .01) and upper (P < .001) cervical cord. Lesion extent at C1/C2 and C5 was higher in patient with SPMS versus RRMS, and patients with PPMS versus RRMS and SPMS (P value range, <.001 to .05). Cord atrophy at upper cervical levels was found in patients with MS compared with control participants, especially in progressive MS (P value range, <.001 to .04). Partial overlap (r = 0.66; P < .001) occurred between regions with T1-weighted hypointense cord lesions and atrophy. Cord atrophy (r value range, -0.24 to -0.48; P < .001) and T1-weighted hypointense cord lesion extent (r value range, 0.36-0.42; P < .001) were correlated with clinical disability. Conclusion Hypointense lesions at T1-weighted imaging were observed in the cervical spinal cord of the majority of patients with MS and more widespread in progressive than in relapsing MS phenotypes. Both T1-weighted hypointense cord lesions and atrophy correlated with patient clinical disability.