RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has extensive applications in managing patients with acute cardiac and pulmonary failure. Two primary modalities of ECLS, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), include several similarities in their composition, complications, and patient outcomes. Both CPB and ECMO pose a high risk of thrombus formation and platelet activation due to the large surface area of the devices and bleeding due to system anticoagulation. Therefore, novel methods of anticoagulation are needed to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with extracorporeal support. Nitric oxide (NO) has potent antiplatelet properties and presents a promising alternative or addition to anticoagulation with heparin during extracorporeal support. METHODS: We developed two ex vivo models of CPB and ECMO to investigate NO effects on anticoagulation and inflammation in these systems. RESULTS: Sole addition of NO as an anticoagulant was not successful in preventing thrombus formation in the ex vivo setups, therefore a combination of low-level heparin with NO was used. Antiplatelet effects were observed in the ex vivo ECMO model when NO was delivered at 80 ppm. Platelet count was preserved after 480 min when NO was delivered at 30 ppm. CONCLUSION: Combined delivery of NO and heparin did not improve haemocompatibility in either ex vivo model of CPB and ECMO. Anti-inflammatory effects of NO in ECMO systems have to be evaluated further.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Trombose , Humanos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Óxido Nítrico/uso terapêutico , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Anticoagulantes/farmacologia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Heparina/farmacologia , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Inflamação/etiologia , Inflamação/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous respiratory system static compliance (CRS) values and levels of hypoxemia in patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) requiring mechanical ventilation have been reported in previous small-case series or studies conducted at a national level. METHODS: We designed a retrospective observational cohort study with rapid data gathering from the international COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium study to comprehensively describe CRS-calculated as: tidal volume/[airway plateau pressure-positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)]-and its association with ventilatory management and outcomes of COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation (MV), admitted to intensive care units (ICU) worldwide. RESULTS: We studied 745 patients from 22 countries, who required admission to the ICU and MV from January 14 to December 31, 2020, and presented at least one value of CRS within the first seven days of MV. Median (IQR) age was 62 (52-71), patients were predominantly males (68%) and from Europe/North and South America (88%). CRS, within 48 h from endotracheal intubation, was available in 649 patients and was neither associated with the duration from onset of symptoms to commencement of MV (p = 0.417) nor with PaO2/FiO2 (p = 0.100). Females presented lower CRS than males (95% CI of CRS difference between females-males: - 11.8 to - 7.4 mL/cmH2O p < 0.001), and although females presented higher body mass index (BMI), association of BMI with CRS was marginal (p = 0.139). Ventilatory management varied across CRS range, resulting in a significant association between CRS and driving pressure (estimated decrease - 0.31 cmH2O/L per mL/cmH20 of CRS, 95% CI - 0.48 to - 0.14, p < 0.001). Overall, 28-day ICU mortality, accounting for the competing risk of being discharged within the period, was 35.6% (SE 1.7). Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that CRS (+ 10 mL/cm H2O) was only associated with being discharge from the ICU within 28 days (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre report provides a comprehensive account of CRS in COVID-19 patients on MV. CRS measured within 48 h from commencement of MV has marginal predictive value for 28-day mortality, but was associated with being discharged from ICU within the same period. Trial documentation: Available at https://www.covid-critical.com/study . TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12620000421932.
Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/terapia , Complacência Pulmonar/fisiologia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Rationale: Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy is a promising intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), although trials to date have not investigated its use alongside extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Recent preclinical studies have suggested that combining these interventions may attenuate the efficacy of ECMO.Objectives: To determine the safety and efficacy of MSC therapy in a model of ARDS and ECMO.Methods: ARDS was induced in 14 sheep, after which they were established on venovenous ECMO. Subsequently, they received either endobronchial induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human MSCs (hMSCs) (n = 7) or cell-free carrier vehicle (vehicle control; n = 7). During ECMO, a low Vt ventilation strategy was employed in addition to protocolized hemodynamic support. Animals were monitored and supported for 24 hours. Lung tissue, bronchoalveolar fluid, and plasma were analyzed, in addition to continuous respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring.Measurements and Main Results: The administration of hMSCs did not improve oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 mean difference = -146 mm Hg; P = 0.076) or pulmonary function. However, histological evidence of lung injury (lung injury score mean difference = -0.07; P = 0.04) and BAL IL-8 were reduced. In addition, hMSC-treated animals had a significantly lower cumulative requirement for vasopressor. Despite endobronchial administration, animals treated with hMSCs had a significant elevation in transmembrane oxygenator pressure gradients. This was accompanied by more pulmonary artery thromboses and adherent hMSCs found on explanted oxygenator fibers.Conclusions: Endobronchial hMSC therapy in an ovine model of ARDS and ECMO can impair membrane oxygenator function and does not improve oxygenation. These data do not recommend the safe use of hMSCs during venovenous ECMO.
Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/patologia , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Pulmão/patologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/imunologia , Animais , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/imunologia , Adesão Celular , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Células-Tronco Pluripotentes Induzidas , Interleucina-8/imunologia , Pulmão/imunologia , Oxigenadores de Membrana , Artéria Pulmonar , Distribuição Aleatória , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/imunologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/patologia , Ovinos , Carneiro Doméstico , Trombose/patologia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Importance: In patients who require mechanical ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, further reduction in tidal volumes, compared with conventional low tidal volume ventilation, may improve outcomes. Objective: To determine whether lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation using extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal improves outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, randomized, allocation-concealed, open-label, pragmatic clinical trial enrolled 412 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, of a planned sample size of 1120, between May 2016 and December 2019 from 51 intensive care units in the UK. Follow-up ended on March 11, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for at least 48 hours (n = 202) or standard care with conventional low tidal volume ventilation (n = 210). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality 90 days after randomization. Prespecified secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days at day 28 and adverse event rates. Results: Among 412 patients who were randomized (mean age, 59 years; 143 [35%] women), 405 (98%) completed the trial. The trial was stopped early because of futility and feasibility following recommendations from the data monitoring and ethics committee. The 90-day mortality rate was 41.5% in the lower tidal volume ventilation with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal group vs 39.5% in the standard care group (risk ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.83-1.33]; difference, 2.0% [95% CI, -7.6% to 11.5%]; P = .68). There were significantly fewer mean ventilator-free days in the extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal group compared with the standard care group (7.1 [95% CI, 5.9-8.3] vs 9.2 [95% CI, 7.9-10.4] days; mean difference, -2.1 [95% CI, -3.8 to -0.3]; P = .02). Serious adverse events were reported for 62 patients (31%) in the extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal group and 18 (9%) in the standard care group, including intracranial hemorrhage in 9 patients (4.5%) vs 0 (0%) and bleeding at other sites in 6 (3.0%) vs 1 (0.5%) in the extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal group vs the control group. Overall, 21 patients experienced 22 serious adverse events related to the study device. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, the use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to facilitate lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation, compared with conventional low tidal volume mechanical ventilation, did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality. However, due to early termination, the study may have been underpowered to detect a clinically important difference. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02654327.
Assuntos
Dióxido de Carbono/sangue , Circulação Extracorpórea , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Idoso , Término Precoce de Ensaios Clínicos , Circulação Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/mortalidade , Volume de Ventilação PulmonarRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a significant long-term burden on survivors after acute respiratory distress syndrome, even 5 years after discharge. This is not well investigated in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The objective of this study was to describe very-long-term (⩾3 years) disability in lung function and morphology, quality of life, mood disorders, walking capacity, and return to work status in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survivors. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study on long-term survivors treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure between 1995 and 2010 at a tertiary referral center in Sweden. Eligible patients were approached, and those who consented were interviewed and investigated during a day at the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were investigated with a median follow-up time of 9.0 years. Quality of life was reduced in several Short form 36 (SF-36) subscales and all domains of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, similar to previous studies in conventionally managed acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors. A reduced diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide was seen in 47% of patients, and some degree of residual lung parenchymal pathology was seen in 82%. Parenchymal pathology correlated with reductions in quality of life and diffusion capacity. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were seen in 22% and 14%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A significant long-term burden remains even 3-17 years after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment, similar to conventionally managed acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors. Future prospective studies are needed to elucidate risk factors for these sequelae.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stem cells exhibit immunomodulatory properties which are currently being investigated as a novel treatment option for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. However, the feasibility and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is poorly understood. This study aimed to characterise markers of innate immune activation in response to mesenchymal stem cells during an ex vivo simulation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. METHODS: Ex vivo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulations (n = 10) were conducted using a commercial extracorporeal circuit with a CO2-enhanced fresh gas supply and donor human whole blood. Heparinised circuits (n = 4) were injected with 40 × 106-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human mesenchymal stem cells, while the remainder (n = 6) acted as controls. Simulations were maintained, under physiological conditions, for 240 minutes. Circuits were sampled at 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes and assessed for levels of interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, tumour necrosis factor-α, transforming growth factor-ß1, myeloperoxidase and α-Defensin-1. In addition, haemoglobin, platelet and leukocyte counts were performed. RESULTS: There was a trend towards reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in mesenchymal stem cell-treated circuits and a significant increase in transforming growth factor-ß1. Blood cells and markers of neutrophil activation were reduced in mesenchymal stem cell circuits during the length of the simulation. As previously reported, the addition of mesenchymal stem cells resulted in a reduction of flow and increased trans-oxygenator pressures in comparison to controls. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of mesenchymal stem cells during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may cause an increase in transforming growth factor-ß1. This is despite their ability to adhere to the membrane oxygenator. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Imunidade Inata/imunologia , Inflamação/metabolismo , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/metabolismo , HumanosAssuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , COVID-19 , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19RESUMO
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a technology capable of providing short-term mechanical support to the heart, lungs or both. Over the last decade, the number of centres offering ECMO has grown rapidly. At the same time, the indications for its use have also been broadened. In part, this trend has been supported by advances in circuit design and in cannulation techniques. Despite the widespread adoption of extracorporeal life support techniques, the use of ECMO remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A complication witnessed during ECMO is the inflammatory response to extracorporeal circulation. This reaction shares similarities with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and has been well-documented in relation to cardiopulmonary bypass. The exposure of a patient's blood to the non-endothelialised surface of the ECMO circuit results in the widespread activation of the innate immune system; if unchecked this may result in inflammation and organ injury. Here, we review the pathophysiology of the inflammatory response to ECMO, highlighting the complex interactions between arms of the innate immune response, the endothelium and coagulation. An understanding of the processes involved may guide the design of therapies and strategies aimed at ameliorating inflammation during ECMO. Likewise, an appreciation of the potentially deleterious inflammatory effects of ECMO may assist those weighing the risks and benefits of therapy.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Imunidade Inata/fisiologia , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/fisiopatologia , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/terapia , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/tendências , Humanos , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/imunologiaRESUMO
Choosing optimal outcome measures maximizes statistical power, accelerates discovery and improves reliability in early-phase trials. We devised and evaluated a modification to a pragmatic measure of oxygenation function, the [Formula: see text] ratio. Because of the ceiling effect in oxyhaemoglobin saturation, [Formula: see text] ratio ceases to reflect pulmonary oxygenation function at high [Formula: see text] values. We found that the correlation of [Formula: see text] with the reference standard ([Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text] ratio) improves substantially when excluding [Formula: see text] and refer to this measure as [Formula: see text]. Using observational data from 39,765 hospitalised COVID-19 patients, we demonstrate that [Formula: see text] is predictive of mortality, and compare the sample sizes required for trials using four different outcome measures. We show that a significant difference in outcome could be detected with the smallest sample size using [Formula: see text]. We demonstrate that [Formula: see text] is an effective intermediate outcome measure in COVID-19. It is a non-invasive measurement, representative of disease severity and provides greater statistical power.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pulmão , Tamanho da AmostraRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The global shortage of donor hearts available for transplantation is a major problem for the treatment of end-stage heart failure. The ischemic time for donor hearts using traditional preservation by standard static cold storage (SCS) is limited to approximately 4 hours, beyond which the risk for primary graft dysfunction (PGD) significantly increases. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) of donor hearts has been proposed to safely extend ischemic time without increasing the risk of PGD. METHODS: Using our sheep model of 24 hours brain death (BD) followed by orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx), we examined post-transplant outcomes in recipients following donor heart preservation by HMP for 8 hours, compared to donor heart preservation for 2 hours by either SCS or HMP. RESULTS: Following HTx, all HMP recipients (both 2 hours and 8 hours groups) survived to the end of the study (6 hours after transplantation and successful weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass), required less vasoactive support for hemodynamic stability, and exhibited superior metabolic, fluid status and inflammatory profiles compared to SCS recipients. Contractile function and cardiac damage (troponin I release and histological assessment) was comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, compared to current clinical SCS, recipient outcomes following transplantation are not adversely impacted by extending HMP to 8 hours. These results have important implications for clinical transplantation where longer ischemic times may be required (e.g., complex surgical cases, transport across long distances). Additionally, HMP may allow safe preservation of "marginal" donor hearts that are more susceptible to myocardial injury and facilitate increased utilization of these hearts for transplantation.
Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Animais , Ovinos , Humanos , Preservação de Órgãos/métodos , Doadores de Tecidos , Perfusão/métodos , CoraçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) versus standard care in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and clinical trial registries were searched from 1994 to 31 December 2021. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days, length of stay, safety and adverse events and physiological changes. As a primary analysis, we performed a meta-analysis of mortality until day 30 using a Bayesian random effects model. We then performed a trial sequential analysis of RCTs. RESULTS: 21 studies met inclusion criteria: three RCTs, enrolling 531 patients, and 18 observational studies. In a pooled analysis of RCTs, the posterior probability of increased mortality with the use of ECCO2R was 73% (relative risk 1.19, 95% credible interval 0.70-2.29). There was substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of safety and adverse events. However, the incidence of extra and intracranial haemorrhage was higher (relative risk 3.00, 95% credible interval 0.41-20.51) among those randomised to ECCO2R. Current trials have accumulated 80.8% of the diversity-adjusted required information size and the lack of effect reaches futility for a 10% absolute risk reduction in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ECCO2R in patients with AHRF is not associated with improvements in clinical outcomes. Furthermore, it is likely that further trials of ECCO2R aiming to achieve an absolute risk reduction in mortality of ≥10% are futile.
Assuntos
Dióxido de Carbono , Insuficiência Respiratória , Humanos , Dióxido de Carbono/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Respiratória/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Ventiladores MecânicosRESUMO
COVID-19 is clinically characterised by fever, cough, and dyspnoea. Symptoms affecting other organ systems have been reported. However, it is the clinical associations of different patterns of symptoms which influence diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making. In this study, we applied clustering techniques to a large prospective cohort of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 to identify clinically meaningful sub-phenotypes. We obtained structured clinical data on 59,011 patients in the UK (the ISARIC Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium, 4C) and used a principled, unsupervised clustering approach to partition the first 25,477 cases according to symptoms reported at recruitment. We validated our findings in a second group of 33,534 cases recruited to ISARIC-4C, and in 4,445 cases recruited to a separate study of community cases. Unsupervised clustering identified distinct sub-phenotypes. First, a core symptom set of fever, cough, and dyspnoea, which co-occurred with additional symptoms in three further patterns: fatigue and confusion, diarrhoea and vomiting, or productive cough. Presentations with a single reported symptom of dyspnoea or confusion were also identified, alongside a sub-phenotype of patients reporting few or no symptoms. Patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms were more commonly female, had a longer duration of symptoms before presentation, and had lower 30-day mortality. Patients presenting with confusion, with or without core symptoms, were older and had a higher unadjusted mortality. Symptom sub-phenotypes were highly consistent in replication analysis within the ISARIC-4C study. Similar patterns were externally verified in patients from a study of self-reported symptoms of mild disease. The large scale of the ISARIC-4C study enabled robust, granular discovery and replication. Clinical interpretation is necessary to determine which of these observations have practical utility. We propose that four sub-phenotypes are usefully distinct from the core symptom group: gastro-intestinal disease, productive cough, confusion, and pauci-symptomatic presentations. Importantly, each is associated with an in-hospital mortality which differs from that of patients with core symptoms.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Confusão , Tosse , Dispneia , Fadiga , Feminino , Febre , Humanos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with obesity are predisposed to a reduction in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and atelectasis after anaesthesia. High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) may increase EELV, reducing the likelihood of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of conventional oxygen therapy versus HFNO after bariatric surgery. The aim was to investigate the feasibility of using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) as a means of assessing respiratory mechanics and to inform the design of a definitive RCT. METHODS: We performed a single-centre, parallel-group, pilot RCT. Adult patients with obesity undergoing elective bariatric surgery were eligible for inclusion. We excluded patients with a known contraindication to HFNO or with chronic lung disease. RESULTS: Fifty patients were randomised in equal proportions. One patient crossed over from conventional O2 to HFNO. Delta EELI was higher at 1 hour in patients receiving HFNO (mean difference = 831 Au (95% CI - 1636-3298), p = 0.5). Continuous EIT beyond 1 hour was poorly tolerated. At 6 hours, there were no differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio or PaCO2. Only one patient developed a PPC (in the HFNO group) by 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a large-scale RCT of HFNO after bariatric surgery in an 'all-comers' population is likely infeasible. While EIT was an effective means of assessing respiratory mechanics, it was impractical over time. Similarly, the infrequency of PPC precludes its use as a primary outcome. Future studies should focus on identifying patients at the greatest risk of PPC.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Adulto , Humanos , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Oxigênio , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
Pulmonary microthrombosis and vasculitis occur in fatal coronavirus disease 2019. To determine whether these processes occur in other life-threatening respiratory virus infections, we identified autopsy studies of fatal influenza (n â =â 455 patients), severe acute respiratory syndrome ([SARS] nâ = â 37), Middle East respiratory syndrome (nâ = â 2), adenovirus (nâ = â 34), and respiratory syncytial virus (n â = â 30). Histological evidence of thrombosis was frequently present in adults with fatal influenza and SARS, with vasculitis also reported.
RESUMO
The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) describes a heterogenous population of patients with acute severe respiratory failure. However, contemporary advances have begun to identify distinct sub-phenotypes that exist within its broader envelope. These sub-phenotypes have varied outcomes and respond differently to several previously studied interventions. A more precise understanding of their pathobiology and an ability to prospectively identify them, may allow for the development of precision therapies in ARDS. Historically, animal models have played a key role in translational research, although few studies have so far assessed either the ability of animal models to replicate these sub-phenotypes or investigated the presence of sub-phenotypes within animal models. Here, in three ovine models of ARDS, using combinations of oleic acid and intravenous, or intratracheal lipopolysaccharide, we investigated the presence of sub-phenotypes which qualitatively resemble those found in clinical cohorts. Principal Component Analysis and partitional clustering identified two clusters, differentiated by markers of shock, inflammation, and lung injury. This study provides a first exploration of ARDS phenotypes in preclinical models and suggests a methodology for investigating this phenomenon in future studies.