Randomized Trial of Facilitated Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy vs Sequential Fecal-Based Blood Test.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines include screening colonoscopy and sequential high-sensitivity fecal occult blood testing (HSgFOBT), with expectation of similar effectiveness based on the assumption of similar high adherence. However, adherence to screening colonoscopy compared with sequential HSgFOBT has not been reported. In this randomized clinical trial, we assessed adherence and pathology findings for a single screening colonoscopy vs sequential and nonsequential HSgFOBTs. METHODS: Participants aged 40-69 years were enrolled at 3 centers representing different clinical settings. Participants were randomized into a single screening colonoscopy arm vs sequential HSgFOBT arm composed of 4-7 rounds. Initial adherence to screening colonoscopy and sequential adherence to HSgFOBT, follow-up colonoscopy for positive HSgFOBT tests, crossover to colonoscopy, and detection of advanced neoplasia or large serrated lesions (ADN-SERs) were measured. RESULTS: There were 3523 participants included in the trial; 1761 and 1762 participants were randomized to the screening colonoscopy and HSgFOBT arms, respectively. Adherence was 1473 (83.6%) for the screening colonoscopy arm vs 1288 (73.1%) for the HSgFOBT arm after 1 round (relative risk [RR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10-1.19; P ≤ .001), but only 674 (38.3%) over 4 sequential HSgFOBT rounds (RR, 2.19; 95% CI, 2.05-2.33). Overall adherence to any screening increased to 1558 (88.5%) in the screening colonoscopy arm during the entire study period and 1493 (84.7%) in the HSgFOBT arm (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07). Four hundred thirty-six participants (24.7%) crossed over to screening colonoscopy during the first 4 rounds. ADN-SERs were detected in 121 of the 1473 participants (8.2%) in the colonoscopy arm who were adherent to protocol in the first 12 months of the study, whereas detection of ADN-SERs among those who were not sequentially adherent (n = 709) to HSgFOBT was subpar (0.6%) (RR, 14.72; 95% CI, 5.46-39.67) compared with those who were sequentially adherent (3.3%) (n = 647) (RR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.61-3.98) to HSgFOBT in the first 4 rounds. When including colonoscopies from HSgFOBT patients who were never positive yet crossed over (n = 1483), 5.5% of ADN-SERs were detected (RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.15-1.96) in the first 4 rounds. CONCLUSIONS: Observed adherence to sequential rounds of HSgFOBT was suboptimal compared with a single screening colonoscopy. Detection of ADN-SERs was inferior when nonsequential HSgFOBT adherence was compared with sequential adherence. However, the greatest number of ADN-SERs was detected among those who crossed over to colonoscopy and opted to receive a colonoscopy. The effectiveness of an HSgFOBT screening program may be enhanced if crossover to screening colonoscopy is permitted. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT00102011.

Projected Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Based on Observed Adherence to Colonoscopy and Sequential Stool-Based Screening.

INTRODUCTION: Modeling supporting recommendations for colonoscopy and stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests assumes 100% sequential participant adherence. The impact of observed adherence on the long-term effectiveness of screening is unknown. We evaluated the effectiveness of a program of screening colonoscopy every 10 years vs annual high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (HSgFOBT) using observed sequential adherence data. METHODS: The MIcrosimulation SCreening ANalysis (MISCAN) model used observed sequential screening adherence, HSgFOBT positivity, and diagnostic colonoscopy adherence in HSgFOBT-positive individuals from the National Colonoscopy Study (single-screening colonoscopy vs ≥4 HSgFOBT sequential rounds). We compared CRC incidence and mortality over 15 years with no screening or 10 yearly screening colonoscopy vs annual HSgFOBT with 100% and differential observed adherence from the trial. RESULTS: Without screening, simulated incidence and mortality over 15 years were 20.9 (95% probability interval 15.8-26.9) and 6.9 (5.0-9.2) per 1,000 participants, respectively. In the case of 100% adherence, only screening colonoscopy was predicted to result in lower incidence; however, both tests lowered simulated mortality to a similar level (2.1 [1.6-2.9] for screening colonoscopy and 2.5 [1.8-3.4] for HSgFOBT). Observed adherence for screening colonoscopy (83.6%) was higher than observed sequential HSgFOBT adherence (73.1% first round; 49.1% by round 4), resulting in lower simulated incidence and mortality for screening colonoscopy (14.4 [10.8-18.5] and 2.9 [2.1-3.9], respectively) than HSgFOBT (20.8 [15.8-28.1] and 3.9 [2.9-5.4], respectively), despite a 91% adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy with FOBT positivity. The relative risk of CRC mortality for screening colonoscopy vs HSgFOBT was 0.75 (95% probability interval 0.68-0.80). Findings were similar in sensitivity analyses with alternative assumptions for repeat colonoscopy, test performance, risk, age, and projection horizon. DISCUSSION: Where sequential adherence to stool-based screening is suboptimal and colonoscopy is accessible and acceptable-as observed in the national colonoscopy study, microsimulation, comparative effectiveness, screening recommendations.

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Concomitant Presentation of Two Molecularly Distinct Entities.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) developing in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is very uncommon and usually associated with prior treatment. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) accounts for a very small proportion of treatment-associated AML. So far, there has been only one reported case of APL occurring post radiation for prostate cancer in a patient with CLL. We report herein the first case of APL and CLL presenting concomitantly in an untreated patient. Evaluation of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate with immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and FISH to confirm two morphologically, molecularly and genetically distinct leukemic populations characteristic of APL and CLL is required. APL is a hematologic emergency, and aggressive management is vital to a successful therapeutic outcome. Standard treatment is with All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracycline-based regimen, whether the process is de novo or therapy-related. Due to increased incidence of secondary malignancies in CLL patients, active surveillance is necessary.

Autologous transplantation as consolidation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of autologous stem-cell transplantation during the first remission in patients with diffuse, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classified as high-intermediate risk or high risk on the International Prognostic Index remains controversial and is untested in the rituximab era. METHODS: We treated 397 patients who had disease with an age-adjusted classification of high risk or high-intermediate risk with five cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP plus rituximab. Patients with a response were randomly assigned to receive three additional cycles of induction chemotherapy (control group) or one additional cycle of induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (transplantation group). The primary efficacy end points were 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 370 induction-eligible patients, 253 were randomly assigned to the transplantation group (125) or the control group (128). Forty-six patients in the transplantation group and 68 in the control group had disease progression or died, with 2-year progression-free survival rates of 69 and 55%, respectively (hazard ratio in the control group vs. the transplantation group, 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 2.51; P=0.005). Thirty-seven patients in the transplantation group and 47 in the control group died, with 2-year overall survival rates of 74 and 71%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.94; P=0.30). Exploratory analyses showed a differential treatment effect according to risk level for both progression-free survival (P=0.04 for interaction) and overall survival (P=0.01 for interaction). Among high-risk patients, the 2-year overall survival rate was 82% in the transplantation group and 64% in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Early autologous stem-cell transplantation improved progression-free survival among patients with high-intermediate-risk or high-risk disease who had a response to induction therapy. Overall survival after transplantation was not improved, probably because of the effectiveness of salvage transplantation. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, and others; SWOG-9704 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004031.).

The Shreveport Myeloma Experience: Survival, Risk Factors and Other Malignancies in the Age of Stem Cell Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The overall prognosis of multiple myeloma has improved significantly over the last 15 years. We wondered whether the overall improvement would also be seen in unselected patients in an academic center in Northwest Louisiana with a high proportion of minority patients, and if second malignant neoplasms are relevant for our patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2009, 215 patients were treated for multiple myeloma at our center and had complete follow-up until May 2013. RESULTS: The mean survival of patients with multiple myeloma increased from 3.25 to 5.34 years, which is comparable to patients treated at larger centers. No prognostic difference was observed in the subgroups of myeloma patients. Among 215 patients followed for the development of secondary cancers, 16 already had a preexisting or concomitant malignancy (7.4%) and 10 developed secondary cancers. Our data indicate a significant background of histologically unrelated cancers and a cumulative incidence of new cancers of about 20% after 10 years of follow-up. Based on SEER data, preexisting or secondary cancers were not statistically increased in our population. CONCLUSIONS: The use of autologous transplantation and the introduction of new agents resulted in a significant improvement in the prognosis of multiple myeloma. Other cancers are not statistically increased before or after multiple myeloma is diagnosed and are not prognostically relevant.

Private Payer's Status Improves Male Breast Cancer Survival.

Survival from male breast cancer is influenced by many factors. This study assessed payer's status effect on survival of male breast cancer patients. This study included 8,828 male breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1998-2006 and followed to 2011 in the National Cancer Data Base. Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of payer's status and other factors on overall survival. Patients had 36.2%, 42.7%, 14.7%, and 6.5% of stage I to IV cancer, respectively. Payer status was private 47.7%, Medicare 42.6%, Medicaid 3.24%, unknown 3.59%, and uninsured 2.95%. Median overall survival (MOS) for all patients was 10.6 years. In multivariate analysis, Direct adjusted MOS was 12.46, 11.89, 9.99, 9.02, and 8.29 years for private, "unknown," Medicare, uninsured, and Medicaid payer's status, respectively. Patients with private and "unknown" payer's status showed a significant difference in survival compared to uninsured patients, while Medicaid and Medicare patients did not. Age, race, stage, grade, income, comorbidity, distance travelled, and diagnosing/treating facility were also significant predictors of survival. Treatment delay and cancer program did not have a significant influence on survival.

Objective Basis for Chronic Pain in Patients with Adult Sickle Cell Disease.

Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) affects approximately 100,000 Americans and due to lack of an organized treatment approach, patients with SCD pose a high economic burden on medical services. The patients with SCD have chronic bone damage from bone marrow infraction and vaso-occulsive events. These bone damages lead to chronic pain in patients with SCD. The inadwquate treatment of chronic pain in adult patients with SCD can lead to pseudo-addictive behavior and also affect their psycho-social life. There are certain barriers to adequate pain management in adult patients with SCD, namely, limited knowledge among the clinicians, inadequate assessment, concerns about addiction, and biases against opioid use. Here by presenting radiographs of patients with adult SCD, we would like to provide objective evidence for the pathologic basis of severe chronic pain in adult patients with SCD.

Effects of payer status on breast cancer survival: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer outcomes are influenced by multiple factors including access to care, and payer status is a recognized barrier to treatment access. To further define the influence of payer status on outcome, the National Cancer Data Base data from 1998-2006 was analyzed. METHOD: Data was analyzed from 976,178 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer registered in the National Cancer Data Base. Overall survival was the primary outcome variable while payer status was the primary predictor variable. Secondary predictor variables included stage, age, race, Charlson Comorbidity index, income, education, distance travelled, cancer program, diagnosing/treating facility, and treatment delay. Multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of payer status on overall survival while adjusting for secondary predictive factors. RESULTS: Uninsured (28.68%) and Medicaid (28.0%) patients had a higher percentage of patients presenting with stage III and stage IV cancer at diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for secondary predictor variables, payer status was a statistically significant predictor of survival. Patients with private, unknown, or Medicare status showed a decreased risk of dying compared to uninsured, with a decrease of 36%, 22%, and 15% respectively. However, Medicaid patients had an increased risk of 11% compared to uninsured. The direct adjusted median overall survival was 14.92, 14.76, 14.56, 13.64, and 12.84 years for payer status of private, unknown, Medicare, uninsured, and Medicaid respectively. CONCLUSION: We observed that patients with no insurance or Medicaid were most likely to be diagnosed at stage III and IV. Payer status showed a statistically significant relationship with overall survival. This remained true after adjusting for other predictive factors. Patients with no insurance or Medicaid had higher mortality.

Feasibility of adding everolimus to carboplatin and paclitaxel, with or without bevacizumab, for treatment-naive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: One standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is paclitaxel plus carboplatin ± bevacizumab. This two-step phase I study evaluated the feasibility of adding everolimus to paclitaxel plus carboplatin ± bevacizumab for advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Adults with advanced NSCLC naive to systemic therapy were enrolled. A Bayesian dose-escalation model was used to identify feasible daily or weekly everolimus doses given with paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2) q21 days) and carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL/min q21 days) (step 1) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2) q21 days), carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL/min q21 days), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q21 days) (step 2). Primary endpoint was end-of-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate. Secondary endpoints included safety; relative dose intensities of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab; pharmacokinetics; and tumor response. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled and received everolimus 5 mg/day plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (step 1 daily; n = 13); everolimus 30 mg/week plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (step 1 weekly; n = 13); everolimus 5 mg/day plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (step 2 daily; n = 13); or everolimus 30 mg/week plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (step 2 weekly; n = 13). End-of-cycle 1 DLT rate was 16.7 % (step 1 daily), 30.8 % (step 1 weekly), 30.0 % (step 2 daily), and 16.7 % (step 2 weekly). Cycle 1 DLTs were grade 3 neutropenia, anal abscess, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia and grade 4 myalgia, cellulitis, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, pulmonary embolism, and thrombocytopenia. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. One patient (step 2 daily) experienced complete response, 10 patients partial response. CONCLUSIONS: The feasible everolimus doses given with carboplatin and paclitaxel ± bevacizumab were 5 mg/day and 30 mg/week. Neither schedule was very well tolerated in this unselected NSCLC population.

Advance lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) at diagnosis is a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation has been linked with cancer development, cancer cachexia and poor outcome. Advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) was developed to assess degree of systemic inflammation at the time of diagnosis in metastatic non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients. METHODS: In a single institution retrospective review 173 patients with metastatic NSCLC diagnosed between Jan 1 2000 and June 30 2011 were included. ALI was calculated as (BMI x Alb / NLR) where BMI = body mass index, Alb = serum albumin, NLR (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, a marker of systemic inflammation). Patients were divided into low inflammation (ALI ≥ 18) and high inflammation (ALI < 18) groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival and overall survival. Log-rank test were used to compare the survivals among various factors. Multivariate Cox regression was used to perform survival analysis in order to estimate the hazards ratio for various factors. RESULTS: Among 173 patients median age was 57 years, 67% were male, 52% had adenocarcinoma. Patients with an ALI score of < 18 suggesting high systemic inflammation were significantly more likely to have more than 2 sites of metastatic disease, have poor performance status and less likely to receive any chemotherapy. Their median progression free survival and overall survival was 2.4 months and 3.4 months as opposed to 5.1 months and 8.3 months in patients with ALI >18 (P < 0.001). On multi-variate analysis ALI score of <18 (1.42, 95% CI 1.003-2.01) remained significantly associated with worse outcome. CONCLUSION: ALI (<18) at diagnosis is an independent marker of poor outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Lifestyle modification in colorectal cancer patients: an integrative oncology approach.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is predominantly a disease of economically developed countries, with many lifestyle-related risk factors proposed that contribute to a higher incidence. These risk factors include obesity, especially visceral fat, lack of physical activity, high consumption of red and processed meat, alcohol and a low intake of dietary fiber. Many population-based studies suggest that a combination of these lifestyle-related risk factors not only increases the incidence of CRC, but also contributes to an increased risk of CRC recurrence after the initial diagnosis. In this article we have reviewed various scientific studies that link lifestyle risk factors with CRC and we propose lifestyle modification as an adjunct intervention to surgery and chemotherapy in patients with early stage and locally advanced CRC.

Commercial insurance triples chances of breast cancer survival in a public hospital.

Breast cancer survival is affected both by endogenous factors and exogenous factors such as socioeconomic status. This study explored the relationship between insurance status and overall survival of 987 female breast cancer patients in a population served by a public hospital. All patients were offered the same level of care regardless of ability to pay. Of the 987 breast cancer patients investigated, 54.6% were African-American. 54.1% of patients were insured (commercial insurance or Medicare), 27.1% with Medicaid, and 18.8% who were uninsured. Overall median survival was 15.5 years and was not statistically significant between Caucasian and African-American women. Median survival times were 15.8, 11.3, and 8.2 years for insured, Medicaid, and uninsured groups, respectively. Uninsured patients had worse overall survival rates compared with insured patients (p < 0.05). Adjusting for other factors (e.g., stage, age, race, body mass index, and income), insurance was a significant factor affecting survival with hazard ratios of 2.24 and 3.22 for Medicaid and uninsured patients, respectively, compared with insured patients. Even in a public hospital, after adjusting for potential risk factors, insurance status still proved to be an important factor in the survival of breast cancer patients. Further research is necessary to identify causal factors related to the survival disparities associated with insurance status.

Superwarfarin intoxication: two case reports and review of pathophysiology and patient management.

Superwarfarin vitamin K antagonists are found in rat poisons and are readily available. Pediatric exposures are common but are usually asymptomatic without significant coagulopathy. Superwarfarin intoxication must be considered in any adult who presents with an unexplained coagulopathy with extreme elevation of prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time with associated depletion of vitamin K dependent factors. If superwarfarin toxicity is confirmed, intentional ingestion should be considered, as a large quantity of ingested rat poison is necessary to induce a coagulopathy. Patients with superwarfin induced coagulopathy require several months of high dose oral and parenteral vitamin K supplementation. We describe two patients with superwarfarin toxicity treated at Louisiana State University Health in Shreveport and review pathophysiology and patient management.

Chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage IVB head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE: As the occurrence of unresectable stage IVB head and neck cancer is expected to continue, we present our experience over the last 17 years with chemoradiotherapy management of 14 cases to clarify the effectiveness and safety of this treatment scheme. METHOD: Of the 1,267 individuals who were diagnosed with carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract between 1992 to 2008, 14 patients were treated by induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation or simultaneous chemoradiotherapy for stage IVB disease. The median follow-up time was 54.5 months. RESULTS: The complete objective response rate was 79%. Six individuals remained disease-free during a followup period ranging from 24 to 149 months. The disease-free survival rate at five years was 68%. Local, regional, and distant failure rates were 21%,14%, and 7% respectively. Most of the patients (79%) experienced transient mucositis during treatment. Significant late complications consisted of dental caries or osteoradionecrosis (14%) and esophageal stricture (7%). CONCLUSION: Definitive chemoradiotherapy administered for unresectable stage IVB head and neck cancer has the potential of achieving long-term disease-free survival in up to two-thirds of the patients with a low risk of complications.

National trends in hospitalizations among patients with colorectal cancer in the United States.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with a rising incidence, especially in young adults. Care for patients with colorectal cancer is associated with significant healthcare costs and expenditures. We retrospectively interrogated the National Inpatient Sample for admissions in patients with colorectal cancer from 2007 to 2017. A total of 1,962,705 admissions were identified: 50.2% were men, 64.4% were white, and the median age was 68. Most admissions (47.8%) that were coded for anatomical location of malignancy were for ascending colon cancer. The average in-hospital mortality was 4.9%, with a lower mortality in admissions with ascending colon cancer (2.9, P < 0.001). The median length of stay was 5 days, with a longer stay in admissions with transverse colon cancer (9 days, P < 0.0001). The median cost of hospitalization was $12,295 and was significantly higher for patients with descending colon malignancy ($16,369, P < 0.0001). The number of annual hospitalizations stayed steady overall but increased by 98.6% for rectosigmoid cancer. Our findings highlight the high costs of hospitalization and the overall economic burden associated with inpatient admissions among patients with colorectal cancer.

A Randomized Multi-institutional Phase II Trial of Everolimus as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck.

PURPOSE: Investigate whether adjuvant everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, improves progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and provide outcomes related to correlative biological factors associated with disease control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind phase II trial of patients with advanced-stage HNSCC from 13 institutions who were confirmed disease-free post-definitive therapy and enrolled between December 2010 and March 2015. Patients received adjuvant everolimus or placebo daily (10 mg, oral) for a maximum of 1 year. p16 IHC as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus infection and whole-exome sequencing were performed. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard rates. Log-rank tests evaluated differences in survival. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints and objectives included overall survival (OS) and toxicity assessment. RESULTS: 52 patients [median (range) age, 58 (37-76) years; 43 men (83%), 9 women (17%)] were randomized to placebo (n = 24) or everolimus (n = 28). PFS favored everolimus, but was not significant [log-rank P = 0.093; HR = 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-1.17]. There was no difference in OS (P = 0.29; HR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.20-16.2). Everolimus resulted in significant improvement in PFS for p16-negative patients (n = 31; P = 0.031; HR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.97), although subgroup analysis showed no difference for p16-positive patients (n = 21; P = 0.93). Further, PFS was significantly higher in TP53-mutated (TP53mut) patients treated with everolimus compared with placebo (log-rank P = 0.027; HR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06-0.95). No treatment difference was seen in patients with TP53 wild-type tumors (P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: p16-negative and TP53mut patients may benefit from adjuvant treatment with everolimus.

The Effect of Payer Status on Survival of Patients With Prostate Cancer.

Background Disparities in access to care and proper treatment can have significant implications in patient survival outcome and mortality. This retrospective study of prostate cancer patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between the years 2004 and 2014 and follow-up to the end of 2015 analyzed such effects that variation in payer status might have on outcome. Methods This study used the data of 696,321 diagnosed prostate cancer patients from the NCDB for the years 2004 to 2014 and follow-up to the end of 2015 to analyze the effect that payer status would have on prostate cancer survival. Multivariable cox regression was used to study the hazard ratios (HRs) of payer status and other variables along with the Charlson Comorbidity Index to analyze their associated increased risk of death. Statistical software SAS 9.4 for Windows was used to analyze the overall survival (OS) of patients on different insurance plans along with variations in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and treatment type. Results When looking at OS, those with private insurance had the greatest overall survivability while those on Medicare were the only ones who reached the median OS. In contrast to those who had private insurance, those who had Medicare, the uninsured, and those with Medicaid demonstrated significantly greater risks of death at 43%, 58%, and 69% increased risk of death, respectively. In addition to payer status, other variables were also significant predictors of OS, including demographic factors (age, race), comorbidities, socioeconomic status (income, education), distance traveled to facility, type of facility, treatment delay, treatment modality, PSA levels at diagnosis, and cancer stage at diagnosis. Conclusion Payer status is intricately linked to a number of other variables that might affect survival. Even after adjustment for a number of these factors, insurance status was shown to have a significant effect on prostate cancer survivorship. In contrast to those who had private insurance, those who had Medicare, the uninsured, and those with Medicaid demonstrated significantly greater risks of death at 43%, 58%, and 69% increased risk of death, respectively. Studies have suggested that those without insurance or on Medicaid are less likely to undergo screening and have worse health-related quality of life, while those on Medicare may be deterred from continuing treatment due to high out-of-pocket costs. However, the complete mechanism behind the improved survivorship of those on private insurance is unclear. The effect of payer status on quality of life may be an interest that needs to be further studied. Further research will be required to provide definite reasons for these observations and mediation analysis of other factors could prove to be valuable.

Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Effect of Payer Status on the Survival of Colon Cancer Patients.

Background and objective Colon cancer is one of the most common types of cancer globally. The factors that could affect colon cancer survival include age, stage, treatment, and other socioeconomic aspects. Payer status has been shown to be a significant predictor of cancer patient survival in retrospective studies. However, due to the limitations of retrospective studies, patient baseline characteristics between payer statuses are not comparable. Few studies have addressed the effect of payer status on the overall survival (OS) of patients using propensity score matching (PSM). In light of this, we conducted a study to examine the effect of payer status on the survival of colon cancer patients based on PSM. Materials and methods  About 66,493 stage II/III colon cancer patients aged 40-90 years and diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were analyzed from a de-identified National Cancer Database (NCDB) file. All patients had undergone surgery, and patients who had received radiation therapy, hormone therapy, immunotherapy, palliative care, or therapies other than chemotherapy were excluded. Only private or Medicaid payer status was included. The propensity score was calculated by computing the probability of patients being in the Medicaid group using logistic regression. The PSMATCH procedure in the SAS software (SAS Inc., Gary, NC) was used to perform PSM on patients with Medicaid and private insurance. The greedy nearest neighbor matching method was used to match one Medicaid to one privately insured patient with a caliper of 0.2. At the same time, an exact match was done for gender, age group, race, and stage at diagnosis. Multivariate Cox regression was then used to estimate the effect of payer status on survival before and after PSM. Results Among the 66,493 patients, 90.3% were privately insured and 9.7% had Medicaid. In univariate analysis, payer status was found to be a significant predictor of OS. Prior to PSM, the median overall survival (MOS) for patients with private insurance was 12.75 years, while those with Medicaid had a MOS of 9.02 years. After PSM, 6,167 paired patients were matched, and patients with private insurance had a MOS of >12.82 years and Medicaid patients had a MOS of 8.88 years. After PSM, patients with Medicaid had a 50% increased risk of death, and payer status proved to be a statistically significant predictor of OS of colon cancer. Conclusion Based on our findings, as per the PSM method, payer status can be a significant predictor of survival among colon cancer patients. Also, chemotherapy, race, age, and other socioeconomic factors were also found to be significant predictors of OS. Further research should be conducted to investigate other covariates not studied here and the mediation effect of payer on the survival of cancer patients.

Assessment of Oral Chemotherapy Nonadherence in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Using Brief Measures in Community Cancer Clinics: A Pilot Study.

The purpose of this pilot study was to assess Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients' adherence to, beliefs about, and barriers to oral anticancer agents (OAC) using brief self-report measures in community-based cancer clinics. Patients completed a structured interview including a health literacy assessment, a Brief Medication Questionnaire, two single-item self-report adherence questions, and the Medications Adherence Reasons Scale. Of the 86 participants, 88.4% were white; 55.8% male; mean age, 58.7 years; and 22.1% had limited health literacy. Nonadherence (missing at least one dose in the last week) was reported by 18.6% of participants and associated (p < 0.003) with less-than-excellent perceived ability to take CML medications (16.3%). Black participants reported more difficulty taking CML medications than white participants (28.6% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.053). Among all participants, 43.0% reported their CML medicine was ineffective and 24.4% that taking CML pills was somewhat to very hard. The most common reasons for missing a dose were simply missed it (24.4%) and side effects (18.6%). Most patients perceived their ability to take CML medication was good to excellent, yet nearly one in five reported missing at least one dose in the last week. Brief, no-cost self-report assessments to screen CML patients' OAC adherence, barriers, and beliefs could facilitate counseling in busy community cancer clinics.