RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) on short- and long-term outcomes after cardiac surgery. METHODS: We prospectively assessed POAF concerning outcomes in 379 adult patients who had undergone cardiac surgery in two heart surgery centers with a follow-up period of one year for every patient. The effects of POAF on postoperative events were evaluated using Logistic regression, Cox regression (adjusted for propensity score), and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of POAF was 27.2%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed POAF was associated with an increased risk of 6-month (OR = 5.36; CI: 1.51-18.94; p = 0.009), and 1-year mortality (OR = 4.56; CI: 1.29-16.04; p = 0.018) as well as Major Adverse Cardiocerebral Events (MACEs; acute MI, cardiac arrest, low cardiac output after surgery, third-degree atrioventricular block or stroke; OR = 3.02; CI: 1.29-7.05; p = 0.011), Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay > 3 days (OR = 2.39; CI: 1.14-5.00; p = 0.021), and postoperative stay > 14 days (OR = 3.12; CI: 1.65-5.90; p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed POAF as an independent predictor of mortality at one year (HR = 2.86; CI: 1.05-7.75; p = 0.038). Discharge plans including statin and beta-blocker had an independent association with a reduced mortality at one year (HR = 0.22; CI: 0.05-0.96; p = 0.045; HR = 0.16; CI: 0.03-0.87; p = 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: POAF is associated with an increased risk of morbidity, all-cause mortality, and hospital duration. Statins and beta-blockers that were included in discharge plans had an independent association with reduction in 1-year all-cause mortality.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Adulto , Humanos , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Vietnã/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
A chronic helminth infection can alter host immune response and affect malaria infection. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to find the impact of anthelmintic treatment on malaria prevalence, incidence, and parasitemia. Nine and 12 electronic databases were searched on 28th July 2015 and 26th June 2020 for relevant studies. We performed meta-analysis for malaria prevalence, incidence, parasitemia, and a qualitative synthesis for other effects of anthelmintic treatment. Seventeen relevant papers were included. There was no association between anthelmintic treatment and malaria prevalence or change of parasitemia at the end of follow up period (pooled OR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.38, p-value=0.71 and SMD -0.08, 95%CI: -0.24, 0.07, p-value=0.30 respectively) or at any defined time points in analysis. Pooled analysis of three studies demonstrated no association between malaria incidence and anthelmintic treatment (rate ratio 0.93, 95%CI: 0.80, 1.08, p-value=0.33). Our study encourages anthelmintic treatment in countries with high burden of co-infections as anthelmintic treatment is not associated with change in malaria prevalence, incidence, or parasitemia.
Assuntos
Anti-Helmínticos , Malária , Anti-Helmínticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Incidência , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária/epidemiologia , Parasitemia/tratamento farmacológico , Parasitemia/epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is preliminary evidence for lavender as an anxiolytic agent through various routes of administration. Our goal is to elucidate the best route of administration for lavender as a treatment for anxiety. METHODS: Thirteen electronic search engines were systematically scanned for relevant publications. The relevant articles were included after the title and abstract screening followed by the full-text screening. This study included randomized control trials reporting lavender for the treatment of anxiety. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017076711). Frequentist network meta-analysis and Bayesian meta-regression were conducted to report the best treatment modality and the effect of covariates on the effectiveness as an anxiolytic. Treatment arms were ordered according P-scores, where higher P-score indicates better treatment choice. RESULTS: Forty studies were eligible for qualitative analysis, and 32 were included in quantitative analysis. Lavender aromatherapy was the best approach for the treatment of anxiety among other lavender modalities at the first week recording [Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = -0.57, 95% CI (-1.14-0.01), P-score = 0.72], in addition to achieve at the first time points [SMD = -0, 95% CI (-0.97 ̶ -0.16), P-score = 0.69], compared to placebo; however, lavender massage along with foot bath were found to be the most efficacious for anxiety treatment at the study endpoint [SMD = -1.10, 95% CI = (-7.41 ̶ 5.21), P-score = 0.65]. Furthermore, network meta-regression revealed that the duration of therapy influenced treatment, suggesting Silexan (oral lavender) 80 mg (first rank probability = .116) as the favorable option for anxiety in long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Lavender aromatherapy is, clinically, superior in short-duration, while Silexan (oral lavender) 80 mg is preferable for long-term treatment of anxiety.