Reliability of a grading rubric designed to evaluate the reflective ability of predoctoral dental students.

INTRODUCTION: Reflection and self-assessment are critical skills for healthcare providers. Identification of gaps in knowledge, skills and attitudes, along with the ability to critically think and problem solve to fill gaps, is the ultimate outcome for lifelong learning. The aims of this study were to (a) refine an instrument used for measuring reflective ability, and conduct comprehensive reliability testing, and (b) describe a process for rater calibration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Students develop e-portfolios over a four-year span with assignments that require reflection and self-assessment. The final piece of the portfolio includes a global reflection written the last semester of the programme. Three faculty raters independently evaluated 106 dental students' global reflections using the revised grading rubric. An intraclass correlation coefficient measured the level of agreement between the three raters. RESULTS: Analysis of the 318 faculty ratings (106/rater) resulted in an intraclass correlation of .708. Based on a 5-point grading scale (0 = does not respond to the assignment to 5 = reconstructing), the ratings of the 106 global reflections ranged from 1.3 to 5.0 (M = 3.1, SD =0.66). DISCUSSION: This study provides confidence in the reliability of a grading rubric designed to assess reflective ability, along with suggestions for calibration. An overall mean of 3.1 (Level 3 = relating-includes evidence of lessons learned) illustrates the complexity of teaching reflection and self-assessment. CONCLUSION: Use of a reliable grading rubric for assessing reflective writing could assist schools interested in incorporating reflection and self-assessment into the curriculum, ultimately supporting lifelong and enhanced health care.

Dental hygiene student perceptions of a school-based sealant program: A qualitative review.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this 2021 study was to explore experiences acquired from a school-based sealant program (SBSP), to improve understanding of the relationship between SBSP and dental hygiene (DH) student outcomes, and to inform institutions of the value of educational experiences aiming to reduce disparities in access to dental care. METHODS: University of Missouri Kansas City School of Dentistry Senior DH students complete a community engaged course which includes participation in community projects and clinical activities targeting Kansas City's urban and surrounding rural environments. The SBSP is a component of this course. This investigation utilized a qualitative methodology to examine SBSP experiences through the experience of the primary investigator, on-site dentist, and DH students involved in the program. RESULTS: Data analysis resulted in consensus of five synthesized conceptual models and twenty-three emergent themes. The conceptual models include: competence, roles and responsibilities, social justice, value added, and lessons learned. CONCLUSION: Based on triangulated results, SBSPs improve access to care for children, save dental costs, and provide essential experiences for DH students.