Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106450

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital- (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are important complications early (<30 days) after lung transplantation (LT). However, current incidence, associated factors and outcomes are not well reported. METHODS: LT recipients transplanted at our institution (07/2019-01/2020 and 10/2021-11/2022) were prospectively included. We assessed incidence and presentation of pneumonia and evaluated the impact of associated factors using regression models. In addition, we evaluated molecular relatedness of respiratory pathogens collected peri-transplant and at pneumonia occurrence using pulsed-field-gel-electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: In the first 30 days post-LT, 25/270 (9.3%) recipients were diagnosed with pneumonia (68% [17/25] VAP; 32% [8/25] HAP). Median time to pneumonia was 11 days (IQR 7-13). 49% (132/270) of donor and 16% (44/270) of recipient respiratory peri-transplant cultures were positive. However, pathogens associated with pneumonia were not genetically related to either donor or recipient cultures at transplant, as determined by PFGE.Diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (HR 4.42, 95% CI 1.62-12.08) and immunosuppression use (HR 2.87, 95% CI 1.30-6.56) were pre-transplant factors associated with pneumonia.Pneumonia occurrence was associated with longer hospital stay (HR 5.44, 95% CI 2.22-13.37) and VAP with longer ICU stay (HR 4.31, 95% CI: 1.73-10.75) within the first 30 days post-transplant; 30- and 90-day mortality were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively assessed early pneumonia incidence occurred in around 10% of LT. Populations at increased risk for pneumonia occurrence include LT with pre-transplant pulmonary hypertension and pre-transplant immunosuppression. Pneumonia was associated with increased healthcare use, highlighting the need for further improvements by preferentially targeting higher-risk patients.

2.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(8): 1022-1024, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30795839

RESUMO

Active pulmonary tuberculosis testing with 3 expectorated sputa can increase isolation days and expenditures compared with 1 induced sputum. Six-month retrospective and prospective chart reviews were conducted, and a screening algorithm was phased into 2 hospital sites. With induced sputum testing, isolation decreased from 7 to 4 days (interquartile range, 4-3, P = .0135), and there was a cost savings of $7,275 per case, with no added harm.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/normas , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Escarro/microbiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/microbiologia , Idoso , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA