RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for chronic knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central to September 2023 for trials that (1) enrolled patients with chronic pain associated with knee OA, and (2) randomized them to MSC therapy vs. placebo or usual care. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: We included 16 trials (807 participants). At 3-6 months, MSC therapy probably results in little to no difference in pain relief (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.74 cm on a 10 cm visual analog scale [VAS], 95% confidence interval [95%CI] -1.16 to -0.33; minimally important difference [MID] 1.5 cm) or physical functioning (WMD 2.23 points on 100-point 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) physical functioning subscale, 95%CI -0.97 to 5.43; MID 10-points; both moderate certainty). At 12 months, injection of MSCs probably results in little to no difference in pain (WMD -0.73 cm on a 10 cm VAS, 95%CI -1.69 to 0.24; moderate certainty) and may improve physical functioning (WMD 19.36 points on 100-point SF-36 PF subscale, 95%CI -0.19 to 38.9; low certainty). MSC therapy may increase risk of any adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 2.67, 95%CI 1.19 to 5.99; low certainty) and pain and swelling of the knee joint (RR 1.58, 95%CI 1.04 to 2.38; low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular injection of MSCs for chronic knee pain associated with OA probably provides little to no improvement in pain or physical function.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Freezing of gait can be seen in a significant number of people with Parkinson's disease. Disappointingly, the classic standard treatment of Parkinson's disease with dopamine replacement has not shown promising results in improving the freezing of gait. Hence the approach have shifted towards using non-invasive methods to address this problem. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of laser cane as a visual cue on the freezing of gait of people with Parkinson's disease and further determine the effect of laser light beam width and color on the freezing of gait. METHODS: 7 known Parkinson's Disease patients were enrolled in this study, all of whom had at least one episode of freezing at at least one clinical visit. These patients underwent gait analysis in 4 stages: walking without a cane, walking with a thin red light laser cane, a thick red light laser cane, and a green light laser cane. RESULTS: Using laser canes effectively improved nearly all parameters of walking, including right and left stride length, step length, the velocity of movement, and rotation time, compared to walking without a stick. Using different colors of laser cane didn't make any significant difference in improving the freezing of gait of our patients. Nevertheless, increasing the laser light beam width significantly improved almost all walking parameters. CONCLUSION: This is the first study assessing the effect of laser light beam width on freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease patients and shows promising results in regards to increasing the thickness of laser lights in order to improve walking parameters in Parkinson's disease patients more effectively. Furthermore, this is the second study to evaluate the effect of laser light color, contradicting the previous results by showing no significant correlation between the color of laser light and improvements in walking parameters.