Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Hematol J ; 3(4): 185-92, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12189564

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate treatment by thalidomide and identify predictive factors of survival, event free survival and response among patients with advanced multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide as single agent therapy. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Patients with advanced multiple myeloma (n=83) were treated with an oral dose of thalidomide (median 400 mg/day). At start of treatment, all patients had active disease and 58 (69%) had received at least one autologous transplantation. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 338 days (range, 247-629 days), 52 patients are alive, whereas 31 died between 8 and 150 days after the first administration of thalidomide. The response to thalidomide was considered as major in 11 patients (13%), partial in 29 patients (35%) and minor in 15 patients (18%), giving a total response rate of 66% (54 out of 83 patients). Thirteen patients had stable disease and 15 patients progressed. In multivariable analysis, age greater than 60 years, short interval between diagnosis and onset of thalidomide, requirement for red blood cell transfusion, IgA isotype, platelets' count <80 x 10(9)/l and serum albumin level <30 g/l at the start of thalidomide were associated with poor outcome. These three last factors produced a simplified prognostic model for patients with advanced myeloma and treated with thalidomide. Thus, among the 38 patients without any of these unfavorable risk features, one-year overall survival and event free survival were 87% and 78%. By contrast, the 43 patients with at least one unfavorable feature had one-year overall survival and event free survival of 40% and 32%, respectively (Log-Rank, P=0.0002 for both). Patients who received > or =34.4 g of thalidomide in the first 90 days of treatment had a better outcome than those who received <34.4 g. However, the mean received daily dose of thalidomide in the first 90 days has not been found to influence survival, event free survival or response. Short-term side effects of thalidomide were generally moderate. CONCLUSION: Thalidomide is an effective treatment for patients with advanced myeloma, in particular, who have no poor-risk features. The poor results achieved by the other patients emphasize the need for prospective protocols using thalidomide in combination, especially with dexamethasone. In addition, further studies are needed to determine the optimal thalidomide dose and duration.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Salvação , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Contagem de Células Sanguíneas , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Tábuas de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/sangue , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Proteínas do Mieloma/análise , Prognóstico , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Risco , Albumina Sérica/análise , Análise de Sobrevida , Talidomida/efeitos adversos , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Blood ; 99(3): 731-5, 2002 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11806971

RESUMO

High-dose therapy has become a common treatment for myeloma. The objective of this study (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome [IFM] 9502 trial) was to compare in a prospective and randomized trial the 2 most widely used conditioning regimens before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed symptomatic patients younger than 65 years old: 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m(2) melphalan (arm A) versus 200 mg/m(2) melphalan (arm B). A total of 282 evaluable patients were compared--140 in arm A and 142 in arm B. Baseline characteristics and disease response to 4 cycles of the VAD regimen performed before randomization and autologous stem cell transplantation were identical in the 2 treatment arms. In arm B, hematologic recovery was significantly faster for both the duration of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, transfusion requirements were also significantly lower, and the median duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter. In arm A, the incidence of severe mucositis was significantly increased. The median duration of event-free survival was similar in both arms (21 vs 20.5 months, P =.6), but the 45-month survival was 65.8% in arm B versus 45.5% in arm A (P =.05). This difference might be attributed in part to better salvage regimens after relapse in arm B compared with arm A. We conclude that 200 mg/m(2) melphalan is a less toxic and at least as effective conditioning regimen when compared with 8 Gy total body irradiation with 140 mg/m(2) melphalan. This regimen should be considered as the standard of care before autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Irradiação Corporal Total , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/toxicidade , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/mortalidade , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalan/toxicidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução de Remissão , Análise de Sobrevida , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Transplante Autólogo/mortalidade , Transplante Autólogo/normas , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA