Fourth-Year Medical Students' Perceptions of Vascular Surgery: Can We Improve the Pipeline?

BACKGROUND: Since their inception, Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency (IVSR) programs have expanded widely and attracted highly competitive medical students by offering a more focused approach to learning both open surgical and endovascular techniques. However, despite substantial modifications to the training paradigm, a shortage of vascular surgeons is still projected through 2050. We aimed to gather and analyze fourth-year medical students' knowledge and perceptions of vascular surgery (VS) to further inform strategies for recruiting future vascular surgeons. METHODS: We sent anonymous electronic questionnaires to fourth-year medical students at 7 allopathic and 3 osteopathic medical schools, with questions detailing demographics, specialty preferences, and exposure to and perceptions of VS. Descriptive statistics were obtained, and responses were compared between students applying to surgical specialties (SS) and nonsurgical specialties (NSS). RESULTS: Two hundred eleven of 1,764 (12%) participants responded (56% female). 56% reported VS exposure, most commonly during the third year. 64 (30%) planned to apply to SS. 57% of respondents reported knowledge of the management of vascular disease, and 56% understood procedures performed by vascular surgeons. Ranking the importance of factors in choosing specialties, SS selected "experiences gained during medical school rotations" (P < 0.05), "types and/or variety of treatment modalities used in this field" (P < 0.001), and "interest in the pathology or disease processes treated" (P < 0.05) as highest priorities. NSS preferred "lifestyle (work-life balance) as an attending" (P < 0.001). Only 7% of all respondents believed vascular surgeons have a good work-life balance, with a larger percentage of SS (P < 0.001) agreeing. Stratified by gender, female students rated "limited ability of childbirth during residency and/or postponement of family plans" (P < 0.05), "gender-related concerns, such as discrimination at work or unfair career possibilities" (P < 0.001), and "fear of unfair competition" (P < 0.05) as potential negative aspects of VS careers. 55% of respondents believed the IVSR makes VS more appealing. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students perceive poor quality of life and work-life balance as deterring factors to a career in VS. Opportunities exist to educate students on the pathologies treated, procedures performed, and attainable quality of life available in our field. We should also continue to develop recruitment strategies to stimulate student interest and increase early exposure in VS.

Complete Heart Block After Aortic Valve Repair and Septal Myectomy in a Patient With Rheumatic Heart Disease.

Surgical myectomy with concomitant valvular repair has been demonstrated to be safe in the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). It is unclear which risk factors predispose patients to develop complete heart block (CHB). We present a unique case of a 66-year-old female with rheumatic heart disease and HOCM admitted for aortic valve (AV) repair and septal myectomy, complicated by a presentation of complete heart block. The histology slide showed fibrosis of the septum, suggesting atrioventricular conduction disease from rheumatic fever, which likely contributed to her presentation. This case highlights the importance of elucidating the etiology of HOCM before undergoing cardiac surgery to guide postsurgical management and improve clinical outcomes.

Myopericarditis as a Delayed Complication of COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report.

Pericarditis is the inflammation of the pericardial layers. Myopericarditis is diagnosed when this inflammation involves the myocardium, which is marked by elevated serum cardiac enzymes. With these two pathologies sharing overlaps in etiology, we present a case of a young patient with a recent history of COVID-19 infection who presented with pleuritic and positional chest pain with troponin I elevation and serial ECG changes attributed to myopericarditis as a post-viral sequela of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS­CoV­2) infection. This case demonstrates the importance of identifying and managing the potential cardiac complications in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, regardless of age or symptom onset.

Pre-clerkship National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examinations Versus End-of-Semester Final Examinations: How Well Do They Assess Preparedness for the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1?

Background The ability to provide performance insights of various United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 assessments is of great importance to medical educators. Two custom pre-clerkship assessments used at the Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (KSOM) are National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME)-derived end-of-semester final examinations and subject examinations. The authors sought to determine if performance on these custom assessments can provide feedback on a medical student's readiness to undertake the USMLE Step 1 examination. Methodology Deidentified student performance data were provided by institutional databases for the KSOM graduating class of 2023 (N = 60). Pearson correlation analyses were utilized to evaluate the strength of the correlation between USMLE Step 1 performance and NBME subject examinations versus NBME end-of-semester final examinations. Results The results indicated that the NBME end-of-semester final examinations have a statistically higher correlation to the USMLE Step 1 score than the majority of the individual NBME subject examinations. However, the mean NBME subject examination score (Semester 1: r = 0.53, p < 0.05; Semester 2: r = 0.58, p < 0.05) demonstrated significantly higher correlation to the USMLE Step 1 performance than the NBME end-of-semester final examination score for both Semesters 1 and 2 (Semester 1: r = 0.50, p < 0.05; Semester 2: r = 0.48, p < 0.05). Conclusions These results showed that the mean of the NBME subject examination score was a better metric to assess readiness for the USMLE Step 1 than the NBME end-of-semester final examinations. However, each NBME end-of-semester final examination score showed a better correlation than the majority of the NBME subject examinations.

Incorporation of Comprehensive Examinations for a Time-Efficient Remediation Method.

Background: Remediation in medical school should be a time-limited, and highly structured process that addresses student deficiencies and allows them to prove content competency before progressing in the curriculum. In this study, we analyze the use of a comprehensive end-of semester final examination in the remediation process for pre-clinical students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine (KSOM). Faculty time utilized is analyzed and compared with the previously employed remediation process. Methods: Administered to all students at the end of each semester is a comprehensive examination consisting of a sufficient number of faculty-selected questions relating to each organ system covered with a 75% passing threshold. A student must also demonstrate competency of any failed system examination content to remediate successfully. The performance of those who did not exhibit competency was analyzed to identify areas of deficiency then an individualized exam would then be administered. The total remediation time spent by faculties and students was then analyzed. Results: KSOM Class of 2024 results showed that faculty were able to yield significant savings in time spent on remediation. Faculty spent 45 total remediation hours for the Class of 2024, compared to 400 hours remediating using the paper-based assignment method for the Class of 2021. With the transition to comprehensive end-of-semester final examinations, a total of 355 hours were saved. Furthermore, faculty used an average 1.07 hours/student with end-of-semester comprehensive examinations. The saved time allows faculty to work on improving the overall curriculum for all students rather than focusing on a limited number of students. Conclusion: Utilizing comprehensive end-of-semester final examinations notably decreased the amount of faculty time spent per semester on remediation. Further evaluation is required to evaluate long-term effectiveness on content competency and would further be strengthened by a multi-institutional comparison.

A Frameshift Variant in the CHST9 Gene Identified by Family-Based Whole Genome Sequencing Is Associated with Schizophrenia in Chinese Population.

Recent studies imply that rare variants contribute to the risk of schizophrenia, however, the exact variants or genes responsible for this condition are largely unknown. In this study, we conducted whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 20 Chinese families. Each family consisted of at least two affected siblings diagnosed with schizophrenia and at least one unaffected sibling. We examined functional variants that were found in affected sibling(s) but not in unaffected sibling(s) within a family. Matching this criterion, a frameshift heterozygous deletion of CA (-/CA) at chromosome 18:24722722, also referred to as rs752084147, in the Carbohydrate Sulfotransferase 9 (CHST9) gene, was detected in two families. This deletion was confirmed by PCR-based Sanger sequencing. With the observed frequency of 0.00076 in Han Chinese population, we performed both case-control and family-based analyses to evaluate its association with schizophrenia. In the case-control analyses, Chi-square test P-value was 6.80e-12 and the P-value was 0.0008 after one million simulations. In family-based segregation analyses, segregation P-value was 7.72e-7 and simulated P-value was 5.70e-6. For both the case-control and family-based analyses, the CA deletion was significantly associated with schizophrenia in the Chinese population. Further investigation of this gene  is warranted in the development of schizophrenia by utilizing larger and more ethnically diverse samples.